Thursday, 17. July 2008, 23:45:33
politics, climate
Another great post by Andrew Bolt about the hype versus reality of scientific "consensus" on climate change
How many believers are left?
Andrew Bolt
Friday, July 18, 2008 at 06:50am
Another sceptic declares himself. Joining the increasing crowd is Professor Geoffrey Kearsley, a geographer developing a programme in environmental communication at the University of Otago:
"It may well be that human activity is indeed changing the climate, at least in part, but there is an increasing body of science that says that the sun may have a greater role.
"If it does have, then global warming is likely to stop, as it appears to have done since 1998, and if the current sunspot cycle fails to ignite, then cooling, possibly rapid and severe cooling, may eventuate. The next five years will tell us a great deal. In these circumstances, we should wait and see. "
UPDATE
A brilliant must-read article by David Evans on how the myth was made:
I DEVOTED six years to carbon accounting, building models for the Australian Greenhouse Office… It was great. We were working to save the planet.
But since 1999 new evidence has seriously weakened the case that carbon emissions are the main cause of global warming, and by 2007 the evidence was pretty conclusive that carbon played only a minor role and was not the main cause of the recent global warming…
1. The greenhouse signature is missing. We have been looking and measuring for years, and cannot find it…
2. There is no evidence to support the idea that carbon emissions cause significant global warming. None…
3. The satellites that measure the world’s temperature all say that the warming trend ended in 2001, and that the temperature has dropped about 0.6C in the past year (to the temperature of 1980)…
Evans is particularly strong in describing how no one can detect what’s meant to be the signature of a man-made global warming - a “hot spot” about 10km above the tropics. But for politicians, this conclusion is particularly crucial:
What is going to happen over the next decade as global temperatures continue not to rise? The Labor Government is about to deliberately wreck the economy in order to reduce carbon emissions. If the reasons later turn out to be bogus, the electorate is not going to re-elect a Labor government for a long time. When it comes to light that the carbon scare was known to be bogus in 2008, the ALP is going to be regarded as criminally negligent or ideologically stupid for not having seen through it. And if the Liberals support the general thrust of their actions, they will be seen likewise.
This could be Kevin Rudd’s Khemlani moment. Labor could be a laughing stock for a generation. But only if the Liberals start distancing themselves from this utter insanity.
Full article
Thursday, 17. July 2008, 23:41:45
church, society, media, Australia
The ABC has led a particulalry vitriolic campaign against the Catholic Church during the World Youth Day celebrations in Sydney, digging up old abuse cases in an attempt to vilify the Church.
Here is a commentary by Andrew Bolt which I tihnk is absolutely spot-on, particularly the last couple of paragraphs.
THE reporter on the ABC’s 7.30 Report sounded sad. The Catholic Church couldn’t find enough men keen to be priests, she sighed.
Gosh. Wondered why? Then check, say, the reports the ABC’s Lateline ran to welcome the Pope and thousand of Catholic pilgrims to Sydney.
“Exclusive documents reveal church ignored abuse allegations”, “New evidence in church abuse case”, “Broken Rites president joins Lateline”, “Demonstrators oppose Catholic Church policies”, “Father of assault victims to visit Pope”. And so on.
Hmm. Now why aren’t more Australians joining up to be vilified?
It hardly needs saying that I despise pedophiles and rapists. But even as a non-Christian, I smell bigotry.
In fact, it seems much of the Left-wing media has tried furiously to make sure when we think of Catholicism, in this week of celebration of the faith, that we think not Saviour but slime.
New laws against protesters that the church never asked for were portrayed as a symbol of church oppression. A newspaper ran a competition for the best anti-Catholic T-shirt. And an ABC host urged men to bait Catholics by going naked, but for a condom.
Meanwhile his colleagues looked for a story to hit the Catholics’ most senior figure here, Cardinal George Pell. And Lateline found it in a man who said he’d been sexually assaulted by a stereotypical dirty priest.
How hard was it trying to find a stick? This victim, Anthony Jones, was 29 when he went swimming at night with a priest, who fondled him. He swam off, aroused, but returned to the priest’s bedroom, dressed in a towel.
There a sexual encounter took place. In convicting the priest for a then-illegal act, a judge later found Jones could have left had he wanted.
And all this happened 26 long years ago. So why bring it up now? Because, Jones conceded, it might at this sensitive time make the church give him $3.5 million—or $100,000, final offer. Let’s not call this blackmail.
He deserved the door. He got instead the media limelight.
Another case long dealt with has also been revived, for much the same reason, by a media that tends to be hostile to any institution that acknowledges a higher authority than the musings of the journalistic pack.
I despise it all. Of the priests I’ve known, not one deserves this casual vilification as pedophiles, or their protectors. And when I check how their church touches even my life, I see one of its hospitals, in which my children were born. I see its churchmen tackling forces that rip up homes and make our streets unsafe. I see its intellectuals preaching values I recognise as essential for the defence of our weak. And I see a faith that exhorts its—yes, fallible—believers to goodness, integrity and public service.
Such a faith deserves respect. Instead, there’s that hooting mob, brandishing cobwebbed skeletons to smash one of the few institutions still trying to civilise the barbarians.
Full article and comments
Thursday, 17. July 2008, 05:17:41
church, mission
Jared Wilson has produced this interesting table comparing missional and attractional churches
That was hard work.... it took me half an hour or more to get that table up!
Wednesday, 16. July 2008, 05:32:21
Zimbabwe, economics
You know things are bad when the Government can no longer afford the paper to print money. Where else but Zimbabwe?
From the SMH:
Stop the press: Mugabe out of Monopoly money
HARARE: It has come to this - Zimbabwe is about to run out of the paper to print money on.
Fidelity Printers & Refiners, the state-owned company that tirelessly churns out bank notes for the Mugabe regime, was thrown into a crisis early this month after a German company stopped supplying bank note paper because of concerns over Zimbabwe's recent violent presidential election, widely seen as fraudulent by international observers.
The printing operation slowed drastically. Two-thirds of the 1000-strong workforce was ordered to take leave, and two of the three money-printing shifts were cancelled.
The result on the streets was an immediate cash crunch.
"If you think this currency shortage is bad, wait two weeks. By then it will be a disaster," said a senior Fidelity staffer, who spoke on condition of anonymity. The paper will run out in two weeks, he said.
Fidelity Printers is Robert Mugabe's lifeline. It prints the money to pay police, soldiers and intelligence agents that keep the regime in power. If they cannot be paid, the country faces economic paralysis - and potential collapse.
Zimbabwe's economic meltdown harks back to the collapse of its main export industry, farming. That left the nation starved of foreign exchange, but government spending went on.
How did it do that? It printed money. But printing more money without an increase in productivity fuelled inflation.
As hyperinflation took hold last year, Fidelity printed $1 million notes, then $5 million, $10 million, $25 million, $50 million. This year, it has been forced to print $100 million, $250 million and $500 million notes in rapid succession, all now practically worthless. The highest denomination is now $50 billion (worth $US1 on the street).
Despite the recent currency shortage, the Zimbabwe dollar has continued to slide against the US dollar and shopkeepers are increasing prices steeply.
Before the crunch, a beer at a pub in Harare cost $15 billion. At 5pm on July 4, it cost $100 billion ($US4 at the time) in the same bar. An hour later, the price had gone up to $150 billion ($US6).
Los Angeles Times
Article
Wednesday, 16. July 2008, 03:46:40
climate, politics
With today's announcement of the details of the Carbon trading scheme to be introduced in 2010, here is a graph indicating the global cooling that is happening at the moment. It is widely accepted, even among global warming fans, that the world has not warmed since 1998 and in fact has been cooling since 2002.
So given that fact, together with the fact that there is not necessarily any proof that CO2 is the great cause of it all, why are we entering into a system designed to tax CO2 emissions and move us into an expensive energy regime? I love wind and solar energy, but I prefer cheap electricity and petrol!
By the way, the Treasurer announced today that world oil consumption has fallen to 1983 levels, solely due to increased prices that have nothing to do with Carbon Trading Schemes. Bit of a blow for peak oil alarmists.

Tuesday, 15. July 2008, 03:42:31
climate
from Andrew Bolt:
From the ABC report, you’d think the Arctic ice was melting faster than ever:
A group of Russian scientists are being rescued from a melting ice-floe in the Arctic.
Our Moscow correspondent, Scott Bevan, reports the 20 scientists have been based on the ice floe since September, conducting a range of experiments, including monitoring the effects of climate change.
The team was meant to be at the drifting station, known as North Pole 35, for a year. But the ice has been melting so quickly, that the floe’s shrunk to a little more than a tenth of its size of last September.
In fact, there is much more ice now at the North Pole than there was last year - a detail the ABC strangely forgot to mention:

(Source: US National Snow and Ice Data Center.)
(This graph shows that the ice this year is more than the same time last year, although somewhat below the long term average, but well above that predicted by "the models"- Keith)
I’m guessing that this fact will get only a fraction of the coverage that this scare received last month:
The distinct possibility that this summer—for the first time in recorded history—the North pole could be free of sea ice, is now a common subject of discussion among the world’s climate experts.
Once again I ask: if the evidence for a warming world, heated by man, is so clear, why the need to constantly exaggerate and cherrrypick?
UPDATE
Speaking of which, Professor Bjorn Lomborg notes:

Given all the warnings, here is a slightly inconvenient truth: over the past two years, the global sea level hasn’t increased. It has slightly decreased. Since 1992, satellites orbiting the planet have measured the global sea level every 10 days with an amazing degree of accuracy – 3-4mm. For two years, sea levels have declined. (All of the data are available at sealevel.colorado.edu.)...
Simply put, we’re being force-fed vastly over-hyped scare stories. Proclaiming six meters of sea-level rise over this century contradicts thousands of UN scientists, and requires the sea-level rise to accelerate roughly 40-fold from today. Imagine how climate alarmists would play up the story if we actually saw an increase in the sea-level rise.
Full article
Monday, 14. July 2008, 02:05:45
humour
The Danger Room has the latest in Iranian Missile technology
hereVery funny!
Sunday, 13. July 2008, 02:28:59
sermon, mp3
The sermon for Sunday July 13th 2008 is now available for download from the New Life web-site.
In this sermon I talk about grace at work. Click here to download
Saturday, 12. July 2008, 08:03:08
Narrabri, dance
I'm very proud of my daughter (and my sons too, but this isn't about them!)
Susannah is studying Dance and for her Third Year Project decided to form a dance company for young people in the country to celebrate their rural upbringing and to develop their skills. She has been working with them since the beginning of the year and today was the climax- a performance in the park in the context of a community event.
The dancers were beautiful, the choreography brilliant and even non-dance people understood what it was about.
It was just a superb day.
I've uploaded some photos into the "Dance In The Park" album
Friday, 11. July 2008, 02:57:17
climate
Could it be that climate change actually has benefits? No it's all doom and gloom, unless you like tuna.
From the ABC:
Bigger fish due to climate change: tuna industry
The tuna industry says climate change is bringing benefits.
The chief executive of the Australian Southern Bluefin Tuna Association, Brian Jeffriess, says Port Lincoln crews in South Australia are reporting an excellent quality and size catch.
He says it can be partly attributed to the effects of climate change on the waters of the Great Australian Bight.
"There's no doubt climate change will bring benefits to the Great Australian Bight ecology in the sense that there's more upwellings therefore more small pelagics as we call them - sardines, mackerel, red bait, other fish - and that will bring tuna so there may be even winners from climate change," he said.
"This year some of the oceanographers are saying they've never seen south-easterly winds in a sustained strong way now that creates a lot of upwellings in the water - that brings nutrients to the surface.
"There's a feed chain which feeds on those - the tuna is virtually the last part of that food chain and benefits from improvements in the other parts of the food chain."
Friday, 11. July 2008, 00:22:25
environment, oil
If you've survived all the fear mongering of climate change (we're all going to die by 2018!) then the latest rubbish about the price of petrol will finish you off.
A report put out by the CSIRO claims that petrol "could" reach $8 a litre by 2018, coincidentally the year we all die of heat stroke, bubonic plague, malaria, dehydration and famine.
Of course that's the worst case scenario. The good news is that Carbon Trading will only account for 25 cents of that. Yay!
I have only read the headlines and not the full report, so i can't criticise the report as such- but I can criticise the journalists who quote it and the people who made the "Worst case scenario."
How do they come up with such a figure? Well it's easy- you extrapolate current supply and demand trends and it's easy to come up with that.
But people at the end of the 1800s were predicting that the price of hay would put transportation out of the reach of all but the richest by the year 1935 and that London would become unlivable because of the sheer quantity of horse droppings on the streets.
Oh look! We invented technology! Why did the price of hay drop to affordable levels? We found another form of transport which had a fuel that was in plentiful supply and over time became so cheap that even people in relatively poor countries could afford to use it.
That technological change itself produced a quantum leap in living standards right around the globe. I'm no expert on horses, but I have noticed hay advertised at $3.50 a bale in the past. I don't know how many kilometres to the bale a horse gets, but if you think back to what your grandparents used to tell you $3.50 (or perhaps 2 pounds) was once an astronomical amount of money. Now it's the price of a decent cup of coffee-- or 2 litres of unleaded. And most of us will go through our entire lives without buying a bale of hay.
We are once again at one of those technological change points. The doomsayers once again fail to see how the real world operates.
Petrol is going up in price because the demand is greater than supply. High school economics tells you as price rises demand falls. In the worst case scenario if you have to spend all your money on getting to work and then the price of petrol goes up again, you have to cut back your petrol use.
High school economics also teaches us that as the price rises supply increases. Those Arab nations will pump out oil faster when they can get $150 a barrel than then they can only get $50. But not only that, at $150 a barrel it becomes worth while to open up oil fields that are not profitable at $50. Even better, it suddenly becomes economical to go looking for oil in new and exciting places, to use new technology to get oil from deep under the ocean.
But it gets better still because as petrol gets to over $2 a litre people start thinking about converting coal to oil- we already have the technology to do that thanks to the oil embargoes against South Africa in the 1970s. And of course running cars on LPG and compressed natural gas starts looking good. And that's not even counting real technology jumps such as electric cars, fuel cells, solar cars etc.
So petrol MAY reach $8 a litre, but I doubt it, unless there are major supply disruptions such as a Middle East war. But even if it does, will it matter? We will by then be well on the way to finding alternatives, so it won't matter any way.
So be happy and in the words of the Hitchhikers Guide To the Galaxy- Don't Panic!
Thursday, 10. July 2008, 01:58:10
arts, bible, movies
The DVD of Evan Almighty is currently doing the rounds at church, and last night Margaret and I watched it, accompanied by Susannah & James.
I know the movie has been around for a while, but despite the best of intentions, I didn't get to see it before now.
My perspective on it- very funny and very clever. I loved all the little touches like the name of the Estate Agent is Eve Adams- lots of little Bible jokes. And I loved the way the animals followed him, especially the luscious marine fish in the tank in the Congressman's office (way overstocked by the way- there is no way you could keep that many fish for more than a day in that tiny tank!). Oh and the gopher wood jokes! 
Theologically and practically it missed a couple of points but hey it's entertainment not theology! You can pick apart the "doctrinal" elements but here's the basic message- GRACE!!!!!
Grace has God redeeming Evan/ Noah through a project that is way beyond him.
Grace enables Evan to proclaim a message that seems stupid, yet is vital.
Grace rescues the mockers, knockers and sceptics.
God in his amazing grace knew that the dam would break on September 22nd and that one man was uniquely placed to launch a rescue mission.
The animals had me perplexed for a while. Why bring those animals from all over the place when they obviously would not rescuing until they arrived in that valley?Then I realised, it could only be an ark if it had animals- the intended occupants would only recognise the mission of the ark if it had the necessary animals already present!
So yes it's a great, fun movie, but with a wonderful message. And in a weird way, true to the meaning of the original story.
Wednesday, 9. July 2008, 07:56:18
bible
We had a good Pastors' Prayer Meeting this afternoon.
Anne, the COC pastor who recently went to Florida to see what's happening at the Lakeland meetings, mentioned that she found Todd Bentley's tattoos confronting. I've seen him on TV and I didn't find that a problem, but she said it was something about the religious spirit in her that didn't like it. She went on to say that Todd has got these tattoos since becoming a Christian.
One of the other pastors started talking about how that couldn't be godly because tattoos are usually done from a rebellious spirit. I said that it was possible that God wanted Todd to do it, that he did it to reach a particular bunch of people or perhaps God specifically told him to get the tats.
The other guy wasn't having that. It says in Leviticus that you must not get tattoos. I pointed out that it also says you must not wear clothes made from blended fabrics. "Is that directed to the priests of the ordinary people?" he asked. I said it was directed to everybody and is in Leviticus (it turns out it's in the same chapter as the verse about tattoos!). I raised the issue of circumcision and that was an Old Testament practice we gladly do away with.
How can we get away from this issue of proof texting (that is plucking verses out at random and using them to back up our favourite doctrine) and instead work to find out what the Bible is really saying? (The process of interpreting Scripture accurately is called hermeneutics)
I'm not a supporter of tattoos, but I'm not going to use that as a basis for judging the ministry of a brother- unless it's an issue for God.
I really want to find out what the Bible says about issues so i need to have principles that will guide me.
The first principle is that Jesus has effectively done away with the Law as a basis for justification. Jesus' death satisfied ALL the demands of the Law for all people for all time. God does not judge anyone on the basis of the Old Testament Law any more- and neither should we. Read any of Paul's letters carefully, especially Romans and you will see this argued at great length by Paul. Interestingly, although Paul wrote the letter of Galatians specifically to refute those who argued that Christian men must be circumcised to be part of the people of God, Paul himself circumcised Timothy in order to forward the mission of the gospel. (Acts 16:1-3)
The second principle is the law of love. Jesus reduces the whole of the law to love God with all your heart and love your neighbour as you love yourself. That is why it is still wrong to commit murder, adultery, theft and fraud. These are not acts of love despite the fact that God no longer measures our behaviour by the Law.
The third principle is the rule of context. Who is a particular verse directed to and why? The verse about tattoos is particularly interesting:
" 'Do not cut your bodies for the dead or put tattoo marks on yourselves. I am the LORD. Leviticus 19:28
At face value it's fairly definitive. But let's look at the context of the verse before and after:
Leviticus 19:27-29 (New International Version)
27 " 'Do not cut the hair at the sides of your head or clip off the edges of your beard.
28 " 'Do not cut your bodies for the dead or put tattoo marks on yourselves. I am the LORD.
29 " 'Do not degrade your daughter by making her a prostitute, or the land will turn to prostitution and be filled with wickedness.
It seems to me that just on this basis, clean shaven and short-haired men have no basis to judge those with tattoos!
Apart from anything else it is inconsistent for any Christian to condemn tattoos on the basis of this verse (the only one in the whole bible that mentions tattoos) while not condemning those who cut their hair or trim their beards.
Does getting a tattoo contravene the law of love? I don't think so, although if a teenager does it defiantly against the wishes of her parent then she is obviously contravening the New Testament commandments for children to honour their parents. It is also wise to consider the fact that tattoos often have an occultic character to them.
So why does Leviticus prohibit Jewish people from having tattoos? The whole chapter is a part of the "Holiness code" of Israel. There is a series of commandments that are given specifically to make Israel not just live in a way that is different to the nations but also to make them appear different. They weren't to allow their cattle to cross-breed nor were they to wear clothes made of blended fabrics.
The verse suggests that other nations may have had tattoos as a part of their worship of ancestors or of spirits. Israel was to honour the Lord only so this was not to be permitted.
There might be any number of comments that one could make about Todd Bentley. I don't think that we should criticise him for having tattoos.
More importantly we need to move past simplistically grabbing verses so that we honour the scriptures enough to find out what they really mean to the best of our ability.
Wednesday, 9. July 2008, 02:09:10
telstra
If you are looking to find on-line maps or directions and you use Opera, don't bother with whereis.com
Not only do they not support Opera they like to treat the 5% of the internet market which uses Opera with contempt.
This is the message you get when you try to access their service:
Can't hear you (browser not supported)
We're not ignoring you, just your browser. Sorry, but all the new features on
Whereis can't talk to your browser.
We have made sure you can use Internet Explorer (we'll listen to IE 6 and
above), the latest Mozilla Firefox or Safari on Whereis. So why don't you
try one of those instead?
It's no surprise that whereis is operated by sensis a subsidiary of our favourite home-grown near-monopoly corporation, Telstra.
Telstra spends most of its time not listening to its customers also.
So, no, whereis.com I won't download the browsers you think I should use. I will use Google maps or NRMA instead.
Wednesday, 9. July 2008, 01:37:26
church
Whatever your take on owmen in leadership, I'm sure you will appreciate this comment from ASBOJesus:

Sunday, 6. July 2008, 23:55:12
climate
I'm not trying to overdo the commentary on climate change hysteria but the release of the Garnaut report last week and another report claiming that we will have droughts every second year, just makes it difficulat to ignore.
I think a lot of people are making a lot of money (with bucket-loads to come) from trying to scare us into dismantling our economy.
Here is a commentary by Andrew Bolt that shows that Al Gore's infamous movie actually brought aobut instant cooling!
Gore cools planet
Dr Roy Spencer, US Science Team leader for the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer on NASA’s Aqua satellite, updates his temperature graph:
When one takes into consideration that the cooling from the Mt. Pinatubo eruption and the warming from the 1997-98 El Nino event were not part of any underlying long-term trend, we can imagine that globally-averaged temperatures were flat from 1990 until 2000, then there was a brief warming until about 2002, after which temperatures have once again remained flat. Note that the longer temperatures remain flat the greater the warming that will be required to put us back ‘on track’ to match the climate model projections used by the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. The coming months and years should be interesting.
Gore Lied scribbles with a red pen on Spencer’s graph to show the famous Gore Effect at its most magnificent. Almost as soon as Gore released An Inconvenient Truth, warning of catastrophic warming, temperatures started to fall:

MEANWHILE, Professor Fred Singer notes the refusal of warmist Clive Hamilton to debate sceptics, and sends Australia a message about such cause-pushers:
As an atmospheric physicist, I deal with facts: many independent measurements published by recognized experts and the published results from some two dozen climate models run by scientists who have specialized in this subdiscipline. The IPCC and nearly all scientists also accept these same facts—although the measurements are never perfect and the model results are based on many assumptions.
All I claim is that the observations disagree significantly with these model results… (O)nce one accepts that the models don’t represent reality, then “all the rest is only commentary” —to quote a biblical sage.
It means that the human-caused greenhouse effect is much smaller than the models calculate—and not significant compared to natural factors that rule the climate and are beyond human control.
Of course, unlike Hamilton, Singer does understand the science.
Article
Sunday, 6. July 2008, 07:06:01
humour
From the ABC:
A man from the US state of Oregon has succeeded on his third attempt to fly nearly 400 kilometres eastwards to Idaho in an armchair supported by helium-filled party balloons.
The man, Kent Couch, took an airgun and blowpipe with him, so that he could shoot some of the 150 large balloons to make sure he didn't fly too high.
Speaking before take-off, Mr Couch said he loves the peace up in the air.
"I would say the best thing is just the peace, serenity of the trip - it's just so quiet," he said.
"There's no wind up there, because I'm moving with the wind.
"I'd do this every weekend if I had the time and the money and the people.
"So, it's just a fun trip. Mostly it's just about having a good time while I'm floating around up there."
His wife describes her husband's venture as 'crazy' and says there hasn't been a dull moment since she married him.
-BBC
Article
Sunday, 6. July 2008, 07:02:58
Narrabri, church
I rarely take photos in church as I'm usually focused on other things, like listening to God. This morning I found my camera sitting on the sound desk, so I took the opportunity to take a couple of shots during the last song. They give a sense of the informal (some say chaotic) atmosphere of our church.
1 2 3 4 5 ... 63 Next »
Showing posts 1 -
20 of
1242.