Skip navigation.

olelog

What on earth

Posts tagged with "carbon cycle"

Arctic (Still ! ) Traps 25 % of World’s Carbon

, ,

The arctic could potentially alter the Earth’s climate by becoming a possible source of global atmospheric carbon dioxide. The arctic now traps or absorbs up to 25 percent of this gas but climate change could alter that amount, according to a study published in the November issue of Ecological Monographs.

Carbon generally enters the oceans and land masses of the Arctic from the atmosphere and largely accumulates in permafrost. Unlike active soils, permafrost does not decompose its carbon; thus, the carbon becomes trapped in the frozen soil. Cold conditions at the surface have also slowed the rate of organic matter decomposition, allowing Arctic carbon accumulation to exceed its release. But recent warming trends could change this balance. Warmer temperatures can accelerate the rate of surface organic matter decomposition, releasing more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. Of greater concern is that the permafrost has begun to thaw, exposing previously frozen soil to decomposition and erosion. These changes could reverse the historical role of the Arctic as a sink for carbon dioxide.

Within a few decades, the thawing permafrost could also result in a more waterlogged Arctic, a situation that could encourage the activity of methane-producing organisms. Currently, the Arctic is a substantial source of methane to the atmosphere: as much as 50 million tons of methane are released per year, in comparison to the 400 million tons of carbon dioxide the Arctic stores yearly. But methane is a very potent greenhouse gas – about 23 times more effective at trapping heat than carbon dioxide on a 100-year time scale. If the release of Arctic methane accelerates, global warming could increase at much faster rates.


Capture: This figure shows the mean extent of permafrost in the Arctic, estimated for (a) the years 1990-2000 and (b) the years 2090-2100. In (c), the estimation of loss of permafrost by 2100 is overlaid on estimations for the year 2000.
Credit: A. David McGuire


Reference:
McGuire et al. 2009.
Sensitivity of the carbon cycle in the Arctic to climate change.
November 2009, Ecological Monographs. (Vol. 79, No. 4, pp. 523-555)
doi: 10.1890/08-2025.1
Open Access





Academics

A Fishy Carbon Cycle

, , , ...

The oceans play an important role (together with land plants) in taking up carbon dioxide (CO2) that has been emitted into the atmosphere. Understanding these uptake mechanisms is important in forecasting the rise of atmospheric CO2 because even though plants and bodies of water now absorb surplus greenhouse gas, they could become new trouble spots.

The following simplified carbon cycle box model is meant to illustrate the carbon emissions of human origin and the fact that vegetation and oceans for the time being serve as sinks for surplus carbon.


I hope I have got the sums right, but they are only meant to be indicative.

A paper published in the journal Science of 16 January 2009 highlights how little in fact is known about some aspects of the marine carbon cycle, which is undergoing rapid change as a result of global CO2 emissions.

Production of calcium carbonate in the ocean is generally attributed to plankton. It is less widely known that all marine bony fish (teleosts) produce and excrete carbonate. Bony fish includes 90 percent of marine fish species. “Gut rocks”, i.e carbonate precipitates, are excreted by bony fish via the guts (intestine) as a by-product of their osmosis regulation. the “gut rocks” are produced whether or not fish are feeding

The blood of fish has a higher water concentration than the surrounding sea water. As sea water passes over the gill membranes, water diffuse out of the blood into the sea water by osmosis. To replace the water they constantly lose by osmosis, they must continuously drink calcium- and magnesium-rich sea-water. Drinking sea water brings a large quantity of salt into the blood and this has to be removed.

The “gut rocks” are excreted at high rates. Based on estimates of global fish biomass the authors suggest that marine fish contribute 3 to 15% of total oceanic carbonate production, which means that fish are a major but previously unrecognized source of oceanic carbonate and contribute substantially to the marine inorganic carbon cycle.

The fish poop carbonate is soluble and dissolves in the upper sea water. Less soluble carbonates, produced by plankton, are more likely to sink further and become locked up in sediments.

The increase in carbon dioxide in the atmosphere not only drives global warming, but also raises the amount of CO2 dissolved in ocean water, tending to make it more acid, potentially a threat to sea life. The uptake of carbon dioxide into the carbonate of fish “gut rocks” (and into planktonic shells) may to a certain degree neutralise this acidification.

Calcium carbonate (CaCO3) is alkaline. Alkaline is the opposite of acid. Solutions with a pH below 7.0 is considered acid, while solutions with a pH above 7.0 is considered alkaline.

I wonder if the fish “gut rocks” - in spite of the high solubility - have any implications for carbonate sedimentation?

References:
Contribution of Fish to the Marine Inorganic Carbon Cycle
by Wilson et al.
in
Science 16 January 2009:
Vol. 323. no. 5912, pp. 359 - 362
DOI: 10.1126/science.1157972

http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/short/323/5912/343
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/323/5912/359
http://fe13.story.media.ac4.yahoo.com/news/us/story/ap/20090115/ap_on_sc/sci_fish_poop
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2009-01/uomr-fms011609.php
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/01/090115164607.htm

See also http://www.seeddaily.com/reports/First_Ever_Estimate_Of_Worldwide_Fish_Biomass_And_Impact_On_Climate_Change_999.html on First-Ever Estimate Of Worldwide Fish Biomass And Impact On Climate Change


Subscribe to olelog by Email

Forgotten Link in Carbon Cycle

,

It turns out that microorganisms in rivers and streams play a crucial role in the global carbon cycle. Microorganisms such as bacteria and single celled algae in rivers and streams decompose organic matter as it flows downstream. They convert the carbon it contains into carbon dioxide, which is then released to the atmosphere. Recent estimates conclude there is a net flux, or outgassing, of carbon dioxide from the world's rivers and streams to the atmosphere of at least two-thirds to three-quarters of a gigatonne (Gt) of carbon per year. This flux has not been taken into account in the models of the global carbon cycle used to predict climate change.

For comparison I bring a diagram of the carbon cycle taken from Wikipedia. It shows sinks measured in Gt and fluxes measured in Gt per year. Rivers are pictured, but there are no data for the rivers. This is symptomatic.


Surface water drainage networks perfuse and integrate the landscape, across the whole planet, but they are missing from all global carbon cycling reports, even from the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). The latest estimates of how much carbon is transferred to the atmosphere from rivers and streams are probably too conservative. According to research presented at the "Complex Systems: Water and Life" Frontiers of Science conference, organized by the European Science Foundation (ESF) and COST, 29-31 October 2008, Taormina, Sicily, the actual outgassing of carbon dioxide is probably closer to 2 Gt of carbon per year.

Two gigatonnes of carbon per year is close to half the estimated net primary production of the world's vegetation each year. Realising that this quantity of carbon may be delivered straight back to the atmosphere, rather than being taken to the ocean where some of it is removed by marine organisms and ends up in sediment, could have profound consequences for our understanding of the (carbon) system.

We need as many accurate elements as possible to approve the accuracy of current climate models in predicting future levels of global warming - carbon flux from rivers to the atmosphere could be one such item.

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-12/esf-rac120108.php
http://www.physorg.com/news147358157.html




It is all Greek to me!

, ,

Or, we are what we eat!

78 % (or more correctly 78.08%) of the air that we breathe is nitrogen, a colourless gas that we just do not see (or taste for that matter). Well not just nitrogen with the chemical formula N, but rather N2 (gaseous nitrogen or nitrogen gas) - just like the oxygen that we breathe is O2 and not O, not to mention O3, ozone, which is extremely toxic.

In French nitrogen is called azote. An older word was diazote, and maybe a better word for nitrogen gas, because nitrogen gas consists of two nitrogen atoms.

In ecology there is a lot of talk about trophic levels. Trophic is derived from the Greek word trophe, which more or less means food or nourishment.

Where am I getting? Well, yesterday I read an interesting article titled: Amazon River enhances diazotrophy and carbon sequestration in the tropical North Atlantic Ocean. What a mouthful! Getting on from (French) diazote and (Greek) trophe we might conclude that diazotrophic organisms eat nitrogen. And indeed diazotrophic bacteria (also called diazotrophs) are bacteria that use nitrogen gas to obtain (metabolic) energy - they fix nitrogen gas, meaning that they convert it into nitrogen compounds (such as ammonia, nitrate and nitrogen dioxide) useful as nutrients for other organisms (for the grass on my lawn for instance) - normally N2 is not usable for living organisms, except of course for diazotrophic organisms.

New nitrogen provided by marine diazotrophs increases the availability of fixed nitrogen in the ocean and leads to carbon sequestration.

So - the fresh water discharged by the Amazon is transported hundreds to thousands of kilometers away from the coast by surface plumes. The nutrients delivered by these river plumes contribute to enhanced primary production in the ocean, and the sinking flux of this new production results in carbon sequestration. The Amazon River plume supports N2 fixation far from the mouth and provides important pathways for sequestration of atmospheric CO2 in the western tropical North Atlantic - in other words:
Amazon River enhances nitrogen fixation and the carbon sink in the tropical North Atlantic Ocean according to an open access article by Subramaiam et al. in PNAS of 29 July 2008
http://www.pnas.org/content/105/30/10460

If you are still hungry, I have some other nice words for you:
acidotrophic, allotrophic, amphitrophic, autotrophic, biotrophic, chemoautotrophic, chemolithotrophic, chemoorganotrophic, dermatotrophic, ectendotrophic, ectotrophic, haemotrophic, heterotrophic, holotrophic, hypotrophic, lecithotrophic, lithotrophic, mesotrophic, metatrophic, minerotrophic, mixotrophic, monotrophic, mycotrophic, myrmecotrophic, myxotrophic, oligotrophic. ombrotrophic, organotrophic, osmotrophic, paratrophic, phagotrophic, phototrophic. photoautotrophic, photolithotrophic, planktotrophic, polytrophic, prototrophic. pseudotrophic, rheotrophic, saprotrophic, symbiotrophic, syntrophic, zootrophic

Try and guess what they all mean :wink: - bon appetit!

Geologists are probably lithophile, but are they also lithotrophic?



Download Opera, the fastest and most secure browser
December 2009
M T W T F S S
November 2009January 2010
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31