Tomorrow, Tomorrow...You're Only a Day Away!
Monday, 3. March 2008, 23:37:23
Tomorrow is March 4th, 2008, and I will vote.
I will vote to end big government.
I will vote to end the war.
I will vote to end the income tax.
I will vote to secure our borders.
I will vote to protect my personal liberties.
I will vote for a strong national defense.
I will vote for a defender of the Constitution.
I will vote for my freedom.
I will vote for Ron Paul!
I will vote to end big government.
I will vote to end the war.
I will vote to end the income tax.
I will vote to secure our borders.
I will vote to protect my personal liberties.
I will vote for a strong national defense.
I will vote for a defender of the Constitution.
I will vote for my freedom.
I will vote for Ron Paul!








Socrates # 4. March 2008, 06:07
http://politics.nytimes.com/election-guide/2008/results/votes/index.html
pauliticalmind # 4. March 2008, 07:45
chanmok # 4. March 2008, 18:06
Vote to be sold out (1)
@chanmok
Public! once you give your vote
An automatic way you get sold out;
You give life and death ownership
Unto your dear Leader, no doubt!
Do you know what are you doing
Do you know who your candidate is;
Are you sure if they are the right one
For you, to help and for your please!
Don't be whimsical and senseless
Your life, future depend on her or him;
Can she or he be angel, the real savior
So think, before you go in their team!
Make sure that they wouldn't enslave you
That they wouldn't be tyrant and dictator;
In the name of narrow nation and religion
Be sure that they are great and good factor!
Public! once you give your vote
An automatic way you get sold out;
You give life and death ownership
Unto your dear Leader, no doubt!
Vote to be sold out (2)
@chanmok
In countries, cheap patriotism to unite people
Teaches hatred, duty, loyalty to the head;
To worship the elected one, like a prophet
And to be insane, to kill brothers, to be mad!
Election, never been an easy task to perform
Restore peace, help finance public to survive;
To have a fearless life, justice and freedom
To re-start, for economical strength to live!
So, have a written commitment from candidate
Accordingly, you can take him or her to justice;
For breach of trust, as a contract violator
There shouldn't be any immunity practice!
A law, Heman or Sheman to be accountable
For their work and nothing they can hide;
No secrecy or anti-democracy after wining
No misleading, zigzag and no false pride!
In countries, cheap patriotism to unite people
Teaches hatred, duty, loyalty to the head;
To worship the elected one, like a prophet
And to be insane, to kill brothers, to be mad!
Anonymous # 4. March 2008, 23:46
I will not vote.
But I wish there was a Paul/Nader ticket.
Smilies are disabled in this election.
chanmok # 5. March 2008, 00:35
pauliticalmind # 5. March 2008, 00:48
Nadar is an establishment person made out to look like an outsider. If you noticed he got more covered by the establishment media when the Libertarian candidate which was on more ballots across the country didn't get mentioned as all.
Thanks, Joy, for this wonderful observation!
Robert Hurley # 5. March 2008, 02:45
pauliticalmind # 5. March 2008, 03:11
chanmok # 5. March 2008, 03:29
pauliticalmind # 5. March 2008, 03:55
chanmok # 5. March 2008, 04:40
if someone can confirm with the definition of socialism and of socialist first; only then we would know what kind of socialism obama is advocating and what kind of socialist he is!
Not mention # 5. March 2008, 11:28
This would be, everything that involves a large number of people like better health clinics, build squares, etc. (even parties, stuff like gay parade)
And not been so worried about oil barrel or army funding or other issues that could affect only few people.
I think Obama is weak, but it's better then Bush.
In brazilian news you won't find any information about Raul, they show every single day on TV "US election"... I get sad when a fake election going on Russia and media just doesn't care, they show a small news only at last day ( and make fun of guys voting semi-nude, WTF).
I totally agree with you, we can't trust mainstream media, even if they act technically, they can (and they do) mistakes.
chanmok # 5. March 2008, 12:06
how about state having the supreme power for wealth and for everything! how about selection procedure! how about people's army and building larger army! how about cutting down rich people's wealth! how about their typical way of education! how about Party's supreme authority! how about what Karl Marks defined and dictated what Socialism suppossed to be! i don't think obama fall in any criteria to be a socialist.
in many countries anyone who offended existing british law and or any criminal were being cheaply cursed as "socialist"
or "communist". a socialist will not try to go to power like obama is trying to be elected on behalf of one of few parties! in giving bluff or few promises in 2/3 fields none should be addressed as a socialist. in learning few words of a foreign language none can be titled as the pundit on that....
Not mention # 5. March 2008, 18:25
Yeah, we all know socialist it's kinda of utopia... Marks suckz. It's good that obama won't create something like "The Great Firewall of China"... FARC (terrorist from Colombia) say they follow Marks, LOL.
In brazil socialist and communist are seen by many as "argue-proof", because of the dictatorship we had (that all sign of left was banned, killed, tortured etc). People tend to protect the left, and say thats "on".
I'm totally against any form of imposed authority. I'm not 'left' nor 'right'. Sure obama is pretending to be soft socialistic same way brazilian president does. Give money to poor people (yes, direct money, not some educational services, money, cash) and say nice things on tv, get angry with big companies (but do a lot of agreements to keep them here) and so on.
talking about learning few words of a foreign language, you just teach "pundit", though i don't know the sound spelling, its good to learn. (lucky they didn't block wikitionary on my work).
chanmok # 5. March 2008, 19:14
___________sorry, sorry my friend! the statement meant for obama since he is into few minor things to pretend himself as a socialist. I beg apology if you get offended in my words which never ever meant for you, personally but it was an example to understand obama only.....i hope i clarified the matter. thanks.
Not mention # 6. March 2008, 11:02
Howie Baby! # 7. March 2008, 02:33
Good luck there.
QuantumBios # 9. March 2008, 05:47
Deke # 9. March 2008, 23:56
QuantumBios # 10. March 2008, 18:33
Isaac Frisbie # 13. March 2008, 00:44
Mark # 20. March 2008, 13:28
the media is only able to show what the gov. wants the people to see....you should know that ever since 911 when they showed the pictures of the attack just long enough for bush to be able to take us to war then stopped the footage saying its too upseting for the people to see. I get many pix from Iraq but you wont see anything like them on your tv or in the paper. IT IS TIME FOR A REVALUTION!!!!!
plenty67 # 26. March 2008, 15:51