Skip navigation.

Tilting the Void

and where is there hope or deed as fair?

I don't think we're in Oz anymore, Toto.

So, I bored the hell out of Greg last night by insisting on watching the SciFi channel's premiere Tin Man, a mash-up of you-know-what.

Two things: I should've known better, and I've seen too many movies. I'd like to say I've read too many books, but that's never the case.

In an attempt (I think) at being clever and post-modern, the directors included every possible pop-culture reference they could; there's the requisite and perhaps even inevitable Star Wars and Lord of the Rings pastiche. An example: the gorgeous (if vapid) gold-corseted Witch strangles her erstwhile commander to death (without touching him, of course--there seems to be some sort of Frighteners spirit-stealing vampirism going on), then turns to the second-in-command, a'la Darth Vader, and says, "You've been promoted". The Munchkins are now tiny wild Pygmies in what look like grade-school Thanksgiving Day turkey costumes leaping about in treehouses (Ewoks, anyone?). Dorothy is now "D.G." (Dorothy Gale), an emo kid; the Scarecrow (played by the usually entertaining Alan Cumming) is a creature called "Glitch" with a zipper in his head (kinda cool, that), and the Tin Man (Neal McDonough) is a hard-nosed ex-lawman with a chip on his shoulder and a need for vengeance straight out of some spaghetti western. The Lion is some kind of mentat/precog whining thing utterly lacking in any kind of character or appeal whatsoever; the little bit of stilted dialog he's given is painful to hear, and only included because he was there in the original story ("Bad things happen here! Bad things! We go now!" That kind of nonsense).

Now, don't get me wrong--at first, I was undeniably interested. The trailers had promise. It looked and sounded good--probably because the art director stole from appeared to be influenced by Jean-Pierre Jeunet (City of Lost Children, Delicatessen), David Lynch (Dune), and Peter Jackson (duh), along with a good dose of Cirque du Soleil. The writers and directors were reaching for the right notes; unfortunately, they fell flat. The witch/evil queen character, though obviously beautiful, reminded me more of a roller-derby champion or wrestling vamp, while Dorothy was emo but still somehow emotionless and dull. Ms. Dechanel is lovely and all that, but about as riveting to watch as a mold growth.

And the flying monkeys. Oh please let me tell you about the flying monkeys. Dare I say it? Why yes, I shall, though be warned; there be spoilers below:

In one climactic scene at the end of the first installment, the Witch rips open her bodice, displaying a magnificent cleavage (but nothing R-rated). Her decolletage is decorated with (wait for it)....flying monkey tattoos, which, on her command, shoot forth and materialize into a flock of shrieking, web-winged crosses between fruit-bats and zombies.

Greg and I howled.

It's tough to take a loved old childhood story, dust it off and put newish sparkles on it. The MGM musical was sugary and bright; the novel was considerably darker, as I recall (I think I last read it when I was in third grade, so it's been awhile). A few years back, The SciFi Channel took Frank Herbert's Dune and did interesting things with it, though they haven't had much luck lately. Tin Man had potential, I felt, but somehow fell apart trying to cobble together too many fantasy elements at once, underscored with a self-deprecation that came off more as a lack of self-respect.


From the original book, illustrated by the redoubtable W. W. Denslow. Nary a bat-wing in sight (nor cleavage, neither).

What cats talk about.In praise of the solitary.

Comments

sanshan 3. December 2007, 16:46

Is it worth watching for a laugh though? The flying monkey scene sounds worth the price of admission. Those monkeys scared me so much when I was a kid, that I didn't watch the original until I was 12. :rolleyes:

mlynnjohnson 3. December 2007, 16:57

Well, there are definitely moments of unintentional laughter--and it LOOKS gorgeous, actually, if a little twitchy and CGI'd at times. Looks like they filmed it in B.C., though I haven't had confirmation on that.

The flying monkeys scared the bejeebers outof me, too. I think it was their blue faces. In the book, if I remember it right, they eventually came around to the good guys' side. That, and the melting witch freaked me out proper. :D

The Eye of Horus 4. December 2007, 01:55

Magical boobs? uhmmm, well..uhh...er, hold on what was I going to say? Oh yeah, they can be mesmerizing, probably because I don't have any, but magical?:D

mlynnjohnson 4. December 2007, 02:09

The first thing Greg said was "Whoa! Trick titties!"

I still say it was a last ditch effort to placate the male viewers... :rolleyes:

Anonymous 4. December 2007, 05:56

Candy Rant writes:

I'll have to rent it when it comes out, just because you said it's somewhat like "City of Lost Children." Sylistically. I love that movie. The soundtrack too.

My sister is digging The Tin Man, mostly for the novelty, I think. I was just on the phone with her tonight while she was watching it and she said "There go the monkeys out of her t*ts." Yoiks.

mlynnjohnson 4. December 2007, 06:19

Har, that was the funniest moment. There definitely was a "Lost Children" vibe--with the colors & tone & stuff, but that was a WAAAAY better movie by far. In fact, I may have to rent that one again.

The Eye of Horus 6. December 2007, 08:07

Why don't you do something foreign this time, like City of God or the Motorcycle diaries?:smile:

mlynnjohnson 6. December 2007, 13:28

Saw City of God--that was very good; haven't done Motorcycle Diaries yet. Tonight, my friends and I are watching Le Hussard du le Toit (The Horseman on the Roof).


Mickeyjoe_irl 6. December 2007, 21:35

I think some films should be made sacrosanct. Only because remakes will pale in comparison.

mlynnjohnson 6. December 2007, 22:56

The trouble is they're working against seventy years of memories, I think. And I really wanted it to work (it's been so long since I've seen a TV show I like)--but it just wouldn't.

Mickeyjoe_irl 7. December 2007, 00:05

I know what you mean, it feels like you have to wade through so much drek just to see something halfways decent.

How to use Quote function:

  1. Select some text
  2. Click on the Quote link

Write a comment

Comment
(BBcode and HTML is turned off for anonymous user comments.)

Type the two words displayed in the image below:


Smilies