Skip navigation.

olelog

What on earth

Posts tagged with "impact craters"

Holocene Meteorite Impacts in Bavaria - or rather NOT ?

,

Robert Huber has started a new geoblog to focus on the impact mania currently going on in Bavaria - Chiemgau Impact ? It is (unfortunately for some of you) in German.

What is all the fuss about. I think that Wikipedia puts it quite well:

“Chiemgau impact crater refers to Lake Tüttensee, supposedly created by a Holocene meteorite impact near Lake Chiemsee and the foothills of the Alps in southeast Germany. The findings of a team of hobby-Archaeologists, calling themselves the CIRT (Chiemgau impact research team), has brought some controversy to the Geology and Archaeology community in Germany, but isn't accepted beyond the CIRT team today. The coordinates of Lake Tüttensee are 47°50′48″N 12°34′05″E / 47.846667°N 12.568056°E / 47.846667; 12.568056 (Lake Tüttensee). According to the hypothesis, the strewn field comprises more than 80 individual craters with diameters exceeding 3 m spread over an area of roughly 60 km x 30 km. After the discovery of the Chiemgau strewn field, much work has been done by the CIRT on the Lake Tüttensee crater and its surroundings comprising geological field work, geophysical measurements and petrographic analyses. The lake is 400 m in diameter and 17 m deep encircled by an 8 m high rim of approximately 500 m in diameter. According to radiocarbon data and archeological finds, the impact is dated to 500 BC by the CIRT.”



On October 16, 2004, the journal Astronomy published an online article entitled “Did the Celts see a comet impact in 200 B.C.?“. A special website is dedicated to the event.

A paper on The Chiemgau Impact: An Extraordinary Case Study for the Question of Holocene Meteorite Impacts and their Cultural Implication by Rappenglück et al. was published in Volume 409 of Cosmology Across Cultures (page 338) with the following abstract:

”Did in the Holocene meteorite impacts of a size capable to affect human cultures happen at all and – if the answer is “yes” – which cultural implications did they have? Since a few years this question is fiercely and con- troversially discussed. The Chiemgau meteorite impact event may provide an important contribution to the discussion. This event stroke south-east Germany very probably in the 1st millennium BC and left a field of about 80 craters. In comparison to other Holocene impacts it provides extraordinary data by the extension of its crater field, the size of the biggest crater, the variety of secondary effects, the direct embedding of the impact layer in an archaeological stratigraphy, and the comparably good dating. The recently known data are introduced and discussed with regard to the question of cultural effects of Holocene impacts.“



Further article: Rappenglück, B. and Rappenglück, M., 2006: Does the myth of Phaethon reflect an impact? – Revising the fall of Phaethon and considering a possible relation to the Chiemgau Impact. - Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry 6/3 (2006), 101-109.

In Germany the discussion goes on - especially in the media. So far the evidence seems extremely doubtful, but that doesn’t necessarily make it less interesting. And at least it has raised local interest in geology.




Academics

Shiva Crater

, ,

At the 2009 Portland GSA Annual Meeting (18-21 October 2009) Sankar Chatterjee will present a paper on the Shiva Crater (18 October 2009, 3:45-4:00 p.m.). The massive Shiva basin is a submerged depression west of India that is intensely mined for its oil and gas resources. Some complex craters are among the most productive hydrocarbon sites on the planet.

If Chatterjee is right this could be the largest, multi-ringed impact crater the world has ever seen, with a diameter of ~500 km. The diameter of the so far known largest impact crater, the Vredefort Crater in South Africa has a diameter of about 300 km. Furthermore the Shiva crater has an age that makes it a suspect for the killing of the dinosaurs ca. 65 million years ago.

According to Chatterjee it is the remnant of a giant meteorite impact that left high-resolution stratigraphic signals in the sedimentary and volcanic rocks such as shocked quartz, iridium anomaly, nickel-rich spinels, sanidine spherules, magnetic nanoparticles, high pressure fullerenes, megatsunami deposits, and melt lavas. If the author and his team are right, this is the largest crater known on our planet. The bolide may have been perhaps 40 kilometres in diameter - as compared to the bolide of between 8 and 10 kilometres that hit Yucatan Peninsula, and is commonly thought to have killed the dinosaurs.

The impact was so powerful that it led to several geodynamic anomalies: it fragmented, sheared, and deformed the lithosphere mantle across the western Indian margin and contributed to major plate reorganization in the Indian Ocean. It initiated rifting between India and Seychelles in the west and created the Laxmi Ridge; it shattered the Indian plate easterly along the Narmada-Son Rift extending 1500 km across, dividing the Indian shield into a southern peninsular block and a northern foreland block. Because of topographic barrier of the Western Ghat Mountain range, the impact-triggered tsunami was restricted along the Narmada-Son Rift at the KT boundary.

The team hopes to go India later this year to examine rocks drill from the center of the putative crater for clues that would prove the strange basin was formed by a gigantic impact.

The rest of us are waiting to hear more.



In Norwegian:




PS of 21 October 2009:
The hypothesis met with sharp criticism. See
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/091018-dinosaur-crater.html

PS of 2 November 2009 - More about the Shiva Crater:
http://suvratk.blogspot.com/2009/11/end-cretaceous-how-many-impacts-how.html
and
http://books.google.co.in/books?id=3IORF1Ei3LIC&pg=PA35&lpg=PA35&dq=bombay+high+stratigraphy&source=bl&ots=ng1Gm3E1r-&sig=lYxnwzsvy96JmE821U2z40VDcKw&hl=en&ei=fLzmSvHfK5DOsQOf36TfBQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=9&ved=0CB4Q6AEwCDgK#v=onepage&q=bombay%20high%20stratigraphy&f=false

Academics

Ages of Impact Craters

,

At present there are 174 confirmed impact structures known on Earth (e.g. http://www.unb.ca/passc/ImpactDatabase/ ) but in most cases the age is rather uncertain. Precise and accurate dating is non the less crucial for correlating causes and effects on the bio- and geosphere of catastrophic processes - can some of them for instance be effectively linked to mass extinctions, like the one that killed the dinosaurs about 65 million years ago?

The known impact structures on Earth range from the largest — the 2-billion-year-old Vredefort that stretches 300 km across South Africa — to about 20 or so structures smaller than the 1-km-diameter Barringer crater in Arizona; most of these are less than 1 million years old. These structures represent only the preserved fraction of the overall series of asteroid impacts on Earth.

Of the 174 listed impact structures only a few are precisely dated (mostly obtained using radio-isotopic techniques, e.g. U/Pb and 40Ar/39Ar), with only 25 ages having a stated precision better than ± 2%, and a mere 16 ages with a precision better than ± 1%. Yet, even the accuracy of some of these ages can be challenged and probably improved based on more detailed interpretations and statistically more rigorous data analysis. Nevertheless the calculated ages tend to pop up in the literature without further critical evaluation, and become widely accepted ages. A review of the age data for the 25 short-listed structures suggests that 11 ages are accurate, 12 are at best ambiguous and should not be reported with any uncertainty, and 2 are not well characterized at all. In a new paper Jourdan et al. report detailed examples of misleading ages and/or age uncertainties (e.g., poor stratigraphic constraints, data over-interpretations, ambiguity due to inconsistent results), and highlight the robustness of the 11 well-defined ages. Based on observations and modeling, suggestions are made on how to obtain better ages by carrying out adequate sample preparation. They also indicate how to interpret ages for non-geochronologists.

It is difficult to infer much from the current crater data about periodicities or changes in impacts through time. The new brief review is meant as a call for immediate, drastic qualitative and quantitative improvements of the ages of terrestrial impact structures.

Reference:
An appraisal of the ages of terrestrial impact structures
by Jourdan et al.
in Earth and Planetary Science Letters (in press at time of writing)
doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2009.07.009





Academics

Are Impact Craters Useful?

,

I have just read a post that I would like to have written - but didn’t.

Nitish Priyadarshi at “Environment and Geology” did, and I am delighted to recommend his post, where he tells how economic deposits are associated with terrestrial impact structures.

Over to:




AcademicsTop Blogs

Ritland Impact Crater

,

In my post on the Gardnos Impact Crater in Norway, i wrote that of the three known Norwegian impact craters “the Ritland crater outside Stavanger is apparently not yet really recognised”. But now the last doubt seems removed.

The Ritland crater was discovered by the geologist Fridtjof Riis in the year 2000. Together with professor Henning Dypvik he has taken more than 200 rock samples, and in one of these they found shocked quartz this spring, which finally confirmed the hypothesis that the Ritland formation is the result of an impact.

The Ritland crater, which is 2 km wide and 350 m deep is situated in a mountainous area with excellent three dimensional exposures of the sedimentary rocks filling the structure and the deformed basement rocks along the crater rim. Within the crater, the crushed basement rocks are covered by sedimentary, post-impact breccias with fragments reaching up to 2-3 m. Lack of basement exposures in the central crater has made it difficult to find samples containing shocked minerals. In 2007, however, samples taken in a small area of exposed basement rocks in the crater interior revealed outcrops of a fine-grained rock with suevitic texture containing quartz grains with good planar structures of two directions - and shocked quartz is now confirmed.

Available geological observations indicate that the crater was formed on dry land. Dypvik is of the opinion that the crater must be about 600 million years old based on the strata in which it was formed and the age of fossils (of Middle Cambrian fauna) found in sediments (Cambrian shales and sandstones) deposited in the crater after its formation. The Caledonian orogeny (that occurred about 400 million years ago) buried the Ritland crater to a depth of more than 5 000 metres (5 km).

The third recognised Norwegian impact crater is the famous 40-km-diameter Mjølnir Crater, which is one of the best-preserved marine impact craters on Earth. I mentioned this crater in a post.



In Norwegian:




AcademicsTop Blogs

Gardnos Impact Structure, Norway

,

Three meteorite impact craters have so far been recognised in Norway. The Gardnos structure was the first impact structure to be recognised. The Mjølnir crater (in the Barents Sea) was recognised just a couple of years after Gardnos. The Ritland crater outside Stavanger is apparently not yet really recognised, or at least not yet confirmed in The Earth Impact Database.

The Gardnos impact has been dated to 546 ± 5 million years old. Today it is about 5 km in diameter, and was created by a meteorite with an estimated diameter of 200-250 m and a velocity of around 20 km/sec.

A 400 m long core was drilled within the Gardnos structure in 1992, penetrating sediments and impactites (suevite and Gardnos breccia). The sedimentary post-impact deposits have been intensively studied and described in several papers. The Gardnos breccia was produced during impact by fracturing of target rocks, formed during the shock wave propagation. In the typical Gardnos Breccia angular white granitic or quartzitic clasts are embedded in a dark matrix. In central parts of the crater, a sheet of suevite breccia is found overlying the Gardnos Breccia. The creation of Suevite is a result of the enormous amount of energy released by the meteorite impact. The rock consists of rock melt, glass and rock fragments (see image below).

The complex crater is well exposed, easy accessible and conveniently located along the main road between Oslo and Bergen, just 170 km from Oslo. In addition, its great exposures offer a magnificent section through several different typical impact lithologies. The Gardnos structure is visited annually by about 20,000 tourists and geologists. It is possible to drive in to the centre of the crater. There are two trails through the surrounding natural region, with information signs describing the geology of the area. There is also a new information centre.

The Precambrian basement of the area consists mostly of granitic gneisses, along with quartzites and banded gneisses.

The Quaternary glaciers excavated the weaker crater-infill rocks and thereby refreshed some of the original crater shape.

An Excursion guide to Gardnos meteorite crater from Oslo University was at the time of writing available as pdf file. Click here for download. (Authors: Elin Kalleson, Tom Jahren and Henning Dypvik, Department of Geoscience, University of Oslo).

• http://www.gardnos.no/servlets/dispatcher?siteNodeId=584122&languageId=2
• http://www.unb.ca/passc/ImpactDatabase/images/gardnos.htm

In Norwegian:
• http://www.forskning.no/artikler/2009/mai/220027

Image of Suevite from the Ries crater in Germany:





El’gygytgyn Impact Crater - Climate

, ,

Many of the first visible signs of global warming are supposed to appear in Earth’s frozen regions. Detailed records of climate change in the polar regions over the past few million years, however, are sparse, in part because the landscape has been repeatedly scoured by massive ice sheets.

The lake bed below Lake El’gygytgyn offers a glimpse into the Arctic’s distant past because it has never been covered by glaciers. Lake El’gygytgyn rests inside an impact crater.

The 3.6 million year old El'gygytgyn impact crater is located on the Chukchi Peninsula in north-east Siberia - some 100 kilometres north of the Arctic Circle. The crater is a well-preserved impact structure with an inner basin about 15 km in diameter, surrounded by an uplifted rim about 18 km in diameter. The flat floor of the crater is in part occupied by Lake El'gygytgyn, 12 km in diameter, and surrounding terraces. The average profile of the rim is asymmetric, with a steep inner wall and a gentle outer flank. The rim height is about 180 m above the lake level and 140 m above the surrounding area. An outer ring feature, on average 14 m high, occurs at about 1.75 crater radii from the center of the structure.

El'gygytgyn crater is surrounded by a complex network of faults. The density of the faults decreases from the bottom of the rim to the rim crest and outside the crater to a distance of about 2.7 crater radii. Lake El'gygytgyn is surrounded by a number of lacustrine terraces. Only minor remnants are preserved of the highest terraces, 80 and 60 m above the present-day lake level. The widest of the terraces is 40 m above the current lake level and surrounds the lake on the west and northwest sides. The only outlet of the lake is the Enmivaam River, which cuts through the crater rim in the southeast.

The Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) on NASA’s Terra satellite took the picture below of the crater and its surroundings on 18 August 18 2008. In this false-color image, red indicates vegetation, gray-brown indicates bare land, and deep blue indicates water. The vegetation is Arctic tundra, with low-lying plants that have short growing seasons.


By examining the chemical compositions of cores extracted from the lake bed sediments, scientists can piece together past climatic conditions of the region. In November 2008, a drilling project began at Lake El’gygytgyn, and drilling was expected to continue through the spring of 2009. The project’s ultimate goal was to use the lake bed cores to assemble the longest continuous record of climate change in the terrestrial Arctic and to compare that record to records extracted from lower latitudes.

The scientists hope this way to be able to reconstruct the climate history as far back as 3 million years (compared with the ca. 900.000 years reached in Antarctican ice cores).

There are also further plans to drill into the bottom of the crater to get more knowledge about the impact process that created the crater.

• http://www.redorbit.com/images/images-of-the-day/img/21513/elgygytgyn_crater_russian_far_east/index.html?source=r_earthiod
• http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=36151
• http://www.unb.ca/passc/ImpactDatabase/images/elgygytgyn.htm




Bosumtwi Impact Crater - Ghana

,

When I visited Bosumtwi Lake in 2003 it was first and foremost to watch birds, I have to admit, although the geological aspects as usually kept lurking somewhere behind. It irritated me enormously that many people (still) thought that it is a volcanic crater - even supported in this belief by tourist guide books! Incredible!


The Bosumtwi impact crater is almost completely filled by Lake Bosumtwi - Ghana's largest natural lake. Maclaren postulated an impact origin of the Bosumtwi Crater already in 1931. Numerous studies have followed, and the impact hypothesis confirmed by all the typical impact indicators. The 1.07 Million years old crater has a rim-to-rim diameter of about 10.5 km.

Before I go on, a few words on tektites:

The term “Tektite” was coined by Suess in 1900 and is derived from a Greek word for “molten”, tektos. Tektites are natural glass objects up to a few centimeters in size, which most scientists argue were formed by the impact of large meteorites on Earth's surface. Tektites are typically black or olive-green, and their shape varies from rounded to irregular. Areas with concentrations of tektites on the Earth's surface are known as strewn fields.

One such strewn field is the so-called Ivory Coast strewn field (with Ivory Coast tektites) to the west of the Bosumtwi Crater. The first suggestions that the Bosumtwi crater is the source crater for the Ivory Coast tektites were made in the early 1960s. Ivory Coast tektites were first reported in 1934 from a geographically rather restricted area in the Ivory Coast (Cote d'Ivoire), West Africa. Microtektites and tektites were later reported from deep-sea sediments and other West African locations. Ivory Coast tektites and the Bosumtwi crater have the same age, and there are close similarities between the isotopic and chemical compositions of the tektites and crater rocks, which strongly support a connection between the crater and the tektites. This makes the Bosumtwi crater one of only three impact structures that have been identified as source craters of a tektite strewn field. (Ries Crater being another - connected to the moldavite strewn field that extends from about 200 to 450 km from the center of the Ries to the east north east).



The principal criteria for determining if a geological feature is an impact structure are listed at the Earth Impact Database. I shall here concentrate on two of them in connection with the Bosumtwi Impact Crater. Impact breccias and multiple planar deformation features (PDFs) in minerals (a.o. found in what is referred to as shocked quartz).

Cores drilled in the Bosumtwi Lake have shown that the lake sediments are underlain by impact breccias, first a layer of polymict and suevitic impact breccia (suevite is also known as “fall back breccia”) and beneath that a thinner layer of monomict impact breccia. In a monomict all the small pieces of rocks in the breccia are of the same type, meaning they came from a single parent body. A polymict has more sources, indicating some sort of collision and melding of material from different areas of the same parent or different parents.

A study of shock metamorphism and shocked rocks of the Bosumtwi Impact Crater was published yesterday (12 December 2008) in the journal Science. I read it with great interest, but as it is rather technical I won’t go into much detail here. So far only three investigations have explored the relative vertical decay of recorded shock pressure in complex impact structures (i.e. craters with diameters greater than 2-4 km on Earth, see drawing below), two for the ~40 km diameter Puchezh-Katunki impact structure and another for the ~65 km diameter Kara crater. So also in this aspect the Bosumtwi Crater is special.

Cr isotope analyses of an Ivory Coast tektite indicates that the Bosumtwi impactor was an ordinary chondrite - a stony meteorite. Most meteorites that are recovered on Earth are chondrites.

Selected References:
Shock Metamorphism of Bosumtwi Impact Crater Rocks, Shock Attenuation, and Uplift Formation by Ferrière et al., Science of 12 December 2008.
An Ordinary Chondrite Impactor Composition for the Bosumtwi Impact Structure, Ghana, West Africa: Discussion of Siderophile Element Content and Os and Cr Isoptope Data by Koeberl and al., in Lunar and Planetary Science XXXV (2004)

• http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/short/322/5908/1678
• http://www.unb.ca/passc/ImpactDatabase/images/bosumtwi.htm
• http://www.univie.ac.at/geochemistry/koeberl/bosumtwi/
• http://originoftektites.com/Chapter_2.php






More Impact Craters

Meteorite craters might not be as rare as you think. A University of Alberta researcher has developed a computer program that could reveal possibly hundreds of undiscovered craters across Canada and around the world. His discovery was published in the journal, Geology, yesterday on 25 November 2008 (Volume 36, Issue 12, December 2008) under the title Anatomy of a young impact event in central Alberta, Canada: Prospects for the missing Holocene impact record.

Chris Herd got his inspiration from the discovery of a meteorite crater near Whitecourt, 200 kilometers west of Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. The Whitecourt crater is the 30th crater found in Canada and deemed to be the youngest.

The simplest detecting tool might of course be Google Earth.

Last year Hickman, a geologist with the Geological Survey of Western Australia, found a crater by using Google Earth, about 260 metres wide and up to 30 metres deep, in the Hamersley Ranges in Western Australia's Pilbara region. The Hickman Crater may become the 30th officially-verified meteorite impact crater in Australia - if confirmed of course. A volcanic eruption is ruled out.


A second discovery by the use of Google Earth may be contributed to Mike Fry, a retired geologist, searching on Google Earth for a place to mine opals. The suspect crater is located about 10 kilometres north-east of White Cliffs, in Australia. White Cliffs is about 255 km north-east of the probably better known Broken Hill, and was in fact the first commercial opal field of Australia.

The search goes on, and if you don’t want or have the ability to go out into the field, just lean back, turn on your computer, and play with Google Earth.


• http://www.physorg.com/news146841660.html
• http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-11/uoa-mho112008.php
• http://www.whitecourtstar.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=1282298
• http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Science/2008/11/26/7538806-sun.html
• http://www.theage.com.au/news/technology/biztech/opal-miner-stumbles-on-mega-meteorite-crater/2008/11/22/1226770814042.html





Aorounga Impact Crater, Sahara

Some time ago a geologist showed me an area that he believed to be an impact crater, and he is trying to gather enough evidence to prove it. Although he didn’t convince me, I wish him every success with his research. I have lately read about other cases of more or less doubtful impact stories. I wrote about one a few days ago. Another example is Bedout, that in 2004 was considered a Possible End-Permian Impact Crater Offshore of Northwestern Australia by Becker et al The Bedout impact hypothesis has, however, not been widely supported by impact cratering specialists (See a.o. abstract here. That is of course bad news for those who think that a Bedout impact is the culprit of the Great Dying, that is The Permian–Triassic extinction event that occurred about 250 million years ago, and was the Earth's most severe extinction event.

Let me today show you a picture of a more convincing looking candidate for an impact crater, and one that IS concluded in the Earth Impact database.



The Aorounga impact crater has a diameter of about 17 kilometres. The original crater was buried by sediments, which were then partially eroded to reveal the current ring-like appearance. The dark streaks are deposits of windblown sand that migrate along valleys cut by thousands of years of wind erosion. The dark band in the upper right of the (NASA) image is a portion of a proposed second crater. The crater is estimated to be less than 345 million years old. The formation age is indeed still disputed.



The impact origin is indicated by complex annular topography, the presence of shatter cones and breccias with quartz showing multiple sets of planar structures, indicative of shock metamorphism. Each ring rises approximately 100 meters above the surrounding plains.


The crater is accompanied by two nearby circular features, that may be related impact craters.

Koeberl et al. Aorounga and Gweni Fada impact structures, Chad: Remote sensing, petrography, and geochemistry of target rocks in Meteoritics & Planetary Science 40, Nr 9/10, 1455–1471 (2005)

• http://www.solarviews.com/cap/earth/aorounga.htm
• http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/images/chad.html
• http://www.unb.ca/passc/ImpactDatabase/images/aorounga.htm
• http://www.lpi.usra.edu/publications/slidesets/craters/slide_22.html





Download Opera, the fastest and most secure browser
November 2009
M T W T F S S
October 2009December 2009
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30