olelog

What on earth

Subscribe to RSS feed

Posts tagged with "earthquakes"

Earthquake in Japan

,

A strong earthquake with a preliminary magnitude of 7.4 has struck in the Pacific Ocean off southern Japan, at the Izu-Bonin Trench where the Pacific plate is subducting beneath the Philippine Sea Plate.





Japan's Meteorological Agency issued a tsunami alert of up to 2 m for nearby islands and warnings of milder tsunami for the southern coasts on the main Japanese island. A minor swelling of waves of about 30 cm was observed on the island's shorelines about 40 minutes after the quake, the agency said. Japan later downgraded the alert to a warning of small waves.





Academics

Indonesian Tsunami

, ,

At 21:42 p.m. local time on October 25, 2010, a 7.7 magnitude earthquake occurred off the coast of Indonesia. The quake struck 20.6 km below the floor of the ocean, spawning a 3 m high tsunami on Pagai Island. News reports have told of more than 300 casualties with around 400 people still missing at the time of writing. Hundreds of wooden and bamboo homes were washed away on the island of Pagai, with water flooding crops and roads up to 600 m inland. In Muntei Baru, a village on Silabu island, 80 percent of the houses were badly damaged.



The earthquake occurred as a result of thrust faulting on or near the subduction interface plate boundary between the Australia and Sunda plates. At the location of this earthquake, the Australia Plate move north-northeast with respect to the Sunda plate at a velocity of approximately 57-69 mm/yr. On the basis of the currently available fault mechanism information (see “beach ball”) and earthquake depth it is likely that this earthquake occurred along the plate interface. The subduction zone adjacent to the region of this event last slipped during the Mw 8.5 and 7.9 earthquakes of September 2007, and the new event appears to have occurred near the rupture zones of those earthquakes. Today's earthquake is the latest in a sequence of large ruptures along the Sunda megathrust, including a M 9.1 earthquake that ruptured to within 800 km north of this earthquake in 2004; a M 8.6 700 km to the north between Nias and Simeulue in 2005; and a M 7.5 300 km to the north near Padang in 2009. The new earthquake occurred near the southern edge of a Mw 8.7-8.9 rupture in 1797 and within the rupture area of a Mw 8.9-9.1 earthquake in 1833.

This NASA image above shows the region where the earthquake and numerous aftershocks occurred on October 25 and 26, 2010. Bathymetry appears in shades of blue, and topography appears in shades of brown. Thin black lines delineate coastlines, and a thick black line marks the fault line in this region. The epicenter of the 7.7-magnitude earthquake appears as a red star. Aftershocks appear as red circles, with bigger circles indicating stronger aftershocks.

On my diagram below the area of the recent larger earthquakes is (approximately) shown in blue.



Further information at Dave’s Landslide Blog: http://daveslandslideblog.blogspot.com/2010/10/mantawai-islands-tsunami-and-eruption.html
If you read Italian Aldo Piombino has written a good account here: http://aldopiombino.blogspot.com/2010/10/il-terremoto-e-lo-tsunami-del-25.html



In Danish:
http://ing.dk/artikel/113327-indonesiens-ulykke-skyldes-efterskaelv-fra-kaempe-tsunami-i-2004



Academics

Saudi Eruption that Never was

, , ,

More than a year ago some mysterious earthquakes in Saudi Arabia were discussed in the Geoblogosphere, a.o. by Ralph Harrington and Erik Klemetti. In the meantime they have been the topic of a paper published in the journal Nature Geoscience.

Both geobloggers have of course duly commented the new findings here and here, which makes my job easy - just read their blogs, and you are up to date, that is what I highly recommend.

Nevertheless just briefly this:
In 2009 (between April and June), more than 30,000 earthquakes struck an ancient lava field in Saudi Arabia - the extensive Harrat Lunayyir lava province formed during the past 30 million years in response to Red Sea rifting and mantle upwelling. The area was so far regarded as seismically quiet.

The Red Sea rifting pushed the African and Arabian tectonic plates apart, and the rifting is still going on, so that within many million years the two continents will have a large oceans between them.

Here is a Google situation map:


Location of Harrat Lunayyir: Latitude: 25.17°N * Longitude: 37.75°E (if the map shouldn’t turn up!)

The authors used geologic, geodetic and seismic data to show that the earthquake swarm resulted from magmatic dyke intrusion. They documented a surface fault rupture that is 8 km long with 91 cm of offset. This deformation is best modelled by the shallow intrusion of a north-west trending dyke that is about 10 km long. Sensors show that magma has risen to roughly 2 km below the surface of the Earth, and eruptions remain possible. Rather than extension being accommodated entirely by the central Red Sea rift axis, the authors suggest that the broad deformation observed in Harrat Lunayyir indicates that rift margins can remain as active sites of extension throughout rifting. Their analyses allowed them to forecast the likelihood of a future eruption or large earthquake in the region.

The lava field of Harrat Lunayyir is part of a "lava province" roughly 180,000 square kilometres in size. Harrat Lunayyir is a basaltic volcanic field east of the Red Sea port of Umm Lajj. It contains about 50 volcanic cones. The hazard from these volcanoes is low, given the remoteness of the site and the type of eruption expected. Volcanic eruptions in Saudi Arabia are rare and only occur every few hundred years. According to contemporary accounts, the best known volcanic event in the region occurred in 1256, which sent flows of lava "like a red-blue boiling river" for 52 days into the holy city of Medina.





Academics

Zagros Mountains - Continued from Yesterday with New Earthquake of Today

,

Zagros Mountains - Continued from Yesterday with New Earthquake of Today

Apparently I wrote my post on the Zagros Fold Belt a day too early. Today the area was hit by a Mw 5.5 earthquake. The new earthquake seems to confirm some of what I wrote yesterday. It was shallow - depth 18 km. And it was a reverse fault, as it appears from the Body-Wave Moment Tensor Solution (“beach ball”).





As you can see on the USGS map the earthquake occurred in the Zagros Fold Belt roughly midway between the Main Zagros Reverse Fault (purple line) and the Persian Gulf.

Quoting Nadine McQuarrie (2004):

“Widely distributed earthquakes that are similar in magnitude (mb , 5–6), depth (11 +/- 4), and geometry (40–508 NE-dipping nodal planes) … combined with preserved sedimentary cover rocks with thickness ranges of 6–15 km …, have lead to a deformation model comprising distributed basement shortening in conjunction with, but decoupled from, folding of sedimentary cover rocks …. Although crustal earthquakes in the Zagros fold–thrust belt may lie at the basement/cover interface where the stratigraphic sequence is undeformed, with gradual tectonic thickening of the deformed strata towards the hinterland, these earthquakes could potentially fall well above the basement cover interface within most of the orogen.”







Academics

Zagros Mountains, Iran

, , ,

Much has been written and said about the Zagros Fold Belt in Iran, not least because the Zagros fold and thrust belt region is known as a major petroleum source. It is however an area with a complex geology and geologic history with many secrets still uncovered. I would exaggerate, if I said that a recent study published in the October 2010 issue of the journal Basin Research has added much to our knowledge about the area, but that is the way science usually works, adding bits and pieces to get a better overall picture. The paper won’t reach the front page of any newspaper, but that doesn’t mean that it is not important, and the thermocronological approach is interesting. The study (“Insights in the exhumation history of the NW Zagros from bedrock and detrital apatite fission-track analysis: evidence for a long-lived orogeny”) has mainly evidenced that the Zagros orogeny was long-lived and multiepisodic, implying that the timing of accretion of the different tectonic domains that form the Zagros Mountains requires cautious interpretation.



The Zagros Fold Belt extends for approximately 1,500 km in length and borders Iran to the southwest along the eastern edge of the Persian Gulf.



The mountains (or Fold-Thrust Belt) were formed by collision of the Eurasian and Arabian tectonic plates. Recent GPS measurements in Iran have shown that this collision is still active. A relatively dense GPS network which covered the Zagros in the Iranian part also proves a high rate of deformation within the Zagros. The GPS results show that the current rate of shortening in SE Zagros is ~10 mm/yr and ~5mm/yr in the NW Zagros.



The activity manifests itself in plenty of earthquakes. A historical seismicity map from USGS shows that these are generally relatively shallow.



Earthquakes are spread over the whole with of 200 km of the Zagros Fold Belt. They mostly have estimated depths that range from 8 to 13 km, and surprisingly enough do not show any real tendency to deepen towards the Main Zagros Thrust (often depicted as an active subduction zone).- actually most of the earthquakes may have occurred in the overriding sediments and not in the basement.



Brief description of possible tectonic evolution:

Prior to the collision between the Arabian and Eurasian continents the Neo-Nethyan oceanic basin rifted apart an Iranian microcontinent from the rest of the Southwest Iran. The separation of Arabia from Africa and its subsequent collision with Eurasia was the last of a series of separation/collision events, all of which combined create the extensive Alpine–Himalayan orogenic system. This continental breakup began in Northwestern Iran during the Permian to Triassic time period, but began later in the Sanadaj-Sirjan Zone during the Late Triassic. (The Sanadaj–Sirjan zone, on the North East side of the thrust zone), is a region of polyphase deformation, the latest reflecting the collision of Arabia and Eurasia and the subsequent southward propagation of the fold–thrust belt). The Arabian plate then began to converge closer to the Eurasian continent, possibly due to the rifting apart of the Arabian continent from Africa at the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden. The Arabian continent began to subduct below the Eurasian continent beginning in the Late Jurassic. Following the time of subduction (80-95 million years ago), ophiolites were possibly generated from island arc collisions with the Arabian passive margin and placed on the edge of the Arabian continent at the end of the Cretaceous. During the continental collision, these ophiolites formed along the suture. Another deformation event took place at the Eocene as subsequent ocean crust was placed on the Arabian margin and then folded. Gabbroic intrusions were then placed approximately 40-38 million years ago and intruded the Sanadaj-Sirjan Zone and folded Paleocene-Eocene volcanics. The complete late Cretaceous and Tertiary history of the collision is however still debated, because multiple collisions of small continental blocks and island arcs against the North East Arabian margin are recorded. The new study helps constrain the different cooling phases and denudation episodes.

References:
Homke et al.
Insights in the exhumation history of the NW Zagros from bedrock and detrital apatite fission-track analysis: evidence for a long-lived orogeny
BasinResearch (2010) 22, 659–680
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2117.2009.00431.x

Nadine McQuarrie
Crustal scale geometry of the Zagros fold–thrust belt, Iran
Journal of Structural Geology 26 (2004) 519–535

Mike Molnar
Tertiary Development of the Zagros Mountains
Geol 418 – Earth History

Useful links:


Continued in next post: http://my.opera.com/nielsol/blog/2010/09/27/zagros-mountains-continued-from-yesterday-with-new-earthquake-of-today



Academics


Earthquake in New Zealand - and “Beach Balls”

While I was having my evening meal, or dinner as most of you would probably call it, a large earthquake occurred in New Zealand (very early morning in New Zealand). Throughout the evening I followed the news about it via Twitter, where tweeps quickly came up with interesting links and other information. I am not going to write more about the earthquake itself and the tectonic setting. Highlyallochtonous has already done this in a brilliant way, DO read his post.

The earthquake however gave me an opportunity to try out my new piece of FREE software for my MAC, OSXGeoCalc, with which I can draw stereonets. Stereographic projections on a stereonet is a way of picturing three-dimensional features (spheres) on a two-dimensional plane. This technique is used within many different geological disciplines.

Within seismology the direction of slip and the orientation of the fault on which it occurs are three-dimensional. Their directions can be calculated from seismograms, and these so-called “focal mechanisms” can be displayed as what is popularly known as “beach balls”, which is in fact a stereographic projection.

Based on information from USGS (time of moment solution: 10/09/03 16:35:44.00 UTC) I made the following “beach ball”.



It looks slightly different from the “beach ball” at Higlyallochtonous, based on moment solution half a minute later (time: 10/09/03 16:36:14.29 UTC).

USGS has a very useful page on “beach balls” and focal mechanisms. Just looking at the “beach ball” (often seen on earthquake maps) you can distinguish between the different fault types (strike slip, normal, reverse). This was apparently strike-slip faulting.



PS: The earthquake may really have been three quakes which makes it a bit complex!



In Danish:




Academics

There is a Hole in the …

,

To-days story probably started (or at least brought forward to a greater public) by an article in Los Angeles Times of 18 July 2010. They wrote a.o.

“The Mogi doughnut hypothesis, developed by a Japanese seismologist, holds that earthquakes occur in a circular pattern over decades, building up to one very large temblor in the doughnut hole.”



In Terra Daily a day later they came up with this comment:

“A new earthquake theory suggests doughnut-shaped patterns of temblors build up over decades to a final large earthquake in the doughnut "hole," scientists say.”

The circular pattern theory, called a Mogi doughnut after the Japanese seismologist who proposed it, may lead to improved earthquake forecasts, the Los Angeles Times reported Sunday.”



To call it a “new theory” may not be quite correct as the Japanese seismologist K. Mogi suggested the idea back in 1969, which isn’t exactly last week.

The concept holds that earthquakes sometimes occur in a circular pattern over decades -- building to one very large quake in the doughnut hole. The idea behind the doughnut is relatively straightforward: Earthquakes in California are basically caused by tectonic movements in which the Pacific plate slides northwest relative to the North American plate. As the plates move, stress builds up along both sides of cracks in the Earth's crust, as if a giant sheet of peanut brittle were being shoved in two directions. Tectonic stress will first cause ruptures on the smaller faults, because they need less pressure before they break and thus produce small earthquakes. When they do rupture, the tectonic pressure gets transferred somewhere else, moving along like a crack in a windshield. Ultimately, the stress moves closer to bigger faults that need more pressure to erupt, thus creating larger and larger earthquakes until the "Big One" happens.

Take it for what it is: Just another unproven and not universally accepted hypothesis (and not even new). Why shouldn’t random earthquakes sometimes randomly create a certain recognisable pattern (circle, square, triangle …).





Academics

Indonesian Earthquake 2010 #2

, ,

Yet another strong earthquake has occurred in Indonesia (as I mentioned in my previous post) - in the same area as the boxing day quake (this time fortunately seemingly without any casualties!). This area is in many ways worth noticing. When we look at the earthquake location map we may notice a series of islands between the Sumatra coast and the Sunda Trench, here marked as a purple line indicating a subduction zone.

These islands are the top parts of an accretionary wedge, here made visible because they pop up above the sea level. Normally you won’t see anything of such an accretionary wedge, because it it hidden by the sea. They are sediments scraped off the top of the downgoing oceanic crustal plate (in this case the Australian Plate) during its subduction and appended to the edge of the continental plate (in this case the Sunda Plate).

Colour coding: Orange = volcanic arc and Asian continent. Light blue = shelf sea (Sunda/Eurasian plate). Purple = accretionary wedge. Green = islands within the accretion wedge area. Dark blue = Indian Ocean. Brown = oceanic crust of Australian plate. Yellow = oceanic lithosphere of Australian plate.

I have used the same colour code is my extremely simplified location map.

As the diagram of the accretionary wedge it is not to scale and out of any proportions.

The coldness of the subducting plate permits brittle failure, and thereby earthquakes, down to as much as about 700 km along the so called Benioff zone Earthquakes at depth between 500 and 800 km are marked as red dots on USGS earthquake maps). The Benioff Zone is defined as the active seismic zone in a subduction zone. Water escaping from the descending plate is probably the primary cause of volcanic activity at subduction zones, but whatever the reason melting of rocks take place and magma rises to form a magmatic or volcanic arc. Volcanoes at subduction zones can be extremely explosive like Krakatau. I have also marked the famous and in the past extremely destructive volcanoes Toba and Tambora in the volcanic arc formed by the subduction of the Australian plate beneath the Sunda Plate.

As the subducting plate slides beneath the upper plate, stress begins to build where the plates meet and the upper plate can deform to create a large structure called a forearc basin. With time this basin, a sort of a bowl-shaped depression, fills with sediment. It appears that the most severe subduction zone earthquakes occur in areas where such sediment-filled basins are found (like the earthquake that triggered the Boxing Day Tsunami in 2004).

Finally a couple of very instructive images from USGS:

First a historic seismicity map from Sumatra. (Red line = subduction zone) The star shows the 8.4 earthquake of 14 September 2007.



And then a cross section A-A'.



Here we can follow the Benioff zone as marked by historic earthquakes. Todays earthquake is in the “yellow zone” - at a depth between 35 and 70 km.

Obviously it is well worth keeping an eye on the extremely destructive forces at play at the Sunda Trench (also known as the Java Trench). The area is well studied, and it is an area where we can learn a lot about how subduction zones work. (Sorry if I have made it look too simple).

PS:
According to a post at the Dongeng Geology blog (in Indonesian) there is still a “seismic gap” to be filled off the coast of Sumatra - with an earthquake above the magnitude of 8.

I wish that either
a) I understood Indonesian
b) Machine translation worked better than they do (having worked as a translator for 30 years, I know why they don't!)

But for those who do understand Indonesian (or Malay may probably do) do read this interesting post.





Academics

New Indonesian Earthquake Magnitude 7.2

,

An earthquake of magnitude 7.2 has struck offshore near the Indonesian island of Sumatra, near Aceh province. The quake struck 214 km south of Aceh's capital of Banda Aceh. A local tsunami alert was issued and later lifted by the Pacific Tsunami Warning Center. The site is very near that of 2004's 9.2 magnitude earthquake.

In a later post today (I have to lave my computer now for a few hours) I intend to comment more on the tectonic setting of this earthquake. Just for now a tectonic summary from USGS:

“The northern Sumatra earthquake of May 9, 2010 occurred as a result of thrust faulting on or near the subduction interface plate boundary between the Australia-India and Sunda plates. At the location of this earthquake, the Australia and India Plates move north-northeast with respect to the Sunda plate at a velocity of approximately 60-65 mm/yr. On the basis of the currently available fault mechanism information and earthquake depth, it is likely that this earthquake occurred along the plate interface.
The subduction zone surrounding the immediate region of this event slipped during the devastating Mw 9.1 earthquake of December 2004, and today's event appears to have occurred within the rupture zone of that earthquake. Today's earthquake is the latest in a sequence of large ruptures along the Sunda megathrust, including a M 7.8 in April of this year, approximately 200 km to the south of today's event; two M 7.4 earthquakes beneath Simeulue approximately 100 km to the south in 2002 and 2008; a M 8.6 210 km to the south in 2005; a M 7.5 650 km to the south near Padang in 2009; and two events of M8.5 and M7.9 approximately 1000 km to the south in 2007.”







Academics

Mysterious Spanish Earthquake

, ,

Here is what USGS wrote about the M6.3 earthquake Monday, April 12, 2010 at 12:08:10 AM at epicentre (Location 37.078°N, 3.470°W = 25 km SE of Granada, Depth 616.7 km.

“The seismotectonics of the April 11, 2010 M6.3 Spanish earthquake is enigmatic, but the occurrence of deep earthquakes beneath this region of Spain are well-documented. The location of the April 11, 2010 M6.3 and it's unusual depth of 616 km suggests that it is related to the well-studied M7.1 deep Spanish earthquake of March 24, 1954. The epicenter of the 1954 earthquake, based on the distribution of ground shaking at the surface (macroseismicity) and limited instrumental recordings of the earthquake, is beneath the town of Dúrcal, 20 km south of Granada. Since the 1954 earthquake, a handful of small magnitude earthquakes (3 and smaller) have occurred in approximately the same location (Buforn et al., 1991). Southwest of the April 11, 2010 M6.3 earthquake in the area of the Alboran Sea, convergences of the African and Eurasian plates does produce a well-defined zone of small magnitude (M < 4) to depth of 200 km. Other than the localized zone of seismicity near 600 km depth, there are no known earthquakes between 200 km and 600 km depth.“



As far back as 1968 (Isacks et al. in J. Geophys. Res. 73: 5855-5899) explained the 1954 quake as an event occurring in a detached piece of the lithosphere which had been pulled away from its upper portion as a result of a large density contrast between the sinking part of the lithosphere and the surrounding mantle.

There was also a similar deep earthquake under South Spain on 8 March 1990.

Earthquakes like this are too deep to cause any damage.



Academics

July 2010
M T W T F S S
June 2010August 2010
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31