Monty Python turns 40
Tuesday, 6. October 2009, 04:45:56
So here's a celebratory clip.
Tuesday, 6. October 2009, 04:45:56
Saturday, 5. September 2009, 21:09:50
ONE in six free-range eggs is not what it seems.
An analysis of egg industry data has confirmed what most consumers have suspected: it is doubtful enough free-range layer hens in the country exist to produce the number of eggs labelled free-range.
From January 2006 to January 2007 the free-range flock would have had to grow by more than 37 per cent to match the increased sale of free-range eggs in the grocery sector, as recorded by the Australian Egg Corporation in its annual reports.
Over that time the number of eggs sold in the grocery market jumped from 811 million to 971 million and the proportion of those sold as free-range rose from 20.3 per cent to 23.4 per cent.
But at the same time the total number of eggs produced dropped from 3 billion to 2.8 billion, and the overall flock of laying hens decreased by 6 per cent.
The total free-range flock would have had to grow from 891,000 hens to 1.22 million to meet the free-range sales figures.
Thursday, 3. September 2009, 01:40:57
Saturday, 11. July 2009, 03:18:15
Dump the toy boy for a lasting union
Adele Horin
July 11, 2009
THE secret to a lasting marriage? It goes like this. Marry a man who is about your own age. If he is nine or more years older than you, the chances of ending up divorced double. And if your parents are still together, marry a man whose parents are also still together.
The advice comes not from an agony aunt in a women's magazine but from some of the country's top demographers.
Rebecca Kippen and Bruce Chapman, from the Australian National University, and Peng Yu, from the Department of Families, Housing Community Services and Indigenous Affairs, have traced the marital fortunes of 2482 Australian couples over six years to see what factors lead to compatibility, and what to divorce and separation.
In short, they advise marrying someone who is more or less like you. But surprisingly, similar education levels, attitudes to religion, and country of birth are not important.
What matters is age. Marriages in which the husband was nine or more years older than the wife, or two or more years younger, had a separation rate of 17 per cent compared to about 10 per cent for their more age-compatible peers.
"Age captures a range of things about being in the same place in life, at the same time," said Dr Kippen, of ANU's Australian Demographic and Social Research Institute.
As well, couples in which the husband's parents had divorced but the wife's parents had not were almost 90 per cent more likely to separate than couples where both sets of parents were together. It also helps if the husband is over 25 when you marry, and if neither of you have children before getting married. Having a similar attitude to wanting children or another child is important, also.
Being comfortably off helps in the cause of marital stability, but not so comfortable as to be among the richest 25 per cent - they have a higher risk of separation. Being poor, unemployed and feeling financially stressed, is a deadly trifecta for marriage stability. About 20 per cent of those unemployed at the start of the survey later separated compared to 10 per cent of those who had a job.
And another thing the demographers advise: don't marry a smoker if you are a non-smoker. It is definitely a romance killer. Two smokers, however, will get along fine.
Dr Kippen said she was amazed that differing educational levels had no impact on a couple's propensity to divorce, and surprised to find believers and non-believers appeared to rub along well.
People born in different countries were at no higher risk of divorce than those from the same country. And nor were those who had lived together before marriage.
The data was drawn from the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia, survey with an initial sample of 7682 households. The findings will be presented at the HILDA conference in Melbourne next week.
Sunday, 28. June 2009, 23:03:27
Environmentalists have an unchanging modus operandi. They find an environmental problem and then blame people for causing it. Decades later true science finds that it's a natural cycle, and often what is thought to be a bad thing turns out to be a good thing.
Remember dry land salinity? It was going to destroy our agricultural land and make huge swathes of the country a desert. It was caused, we were told, by extensive land clearing. State governments, responding to what they were assured was incontrovertible science (we didn't yet have "scientific consensus", brought in draconian laws banning removal of native vegetation.
It turns out it was all wrong, but don't expect any apologies, or even changes in the law.
From the SMH:
Full articlceHigher rainfall holds key to salinity
Ben Cubby Environment Reporter
June 29, 2009CLIMATE and rainfall, not land-clearing, have emerged as the main drivers of salinity in south-eastern Australia, in a study that could overturn decades of research.
By studying historical records for thousands of water bores across NSW, researchers from the NSW Department of Environment and Climate Change and the University of NSW have shown that salinity is traceable to rising groundwater levels.
This means that the salinity crisis that threatened thousands of farms in the 1980s and '90s is now in retreat as the land dries out as a result of drought and climate change. Higher groundwater levels mean more water interacts with friable, sandy soil and forms the crust of salt that can accelerate erosion and destroy agricultural productivity.
"The mistake we made in the past was to assume that the kind of rainfall we were seeing from the middle of the 20th century was normal, whereas it was actually quite wet by historical standards," said Professor Ian Acworth, a University of NSW hydrologist who worked with the environment department researcher Aleksandra Rancic.
Long-term rainfall variability, separate from human-induced climate change, is expected to mean that slightly drier conditions will up to the middle of the century, followed by another period of higher average rainfall.
"Dry land salinity is not going to be a problem as much in the first half of this century than it was in the last half of the previous century," Professor Acworth said.
Thursday, 25. June 2009, 01:23:01
One of the distracting polarizations under which we've been laboring over recent decades is typically framed like this: big government versus big business. There are a thousand ironies in this. Those against big government are generally for big military, which is government working with taxes and weapons instead of taxes and laws. Those against big business generally depend on it for campaign donations.
But there's a deeper irony: what if big usually means unaccountable, and what if big and unaccountable are inherent to our problems? 
I think it was Rick Warren who said, "Bigger isn't better and smaller isn't better. Better is better."
Sunday, 21. June 2009, 23:29:57
Thursday, 18. June 2009, 11:57:18
From "Breaking Christian News":
Only Reaffirmation of Marriage Can Mend Britain's Broken Family Structure
Teresa Neumann (June 18, 2009)
"There is no quick-fix solution, although the reaffirmation of marriage as the gold standard would be a start: statistically, it has proved to be the most enduring relationship, and the best environment for children."
(United Kingdom)—
UK newspapers are buzzing this week with statements from Justice Paul Coleridge who claims that only marriage can mend "broken Britain."
The sensation his stand is causing in Britain may not get much airtime in the U.S., but Breaking Christian News is here to see you read about it.
Listing a litany of statistics regarding children from broken homes, The Daily Mail quoted Coleridge as saying marriage should be promoted by the government to end the "social anarchy of family breakdown."
Coleridge also said mothers and fathers "who fail to commit to each other [are] engaging in a game of 'pass the partner' that has left millions of children scarred for life."
The Telegraph U.K. ran a commentary by Coleridge which read, in part:
"There is a tendency, especially among the chattering classes, to assume that we have attained a social utopia, in which we are entirely and happily free from taboos, stigmas and other constraints on behaviour. It sounds so beguiling: let us all do what we want, when we want and sort out any mess as we go along.
"But surely the test of any social change is whether it enhances people's lives or makes them more miserable. And this is where I take issue with the modern view of the family. If it is so successful, why are the statistics for separation so large? More significantly, why are the family courts overwhelmed with cases involving damaged, miserable or disturbed children? How do other children, caught up in less serious separations, really feel? Do they relish the endless changes of partner, or adapting to a new step-parent and step-siblings?
"In the end, however," concludes Coleridge, "it is the behaviour of individuals that has driven us here, and it is only changes in behaviour that can make a radical difference. The time has come for a major examination of all the issues surrounding family life, so that we can stand back and remould our behavior for the benefit of us all—especially our children."
God bless you, Justice Coleridge.
Source: Paul Coleridge - The Telegraph U.K.
Tuesday, 16. June 2009, 01:33:45
This is, in fact, what you get when a society abandons the concept od responsibility for self-determined rights.
From the SMH:
Father 'beside himself' as 12-year-old daughter falls pregnantThe Department of Community Services says it could have looked closer at the case of a 12-year-old, now pregnant and set to become one of NSW's youngest mothers, but it had to deal with more urgent cases.
The girl's mother let the child's older boyfriend move into their home when she was 11, and reportedly allowed the two to sleep in the same bed. When the girl's father, who was separated from her mother, found out about this he pleaded with DoCS staff to do something but they failed to act, Dubbo MP Dawn Fardell said.
He took custody of his daughter in March after his ex-wife was placed in a mental health unit, which was when he discovered she was pregnant, Ms Fardell told NSW Parliament in March.
Father 'beside himself' as 12-year-old daughter falls pregnant
Thursday, 11. June 2009, 23:42:21
One woman's incredible story:
It was 2 years ago this month that I was sitting in a chair looking at my unborn baby in 4D. She was precious! We had previously found out that our baby had several “markers” for down syndrome and had enlarged kidneys which may have required surgery upon birth. Thus we were monitored more carefully and had a ton more ultrasound shots at a hospital. This was the first level 3 ultrasound with this pregnancy (I had had one with my 3rd with no problems). I got to gaze upon my baby for almost a full hour – it was wonderful! I was there alone as my husband was out of town. The specialist doctor called me in after the ultrasound to go over the findings. The first words out of his mouth to me were “Well you will have to come in tomorrow for your abortion because of how far along you are.” I was utterly shocked and devastated. All I could do was mutter “What??????” He then proceeded to tell me that my baby had more “markers” for down syndrome and it didn’t look good. I was more shocked that his automatic assumption was that I would abort my baby. I almost couldn’t comprehend what he was telling me in that office . . .
I decided against the amnio to find out for sure and thus my pregnancy went on not knowing whether or not I was going to have a baby with down syndrome. For me at that point the risk of miscarriage outweighed the need to know. What I did do was to research as much as possible about down syndrome to prepare. What I found out is what I want to remember and never forget. I do not know what the implications of this knowledge will be for my life but I am confident that this ordeal was not an accident. I found that over 90% of babies that are diagnosed with down syndrome are aborted. Those words the doctor spoke to me were for a reason and out of his experience. This has chilled me to the bone. Another fact I found was that even if your baby is diagnosed with down syndrome there is no way to tell what function level the child will be at. Some children with down syndrome go on to graduate from high school and lead independent lives. Others will require continual care. The point is that they can not tell you what the function level of the child will be. Having a special needs child is hard. It is life changing. It alters the family in ways that are not predictable. But who are we to judge who lives and dies?
Our fourth daughter was born in August with no physical problems. Her kidneys were fine and she did not have down syndrome. What my heart went through in the months of not knowing I hope and pray will never leave me.
Thursday, 28. May 2009, 03:28:34
From the ABC:
An infectious disease expert says fears about the spread of swine flu are out of proportion to the threat posed by the disease, and people who are not showing symptoms do not need to be quarantined.
The number of cases in Australia is approaching 90 today, but Australian National University microbiologist Peter Collignon says the virus is no worse than annual influenza strains.
"I don't actually think this particular strain appears from the data ... to be worse than what we do predictably see every year," he said.
"My major concern about what's happening is the fear is out of proportion to what the data shows."
Professor Collignon says swine flu will inevitably spread around Australia this year, but there is no need to be alarmed. "It is actually similar to what's been circulating for the last 90 years - it is a H1N1 strain which was first introduced around 1918," he said. "And more importantly in the US in particular if you're over the age of 35 or 40 you have a very slight chance of catching it.
"It's people who are younger because they don't have immunity from getting those natural infections that seem more susceptible.
"The good news is they're not getting seriously ill either."
Swine flu fear 'out of proportion' - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)
Friday, 22. May 2009, 01:08:57
Salvos apologise to sex workers over ads
The Salvation Army has issued an apology to sex workers for its newspaper advertisement featuring the story of a prostitute that the charity helped.
A row broke out after the Australian Sex Workers' Association, the Scarlet Alliance, claimed the charity was capitalising on prostitution in its latest campaign.
The Red Shield Appeal advertisement details the story of 'Rick', a prostitute who left a message on a computer screen inside the Salvation Army's Oasis van.
"Disguised as a client, we picked him up, took him to the airport and flew him interstate to one of our rehab centres, miles away from the heroin and hustling," it says.
It says that months later, Rick is living a new life.
Scarlet Alliance President, Elena Jeffreys, said her organisation received many calls from upset sex workers who had seen the ad.
"(We) are angry that the Salvation Army is capitalising on discrimination against sex workers, when sex work is not their core work," she said.
The Salvation Army, which is preparing to doorknock for its annual Red Shield Appeal this weekend, says the story featured in the ad is genuine, but is sorry for any offence it may have caused.
Major Phillip Maxwell says the advertisment will now be pulled.
"The potential was that it could seriously damage the relationship that we have in providing services," he said.
"Our priority is to look after the needs of people and we gain nothing if we marginalise or distance ourselves from the very people we desire to serve."
Sex workers had been planning to protest at the Appeal's launch, unless the charity said sorry.
/QUOTE]
Thursday, 21. May 2009, 23:44:52
Swedish health authorities have ruled that gender-based abortion is not illegal according to current law and can not therefore be stopped, according to a report by Sveriges Television. The Local reported in February that a woman from Eskilstuna in southern Sweden had twice had abortions after finding out the gender of the childtheophiles.org - Sweden rules 'gender-based' abortion legal
Thursday, 14. May 2009, 06:32:52
Wednesday, 13. May 2009, 05:04:55
$2m lotto winner to buy new glasses
A legally blind Adelaide man is celebrating his $2 million lotto win after hearing about it on the radio.
SA Lotteries says the single father from Seaford in Adelaide's southern suburbs only checked his ticket after he heard on the radio about a mystery winner of the major prize having bought the ticket from a Seaford newsagency.
"I want to financially secure my children's future and then buy myself a new pair of glasses," he told lottery officials.
Despite being legally blind, the man says he will keep working hard in the business he part owns.
"I'll keep working, but might now hire someone to help me out."
Sunday, 10. May 2009, 05:11:04
The protagonists in today’s market of fear have forcefully sought to demonise flu as a threat to the world, as something that might even be turned into a weapon of mass destruction. The prestigious Massachusetts Institute of Technology now advertises a course on ‘Pandemics and Bioterrorism’. It claims that ‘swine flu is only the most recent of the challenges posed by threats of bioterrorism and global pandemics’. The casual manner in which the threat of bioterrorism is introduced into the discussion of swine flu, by one of the most respected scientific institutions in the world, provides disturbing evidence that fearmongering has become a respectable pastime and pursuit.
Today, fear entrepreneurs come in all shapes and sizes. Some are moral crusaders who genuinely believe that the very fabric of society is threatened by evil forces. At the other end of the spectrum are the salespeople and hustlers of the market of fear. It is useful to distinguish between the different species of scaremonger, so here is your ‘Guide To Spotting The Different Actors In The Dramatisation Of Fear’.
Thursday, 7. May 2009, 10:59:15
Monday, 4. May 2009, 01:13:19
River of Blood
I saw a river of blood forming in pools in judgment on the White House lawn, on the tarmac, and on the steps of the Supreme Court. This river of blood is the slain blood of the innocent, of the unborn. Even as God judged the gods of Egypt with blood, so he will judge America with blood. This river of blood will sweep over this nation until we confess our sin of sacrificing our unborn on the altar of materialism and convenience, and we confess that we have murdered the innocent. The cries of the blood of the slain innocent have reached the ears of God. The very ground is cursed because mothers and fathers have slain their unborn children. And the fruitful land will produce crops of thistles and thorns because of the curse of innocent blood is on this land. They scorned Life Himself and so shall reap death. As they caused the womb to be barren, so shall their fields be barren. I saw another river of blood, the blood of Christ, rising up as a river that is beginning to break out of her banks and flood to overflow. Many who hold to a form of religion shall try to dam, dam, and dam again to stop the flow of this river of blood. They shall be swept away. Many, many, many will cry out to God repulsed by their sin, and the sins of this nation, and the blood of Jesus will flood over their souls and they shall find forgiveness, and cleansing, and wholeness under the cleansing fount of Calvary. Those that the enemy tried to “dam” by denying them the blood of Christ shall find healing and rest for their souls. As it was in Egypt, so shall it be in America. For some, the blood sacrificed to demon gods meant the angel of death will call. For others who take the blood of Christ, the blood shall mean LIFE! Chooses this day America for your God has roused Himself to deliver His people - and to smite His enemies. Which river of blood shall overflow you? That of the slain Lamb of God which takes away sin, or that of the slain innocent? Shall you be baptized in a river of blood that leads unto Life, or in a river of blood that leads unto death? Choose this day whom you will serve! As the gods of Egypt fell before the Lord, so shall the gods of America fall. And great shall be the deliverance of His people!
Two Rivers of Blood on America :: Sheeptrax Xpress Monday, 4. May 2009, 00:00:16
Empire building to blame?
THE World Health Organisation has “cried wolf”’ over swine flu, a leading US researcher says. An expert in epidemiology from Stanford University, Shelley Salpeter, said that recent changes in the World Health Organisation’s influenza pandemic guidelines had exaggerated the risks of swine flu, which has infected fewer people than normal strains of influenza.
A World Health Organisation representative confirmed that, following the avian flu outbreak of 2003, the threshold for pandemic alerts was lowered so people would be better prepared for a serious outbreak… Under the new guidelines, the WHO moves to its second-highest alert level if two countries in a global region reported human-to-human transmission of the disease… But a WHO spokesman admitted that under the guidelines many normal strains of flu would also be “pandemics”.
This has been like the great global warming scare pushed by the IPCC, another UN agency, but mercifully played out much, much faster.
Wednesday, 29. April 2009, 02:09:59
The Truth Delusion of Richard Dawkins
Tuesday, 28th April 2009
The most famous atheist in the world, biologist Professor Richard Dawkins, poses as the arch-apostle of reason, a scientist who stands for empirical truth in opposition to obscurantism and lies. What follows suggests that in fact he is sloppy and cavalier with both facts and reasoning to a disturbing degree.
I previously wrote about the remarkable debate (which can be seen at this website) between Dawkins and John Lennox, Professor of Mathematics and Fellow in the Philosophy of Science at Oxford. Lennox is the author of God’s Undertaker: Has Science Buried God? which demolishes Dawkins by showing not only that there is no inherent conflict between science and faith but that the argument for faith is now being bolstered enormously by the remarkable developments in science. Dawkins was on the back foot because Lennox was attacking him from his own platform of science. He was on safer ground only when, in a further debate between the two at Oxford’s Natural History Museum last October, he attacked Lennox for his Christian faith which he could more easily ridicule. But to Lennox’s core arguments, he seemed to me to have no convincing response.
Showing posts 1 - 20 of 221.
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
| 29 | 30 | |||||