Skip navigation.

olelog

What on earth

Late Cretaceous Anoxic Event

, , ,

Oceanic anoxic events or Anoxic events occur when the Earth's oceans become completely depleted of oxygen (O2) below the surface levels.

Detailed stratigraphic studies of Cretaceous black shales from many parts of the world have indicated that two Oceanic Anoxic Events were particularly significant in terms of their impact, one in the early Aptian (~120 Ma), sometimes called the Selli Event (or OAE 1a) after the Italian geologist, Raimondo Selli (1916–1983), and another at the Cenomanian–Turonian boundary (~93 million years ago), sometimes called the Bonarelli Event (or OAE 2) after the Italian geologist, Guido Bonarelli (1871–1951).

OAE2 was the big one. It was the most global, the most dramatic of a half-dozen OAEs during the exceptional warmth of the mid-Cretaceous period 120 million to 80 million years ago. The young Atlantic Ocean was as narrow as a few hundred kilometers, the sea ran free between Europe and Africa and into the western Pacific, and high sea levels drove the ocean up onto the continents.

Palm trees grew in what would be Alaska, large reptiles roamed in northern Canada and the ice-free Arctic Ocean warmed to the equivalent of a tepid swimming pool. But the depths of the ocean suddenly became starved of oxygen, wiping out swathes of marine life - a mass extinction. The sea floor around the globe became a lethal black ooze, that much later turned into black shale and partly transformed into oil.

After the extinction, levels of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere dropped and Earth lurched into a sudden, but short-lived, period of cooling. What was the cause of this extraordinary event? Palaeoceanographers looking for triggers of OAEs, especially OAE2, have long turned their attention to large volcanic eruptions. A shift in lead isotopes recorded at the very onset of OAE2 in Italy supported that idea (Science, 27 April 2007, p. 527 - Humongous Eruptions Linked to Dramatic Environmental Changes), but the evidence remained regional in scale.

In the journal Nature of 16 July 2008, palaeoceanographers report geographically broad-based isotopic evidence for a volcano-OAE2 link. They measured the element osmium (a rare metal) in sediments across OAE2 from Italy—which was in the Tethys seaway between Europe and Africa at the time—and just off northeast South America, which was then in the opening Atlantic. At both sites, they found that the ratio of osmium-187 to osmium-188 dropped dramatically just before the extinction event. The drop indicates that a huge amount of molten magma, carrying a higher proportion of the heavier isotope, was discharged into the oceans.

During that time period, the only volcanic site large enough to spew forth the necessary amount of magma in a few hundred of thousand years was a known volcanic plateau underneath the modern-day Caribbean. However, the researchers say that the huge lava flows thought to have been involved (and forming the bed of the present-day Caribbean) would have preceded the extinction by up to 23,000 years.

Next big question: what caused the huge eruption in the first place?

References
Turgeon, S. C. & Creaser, R. A. Nature 454, 323–326 (2008)
Kerr, Caribbean Megaeruptions Drove a Global Ocean Crisis, Science of 18 july 2008, p. 327.

http://www.physorg.com/news135432196.html
http://www.terradaily.com/reports/Death_in_the_deep_Volcanoes_blamed_for_mass_extinction_999.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7510541.stm
http://www.nature.com/news/2008/080716/full/news.2008.957.html



Rodinia Supercontinent Jigsaw PuzzleGulf Stream born 3 million years ago?

Comments

galanga 19. July 2008, 22:30

OAE2 sea wasn't a great tourist spot at that time I guess...

I don't clearly understand the last sentence :

However, the researchers say that the huge lava flows thought to have been involved [...] would have preceded the extinction by up to 23,000 years.



Does it mean that "23,000 years" is too much to have a possible link of cause to consequence between the lava flows and the Oceanic anoxic event, or is it enough short from the point of view of geologic times to make this hypothesis acceptable ?

nielsol 20. July 2008, 07:03

There are dating uncertainties (after all 93.5 million years is a long time), and it's not entirely clear how a massive eruption of this sort actually depletes the ocean's oxygen and thereby how long afterwards you may expect the effects. Furthermore the eruptions would have been going on over a relativey long period (how long is another question?)

So, YES, it is short enough from the point of view of geologic times to make this hypothesis acceptable.

Ole

galanga 20. July 2008, 08:23

Thank you for your answer !

Write a comment

You must be logged in to write a comment. If you're not a registered member, please sign up.

Download Opera, the fastest and most secure browser
November 2009
M T W T F S S
October 2009December 2009
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30