Strange Bedfellows
Tuesday, 29. July 2008, 14:28:40
You may recall that a couple of weeks ago Phil Gramm, ex-Senator, and economic advisor to the presumptive Republican candidate for the Presidency of the United States, had to resign over comments he made to the Washington Times about the US economy:
You've heard of mental depression; this is a mental recession.
He went on to say that growth has held up at about 1 percent despite all the publicity over losing jobs to India, China, illegal immigration, housing and credit problems and record oil prices.
Apparently, all those issues are in our heads. Our collective head.
SNAP OUT OF IT!!
Maybe if we visualize prosperity, we’ll all be rich!
McCain, of course, had to distance himself from the comments, and several days later, Gramm left the campaign, accusing the liberal press of focusing on dragging him through the mud, rather than on the issues. Never mind that the economy is the issue that most worries Americans.
The mental recession hit housing prices, which dropped more than 15% in May. It’s unprecedented, but luckily, it’s all in our heads. We’ll wake up and it will be fine. One of the largest causes of the drop in sales prices is the high number of foreclosures stemming from that lending fiasco that has hit Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac lately. Banks suddenly own a lot of houses that once belonged to owners who borrowed more than they could afford, and they are unwilling to sit on them for months. They are discounting these properties, and that means competing sales in the neighborhood have to be discounted, too.
On a completely different subject, I’ve been listening to the McCain camp complain about a liberal media bias. Obama gets more press, and that doesn’t sit well. Personally, I don’t get it. I’m left of center, but not wacky: more moderate than liberal on most subjects. I watch McCain say some mighty peculiar things and no one in the media seems to notice. On the other hand, I’ve heard nothing lately, but that Obama hates the troops, because he didn’t visit a hospital in Rammstein, Germany. Never mind that he visited troops in four other countries and two other hospitals the same week.
Anyway, McCain isn’t the only one who thinks that the media is biased towards Obama: the American public thinks so too, according to a Rasmussen Poll carried out last week. Apparently, we’re all wrong! The Center for Media and Public Affairs, a Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit research group published a study yesterday suggesting that McCain gets far more favorable treatment than does Obama. This is true on the Networks (and the gap increases over on Fox News). You can read more about the report here, but the thing that jumps out at me is that this is not a liberal think tank spinning things on behalf of a liberal media. This is the same group who has been publishing reports of a liberal media since the mid 80s, and lauding Fox News for their "unbiased" election coverage. Rush Limbaugh has cited them for decades, and Conservatives use their past studies to support fund-raising. Just so we’re clear, the President of the Center for Media and Public Affairs, Robert Lichter, is a paid consultant for Fox News. And he says there is no liberal bias. Quite the opposite, in fact. Read more about them here.
Liberal bias. Hah!



James # 29. July 2008, 15:25
Politically left of center is a good description for me, too, and I can't believe the vitriol that passes for "news" nowadays. I credit, i.e., blame the Bush Administration for that.
His cronies, i.e., his puppet-masters have completely re-tooled the media to their liking. It appears that the tide is finally turning back, but so much damage has already been done by the media's acquiescence.
I'm confident that at least some major news outlets will revert from their current slant. Even in the long run, though, a lot has happened that cannot be undone.
These eight years are a very dark chapter in our nation's history.
Matthew # 29. July 2008, 15:58
Sadly, since the early or mid-90s, those on the right have really obfuscated the news in a concerted plan to present a world view that does not comport with reality.
This obfuscation is a three step process, and it's scripted:
Step One: label people you do not agree with. I think there is nothing more divisive in the past 20 years than the Limbaughization of words like Conservative and Liberal to mean "us" and "them." Most of us hold both conservative beliefs and liberal beliefs. But most of us also are fairly reasonable when confronted with facts. We don't want kids to starve, we want communities where meaningful education is provided to the kids who will support us in our old age. How we get there is where we differ, but if we're all going the same direction, we're smart enough to recognize when something isn't working, and willing to try something new. We don't really care if the sponsor of helpful legislation has a (D) or an (R) behind his or her name.
Step two: take statements out of context, and mischaracterize them to paint your target as insane or disconnected from reality. McCain's done this with Obama on the Rammstein issue, and it's textbook. Rove and Cheney employed this masterfully. There's a reason "Swift-boating_ has become a verb.
Step three: Frame the argument, and attack your target if they attempt to reframe. It's a set up, and the field is skewed in their favor. It's like the old question: "Have you stopped beating your wife?" Bill O'Reilly is a master, although Steven Colbert pwned him when they were face to face.
It's sad to me that the news outlets have taken the attacks as news, and not explored the context.
Personally, I'd love to see some unbiased news. I just want to know what's new!
Aadil # 29. July 2008, 16:52
We will assimilate you
Matthew # 29. July 2008, 17:00
Edward Piercy # 29. July 2008, 22:55
@ Matt.
I do know that my own mental recession will end (temporarily) on Friday, when I get paid.
Upon which I will go out and have a few Jack Daniels and try to forget about ALL of this crap...no offense intended.
Matthew # 30. July 2008, 03:11
I get paid soon too, Edward. I wonder how I'll ease my pain?
solid copper # 30. July 2008, 03:52
Matthew # 30. July 2008, 04:06
Edward Piercy # 30. July 2008, 04:14
Ohhhhhhh....THAT explains it. Toxins.
Matthew # 30. July 2008, 04:22
James # 30. July 2008, 13:40
This talk of drinking too much Jack Daniel's is appalling to me.
You shouldn't knock back the JD until you're already drunk! It's Tennessee sour mash whiskey and way too harsh!
Some nice, smooth Kentucky bourbon goes down so much better. Maker's Mark, Elijah Craig, Bulleit, Woodford Reserve are fine ways to commence with killing brain cells.
Matthew # 30. July 2008, 18:29
Edward Piercy # 30. July 2008, 18:40
solid copper # 30. July 2008, 21:43
Matthew # 31. July 2008, 01:45
Seriously, I've long since decided that pain is worth feeling. I reckon it's Nature's way of giving me a hint, and that hints like that are worth my attention.
solid copper # 31. July 2008, 03:37
Matthew # 31. July 2008, 03:45
Heck, this week his campaign spokesman said that McCain doesn't speak for the McCain Campaign. Even his own folks are wary of him!
r j # 2. August 2008, 14:08
I totally believe they use the "three-step" process you've described, and for once, I'd like to hear some real news. True news. Unbiased news. But I fear I might as well wish in one hand and...
Matthew # 2. August 2008, 21:34
I'm not totally enamored of Obama - far from it. I'm more worries, though, that he's got nothing up his sleeve, than that he has something up there. I do believe he cares about people, and that he's way closer to me than McCain when it comes to deciding how to express that care. I'm afraid politics, particularly at the national level, has become a race to find the lesser evil, and for that I blame the press.
Qlue and I have talked about this before, and I'm convinced that you have to go to non US-based media outlets to find decent coverage of US politics.
What we seem to have in the US is reporting that supports what you already believe. There is a group of people who watch/listen to Fox, and who will never believe anything they see on the Networks or CNN. There is also a group of people who like CNN or a Network, who will never believe anything they see/hear on Fox.
r j # 3. August 2008, 01:47
My friends in Germany sometimes know more about what's going on here than I do. I believe that our so-called news is usually about as real as Pam Anderson's hoozies.
And it is, unfortunately, down to choosing the lesser evil...but I still wonder how much our "choices" actually count...?
Matthew # 3. August 2008, 02:31
The choice is what we're given. Not that much of a choice really, is it?
r j # 3. August 2008, 14:02
U.S. 1
Canucks 0
Woohoozie!
Matthew # 4. August 2008, 00:05
r j # 8. August 2008, 18:25
Aadil # 17. August 2008, 15:56
Matthew # 18. August 2008, 00:45
r j # 18. August 2008, 17:27
Aadil # 22. August 2008, 20:17