qlue's blog

Hmm - works OK for me, Mr. Scientist...
http://files.myopera.com/FlaRin/files/wallstreet.jpg -

I think you live in a country with some heavy censorship. Like I do. But here they censor different things. The USofA is free...

Originally posted by Google Occupy Wall street:

About 684,000,000 results (0.15 seconds)

Would you like me to list all the links?

Originally posted by bentrein:

About 684,000,000 results (0.15 seconds)

What, why I have only 607,000,000 results

Originally posted by qlue:

if it's censorship then it's in Norway.

I doubt this

Both Google and Opera have been running some updates.

I got "About 634,000,000 results (0.19 seconds)" so it seems to work ok

Temporary issues it must be. Since yesterday Opera Mini servers have acted slowly for me.

Perhaps Google is no longer your friend...

Ongeveer 687.000.000 resultaten (0,08 seconden)
Approximate 687.000.000 results (0,08 seconds)

Is that all??? :shakes head:

Peter, where did you find those additional 53 million results?

I have no idea. I tried it several times and the only thing that was different was search time that varied between 0,08 and 0,14 seconds.
Could it be case that I get the English and a few translation in Dutch.

Originally posted by qlue:

if it's censorship then it's in Norway. (But I doubt that )

Your doubt is correct. It works just fine in Oslo.

Completely irrelevant to the blog, but though this was the type of thing you'd be interested in, Q. http://yro.slashdot.org/story/11/10/22/1325238/anonymous-hackers-take-down-child-porn-websites

Powerful my ass. They released an announcement that they've taken down child porn sites yet gave no proof and nothing has backed up the story. One might even think it was a cover story to improve their image after the kicking they've taken recently and the recent revelation that "unnamed hackers" broke into the Sesame Street Youtube page and replaced every video with hardcore porn for the kids to watch.

They're bullies of the web, that's all. When a few of them were arrested not long ago it was a bunch of kids and a 47 year old "man". They're a disorganised bunch of lunatics who think they run the web. They think they're powerful but the fact of the matter is that all they do is annoy people by running scripts and taking down services and destroy things that truly powerful people create.

Script kiddies are the 14 year-old-mentality twats of the Internet

=/ What I was linking was the page, comments and all.. Not just the blog post!

To quote Loafing_Oaf, "So they're tackling the only issue about which there is absolutely no debate, just like cable news anchors. Does Anonymous have a PR department now, improving their image?!"

Though they are not ALL disorganized wannabe' vigilantes. I doubt they could have done half the things they have, if that was the case. Remember when they hacked into the Syrian Ministry Of Defense website? Was quite funny.

That's exactly the point. Most of these people who they're hacking are kids when it comes to computers, using 1234 or 0000 as their passwords. The Syrian one is particularly funny as they used the login name as their password too. Someone got lucky on that and the particular glitch has been patched so that's not possible anymore.

For me, it's not a case of how they hack but what they do with the information. Take the list of undercover operatives that got put public. A true hacker would have given it back and listed the security loopholes they exploited to get in (you can't use brute force to get into government or military websites) so they can be fixed. Only a glory hog would put other people's lives at risk simply to show off that they could get in somewhere (in their own words "to expose the risk").

good!!