GOP-diculous
Thursday, 7. August 2008, 14:15:51
Let me begin by saying that this blog does NOT mean I am voting for Obama (far from it--I have my own issues with him). Nor will I vote for McCain. My issue here is with the Republican Party census document which I received in the mail yesterday.
The questionnaire covers the usual issues:
1. Homeland Security
2. Economic Issues
3. Domestic Issues
4. Social Issues
5. Defense Issues and
6. Republican Party
The third question under the "Republican Party" heading is this:
"Will you join the Republican National Committee by making a contribution today?"
Here are my choices for a response:
1. Yes, I support the RNC and am enclosing my most generous contribution of (fill in the blank).
2. Yes, I support the RNC, but I am unable to participate at this time. However, I have enclosed $11 to cover the cost of tabulating my survey.
3. No, I favor electing liberal Democrats over the next ten years.
Now, I consider myself a Libertarian leaning Republican, so I went ahead and filled out the survey. When I got to the last section, however, I was angry. I was angry because I had filled out that whole stinking survey only to find that I either had to 1. send money, 2. send money to even have my survey TABULATED, or 3. pledge my allegience to the Democratic Party! How about NONE OF THE ABOVE?!?!?! The truth is, I am not happy with the individuals currently in office who call themselves Republicans. I am not happy with the Republican Party's current Presidential nominee. I am not happy with the stance that the Republican Party is taking with regards to our foreign policy, and I am not happy with the standstill our Party has come to with regards to the economy. With that said, I wholeheartedly disagree with MOST of the Democratic stances as well.
I refuse to pick the lesser of two evils. I think the Republican Party is scared to see how many of their members are fed up, so they choose to leave out the "None of the above" answer. I am tempted to attach a letter of concern and return my survey, but I'm guessing if no money is included, no one would bother to read it, so I won't waste my time. I am curious to find out if the DNC sends out similar surveys? Let me know if you've seen one! For now, I'll continue my search for a candidate that will be on the ballot who deserves my vote.
The questionnaire covers the usual issues:
1. Homeland Security
2. Economic Issues
3. Domestic Issues
4. Social Issues
5. Defense Issues and
6. Republican Party
The third question under the "Republican Party" heading is this:
"Will you join the Republican National Committee by making a contribution today?"
Here are my choices for a response:
1. Yes, I support the RNC and am enclosing my most generous contribution of (fill in the blank).
2. Yes, I support the RNC, but I am unable to participate at this time. However, I have enclosed $11 to cover the cost of tabulating my survey.
3. No, I favor electing liberal Democrats over the next ten years.
Now, I consider myself a Libertarian leaning Republican, so I went ahead and filled out the survey. When I got to the last section, however, I was angry. I was angry because I had filled out that whole stinking survey only to find that I either had to 1. send money, 2. send money to even have my survey TABULATED, or 3. pledge my allegience to the Democratic Party! How about NONE OF THE ABOVE?!?!?! The truth is, I am not happy with the individuals currently in office who call themselves Republicans. I am not happy with the Republican Party's current Presidential nominee. I am not happy with the stance that the Republican Party is taking with regards to our foreign policy, and I am not happy with the standstill our Party has come to with regards to the economy. With that said, I wholeheartedly disagree with MOST of the Democratic stances as well.
I refuse to pick the lesser of two evils. I think the Republican Party is scared to see how many of their members are fed up, so they choose to leave out the "None of the above" answer. I am tempted to attach a letter of concern and return my survey, but I'm guessing if no money is included, no one would bother to read it, so I won't waste my time. I am curious to find out if the DNC sends out similar surveys? Let me know if you've seen one! For now, I'll continue my search for a candidate that will be on the ballot who deserves my vote.








Ripp # 7. August 2008, 15:22
pauliticalmind # 7. August 2008, 15:26
Charlie # 7. August 2008, 20:10
pauliticalmind # 20. August 2008, 11:25
Anonymous # 29. August 2008, 16:50
i encourage you all to learn the truth at http://www.infowars.com or even better google search "zeitgeist" and watch the 2hr movie. most people running your country are all the same. you think really have a choice? only when you choose to seek the truth and practice it.
love to all.
pauliticalmind # 30. August 2008, 13:19
Brian # 10. September 2008, 11:47
pauliticalmind # 10. September 2008, 12:32
Brian # 10. September 2008, 18:05
Eric # 12. September 2008, 00:57
While Palin is a good speaker, I found her convention speech lacking on substance. I don't get a re-assuring feeling with her if something were to happen with McCain (should he get elected).
I would have preferred McCain to go with either Lieberman or Ridge.
This election is a frustrating one. It would have been nice to have a candidate who was fiscally conservative, had a clue on foreign policy, wanted smaller government, stay out of people's private lives, and would follow the constitution. Instead we have ended up with Tweedledee and Tweedledumb as the two choices (the third party candidates don't impress me either).
Julio C. # 13. September 2008, 03:49
John # 24. September 2008, 04:05
I suggest you check things out again because he is for continuing the war and giving Israel warmaking equipment ( yeah. I know they say it's 'defensive'. It's likely 'defensive' to shell Somalia, bomb Iraq and Afghanistan, etc. too.
I hate mealy-mouthing that won't even flat call things as they are : it's the freakin' Department of War already. )
Of course, since about 80% of Americans think losing troops to further enrich the super-rich a rip-off, maybe that shit about 'Supporting the Troops' could boomerang on those who waste and neglect them after jacking John Q. Public around buying the services of mercenaries and equipping the military with crap more often than not.