Saturday, 2. September 2006, 04:04:16
When Ubuntu gets into fame, it also gets into flame. Bellow are the some complaints, some comments from the Ubuntu users, linux users (never use Ubuntu before but still they comments), others users ( tried once, try live cd, saw his friends using ubuntu, new ubuntu user, migrate from windows)
Why Ubuntu doesn't works like Ms Windows? Why I click Setup.exe it doesn't work?
Ubuntu is not windows, they though every OS is the same beside GUI. For them, Windows = OS. Maybe they not even know what is OS means. At least they now gets to know what is OS and what is Linux.
Ubuntu may wants to consider to put some user guideline, such as welcome page to lead the MS Migrant to get use to it. The guideline must be loaded when ubuntu is first installed, and it must able to drag user's attention.
Ubuntu by default does not come with GCC.
Ubuntu doesn't allow customization during installation like Fedora/Red Hat.
The target audience for Ubuntu is it only new user? or Microsoft Windows migrant? If this is true, this is bad. A lots of user why they want to come to linux is not because they have nothing to do and want to try new stuff, or follow the trend. They uses linux because they have their purpose, such as they need to get apache up, they need to do programming under unix/linux, they need to use certain tools to conduct their science research. Within a guided custom installation, it will scares people away. For example, I heard linux is come with gcc, after I install ubuntu, why gcc is not there? Okay I apt-get install gcc, why still i can't get my souce code compiled? OMG so many libraries is missing.
Wish that ubuntu developement team may consider to put in customization option to the installer. Anyway this will lead ubuntu cd to grows to few cd, if that is not the case, Ubuntu might consider to release developer version, where it will comes with all core libraries and compilers and remains some tools for customization.
Ubuntu uses sudo instead of root account, it is so confusing
This is not a big deal for me. I like sudo, I install sudo to my fedora machines and make it works under there which it doesn't come by default. For those who rant about this, you can turn sudo off, or you can forgot about sudo, because su - works under ubuntu.
Again, this can be put under installation customization, such as turn on sudo option.
Stupid name and brown color
This are the most stupid reasons to dislike Ubuntu, but the thing is I discover a lots of people gives these reasons. "Why do you think ubuntu sucks?" "I don't likes its name and color. " "WTF" What to do, its people's preferences.
No firewall rules by default
I like the way Red Hat deals with configuration, such as using service, chkconfig, have iptables script by default and ease of changing. All of this, I make it happen to my ubuntu, I copy out iptables from fedora using iptables-save and place it to my ubuntu. I wrote service scripts to load daemon from /etc/init.d. But some of them replies said that some programs fails to run because of restricted firewall rules, which it should not happen in ubuntu, because it is design for new linux user. But again, windows have firewall too, did it blocks your software?
To update the system you need to do apt-get update; apt-get upgrade where yum just a simple call yum update it does all the thing.
When I see this line appear in the forum, I take my opportunities to reply "Ya, yum does all the thing without user asking for it, thats makes yum extremely slow and thats makes yum sucks."
Ubuntu is for noob, consider Gentoo or Slackware.
Nah! ubuntu is not as friendly as other distro for newbie, consider PCOSLinux
Slow boot time ...
buggy ...
Whatever, too many to list here and a lots of them are not true.