Skip navigation.

olelog

What on earth

Posts tagged with "gas"

Pockmarks in Spitsbergen Fjords

, ,

In my latest post I mentioned the open access to the Norwegian Journal of Geology. In this post I shall concentrate on a paper in their latest issue (2009 Volume 89 Nr. 1 & 2) - Pockmarks in Spitsbergen fjords.

Pockmarks are concave, crater-like features on the seafloor, generally up to several hundreds of meters in diameter and tens of meters in relief. ’Mega pockmarks’ can have diameters of more than 1.5 km and depths exceeding 150 m. The formation of pockmarks is mostly caused by the seepage of thermogenic and biogenic gases and the release of pore water. (For a discussion on biogenic versus thermogenic gas see a.o http://www.gaschem.com/determ.html ).

Forwick et al. have studied and analysed pockmarks in five selected fjords on Spitsbergen. I find that figure 8 in their paper summarises their findings quite well, so I have allowed myself to reproduce it below:



In short the pockmarks in question developed during the past ca. 11,300 years (that means after the last ice age or in other words in the Holocene), as the result of seepage of thermogenic gas and porewater. Factors controlling the distribution of pockmarks in these subpolar fjords include 1) tectonic lineaments, 2) the lithological composition and lateral outcrop of bedrock, 3) the orientation of glacial lineations and 4) exceptionally rapid deposition of debris lobes related to glacial surges.

I find it important to notice that the authors do not regard the melting of permafrost as an important factor contributing to the formation of pockmarks in Spitsbergen fjords, and they also exclude up-drifting ice detaching from the sub-seafloor as an important factor for the formation of pockmarks in the study area.

To recapitulate with reference to the figure: in general the gas is thermogenic and originating from organic-rich bedrock (4 on figure) - with pockmarks where these rocks crop out. The gas may also seep upwards through faults - with pockmarks along tectonic lineaments. Other pockmarks occur as strings in grooves of glacial lineations. More randomly orientated pockmarks occur where porewater migrate up through debris lobes (1 on figure).

Reference:
Matthias Forwick, Nicole J. Baeten & Tore O. Vorren
Pockmarks in Spitsbergen fjords
Norwegian Journal of Geology, 2009 Volume 89 Nr. 1 & 2.

I find the paper interesting on the background of the present discussion of increased release of methane in the Arctic Sea due to global warming - also “marketed” as the methane time bomb.

Here are a couple of links to articles in the media on respectively methane coming from reserves of methane hydrate beneath the sea bed and methane coming from thawing permafrost:





Academics

Environmental Risks Posed by Oil Activities Offshore Greenland

, , , ...

The National Environmental Research Institute of Denmark has released two reports on “a preliminary strategic environmental impact assessment of hydrocarbon activities” in the areas respectively west and east of northern Greenland. The background is that the Bureau of Minerals and Petroleum of the Greenland Home Rule wishes to open the Kanumas areas for invitations for tender for oil exploration and exploitation. The Kanumas areas include two large areas: Northwest and Northeast Greenland, north of 72°N. In response to these areas opening up for exploration and exploitation a program was initiated in 2007 to provide knowledge necessary to assess potential consequences of oil activities through a Strategic Environmental Assessment.

Kanumas is an acronym for the Kalaallit Nunaat Marine Seismic (KANUMAS) project. “Kalaallit Nunaat” is Greenlandish for "Land of the Greenlanders", i.e. greenland (also known as Kalaallisut).

The two reports are of more than 200 pages each and cover a wealth of information - too much for me to mention in one post. Fortunately the full reports in pdf can be downloaded via the links below.

The physical environment of the study area is briefly described with focus on oceanography and ice conditions. Sea ice and icebergs are present throughout the year, with the lowest concentrations in August and September. One of the most important physical features of the biological environment is the polynyas (ice-free or almost ice-free areas surrounded by sea ice). (I described polynyas here).

The environmentally most severe accident would be a large oil spill. This has the potential to impact the marine ecosystem on all levels. The recent oil and gas assessment by the Arctic Council working groups (AMAP 2007) concluded that the main issue of environmental concern for the marine Arctic environment is a large oil spill, which particularly in ice-covered waters represents a threat at the population and even species level. Furthermore, will the lack of adequate response methods in ice-covered waters and the remoteness and lack of infrastructure in most of the assessment area add to the severity of an oil spill. Accidental oil spills may occur either during drilling (blowouts) or from accidents when storing or transporting oil. Large oil spills are rare events today due to ever-improving technical solutions and Health, Safety & Environment Policies. However, the risk cannot be eliminated and in an area with the presence of sea ice and icebergs, the possibility of an accident will be elevated.

I may come back to some of the points in the two reports later. For now I will just show you a figure from the reports showing the ocean currents around Greenland. This figure is from report 719 covering the eastern part of the Kanumas (shown in yellow). A similar figure for the western part is found in report 720. Please notice the Greenland Sea Gyre south of Svalbard/Spitsbergen. I wrote more about gyres here and here.



http://www.dmu.dk/Udgivelser/Faglige+rapporter/700-749/Abstracts/FR_719_GB.htm
http://www.dmu.dk/Udgivelser/Faglige+rapporter/700-749/Abstracts/FR_720_GB.htm



AcademicsTop Blogs

Large Arctic Energy Reserves

, ,

The United States Geological Survey (USGS) has assessed the area north of the Arctic Circle and concluded that about 30% of the world's undiscovered gas, and 13% of its undiscovered oil, may be found north of the Arctic Circle. Undiscovered natural gas is three times more abundant than oil in the Arctic and is largely concentrated in Russia. Most of the oil is on the other hand located offshore Alaska. Advances in the technology of oil and gas recovery, as well as vanishing ice cover around the North Pole, make the Arctic an increasingly attractive region for energy.

Of the 6% of Earth’s surface encompassed by the Arctic Circle, one-third is above sea level and another third is in continental shelves beneath less than 500 m of water. The remainder consists of deep ocean basins historically covered by sea ice.

While global warming gradually melts away the sea ice in the Arctic Ocean, the oil and gas deposits buried in that inaccessible region are becoming a lot less theoretical to the five northern nations with claims to those riches, the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) is deeply worried over the development and says that Arctic governments and industry are still unprepared for oil spills. On occasion of the 20th anniversary of the Exxon Valdez on 24 March, WWF issued a report renewing its call for a time-out on new offshore oil development in the Arctic until technologies improve to ensure adequate clean-up of an oil spill.

http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/324/5931/1175
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2009/05/29/in-the-arctic-oil-gas-lottery-russia-looks-like-a-big-winner/
http://www.neurope.eu/articles/93749.php

In Norwegian:
http://www.tu.no/nyheter/article212007.ece

In Swedish:
http://www.sr.se/Ekot/artikel.asp?artikel=2866731



AcademicsTop Blogs



Download Opera, the fastest and most secure browser
October 2008
M T W T F S S
September 2008November 2008
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31