Skip navigation.

oedipus' online complexes

a compendium of truth which is stranger than fiction

Posts tagged with "blindness"

an experiment in ALT

, , , ...



this week, after a month of server monkeys throwing wrenches into my attempts to upload new photographs, i created a new photo album, entitled an experiment in ALT, which contains pictures named by me as they were described to me by the person who took them....

so, what's the point? i am attempting to ascertain if i have provided "meaningful" file-names, pseudo-alt text, and a thumbnail long description which matches the brief descriptions i was given of the photos when they were downloaded by the photographer to my hard drive...

where do you come in? well, does the pseudo-alt text and "meaningful" file-names help you make sense of the pictures if you cannot see them, or are using a text-based browser? my descriptions are woefully inadequate, based on only enough information to name the photos, so i am interested in what it is that you see? what words would you use as an alternative text equivalent for the image? what would you add to my thumbnail long descriptions?



my fifteen minutes of fame

, , , ...

the year i was born, in a catalog for an exhibition of his art in stockholm, sweeden, andy warhol famously wrote, and has been misquoted ever since: In the future everyone will be world-famous for 15 minutes.

well, andy's future is now -- i dare you to contradict that - he's dead, i'm not -- and, so, today, unto me was delivered my fifteen minutes, when i, or rather, my photographs, had the honor of being featured on the front page of MyOpera.

as an internet whore (a.k.a. a webmaster) i am grateful for anyone or anything that drives visitors my way, especially if we can barter: a broken link report for an operational link; a comment or inquiry that leads to a response that leads to a new webpage, sub-site, or concrete action; the give and take of the web that makes it simultaneously humankind's greatest collaborative effort and cause for optomism, as well as the world's largest vanity press and red-light district...

perhaps i expressed it more coherently on april 19, 2007 -- patriot's day, one of my most holy of holidays -- when i spent over four hours, looking at my surroundings through other people's eyes... it gave me a better gestalt mind's eye view of my surroundings, as i tend only to concentrate upon -- and hence, remember -- that with which i come into constant, consistent or regular contact,.. but i became so impressed at the acuity of my fellow operators, that i neglected to finish writing, and, hence, posting about the experience, until today...

MyOpera offered me an opportunity to do -- and took away my excuse not to do -- something i've wanted to do ever since i first heard of digital cameras -- mount pictures, taken by myself and others, on the web, and ask for descriptions; actually 2 descriptions: a single sentence descriptor, as one would expect to find in ALT text) and an unbounded text-entry field for as full a description as the viewer deemed appropriate...

i have created an album named Is A Picture Worth A Thousand Words?, but have yet to populate it with images... i intend to collect the most iconic pictures of human and natural events that the majority of us take for granted, myself included, until 1989; a topic upon which i ruminated in a comment on a comment (and some of whose text is alarmingly similar to that which preceded this aside)

in any event, i am extremely grateful to all who have visited, and to all who may visit in the future, especially to those who took time to post comments that gave me a much greater cognizance of my surroundings than i have had in quite a long time... all too often, out of sight, out of mind, is not just a cliché -- it's part of life that i simply took for granted until it faded from view, and, which seems much less important, albeit annoying, in that if i don't come into contact with something on a regular basis, it may as well not exist... i am especially thankful to chaals, for getting me to join MyOpera, and for sowing the seeds for others to water; the entire MyOpera team, for being so reactive and proactive to usability and accessibility concerns; to DanteSoft, whose analytic and descriptive powers amaze me; SmithW, who not only commented on, described and refined previous descriptions, he joined the MyOpera community; to Espen, for writing about what i'm up to; and, as always, to Helen Shapiro, for the eels...

RFB&Doh!

, , , ...

Recording for the Blind & Dyslexic (RFB&D) has announced, that - effective 1 july 2007 - it will cease distribution of recorded material on audio cassettes, and will, thereafter, distribute materials in Digital Talking Book (DTB) format only.

Now, this sounds like a step forward for those of us dependent upon audiobooks to avoid illiteracy, and the granularity of the DTB format is undeniably superior to the gross navigational cues available via audio cassette when one is in fast forward or rewind mode, but...

you knew there'd be a but, didn't you?

here's the problem: in order to play Digital Talking Books, one needs a Digital Talking Book player. the same was true of the older, audio cassette format; for copyright protection reasons, RFB&D audio cassettes played at a different speed than normal audio cassettes, and used the stereo tracks on an audio cassette to deliver 4 seperate streams, so as to fit the maximum number of information on each cassette. gross section marking (sometimes by page, more often by chapter) was accomplished through the use of "a beep, audible when your player is in Rewind or FastForward mode". Most of RFB&D's client base already had a specially adapted audio cassette player, sent to them when they were enrolled in the National Library Service for the Blind & Physically Handicapped (NLS). NLS doesn't plan on "going digital" until 2009, as they are currently testing the default digital talking book player which will be distributed to NLS patrons, to ensure its usability (not just for "the blind" but also for those with limited mobility, limited coordination, and/or neuropathy), portability, and structural integrity (that is, ensuring that if it is dropped, it will still function).

most individuals use their NLS distributed cassette players (which feel - and, i've been told - look like they were manufactured by PlaySkool) in order to listen to both NLS-distributed materials and RFB&D-distributed material, the point being that - by virtue of having been enrolled in NLS - most blind individuals receive an adapted cassette player from NLS before becoming a member of RFB&D, so when one did receive cassettes from RFB&D, one had a specially adapted player at hand upon which to listen to an RFB&D audio recording.

there are digital talking book players on the market, but the market at which they are targeted constitutes a fraction of one percent of the USA's population, seventy to seventy-five percent of whom are unemployed. one such portable DTB player is the incredible BookPort, manufactured by American Printing House for the Blind (APH), whose price tag is $395. doesn't sound like much, until one remembers that 70 to 75 percent of those for whom the BookPort would be a godsend, rely on government assistance just to keep a roof over their heads, and hope that there'll be enough left for food, medication, etc.

putting the onus on RFB&D users to "Go Digital" at their own expense, sounds like an undue burden, doesn't it?

and, to add insult to injustice, in order to use RFB&D distributed materials, one needs to pay a user fee of nearly almost $10 (US) for a decryption key, so that one can access RFB&D's digital talking books.

thankfully, there are computer-based solutions, namely software Digital Talking Book players, some of which are actually freeware or shareware, the software solution, however, defeats one of the purposes of digitalization: namely, portability and ease of use.

and what of RFB&D's back-catalog of recordings? one of the unique aspects of RFB&D is (or, at least, is supposed to be) that they record materials upon request, no matter how obscure the subject matter, and when that recording is made, the entire text of the work being read - including page information, appendecies, the bibliography and the source notes - is included, in order to make attrubutions, citations, and page references possible; RFB&D is intended to assist the blind and dyslexic in their studies, work, and any and every other aspect of life. it provides books in toto, unlike NLS, whose focus is more narrative, and - like commercial audiobooks - do not include footnotes, endnotes, nor bilbiography. thus, it hit me like a thunderbolt from the sky, when my screen reader, in the course of reading RFB&D's Go Digital FAQ, i heard the following:

4. Is RFB&D planning to convert its entire library to digital?

No. RFB&D's team of librarians has done extensive research and taken steps to ensure that all of our most-requested, highest circulating titles are already recorded digitally. Also, member requests over the past few years have complemented our market research efforts to help us build an extensive library of books that we have already converted analog to digital. In addition, RFB&D is investigating retaining a portion of our analog library for distribution upon request in a simplified digital format that would not have the same navigation enhancements as RFB&D's AudioPlus books. In some cases, the quality of some of the analog formats that are archived make conversion impossible.

having listened to more than a few DTBs converted from analog, i can assure you that - even titles recorded as analog audio books, as recently as 4 years ago - begin with a disclaimer to the effect that, since this was converted from an analog source, attempting direct access to a page by its number, may not result in bringing the reader to the requested page. oh, and lest i forget, there is also the disclaimer asking the listener to disregard any instructions about changing sides, tracks, or cassettes...

now that's gross, in every sense of the word...

it is as if a librarian, at the dawn of printing, decided that, not only would all new works be published by printing press solely, but that only a select portion of the library's vast and varied holdings of manuscripts would be converted into the new, ubiquitous printed format, whilst the rest of the manuscripts are abandoned as fodder for silverfish, the rats, and the library's ravenous fireplaces and furnaces...

no wonder the DTB format doesn't include a way to directly access prefaces and introductions, which - at least in english - are conventionally numbered using roman numerals...

your opera is now my opera

, , ,

as a blind individual, i had a hell of a time setting up myOpera account, as one of the required fields contains a visual turing test, without a non-visual alternative... the good news is that in the near future, there will be an alternative to the visual CAPTCHA; the bad news, of course, is that i had to have a mate create an account for me... yes, absolute self-reliance is an illusion, but having to depend upon others to perform a task one is perfectly willing to undertake, undermines the autonomy that the internet ostensively offers everybody, something which i and other blind individuals have to surrender all too often in the "real" world... but i'm here now, and that's what really matters...
December 2009
S M T W T F S
November 2009January 2010
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31