Chevrons
Wednesday, 29. April 2009, 18:55:35
“Chevron dunes are not formed by wind. Chevron dunes are not oriented in the direction of the prevailing wind, they can form where there are no beaches, and they contain grains larger than 2 mm in diameter. Chevrons are produced by megatsunamis originating from point sources, i.e. landslides, impact craters, and volcanic explosions.”
I am quoting an abstract by Dallas Abbott et. al for the Philadelphia Annual Meeting 22–25 October 2006. Actually I wrote a post about chevron dunes in 2006, and I remember that other bloggers from the geoblogosphere pursued this topic as well. Hindered Settling returned to the topic of ‘megatsunami chevrons’ in 2008, referring to the January 2008 issue of GSA Today, where there is a short paper by Pinter and Ishman of Southern Illinois University, entitled "Impacts, mega-tsunami, and other extraordinary claims".
As late as at the IGC meeting in Oslo 2008, Gusiakov stated in his abstract (with Dallas Abbott as one of his coauthors) that:
“The allied problem to these climate affecting impacts is the problem of origin of chevron dunes that are V-shaped dunes widely developed in many parts of Indian Ocean coastline and in the Gulf of Carpentaria. Although some propose a wind-blown origin we have evidence in favor of their mega-tsunami formation. In southern Madagascar we have documented evidence for oceanic water run-up reaching 205 m with in-land penetration up to 45 km that is far beyond the run-ups of any historical tsunami. In the field study of these chevrons we found a number of features that are inconsistent with their wind-blown genesis, but well explained by flooding resulted from mega-tsunami waves coming from the areas with proposed crater candidates.”
“Nonsense’ is what University of Washington geologist and tsunami expert Jody Bourgeois now calls the thought that so-called "chevrons," large U- or V-shaped formations found in some of the world's coastal areas, are evidence of megatsunamis caused by asteroids or comets slamming into the ocean. In a paper in the May issue of Geology, Bourgeois and Weiss, an assistant professor of geology at Texas A&M University, conclude that "the extraordinary claim of 'chevron' genesis by megatsunamis cannot withstand simple but rigorous testing."
I have one small remark: Bourgeois and Weiss seem to have based their findings mainly on Google Earth to get close-up looks at chevrons in different locations. I find Google Earth a fantastic tool, but would like to hear more about evidence from the field, after all that is where real geology work originates. Is the answer blowing in the wind? I expect the discussions over the origin of chevron dunes to continue.
• http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/04/090429091637.htm
• http://uwnews.washington.edu/ni/article.asp?articleID=49190
• http://gsa.confex.com/gsa/2006AM/finalprogram/abstract_114274.htm
• http://www.redorbit.com/news/science/1679408/chevrons_are_not_evidence_of_megatsunamis/index.html?source=r_science
http://my.opera.com/nielsol/blog/2006/11/15/asteroid-impacts-tsunamis-and-chevron























