Statements, Whether Confused Or False, Are Not Fallacies
Friday, 21. July 2006, 13:14:12
(BBC News Technology. "Numbers cut through blogging hype." (20 July 2006) URL=<http://http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/5197808.stm>"A study by social networking site MSN Spaces found that nearly 60% of people in the UK use blogs as an online diary.
"Citizen journalists" are increasingly dominating the headlines for reporting events using online tools like blogs.
A second survey by the Pew Internet and American Life Project found that 65% of people in the US who write a blog also do not consider their work journalism.
The confusion implicit in the first sentence implies that 60% of the people in the UK blog. However, the context provided by the two following sentences in the quoted passage make it clear that the intent of the author is to report that of the people in the UK who blog, 60% of those blog in an online-diary form.
The mistake in the composition of the population studied is not an instance of the Composition Fallacy, since a fallacy need have at least two statements: a premise and an conclusion. This passage is only one statement with no supporting ellipsis.
Instead, by the Principle of Charity, it's best to regard the statement as confused rather than false. Thus, we should translate to an appropriate contextual meaning before analysis.









