Overjoid

Android news and app reviews

WHEN IN CHROME... OUR FIRST IMPRESSIONS OF CHROME FOR ANDROID

, , ,


As we posted yesterday, Google have released a mobile version of their Chrome browser. It’s currently a beta version, and only available for devices running Android 4.0, but I’ve spent a bit of time with it, and here are my thoughts.

First, a bit of background… Before Chrome, I had three browsers installed on my phone: the stock Android browser, Opera Mini, and Opera Mobile. None are perfect, hence the need for having three. The stock Android browser is the best at integrating with Android, so links for things like YouTube and the Android Market open in the relevant app. It’s terrible at rendering pages, however, and is not overly fast.

Opera Mini is great for browsing when I have poor signal strength, but doesn’t offer a fully fledged browsing experience. Opera Mobile is probably the closest to perfection for mobile browsing; it’s fast, smooth, and feature-rich. It doesn’t, however, integrate that well with Android (Market links take you to the desktop version, for example), and I had to fiddle about with the Custom User Agent settings to get web pages to appear as I liked. I hoped that the Turbo feature of Opera Mobile meant that I could dispense with the need for Opera Mini, but this strangely seems to slow down browsing when not on Wi-Fi. Not sure why this is.

So now we get to Chrome. It’s important to bear in mind that this is only a beta version, and it does have a few bugs. But it also has a few neat features.

Accelerated page loading, scrolling, and zooming

It’s hard not to improve on the stock Android’s browsing experience, and Chrome beta does just that. It’s certainly fast, and renders pages much better (there are no blank areas or blurry text), but it’s not particularly smooth.

There doesn’t appear to be any text reflow either, so the text size remains constant when you zoom in and out. In fact, the browser adopts a rather large font size when viewing web pages. It’s handy in as much as you don’t have to zoom in to read tiny details, but it looks a bit odd to me.

To counter this, there is a pop-up box that zooms in on fiddly hyper-links. It actually works quite well, and means you can view and navigate full web pages with ease.

Search and navigate directly from the omnibox

The omnibox isn’t a particularly new feature, and it’s been present in the stock browser for a while. I tend to use the physical search button to open up a search in the browser, so it’s not of great use for me.

That said, Google are trying to phase out physical keys, so you may be using this more and more in the future.

Open and switch between unlimited tabs in an easy-to-view stack

Again, tabs are nothing new, but being able to have unlimited tabs open is fairly impressive. I’m not sure if it’s particularly useful to be able to be such a tab slut, and it does come at a price.

Chrome appears to be a bit resource hungry, and all those tabs take their toll. The animation for scrolling between the tabs is lovely though, and it’s very satisfying to close them with a swiping gesture.

Sign in to Chrome to sync your bookmarks and view tabs you have open on your computer

Syncing bookmarks is a great feature, and I use Opera Link to sync between my phone, tablet, and PC. Chrome goes that step further, and allows you to view the tabs you have open on your PC on your phone. It’s great if you have to dash out, and want to continue reading. It’s like Chrome to Phone in reverse.

It’s a bit fiddly to set up, however, and you have to activate the feature on the PC though the chrome://flags menu. It’s not at all clear, unless I’ve missed something obvious.

Send pages from desktop Chrome to your smartphone or tablet with one click and read them on the go, even if you’re offline

There is a new Chrome extension called Chrome to Mobile Beta, which acts in the same way to Chrome to Phone. It has the advantage of being able to send full copies of web pages so that they can be viewed offline.

Browse privately in Incognito mode

The stock Android browser has an incognito, and it’s a nice addition. You know, for when you want to use your phone to buy your wife a birthday present, and make sure that she doesn’t find out what it is. And for no other reason, no sir.

No Flash

In a matter of hours after the release of Chrome Beta, Adobe announced that it is unlikely that it will ever have Flash support. It’s a definite step back, although I’m probably missing the bigger picture.

It’s just always been nice to have Flash support as a feather in Android’s cap over iOS. Time will tell if you will miss it all that much. Some embedded YouTube videos still play, however, and people smarter than I am will have to explain why.

Poor integration with Android

The biggest surprise for me is how badly Chrome Beta integrates with Android. Android Market links take you to the desktop version of the Market, and not the app, and YouTube links take you to the mobile version of the site.

It seems to defeat the point of having dedicated apps, if you can’t use them to view their content. Having worked so well with the stock Android browser, it was a shock to not see the same level of integration with Chrome.

No customisable user agent

For some people, being able to view the desktop version of websites on their phone is a real necessity. For me, I’m quite happy to look at mobile sites, as most offer the same content in an easier to view format. It is nice to have the choice, however, and Chrome doesn’t give you this.

So there you have it - a brief look at the Chrome Beta browser. I'll be sticking with it for a while, to see how it fairs with longer use, but there is certainly room for improvement. If you have a device running Android 4.0, the browser can be downloaded from the Market here.

Chrome to phoneFOLDER AND WISER?

Comments

Robbiemoirob Wednesday, February 8, 2012 9:27:44 PM

Nice indepth review. This read really well.

RE:Chrome.
If Google cannot be bothered with supporting phones older than 4.0 than they don't get my support.

seaempty Wednesday, February 8, 2012 10:03:50 PM

It does seem a strange move. It alienates nearly all their users. It'll be interesting to know why it's only 4.0+.

Knut Remi "DrLaunch" Løvlidrlaunch Wednesday, February 8, 2012 10:11:15 PM

Originally posted by seaempty:

Market links take you to the desktop version


Strange. Cause I've noticed that Opera opens the YouTube or Market app in some cases when you open links to such content. Not sure when this happens though.

Charles SchlossChas4 Thursday, February 9, 2012 1:17:08 AM

I know there are a few ester eggs in Chrome beta

I prefer not to have a battery drain called flash

Sami Serolaserola Thursday, February 9, 2012 5:40:37 AM

Thanks for review smile Although, I don't have Android 4, its nice to know what Chrome has to offer.

I still stick with my lousy ZTE Blade and Opera Mini.

Austin E.tldanon Thursday, February 9, 2012 6:25:24 AM

It's a huge step backwards that they aren't including Flash. I've helped a lot of my friends purchase phones over tha pst couple years and one of the biggest selling points was that you can view Flash! ... Weird.

Thank you for your honesty in this review! I, too, have 3 browsers set up on my DROID 3. Opera, Browser (default), and FireFox (which doesn't work very good at all!). I love useing Opera for my every day stuffs but some things are integrated better with the default browser. Like saving a link.

p.s. Speaking of Opera Browser, can we please ditch the splash page?! lol

dżekdzek69 Thursday, February 9, 2012 6:34:19 AM

"Some embedded YouTube videos still play, however, and people smarter than I am will have to explain why."

Ever heard of HTML5? :>

Not all (older) movies are converted to webm format, so not all are possible to view, but a lot of them (I bet all new movies are converted to webm) should be available smile

seaempty Thursday, February 9, 2012 6:42:16 AM

Originally posted by drlaunch:

Cause I've noticed that Opera opens the YouTube or Market app in some cases when you open links to such content.


Strange... I don't think it's ever worked for me.

Originally posted by tldanon:

It's a huge step backwards that they aren't including Flash.


I don't think it's Google's decision, although I'm not sure how it works. If Adobe support the stock Android browser, why not Chrome? I guess they have to draw a line somewhere.

Originally posted by dzek69:

Ever heard of HTML5? :>


I thought that would be the case, but wasn't sure. Far too technical for me smile

Sami Serolaserola Thursday, February 9, 2012 7:10:01 AM

Originally posted by dzek69:

Ever heard of HTML5? :>


That's news also for me bigsmile http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YouTube#Platforms
I knew about RTSP but glad to hear HTML5 has been taken into use as well. I personally still don't understand all the hype of wanting to watch videos on mobile phone, but I see many peeps like to do so. This has been a hot topic on Opera Mini forums for years. I think its better to open videos always on full screen video player instead of trying to embed them inside a browser and on already small display. Matter of taste though sherlock

ClashCityRockerclashcityrocker Thursday, February 9, 2012 8:21:20 AM

Not a great review, the writer does not fully understand Android intents system.

Also, i'm pretty sure Google will issue a flash plugin for Chrome for Android, as anyone that's a Adobe partner can compile flash for whatever they want, and clearly Android (including ICS) can run flash, so it's just the API wrapper to the browser than needs tweaking.

seaempty Thursday, February 9, 2012 9:22:42 AM

Originally posted by clashcityrocker:

the writer does not fully understand Android intents system.


I'm happy to admit that I don't fully understand it (if at all!). Would be more than happy for you (and would appreciate it, too) to explain it smile

Sami Serolaserola Thursday, February 9, 2012 9:30:13 AM

Well, I appreciate reviews written by less technical style. I myself is just an ordinary end user, and I don't care to read too detailed tech stuff.

Dustin WilsonKhadgar Thursday, February 9, 2012 4:24:39 PM

Adobe's abandoned Flash on mobile because they've never been able to get it working at all on mobile devices. Hell, they have trouble getting it to work properly on desktops. This is the reason why Flash isn't on Chrome, and good riddance to Flash. Adobe's still supporting Flash on Android browser because they're still under contract to do so. Once that contract is up Flash will disappear from Android browser as well provided it still exists then, too.

Pretty much what's going on right now is that Google is eating some crow baked into a humble pie. Too bad there's not many crows left because Adobe's been eating the world's supply of the nasty black birds.

Cutting Spoonhellspork Saturday, February 11, 2012 4:29:52 AM

In my experience,the stock Android browser mostly exists for interacting with a few markets like the Gameloft phone site, as well as my wireless carrier's account/settings pages.

Opera Mini is AMAZING for sites that do not use plugins extensively, or do not have unfriendly javascript (90% of pages I visit are fine). I find that links generally open in the correct Market app, media player or YouTube player when clicked in Mini. I have had more than 120 tabs open and more than 20 simultaneous downloads on a 1GHz Snapdragon-based phone with 512MB total RAM. "It's like a bulldozer propelled by rockets that run on starlight." HOWEVER it does not do any kind of media inside the browser itself, and there are some pages that don't work at all. There are also major sites like Amazon and NewEgg that lock Opera Mini into a crippled shopping page that I consider unacceptably basic.

Opera Mobile has been a mixed experience as updates come and go. It currently force-closes to the Home screen far too often, but another update should fix that again. ANYWAY it's great! (when it works) The Flash performance has been superb, Desktop mode is excellent and has nearly identical performance to Opera on Windows. (in terms of rendering and etc) Zoom and text reflow are great, Turbo works well on the Sprint 3G network. Working with desktop session files and working in Private browsing mode would both be nice.

I have only seen video of Chrome for ICS, but it reminds me of Firefox Mobile. Firefox Mobile began as a cruel joke browser, totally useless and more trouble than it was worth. As of FFM 9.0 it seemed functional but did not offer enough for me to keep it on my phone. I expect that Chrome for Android will improve with time, but it will only hold appeal on the newest generation of hardware. That means mass adoption is delayed by feature creep as phones gradually become more powerful. I feel that Chrome will not be a serious threat to other mobile browsers for at least another year.

Originally posted by Khadgar:

Adobe's abandoned Flash on mobile because they've never been able to get it working at all on mobile devices.


Try again. Not all elements work very well, but my single-core 1GHz Snapdragon phone with 512MB total RAM can play most Flash games smoothly and works great with desktop-version YouTube. The biggest issue is that Adobe feels redesigning mobile Flash for multicore and the newest Android APIs....would be a large investment with small game. Partly I blame poor performance in the STOCK Android browser, and improving browser features and more powerful applications.

Write a comment

New comments have been disabled for this post.