Skip navigation.

Creative thinking

Notes in creative thinking

Jatin Das's painting : A couple and a philosopher

Jatin Das's Couple and a philosopher

Jatin Das is a highly respected artist in India. There is a man and a woman and standing between them is a philosopher .Perhaps it is a husband and a wife ,each of them looking at the philosopher for an answer to a tricky question of life. Or may be,it is the philosopher between them who comes between them all the time preempting their asking any questions about life. The philosopher is looking at neither of them although the man is eagerly awaiting an answer. May be, he is in need of an answer more than the woman who is merely looking on.

The colours are pretty,three different colours used for three characters. The reddish tinge on the man shows his passionate nature while the woman is blue and placid .All the while the philosopher ,in the ochre robes of a wise man,is looking away as though he seems to know the answer but is unwilling to give it.

Indian religio-cultural representations in art



Anjolie-Ela Menon's painting entitled The Kavadias has its theme drawn from the religious practice of thousands of pilgrims undertaking long and arduous journeys by foot to the river Ganga in order to bring back the holy Ganga water for worship of the Shiva linga in their villages. The pilgrims are called kavadias because they carry the water on a kavadi ,a wooden stick slung over their shoulders with two pots of water on both the ends .The journey sometimes stretches for days and the trek may be as much as 500 kms.

Representations of religio-cultural themes in painting have been very common in Indian art because religion is hardly kept separate from culture and daily life in the Indian conscious .It is difficult to arrive at a secular interpretation of the Indian way of life.Myths are a part of the shared consciousness and get translated in daily life into social and cultural practices.

The painting has a unique structure where three tablos are incorporated,two of them depicting two separate kavadias leaving their homes and the third one in the middle depicted in the process of walking. In the left side panel the kavadia is shown leaving his wife with a suckling baby and a child and in the right one,he is shown leaving an aged father.The beauty of the painting stems largely from the use of the vivid colours and the the use of light and shade alternately to bring into relief the lively characters of the family and their reactions as the Kavadias leave for the distant place.

One must not look at the local colour by itself but only in conjunction with the colour of the sky



Vincent van Gogh to Theo van Gogh : 12 October 1883

"one must not look at the local colour by itself, but in conjunction with the colour of the sky! That sky is grey -but so iridescent that even our pure white would be unable to render this light and shimmer. Now, if one begins by painting this sky grey, thus remaining far below the intensity of nature, how much more necessary it is to tone down the browns and yellowish-greys of the soil to a lower key, in order to be consistent. I think if once one analyses it thus, it is so logical, one can hardly understand not having always seen it so."

In most photographs we do the same thing -that is we look at the local colour of the thing photographed ,the paddy field,the brown earth ,the rocky terrain, the water surface etc.and ignore the colour of the sky hoping to salvage the colour in editing. This is just unworkable and very often I find that the local colour comes out beautifully but a terrific mess is found in the sky .In digital photography some part of the sky gets dissipated by way of loss of pixels and the overall impact is none too satisfactory.
What is true of painting as observed by van Gogh in 1883 is true of photography today.

The creative process in schizhophrenics


"Still Life with an acquarium" by a schizhphrenic artist Bruce Doyle

(Bruce Doyle
Still Life with Aquarium, 1988)


This work involved a multi-staged printing process and a high degree of organizational skills, suggesting the work was created with a relatively calm state of mind despite the artist's diagnosis of schizophrenia. This highlights the problematic nature of correlating artworks to an individual diagnosis, rather than understanding them in the context of the artist's precise state of mind at the time.

http://www.daxcollection.org.au/selectedworks.html

The creative process in the case of people suffering from mental diseases perhaps reflects the state of their minds .But not in all cases. In the above case the painting does not show any unusual or abnormal perceptions of reality.

When you look at the painting you get a feeling that the perception of the artist is no different than any other person's. There is a certain order which is instinctively felt within a normal person when he sees a similar arrangement which we may call "normal" and any deviation from this arrangement may result out of a distortion of perception. On the first look one does not feel that any distortion has taken place .For example there is just one chair but four cups and the chair is out of alignment with the width of the table.But this does not mean that no conscious desire is in evidence to reproduce reality .For the sake of verisimilitude the handles of the three cups are made visible from the angle from which the picture is laid out and one cup's handle is turned the other side making it invisible in this perspective.There are four fish in the aquarium ,all of which are swimming in the same direction as they do in real life.

Let us see how the artist has dealt with the problem of space within the painting.This is not a surreal painting where distortions from real life take place in the way objects are laid out. The depth of field is indicative of the relative spaces between objects as they are seen in real life. For example the size of the aquarium is less relative to the size of the flower vase giving one the impression that the depth of the location of the aquarium has not been adequately built in the space.

But all this does not mean that there are perceptual errors arising out of the mental state of the artist.A perfectly "normal" artist may choose to do away with detailed scale-mapping of the objects. So there is nothing in the painting which would suggest the working of a person with a mental health problem.

The creative process

An interesting question is if an infinite number of monkeys were at an number of typewriters,would the works of Shakespeare eventually come out(www.askphilosophers.org)? Prof .Velleman seems to think so .He has calculated the probability of 1 for an infinite number of monkeys. Of course the assumption here is that there is a preciseness and identifiability of the work to be produced which can be recognised as the same as Shakespeare’s. Is’nt there something about an artistic work which does not carry identifiability with a similar work by anybody else ?

This brings us to the good old question of the difference in the logical processes leading to a creative work and those that lead to a scientific discovery.In the processes that lead to scientific discovery the thought process can be easily simulated and duplicated ,if necessary .This is because the processes lead to a clearly defined logical path which will probably lead to the same conclusion, whoever has followed the path. A similar thing does not necessarily happen in the creative process in which each artist contributes his unique vision which cannot be simulated or replicated by another artist.

Art is a death-like experience

The human mind has this constant need to conform because it is otherwise free beyond any limitations that define structures governing human activity.There is this need to be like everybody .The moment we are free we feel lost and disoriented in the vast wild wastes of logical possibility. Hence the defining structures.We always try to devise newer structures because we are afraid of being sucked into the uncertainty of the infinity,the kind of borderless existence that fills us with fear.Human existence is a matter of so much enclosed space with a dream which refuses to acknowledge contours. Art is a uniquely human endeavour to break down structures ,to demolish contours and become part of space which is not defined by any outlines. The only way such a thing is possible when the body disappears . Art is a death-like experience when the individual attempts to burst out of enclosed spaces.

Dance is an effort to extend human existence into the infinity of space.When the dancer throws her limbs in space in her dance movements she extends the frontiers of her own enclosed space. The abstract artist demolishes the outlines of physical objects and abolishes form and structure in order to experience freedom. That is the only way one invents freedom,the freedom which is hiding behind form and symmetry.When we dream on the side of our pillow we experience scary freedom ,when we disappear in the vastness of space . We have invented our God , a finite God with arms akimbo ,enclosed in the claustrophobic space of a human-like form because we are scared of an infinite God who is not enclosed in finite space.

The bedroom



The famous Bedroom in Arles by Van Gogh(third version).I love this painting for its vivid colors and the "lived-in" feeling that arouses - as though the sleeper has just got up and gone out of the room.

Time hangs lightly




The Persistence of Memory, 1931
by Salvador Dali

Attempts to conquer time lead to failure and frustration with time's tokens living on as memories refusing to fade away .The colors of the painting are wonderful.

This way or that



"This way or that" -a photo by GMS on Flickr.
I love this shot for the wonderful perspective. A wide angle shot with some distortion.The sheer beauty of the stones takes your breath away.The distortion makes the picture larger than life.The line that forks out into separate streets is exquisite.The "undecidedness" of the street is simply delicious.

Photographing the silence


(Photo by Bennehboy-Ilove corps on Flickr
Tate: Photographing Britain)

What is interesting in this picture is the body postures of the lady and gentleman whose silhouettes form the focus in the foreground.Their shadows are not clearly delineated in the pool of light but definitely convey some sort of an attempt to lose themselves and become real and three-dimensional. Both seem to be going separate ways but between them is a common objective and a destination. May be they are attending the same meeting or something. Apparently there is a bunch of people in the darkness of the background ,perhaps around the registration desk. The quiet efficiency of the atmosphere is revealed in the way silence comes through in the softness of the light.