Skip navigation.

olelog

What on earth

Posts tagged with "nitrogen cycle"

Nitrogen Cycle Included in Climate Models

, , ,

Prediction is very difficult, especially if it's about the future, Niels Bohr once said. This is certainly true for predictions about climate change. Climate models are important tools for climatologists. They are based upon what we know (and assumptions) about to-days climate and climate change in the past. They rely on the input, which means that climate models don't tell the full story.

To date, climate models ignored the nutrient requirements for new vegetation growth, assuming that all plants on earth had access to as much 'plant food' as they needed. But now climate scientists have successfully incorporated the nitrogen cycle into global simulations for climate change, questioning previous assumptions regarding carbon feedback and potentially helping to refine model forecasts about global warming.

By taking the natural demand for nutrients into account, the authors of a new study have shown that the stimulation of plant growth over the coming century may be two to three times smaller than previously predicted. Since less growth implies less CO2 absorbed by vegetation, the CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere are expected to increase. However, this reduction in growth is partially offset by another effect on the nitrogen cycle: an increase in the availability of nutrients resulting from an accelerated rate of decomposition – the rotting of dead plants and other organic matter – that occurs with a rise in temperature. Combining these two effects, the authors discovered that the increased availability of nutrients from more rapid decomposition did not counterbalance the reduced level of plant growth calculated by natural nutrient limitations; therefore less new growth and higher atmospheric CO¬2 concentrations are expected.


Capture: Schematic illustrating feedback pathways coupling terrestrial carbon and nitrogen cycles. Blue arrows show, in general, the processes represented in previous carbon-only land model components: plant carbon uptake by photosynthesis draws down atmospheric carbon dioxide (Atm CO2); litterfall and plant mortality pass biomass from plant to litter and coarse woody debris (CWD); decomposition of fresh litter generates soil organic matter; respiration by both plants and heterotrophic organisms returns CO2 to the atmosphere. Orange arrows show the additional processes represented in our coupled carbon-nitrogen land model, differentiated here between rapid internal cycling (solid arrows), and slower fluxes between land pools, the atmosphere, and ground water (dashed arrows). The critical feedback pathway connecting heterotrophic respiration with plant growth is highlighted as a thick orange arrow: decomposition of soil organic matter not only releases CO2 to the atmosphere, it also releases nitrogen from the organic matter (mineralization) in forms that can then be taken up by plants (assimilation). Plant nitrogen uptake competes with the demand for mineral nitrogen from heterotrophic organisms decomposing fresh litter (immobilization, abbreviated (i) in the figure.

The inclusion of the nitrogen cycle marks one more step toward a more realistic prediction for the future of the earth’s climate.

Reference:
Thornton et al. (2009)
Carbon-nitrogen interactions regulate climate-carbon cycle feedbacks: results from an atmosphere-ocean general circulation model.
Biogeosciences, 6, 2099-2120
(Open Acces, and thus freely available for download)



Tomorrow is “Blog Action Day ‘09 Climate Change”. It is expected that more than 6000 bloggers from more than 100 different countries will blog about climate change - posts that will be read by more than 10 million readers.

Blog Action Day is an annual event that unites the world's bloggers in posting about the same issue on the same day on their own blogs with the aim of sparking discussion around an issue of global importance - such as “climate change”. Blog Action Day 2009 will be the largest-ever social change event on the web. One day. One issue. Thousands of voices.

You are kindly invited to listen in tomorrow.



Academics

Fate of Human-induced Nitrogen

,

Human impacts on the global nitrogen cycle are well documented. Humans have doubled the input of available nitrogen to the Earth’s land surface, largely through the industrial production of nitrogen fertilisers. Some environmental effects are obvious, like dead zones and rising concentrations of nitrogen oxides in the atmosphere (adding to the greenhouse effect). The consequences for health impacts of nitrate in drinking water may be less clear.

A paper in PNAS by Schlesinger titled “On the fate of anthropogenic nitrogen” provides some estimates of what happens to nitrogen applied to the Earth’s land surface, focusing on four sinks — the biosphere, groundwater, fluvial transport to the sea, and denitrification - based on already published science literature values. It is an Open Access Article so that everybody can read the full text (in pdf).

The comparative magnitude of the fluxes to these sinks gives some indication of where better environmental management might reduce human impacts on ecosystems. All efforts to minimize human impacts on the global nitrogen cycle will benefit from improved efficiency in the application of nitrogen fertilisers. With the era of cheap energy now ending, economics alone may dictate a greater efficiency of fertiliser use. However, policy makers should consider future regulations on losses of nitrogen to runoff and perhaps even to institute a cap-and-trade system to reduce wasteful inputs to the global nitrogen cycle.

The marine environments seem worst hit by human-induced nitrogen, not only from fertilisers, but also to a large degree from combustion sources. Better management of emissions from agriculture will help preserve coastal ecosystems and their fisheries.

Humans are adding nitrogen to the Earth’s surface, and we do not know where it all goes, but we do know that increasing concentrations of nitrogen in unexpected places will cause significant environmental damage.


http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2008/12/31/0810193105.abstract?etoc



It is all Greek to me!

, ,

Or, we are what we eat!

78 % (or more correctly 78.08%) of the air that we breathe is nitrogen, a colourless gas that we just do not see (or taste for that matter). Well not just nitrogen with the chemical formula N, but rather N2 (gaseous nitrogen or nitrogen gas) - just like the oxygen that we breathe is O2 and not O, not to mention O3, ozone, which is extremely toxic.

In French nitrogen is called azote. An older word was diazote, and maybe a better word for nitrogen gas, because nitrogen gas consists of two nitrogen atoms.

In ecology there is a lot of talk about trophic levels. Trophic is derived from the Greek word trophe, which more or less means food or nourishment.

Where am I getting? Well, yesterday I read an interesting article titled: Amazon River enhances diazotrophy and carbon sequestration in the tropical North Atlantic Ocean. What a mouthful! Getting on from (French) diazote and (Greek) trophe we might conclude that diazotrophic organisms eat nitrogen. And indeed diazotrophic bacteria (also called diazotrophs) are bacteria that use nitrogen gas to obtain (metabolic) energy - they fix nitrogen gas, meaning that they convert it into nitrogen compounds (such as ammonia, nitrate and nitrogen dioxide) useful as nutrients for other organisms (for the grass on my lawn for instance) - normally N2 is not usable for living organisms, except of course for diazotrophic organisms.

New nitrogen provided by marine diazotrophs increases the availability of fixed nitrogen in the ocean and leads to carbon sequestration.

So - the fresh water discharged by the Amazon is transported hundreds to thousands of kilometers away from the coast by surface plumes. The nutrients delivered by these river plumes contribute to enhanced primary production in the ocean, and the sinking flux of this new production results in carbon sequestration. The Amazon River plume supports N2 fixation far from the mouth and provides important pathways for sequestration of atmospheric CO2 in the western tropical North Atlantic - in other words:
Amazon River enhances nitrogen fixation and the carbon sink in the tropical North Atlantic Ocean according to an open access article by Subramaiam et al. in PNAS of 29 July 2008
http://www.pnas.org/content/105/30/10460

If you are still hungry, I have some other nice words for you:
acidotrophic, allotrophic, amphitrophic, autotrophic, biotrophic, chemoautotrophic, chemolithotrophic, chemoorganotrophic, dermatotrophic, ectendotrophic, ectotrophic, haemotrophic, heterotrophic, holotrophic, hypotrophic, lecithotrophic, lithotrophic, mesotrophic, metatrophic, minerotrophic, mixotrophic, monotrophic, mycotrophic, myrmecotrophic, myxotrophic, oligotrophic. ombrotrophic, organotrophic, osmotrophic, paratrophic, phagotrophic, phototrophic. photoautotrophic, photolithotrophic, planktotrophic, polytrophic, prototrophic. pseudotrophic, rheotrophic, saprotrophic, symbiotrophic, syntrophic, zootrophic

Try and guess what they all mean :wink: - bon appetit!

Geologists are probably lithophile, but are they also lithotrophic?



Download Opera, the fastest and most secure browser
December 2009
M T W T F S S
November 2009January 2010
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31