UbuKubuntu - is Gnome 3 off track?
Sunday, 29. November 2009, 10:53:28
Having worked on the first Mac OS the phenomenon of the computer 'desktop'-travesty has always accompanied me. My involvement goes back nearly 27 years. To be frank: visually hardly anything has fundamentally changed since OS-6. Yes, more graphical gimmicks, better file-systems. But the principles remained very much the same ever-since. The 'desktop-metaphor' or 'graphical user interface' helps to interact with computers. Since Alan Kay at Xerox PARC introduced this concept in 1970 many attempts have been made to go beyond this metaphor, that I rather call a 'travesty' of the real day-to-day office desktop. A travesty revealed by Linux where usage of the Terminal not only shows how efficient 'direct' communications with the OS is, but also that it still has a cult value as part of a modern GUI. Microsoft hides the presence from its average users. On-screen windows and hierarchical collections of data in folders no longer efficiently support the multi-role of modern communication devices, multi-tasking and network interactions. This requires a far more integrated environment. Gnome-shell-3 is an innovative experiment in that direction. But can it -for the moment- stand up against the graphical 'beauty' of UbuKubuntu: the mixture of Ubuntu Karmic and Kubuntu 9.10? Perhaps that is what modern users prefer over optimum efficiency and clever integration of elements. I investigated...



















