Windy Sunday
Sunday, 11. May 2008, 15:58:32
Why wind should have such an influence, I don't fully understand, but it clearly does. Michelangelo Antonioni used the wind to great effect in the pivotal scene in Blow-Up, one of my few truly essential movies. Only after repeated viewing did I fully grasp that a good part of the tension of that outdoor scene where our protaganist may - or may not - have witnessed the prelude to a murder is due to the camera encompassing and lingering on the wind as shown by the movement of the trees.
The direct stimulus for my return to the distant past was the discovery of this old photograph, taken in the late 1970s, of a view from top of The Chantries hill, looking south into Surrey. I was rooting around in the basement, attempting to organize some of my oldest things.

A largely undistinguished photograph, and one that needed to be balanced again for color after I scanned it as it was faded and browned. Sometimes I wonder if I do not do the same thing to my memories. Perhaps I do. What was remarkable to me, looking at that photograph, is that I was not seeing what I once saw. Nothing to do with my eyes, although a pair of reading glasses is now a necessity, and everything to do with my mind.
So, why then, does it look so different? The answer lies in the emotion behind the seeing. In the past, I would have felt an acute nostalgia at such a sight, and I can still feel glimmerings of that around the edges of my thoughts, but now I see it largely as the landscape it is. A beautiful landscape, but by no means uniquely beautiful. It used to be so. Much of my early adolescence revolved about that land where I roamed again and again, and my earliest deep and remembered thoughts derive from that time.
The influence of those memories and that state of mind, in large part one of loneliness and anxiety (but also a delicious aloneness), was very strong throughout my early life and well into my middle years. Today, it has effectively vanished. So I can say I am not the same person who took that photograph, and who gazed upon for a long time. Yet I am made out of that same person, so I cannot regard it with complete dispassion. That's why I am writing this.
Moments such as these will return from time to time for the rest of my life.
My dear friend Richard,
An open landscape that allowed your imagination,
your mind to spread and expand and share with us the fascinating way that you can see the wind blowing.
Some will see the wind throwing useless dirty papers in a corner,
you take the wind and you transform it to art. Thank you for that
By ellinidata, # 11. May 2008, 18:21:16
Your thought about whether we are "the same" person as we were back in the day rings a bell in my mind. I have had -and have - similar thoughts quite often. Also, I ponder whether places I once knew are still the same places.
Imagine you go back to your beloved Surrey, to the exact place where you took that photograph. I bet you'll be able to find that place. It will undoubtedly have changed, I'm sure. Vegetation will have changed, maybe there will be some urban sprawl previously unknown to that landscape. Plus, that - if you look at things relatively in the Einstein way - our planet and our whole solar system, not to mention the entire galaxy, is now situated in an entirely different place in the universe.
Everything's changed.
Now is it still the same landscape in the same place? Are you still the same?
Of course not - yet of course you are. Depending.
Need to ponder further - thanks for getting me started. Or sorry for having started filling up your blogspace with my ramblings.
By ricewood, # 11. May 2008, 18:23:11
To quote the song..."Thanks for the memories" Richard.
By edwardpiercy, # 11. May 2008, 19:52:18
Ed,
I was wrong !
don't visit that eye doctor too often!!
did I tell you that we love that DNA of yours that makes so enjoyable ??
By ellinidata, # 11. May 2008, 20:10:29
Actually, the skin cells on my hands these days are pretty cool looking. They remind me of some sort of strange, Pre-Cambrian plant cells.
By edwardpiercy, # 11. May 2008, 20:14:35
By Stomyr, # 11. May 2008, 20:15:49
I am glad to know,
Scarlett always in her interviews mentions how important hands are to her
P.S.
did you mail her the "Fedora picture" yet??
now you can kill me !
By ellinidata, # 11. May 2008, 20:29:53
But to be honest, I'd rather Clint Eastwood found my blog and decided to make a movie out of one of my stories and paid me a lot of money. That would actually be better.
By edwardpiercy, # 11. May 2008, 20:45:34
DID some body say Clint Eastwood ??
He is a brilliant mind !
I hope he does !! It will be money at the bank !!
Scarlett can have a small role , let's not be unfair !!
By ellinidata, # 11. May 2008, 21:53:11
I think Clint would make a very good movie with Pat Maginess as protagonist. Let's hope he stops by!
By musickna, # 11. May 2008, 22:01:33
What's it all about, Alfie?
(Who in the hell is Alfie, anyway?)
Great post, Richard!
By Stardancer, # 12. May 2008, 00:34:09
Alfie is best known as the anti-hero of the film of the same name, acted superbly by Michael Caine (one of my favorite actors). He's essentially a totally mercenary womanizer who is forced finally to confront the bitter consequences of his rakish ways. Great song too, a Bacharach-David composition recorded by Cher, Cilla Black and Dionne Warwick amongst others. My favorite tune of theirs outside of "The Look of Love".
Probably more there than you ever really wanted to know...
By musickna, # 12. May 2008, 01:54:07
"The Look of Love is in your eyes
a look your smile can't disguise..."
(I probably just ripped those lyrics to shreds...)
I think I've seen that movie--"Alfie"--at least of couple of times. Caine rocks!
By Stardancer, # 12. May 2008, 02:13:45
I shall doze off happily with 'The Look of Love' as a lullaby!
Good night all!
By musickna, # 12. May 2008, 03:12:33
Stardancer and musickna gave me the first happy note of the day!!!
Thanks and have a great week ahead
By ellinidata, # 12. May 2008, 11:37:25