Skip navigation.

Log in | Sign up

photo of Matthew

Noah Counte

Hanging around in a one horse town

A Good Morning

,

Today the world is, I think, a very different place than it was yesterday. Of course, we elected Barack Obama to be the next President of the United States. People around the world already like us better, and people in the US sense optimism they haven’t felt in years.

I must say, Obama’s speech was great: he hit all the right notes, didn’t gloat, talked about working for a better future, and putting partisanship behind us (muzzles for Limbaugh and Hannity, maybe?). I knew his speech would be good. The speech that surprised me was McCain’s, which was remarkably upbeat, gracious and optimistic, after all the negativity and fear that the campaign had unleashed. Nicely done. I hope it augers well for the state of Washington over the next four, eight, and more years. President Bush had some pretty nice things to say too, after being mostly absentee for the last two months. I wonder if he is tired of being President?


Why did Obama win? Because in dark times, optimism carries the day. Rather than focus on the past, Obama successfully defined himself has having a bright view of the future, and people need that. So, what does he do now? How does he turn the ideas that fueled a campaign into policies that fuel a better tomorrow for all people?

Haha! Someone smarter than me will have to help you with that one. I think some things are clear, though.

The financial crisis has to be dealt with as soon as possible. There is a chance that the mere election of Obama will inspire enough confidence to turn things around. Goodness knows that our current policies have done nothing to inspire confidence. Obama is thoughtful, capable, and caring, and will have some really smart folks helping him with this. Look for Paul Voelker to be the next Secretary of the Treasury He was head of the Federal Reserve before Alan Greenspan, and is likely to be able to hit the ground running, which is really important.

Restoring the United States’ standing in the world has to be a huge priority. Europe and Africa are already ecstatic, by all accounts, just to have Obama as the US president. Certainly, he seems to project a demeanor that will hold us in good stead. Rumors around here are that Sen. Dick Lugar is on the very short list to be offered the Secretary of State job. He’s a Republican, and they’ve worked together in the past. Lugar is as knowledgeable as anyone on foreign policy. I wonder if Colin Powell is interested in being Secretary of State again?

You can find plenty of other people’s opinions about who will or should be in the rest of the cabinet, and it really doesn’t matter to me, except that I know his choices will be smart, thoughtful, seasoned experts, who will offer good advice and make good decisions. That’s all I want from and for any president, so I’m pretty happy even before I learn who his choices may be.

I think we’ll see Republicans try pretty hard to work with Obama. They have a lot of work to do on their own, too. I’m far more concerned about Obama’s ability to rein in the Democrats in the committee chairs in both the house and the senate. For all the talk about Obama’s liberalism, he’s really more centrist than a lot of people think. Mostly, he’s a pragmatist. Heck, he’s taking the parts of Reaganomics that work, and augmenting it with successful economic strategies form the Clinton years.

Democrats, for their part, are going to have to figure out how to get things done. Most of them will remember that President Carter was elected with similar numbers as Obama (in terms of popular vote), and had a Democratic House, and a filibuster proof Senate. That lasted four years, because they couldn’t get together on major issues. Frankly, that’s one of the things that has killed the Republicans, too. They aren’t just a base party, anymore. Even the Christian Right has more than one issue, now.

Can the most liberal members of Congress, many of whom are committee chairs, pass legislation that moves the country forward in steps that are small enough not to be divisive? We’re already divided. We don’t need anything wacky to drive a wedge between us. Don’t get me wrong – I’m liberal on most matters that aren’t fiscal – but the economy is a pressing issue, and running up huge deficits on the heels of the ones that Bush has run up isn’t going to move us anywhere except closer to demise. My advice to them is to get it together! Work for the country, please.

Republicans have a lot of healing to do, and I’m not sure they are ready to do it. They are as fractured as the Democrats were in 1994, and I don’t see them piecing things back together anytime soon. The Christian right is dealing not just with abortion anymore, they are dealing with AIDS, poverty, and a host of other social issues that have traditionally been the Democrats strong suit. Moderate Republicans and the Christian Right agree on very little. I wonder if we might see the party splinter, and a viable third party emerge? If a splintered party wasn’t enough, the fastest growing demographics in the country are all trending heavily towards Democrats.

That’s all I have time for, and probably more than most of you will read. :lol: I know just a little: it’s going to be interesting, and it’s already a brighter future for Americans, our neighbors, and people around the world. Now, to keep that ball rolling…

Election Day, 2008Miriam Makeba RIP

Comments

ripp2002 5. November 2008, 18:08

Blah blah blah. I will read this another time...

Personally, I really do not think it matters what other people think is "US"... I seriously do not think that changing the president is going to change the values of this country. Our values and beliefs are what a lot of the world dislikes. And if it does than we have a lot more serious problems than what he can change in a term or two.

Of course some do not like policies etc... But I think that is a much smaller item in the overall picture and that picture will not change.

The US will still be viewed in a negative live for our life style. I like that though. I wouldnt give up my life style for anyone or anything.

Just a quick blurp so I can be a negative in your bright day...

:devil:

daxonmacs 5. November 2008, 18:36

I read it all *tapping meself on the shoulder*.
I doubt that the mere election of Obama has changed Europe's or Africa's opinion about the USA orr restored faith. But the clear signal of the people of the USA has been noticed and their voice has been heard. Most around here wil follow up on the next, first steps and measures taken by Obama.
He has proven to be charismatic and knowledgeable enough, but now advisors' seats need to be appointed.
Europe is watching, Africa too, I assume.
Personally I hope that he chooses wise and finds a way to keep the lobbies out.
Take care of them fingers, Matt.

noah counte 5. November 2008, 18:58

I think - and I saw some evidence of this on PBS last night - that Europe and parts of Africa think better of America today because they didn't believe that we could change course. Regardless of what Obama does, he represents a different direction, and a dramatic change from the arrogance of the past eight years.

I think that people on the left are going to be surprised to find Obama leading from the center, and surrounding himself with advisers from across the spectrum. I think it's good for us, and good for the world.

noah counte 5. November 2008, 19:12

It strikes me that another interesting thing to watch will be President Bush's willingness to assist in the transfer of power. Clinton's transition was a mess. Bush's first transition was a mess, too - took 30+ days to find out whether he "won" the election or not.

Crisis is a bad time for transition woes, and Bush can make Obama's life (and the country's) more difficult or easier. He's promised to do all he can, and I hope he does.

daxonmacs 5. November 2008, 21:00

The election of barak Obama as president, though expected, has certainly brought USA back to the attention of many and raised expectations.
Therfor i hope he can fulfill these.
Judging by the thoroughness of his campaign, the people chosen and picked to put it together and execute it, I have good faith he will chose wise.

CultureSurfer 5. November 2008, 21:55

Beautifully & intelligently written, no matter what Ripp says. p:

My impression was that just electing Obama has convinced the world Americans might not just be a bunch of total idiots, or am I wrong? :eyes:

I heard on NPR today that Obama & Biden will start receiving the same daily security briefings that Bush gets TOMORROW. Wow. Who knew? :yes:

DBabbit 6. November 2008, 00:02

Excellent post, Matt. I always enjoy reading your thoughts on political matters. :up:

I won't go into what I think about the messes Bush made since we've already hashed those out as they were in the making, but I have faith that Obama will do his upmost best to try and get some positive changes made. As I watched the votes coming in last night, there was a definite division of the reds and blues. Americans are ready for change, and electing Obama for president was a monumental one. My hope, and I'm sure the hope of many others, is that he will be the change we've needed for so long. However, if we want to see change in this country, we must be willing to make those changes. No one person can do that for us.

momable 6. November 2008, 00:36

I voted for him.

The appropriations committees, the ones who hold the purse strings, they are the ones that really get things going in the USA.

Funny thing is, the public doesn't elect them, most people don't even know who is on what committee. This group is where all the finagling about what projects get what or even put into Bills. Then, once the Bills are put together, the respective Houses get their says and eventually voting occurs.

Let's hope that these committees get new people in them that will work more for the common good of all, not just big business and big pharma.

DBabbit 6. November 2008, 01:50

Obama isn't waiting to get started choosing his team members - He said he was deciding that today.

noah counte 6. November 2008, 02:04

Thank you Naomi and Babs.

What the world thinks of us is important because we owe them 10 billion dollars, and if they want to collect, we're in for trouble. What the world thinks of us is important, beacause we need to sell our goods to them, in order to maintain our current standard of living. What the world thinks of us is important, because when Russia deploys missiles between Poland and Lithuania, we're going to need the support of allies, not the scorn of people who hate us. By the way, Russia declared that they are goign to put missiles between Poland and Lithuania today.

What the world thinks of us is important because, for all its shortcomings, we have the best government on earth. If we bully, instead of convincing, if we go rogue, instead of employing partnerships, the rest of the world will stop trying to emulate us, and will follow some other power. China, maybe. That will be a fun one, war with a China that is angry at us and her new allies.

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jOAE9oSlKRYh_6HgMBbZW72vjnQQD948N8OO1

I_ArtMan 6. November 2008, 03:46

@ripp blah blah... comment. i'll read that in some other lifetime.

matthew,
you expressed it very well and now we will see what happens. i for one, am very hopeful.
it's just my assessment of obama as an intelligent and capable man. i like his genuine smile too. that will win over a few heads of state. :happy:

noah counte 6. November 2008, 04:24

The mere fact that Obama seems to listen will take him far. He doesn't seem to have the "if you're not with us you're against us" mentality, either. We've bludgeoned or railroaded a lot of countries into disliking us.

DBabbit 6. November 2008, 05:36

We've bludgeoned or railroaded a lot of countries into disliking us.


We've been doing it for years. I forgot who, but someone here on Opera posted a blog about how we overran Japan in the mid 1800s to make them do trade with us. This is the original story.

ripp2002 6. November 2008, 06:12

:lol: I feel so loved; like crabs on a hot day... :whistle:

doesnt change the course...

On that note; I am sure it will be an easy transition. I would hope that both parties noticed and understood how horrid their behavior was in the above mentioned wonderful transition... the ballots, just the general lack of maturity, class and example that those positions shoudl be setting for the rest of the country. I would think both of the people in question at least have the character to be civil. If not then hang them from their sack and try ovaries in 4 years...

:devil:

cajunlayde 6. November 2008, 08:09

"I wonder if Colin Powell is interested in being Secretary of State again?"

Or...wouldn't he make a great Secretary Of Defense? He certainly has the know-how. But in any event, I hope he is tagged for an important role. He has shown his integrity and people have shown their trust in him...no matter the situation.

What we have seen here is history of the highest making. A history I never dreamed possible in my lifetime. And I rejoice in that. I grew up in the deep south. Like Louisiana, where seeing the state remain red didn't surprise me in the least. Other states did surprise me and it heralds a new wave of optimism and hope for the entire country, as well as the hope of rebuilding the sad state of affairs that now exists with foreign countries, thanks to the blunders made by the past/still current administration.

Did anyone else notice that Obama didn't need to look (even once) at notes or a *cheat sheet* to present an excellent speech? No, he seemed to speak quite eloquently from nothing more than his thoughts alone. Already a huge plus for anyone listening!

I may be premature but I am filled with new hope for the future of this country. No, I do not assume that the battle will be easy. We are in big trouble in many ways. And it will take (anyone who was elected) more than a mere single term to turn things around but if we give him our support and respect I believe that so much good can be accomplished that he may just astound us. All I am hoping for is that he is given ample time to prove it to us and not be swept under a carpet whilst others claim his hard work as their own.

Earlier I saw a video (Ok, it was a Fox video, but who knew at the time?) :rolleyes: It clearly predicted failure by Obama by the year 2010. Of course, it was said by Karl Rove and aimed at Sarah Palin, making it almost ridiculous. He predicted that she would be groomed by that time to once again, take on a Presidential role. While I am willing to conceed that Palin has done good things for Alaska, she looked like a deer in the headlights when asked important political questions by respected journalists.

In short, I don't care how pretty she is, I want her to have an above average intelligence and to be able to show it! Not only that, I expect anyone in her position to be able to USE it.

Like Noah, I have had a big grin on my face all day. And no, it has nothing to do with the weather! :D









DBabbit 6. November 2008, 08:48

Cajun, I've been saying for years we need change. I'd like to see our new President Elect get 2 terms so he at least gets us back on the right track. Like you, I too feel that one term isn't long enough. That said, let's see how he does his first 4 years. I have a feeling that he is the change we've needed to see for so long.

cajunlayde 6. November 2008, 12:00

" I have a feeling that he is the change we've needed to see for so long."

I couldn't agree more, DBabbit! :up:

noah counte 6. November 2008, 13:07

I feel so loved; like crabs on a hot day...


I hear crabs are much better when it's cool outside :whistle: Ripp, I don't expect Democrats to be much better than Republicans, but I do hope they are different. I'm with you on the ovaries thing. It's worth a shot!

Regarding the history that was made, I do believe it's significant. Some people voted for him, because he's part black. SOme people voted against him because he's part black (somehow, the fact that he's part white is lost in here?). The history we made, I think, is that some people - maybe a lot of people - didn't want to vote for a lack man, but did anyway, because of his policies. To me, that's a huge step in combatting public racism. Now we'll have a bright, articulate black family in the White House for four years, and a lot of people are going to see that skin color doesn't matter quite as much as they thought it did.

ripp2002 6. November 2008, 15:40

It would be interesting to know the actual % that voted for what reason. Obviously there is no possible answer however I would be willing to bet that 30-50% of the votes for both candidates revolved around the color of skin of one or both candidates.

Not voting for a black man, voting for the white guy, not voting for another white guy, voting for the black man...

With that being said; I think it is not quite the step forward in racism that all or at least most would like it to be. I do think it is time for something "different"; althought, I would prefer honesty, character, integrity to be the things that are different. Just changing the color of skin but keeping the same character flaws as the rest of the politicians will simply not make a difference.

Im just worried about the mexicans; you know the illegal aliens who do the yard work at the whitehouse. How are they going to trim the bushes with all the cars on the lawn... :whistle:

:devil:




CultureSurfer 6. November 2008, 15:49

I just thought of something so ironic it's not even funny. Now that dissent will no longer be seen an unpatriotic (I swear I feel like we've just thrown off the shackles of a dictatorship!), we may have less to bitch about. :rolleyes: :lol: :eyes:

ripp2002 6. November 2008, 17:16

:lol:

If you have paid attention to history you know that the shackles always come off before the ball and chain are added; this is so when the shackles are replaced the chain goes through the ball chain loop!!!

I would prefer to be shackled; at least, then I know where I stand (usually against the wall ass out)... I do not need anyone making decisions for me. I am perfectly fine fucking everything up for myself; I need no help!!!

:devil:

noah counte 6. November 2008, 17:52

Some people will bitch, regardless of their circumstances, Naomi. I had a grandfather who was never happy. More accurately, he was at his happiest when he was unhappy, and he worked very hard to be as unhappy as possible.

Ripp, your ability to make decisions is diminished since Bush took office. Rightly or wrongly, since 9/11, the government has restricted the rights of everyday people and extended the rights of law enforcement.

ripp2002 6. November 2008, 19:09

Hey look I completely agree with you on that. :whistle:

But like I said, at least I know where I stand...

Homer: Doh! Why do you have to bring in my age???? Just so you know; my decisions making ability started diminishing a long time before Bush was elected... But at least all the beer and tequila put a smile on my face...

:whistle:

:devil:

noah counte 6. November 2008, 19:23

Haha. I meant that our decision-making ability has been limited by government, not that you've created a stupor for yourself. Of course, if the foo shits... :lol:

Quinnuendo 6. November 2008, 19:42

good post as usual. sorry but didn't have time to read all of the comments, so I probably won't be tailing along with them...

we'll see how it goes. the start is, as you said, very optimistic in most of the world.

momable 6. November 2008, 20:23

What do you think of my above-mentioned comment, Matt?

noah counte 6. November 2008, 20:56

I think you've put your finger on one of the two big problems, Mom: lobbying. The other may be power - committee chairmen and women like to wield it, I imagine. In my experience, power clouds judgment.

Letting big Pharma write healthcare policy has been a recipe for crappy coverage (and record profits for big Pharma). And the pharmacuticals are just one of many - big Oil is another that springs to mind. Big Banking didn't do so badly for themselves at the expense of taxpayers, either.

ripp2002 6. November 2008, 21:17

Homer: Doh! stupor is a strong word... :whistle: don't hate...

noah counte 6. November 2008, 21:42

Heh. You're the one who said beer and tequila put a smile on your face...

Nerak 6. November 2008, 21:53

I agree - Obama's speech was great. But then, weren't they all? Like him or not, there is no denying the fact that he's a wonderful speaker.

I also like the idea of having a president who looks so flippin' healthy. I'm not worried about him keelin' over with a heart attack or going into an Alzheimer's stupor...etc. He looks very healthy and whatnot. I like that...it's sense of security. Perhaps a false sense of security, but one none the less. :D


noah counte 6. November 2008, 21:55

Health is a positive trait in a president... unless you really hate him. :right:

momable 6. November 2008, 22:47

:lol: A very insightful comment -- or inciteful? :lol:

DBabbit 6. November 2008, 23:14

We know Bush & Cheney were both big oil men, what about Obama? I must have missed the news cast that said who supports him or how he makes his money. I know he wrote a couple of books, but that income wouldn't generate enough to support a family of 4.

noah counte 7. November 2008, 02:26

Obama is a millionaire, apparently only just.

He is a senator, and they make $162,000/yr.

Before he went to Washington, he was a state senator in Illinois, a job that paid about %50,000 per year. Before that, he was a "community organizer," which doesn't pay well to begin with, but I imagine he did fine after a while. Especially since he was, by all accounts, gifted at it.

His wife makes $300,000/yr as a hospital administrator.

The tax returns he released as part of his run for the presidency book royalties of almost $4 million in 2007.

He'll pay higher taxes under his tax plan. :lol:

I_ArtMan 7. November 2008, 02:55

which of course demonstrates that he can think impartially and be objective when he deliberates about what is best for all. :smile:

DBabbit 7. November 2008, 08:40

If he's willing to pay more taxes, then he apparently thinks the rest of the wealthy can too. AND if his wife gets $300,000 a year, and he's pushing for higher taxes for those who make $250,000 and up, then apparently, he's taken that income into consideration as well. Go, Obama! :cheers:

qlue 7. November 2008, 17:32

Great post and even greater comments! :up: .
Speaking without a mandate but on behalf of Southern Africa anyway. Most folks around here have expressed reserved optimism! Yes, the world view of Americans did change over night. Mostly because people thought that Americans would never ever elect a 'black' president. Like I said, optimism, but with reservations. Barrack Obama can certainly talk the talk, but will he walk the walk? At least he seems willing to put his own money where his mouth is. :D

noah counte 7. November 2008, 18:17

"...reserved optimism..."

Way better than outright hostility, I think. :lol:

daxonmacs 7. November 2008, 19:04

It's a nuance :D

I_ArtMan 7. November 2008, 21:37

*wait... i feel a prediction coming on... a prognostication oracularly sublime.... :yes:

barak obama will surpass our highest expectations... :smile:
but i've been wrong before :cool:

edwardpiercy 7. November 2008, 21:42

Too bad Ann Coulter wasn't in tears. I would have loved to have seen that ***** sitting there on FOX crying her ass off.

noah counte 8. November 2008, 01:53

Ann Coulter is the worst. It doesn't matter what it is, she's the worst.

Pull a noun out of your ass, and she's the worst.

MConor 8. November 2008, 03:25

YOu know most of his voters were first time ie didnt have a clue who they were voting for. Ive got a blog with the statisics

noah counte 8. November 2008, 04:34

Most people don't know who they're voting for, and you can be sure that his opponent's supporters had no better (and perhaps a worse) understanding of their candidate. It's the joy of democracy.

cajunlayde 8. November 2008, 05:04

"barak obama will surpass our highest expectations.."

From your mouth to God's ears, ArtMan! I'll be hoping you're right. :yes:

CultureSurfer 8. November 2008, 16:11

My logic tells me to be cautious with my expectations because all politicians are very much restricted by various circumstances, other politicians, the system, etc....

but my gut tells me Obama will pull off way more than I imagine.

Hope my gut is right.

themugs 8. November 2008, 18:11

Lots of hope and expectations in the comments here.

I give him kudo's for even running to be the President, winning and inheriting the mess left behind.

I_ArtMan 8. November 2008, 19:40

he's already rewarded his main political allies so now he can get down to business. and since most of the money for his campaign came from the 'little people' it will be honorable for him to work for their good. that in itself will encourage everyone. :smile:

MConor 8. November 2008, 21:27

Actually thats were your wrong noah. MOst of McCains voters were over 65, people who actually care.

Merc1 9. November 2008, 06:37

my oh my! too many comments to read.
i just wanted to say your posting was well written and intelligent. and i second just about everything you said. I would add more...but i have no idea what was already said or not (in the comments, i mean)! lol :D

Write a comment

You must be logged in to write a comment. If you're not a registered member, please sign up.

Download Opera, the fastest and most secure browser
December 2009
M T W T F S S
November 2009January 2010
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31