Essentially the Only One

by Richard

Cleaning the CCD

,

Instead of sneaking off the library to take a nap on one of the many soft couches (and doubtless filling the library with the reveberant snores that Allan has experienced elsewhere), I decided to take the life of my digital camera in my hands and clean the CCD.

Why would I want to do such a potentially destructive thing to this sliver of vulnerable silicon buried deep in the body of my Canon Digital Rebel XT SLR?

The short answer is dust. It's impossible to keep dust out the thing (indeed many are shipped brand new with a few dust particles already sitting on the sensor). Normally, you'll never notice it. However, should you take a photograph of a light block color - e.g. the blue sky - with a very small aperture size (f/22 or smaller), you might see a lot of little black slightly smudged dots. This is dust that has settled directly on the surface of the chip.


Now, one of the advantages of working in a research laboratory is that there are all sorts of useful reagents and equipment lying around. Highly purified methanol. Sterile swabs. Air and vacuum outlets. PVC and rubber tubing.

A cursory Google search of the many photography sites revealed methanol to be a solvent of choice. It has no corrosive effect on the chip, and attracts dust like a magnet. Nonetheless, at first I was wary of applying anything wet to the CCD, so I devised a blower and vacuum system to see how that would work.

This was simple. I hooked up two pieces of PVC tubing to the AIR and VACUUM outlets in the chemical hood (making a trap out of a flask with sidearm for the vacuum to guard against blowback and attaching a syringe filter to the air jet to prevent any highspeed particulate matter scouring my CCD). Then I opened up the camera, exposed the CCD using the 'sensor cleaning' option in the camera's own firmware program, and alternately blew and sucked air in and out close to the chip.

Too close as it happens. I looked down and saw to my horror that I had touched the surface with the tubing from the vacuum and left a smudge mark.

Naturally, I considered that I must have broken it. However a few snaps revealed no damage. The only result was the appearance of a very slight (much less than with dust) darkening in the image under similar small aperture, blue sky conditions, as described above.

Nonetheless, the appearance of this smudge pained me. In addition, the blowing and vacuuming had removed some, but by no means all, of the dust particles. So I decided it was time to go for the methanol.

This was the most difficult part of the whole process. I used reagent grade methanol, so I felt pretty sure it was going to be pure enough not to leave any residue, but the application was tricky. Fortunately we had some long stem sterile swabs in the lab that are relatively easy to manipulate. With great care, I brushed the smudged area with the methanol-soaked tip. To my great satisfaction, the smudge was removed and the CCD assumed its pristine former self.

I could have given the CCD a more complete cleaning with the methanol, but as I had had enough heart stopping moments for a Friday afternoon, I decided to leave it there.
Nonetheless, as you can see, while it is not yet perfect, it is greatly improved.

Friday afternoonWhat a let down

Comments

Allanricewood Saturday, June 10, 2006 6:49:47 PM

Had I seen a smudge mark on my ccd, I would have had a heart attack for sure.

I have not yet had the guts to touch it, only to blow the dust away - which improves the result but isn´t eliminating every dustdot. Photoshop fixes the last two or three.

Richardmusickna Saturday, June 10, 2006 7:41:42 PM

That's probably the best approach, Allan. It's relatively easy to Photoshop away a few smudges, and you do avoid the heart-stopping moments!

Still, having done it, I now realise that the CCD is not as fragile as I previously believed, even though you do need to take good care with it.

Lagged2Death Tuesday, June 13, 2006 1:41:19 PM

Yikes. When I daydream about getting an SLR myself, this isn't one of the things I think about!

According to some accounts, the CCD isn't actually that delicate:

Contrary to the urban myths that propagate like viruses on computer discussion boards, no digital camera with interchangeable lenses has a exposed imaging sensor. All either have a glass anti-aliasing filter or an optical glass cover. With the right tools cleaning this piece of glass is no more dangerous than cleaning your lens' front element.


But then again, how far should you trust the word of some guy on the internet?

hungryghost Wednesday, June 14, 2006 12:13:45 AM

Hey, I should have asked your advice or followed your actions two years ago when my digital camera went for a swim in the Atlantic Ocean... My heart plummetted with it, but fished it out, rinsed with water, then with alcohol...and it started working again (whew) - and still doing so...touch wood.

cheers

Richardmusickna Wednesday, June 14, 2006 12:22:19 AM

Hungryghost - Ouch! My heart would have been in my boots had that happened to me. So glad you were able to fix it.

L2D - thanks for the link. I think he's essentially right about the relative ease of cleaning provided you use good reagants and materials. I will probably get used to it eventually - much as I became used to taking computers apart and reassembling them, CPUs, heatsinks and all. (Nonetheless, I have fried one CPU, I have to confess... sad)

Write a comment

You must be logged in to write a comment. If you're not a registered member, please sign up.

February 2012
S M T W T F S
January 2012March 2012
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29