Skip navigation.

Piloti's Pages

Isn't it enough to see that a garden is beautiful without having to believe that there are fairies at the bottom of it too? [Douglas Adams]

Posts tagged with "Ireland"

Food on the Hoof

, , , ...


Welcome one and all to the latest excursion into the world of food. Roald Dalh understood food. He wrote about it more than once. There were Giant Peaches, rivers of Chocolate, Henry Sugar and Nibbleswick, which, is not strictly speaking food, it is a food related act that Pavlov would be ashamed to claim as his own. Charlie inherited an entire factory given over to the production of scrumptious, delicious sweets. And the Oompa Loompa's

So far, our culinary tour, or trot, has taken us from the delights of the sandwich empires of England, to the simple and straight forward pizza Azzuri and beyond to the sophisticated and elegant Vienesse with their delightful torts. Not Cakes, torts.
.

So where do we head for with our next trip into the world of quick, easy, but most importantly, good food, food that can be eaten out of hand, food that is best when consumed in and with the elements, food that is to be taken out of doors, not by accident, or by a lack of time, but, by design, by intention. Food on the hoof, is food fit a for walk.

Dublin. The capital of Ireland. Famous for Georgian doors on post cards, a wrought iron bridge over a river and of course, some black heavy stout. Home of around 750,000 people, if you include some of the sub-burbs that, ten years ago were distinct places, but are now conurbations of the city itself. There are probably as many tourists visiting Dublin every year, if not more, which, if you include the amount of people who travel in to Dublin every day for work, means that there could be as many as two million people in the city at any one time.

Two million people. Two million mouths to feed. Four millions feet. A fantastic opportunity for some wonderful food on the hoof.

Dublin is a large, bustling city, with a population that, in recent years of European 'investment' has meant that the disposable income is higher than at almost any other time in the country's history. One of things that one notices in Dublin are the shop's; lots of shops, gleaming with their wares, the latest fashions, music and consumer electronics. Book shops galore to feed the new curiosity for the country's noted writers. And pubs. Lots of pubs. Lots and lots of pubs. And some of those pubs sell food. Good food. Hearty food.

Like England, Irish food could probably be best described as winter food. Not surprising really, considering how close they are, with similar climates and soils, the growing seasons are bound to be similar. And they are. And like England, it is not to say that the food is worse for being described as winter food. Indeed, there is nothing like a sitting at home, curtains drawn, with some fresh bread and good stew with dumplings, boiled bacon and cabbage or, if you were on the west of the country, fish.

But this is not good food on the hoof, er, food. A bowl of stew, stuffed full of dumplings, spring onions, red onions, potatoes, and bacon is not, on reflection, the easiest food to be wandering round a bustling city with. So, Irish food, food for eating indoors, with cutlery, crockery and, probably most important, a table, is good stuff. Good stuff indeed.

But food on the hoof ? How does this fare ? Where is there to eat ? Well, like most european cities, there are wealth of fast food / fried food places. Meat like, circular discs wedged between something that was, three days prior, like fresh bread. The meat like substance could be like beef, or like chicken, or frankly, like nothing on earth. Dublin is not different, with all the major euro' brands available on the high street, but also the Irish 'me too' brand called Supermacs. Supermacs is a curious place. Fast food burger bar, selling kebabs, salads and pizza. All served very quick, in a cardboard box, where, most of the time, the most nutrious part is
the cardboard box. Now, the thing is, for a vegetarian, there is nothing, nothing except the salad bar, to tuck your teeth into.

So what else is there in Dublin ? There is the Epicurean Food Hall. This is an indoor courtyard of small, eateries, selling food from different parts of the world. There is the usual Thai and Chinese style food, Mexican fajitas', kebabs and falafel, fish and chips, prawns and squid dishes and of course the gourmet sandwich shops, selling most things on ciabatta or bagel, depending on your hunger or your budget. My favourite though is the crepe place, where, depending on the person pouring the mix, are really quite nice, sweet and savoury. No 'crepe breton' but there you go. More often than not, you will find something here that will tempt you and fill you. And it is not that expensive either.

So what else is there to tempt the hungry pedestrian to part with their money and to consume some vitamins. Well, like the Anglo Saxon cousins, it has to be said, not much else. Marks and Spencer sandwiches and some chunky 'Stilton and red onion' crisps per chance ? Fish and chips ? A late night kebab as you tumble half cut from the local pub ? Deep fried chicken wrapped in a seasoned batter of 51 secret herbs and spices, but which seems to consist largely of pepper.!!!

Food on the hoof in Dublin is not too good, and if you happen to prefer your food without the thought of a thousand dead animals lining the stomach, then the food choices are limited. Epicurean is pretty good, but it is mainly 'plate food' and it is only one place. Dublin is dominated by the pub, and the hundreds of landlords around Dublin who do server food, serve pretty good food, but it is not fit for 'food on the hoof', sadly.

So the Dublin Food on the Hoof rating :

:worried: :worried: :worried: :worried: out of Ten.

The 2007 Six Nations : Final Thoughts

, , , ...

Well, depending on your point of view, the best team came first or second.

France clinched their second Title in two years, but were less than thoroughly convincing, which, if they are hoping to take England's crown of World Champions later this year, on home soil, then they will need to improve in greater leaps and bounds than a gazelle being chased by a pack of very hungry hyenas.

On the way to the French victory, the scored a last minute try against the Irish and were less than convincing against Scotland, scraping past the required point tally by a meagre two. LaPort will be cherishing the silverware, and the moment, but, if this is what the French have to offer later in 2007, then the World Cup is not going to be a 'home win.' Still, it could be argued that, as is the case for all great champions, across all sports, they dug in, the fought and they pushed until the last, the reward being, well, the reward.

France won four of their five games, the defeat coming against a fluctuating England, who, under Brian Ashton, showed sparks, small, in-frequent, but sparks none the less, of the flair, expanse and forward power that brought them the Trophy four years ago. The fact that France beat Italy, Scotland Ireland and Wales, is by no means a 'shoe in' for glory later this year, and the French rugby public must be wondering where they will improve [they know where they needto improve] and if they are capable.

Lets be frank. France are an excellent rugby nation. On their day, they can, and often do, beat the very best in the world [and by that I mean the Blacks, the Whites and the Wallabies] but too often, far too often, they choke on the big day. World Cup 2003, France 'v' England ?. Six Nations 2007 'England 'v' France? On both occasions, England were the better team, but it was almost as if the French really could not be bothered. Temperamental ? Emotional ? Gallic ? You choose the adjective.

So what of England ? If you are English, and of a romantic persuasion, you may see some parallels between World Cup 2003 and World Cup 2007. You don't ? Well, let me show you. England spent the previous 12 months [end of 2002 and the rest of 2003] touring, building a squad and team mentality. They went on tour and put a marker down, beating the Blacks on their own turf for the first time, in, well, in a long time. They built momentum, they improved. Individually, they had some excellent players, but they were a team, rather than a collection of excellent players. All too often, New Zealand have been 15 of the best players in the world at any one time, but have failed to gel as a team. In 2003, England gelled as a team.

In 2007, under Ashton, England are starting, only startingto gel as team. Robinson was probably the right man in the wrong job for England. He did an excellent job as Sir Clive's forward coach, but failed to get a grip of the England job as a whole. Ashton seems to getting a grip. Yes, England lost to Ireland in the biggest defeat ever to Ireland, even taking into account the Croke Park effectit was a bad day for English rugby. And we lost to Wales. Always, ALWAYS a bad day, losing to Wales.

However, England started supremely well as they took Scotland apart [who themselves were bitterly disappointing as a squad this year], they were magnificent in their win against our Gallic cousins, but were inconsistent [at best] in the win over Italy. A solid second 40 mins saw England past the Italians, who, in turn, had their best tournament ever.

Italy, frankly, were brilliant. They finished fourth, above Wales and Scotland. They scored more tries than both Wales and Scotland and in fact, beat both Wales and Scotland, they first time they have ever won two games back to back in this, or any other tournament. Italy finished fourth in the table, just behind England who were third. They also scored more tries than Scotland and Wales, with nine, against seven each for Blue and Red. In the past, Italy could be described as 'hard working' for 60 mins, but amateurish for the last 20 mins, often conceding the game winning tries in the last 20 mins or so. But not this time, they were solid throughout the 80 mins, and in fact, scored late tries themselves, against the Scots and, probably most importantly in determining where the title finally went, against Ireland, scoring two in the last ten mins or so.

So what of Ireland? They played good, expansive rugby, they were the tables top scores with 17 tries, one better than France and a massive seven better than England. But, they were sloppy, in two games, in the last few mins. And that cost them the title. France beat them in the last minute with a converted try, and Italy, although they lost to Ireland, heavily, scored those two late tries which helped France who in turn needed a less impressive win over Scotland.

Scotland were perhaps the biggest disappointment during this tournament. Before the ball was thrown, the first ruck was turned or the first fist was thrown, Scotland proclaimed themselves so confident that they would, at least, take this Triple Crown. A proud and massive boast indeed. Sadly, this did not happen. Throughout the entire tournament, they were nip and tuck, push and shove, heave and ho with Wales for the biggest ignominy of them all, the Wooden Spoon. In the end, it was points difference that gave Scotland the cutlery, -58 points to the Welsh -27. Wales deserved the Spoon, Scotland, on average, were better than Wales, although the 21 - 9 win over wales, [seven penalties to three] was hardly impressive, but the 18 - 19 defeat to Ireland, a game that frankly, Ireland were lucky, very lucky, to get away with, was a far more impressive time for the Scots.

So, overall. A fair table ? It has to be, really.

France on top as their points difference was better, and they did beat the team with whom they were tied at the top. Italy were the major surprise of the tournament, Scotland were the biggest disappointment and England were the most enigmatic [if you are English, you'll be fairly happy with this progress and turn around and a win over the French, if you are a celt, well, you'll be happy the Irish got second spot ahead of the English andput a few points on the board against them at Croke Park.

And the World Cup 2007 ?

Well, if it is to be, as Jacque Chriac said after England won the 2003 Cup, a fantastic win for NORTHERN HEMISPHERE rugby [shurely JC, you mean 'English Rugby ? : ed.] then a dramatic improvement will be sorely needed 'oop north' and the Blacks, the Boks and the Wallabies need to have a very poor 'off month' this coming September / October.

I thank you.

January 2010
S M T W T F S
December 2009February 2010
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30