Am I wrong!
Saturday, 20. December 2008, 02:32:34
When ethics and common practice collide, which one shall be the loser?
I've just had a conversation with a colleague. He's being trying to convince me that it's time for me to 'lighten up', to 'go with the flow' and 'bend' the rules.
You see, the coversation revolted around the fact that I am single. According to him, the reason that I'm single is because I don't fuck around. Apparently, the only way to get married is to first have non-committal sex with a wide variety of women. Presumably, these women would, themselves, be having multiple non-committal relationships.
Is this what the world has become? A ducking free for all where morals at ethics are to be despised and viewed with contempt?
How did this society get so damned corrupt that the stench of corruption smells sweet to the very guardians of virtue!!
Woe to the world, for it has fallen. Woe to humanity, for it is no longer human!




ellinidata # 20. December 2008, 02:57
you are single because you respect yourself enough
not to get politically correct
by following everybody elses' example!
the divorce statistics are higher not
by people that respect women and themselves,
but by "multiple non-committal relationships"holders
the ones that marry but they are not ready for the marriage!
I see it daily on line here
men and woman that clain to have the "love of their lives"
in their life,
they try to find happiness by chatting for multiple hours
with other commited people.
Who ever tells me that all is frendly ,
will have to notarize his/het tongue for me to believe them!
it is cheating on line and it seems OK,
the multiple relationships continue....
either on line or in real life:(
be yourself and ignore "smart@@@@@" that know everything!
You don't want your fiance' or wife on Opera
posting provocative videos, pictures or chat with other men
all day long!
Your life has to change 100% when the time comes for you to have a family and to do so,
a. you have to be ready for it,
b. you have to find the right person to become the mother of your children and focus in her family the way you are willing to do so !
I am proud of you!
qlue # 20. December 2008, 03:56
ellinidata # 20. December 2008, 04:07
there are some great people out there,
you don't set time in life,
when I left my coutry,friends,family,job for the man I married,
I knew it was the right thing to do!I never regret it ,even after becoming a widow at 29. The bar he set is so high I will nevet settle for less.Remember not all people realize that marriage is special!
the time will come for you...
trust your feeling only,
nobody elses!
dragon_harrower # 20. December 2008, 04:08
qlue # 20. December 2008, 05:45
Cois # 20. December 2008, 08:27
Seriously though.. Everyone should live their lives as they think. If its his choice to shag around then so be it. Though safety is a prerequisite and religion isn't an issue..
Still you don't need to 'play the field' to find the right woman eh..
Spaggyj # 20. December 2008, 10:43
Your way of life will bring better - because you won't end up with someone who's whored themselves around - you'll find someone with the same ethics as you, hopefully. There may be few people like that, but it doesn't mean you'll never find your lady
Cois # 20. December 2008, 11:09
Spaggyj # 20. December 2008, 11:58
Furie # 20. December 2008, 12:12
While you believe you're keeping yourself ready for the woman you'll end up with, you may well be missing out on that woman by not giving her a chance. The woman of your dreams doesn't magically drop into your lap. She starts as a regular date and you build the relationship together. It's not romantic like the movies but it is practical and a lot longer lasting than most.
And purity is another word for naivety these days. How hurt would you be if you didn't have the practiced skills to retain the woman when you do find her? Women like to say how they admire a guy like that, but the sad fact is they admire him only as a friend even if they wont admit it. When it comes down to sex, the majority of women will leave if it's no good, even if they're not willing to admit it themselves.
I agree that the world has become a sweating, rutting cesspit, but that only increases the need to at least participate. As more people adapt to this, more will have preconceived standards that someone without experience just can't regularly fulfill. And no matter how many women protest, the fact remains that these things do matter to them more than a guy with a past.
Just some food for thought on how this can affect a happy relationship in the future. You don't need to sleep around, but don't stop yourself completely in the vain hope that romance will save the day.
qlue # 20. December 2008, 12:15
It's comforting to know that I'm not alone in believing that there is a better way of life that the status quo.
SqueakeyCat # 21. December 2008, 00:36
my quote is this:
"Don't let anyone tell you that you can't do something. For if they do, it just means that they couldn't do it themselves."
don't let them bully u into changing your standards.
Shaunak # 21. December 2008, 05:37
What right do I have to comment on the issue? I may not lay eggs but I know more about omelets than the hen
qlue # 21. December 2008, 14:10
That sounds like something that a catholic priest would say
ellinidata # 21. December 2008, 16:26
ripp2002 # 22. December 2008, 01:56
qlue # 22. December 2008, 03:02
angel292005 # 22. December 2008, 19:03
Have I ever been single? Oh yeah...when I was under 14.
qlue # 23. December 2008, 00:39
I regret not holding on to what I believe in though.
ripp2002 # 23. December 2008, 05:41
noah counte # 25. December 2008, 23:49
ripp2002 # 26. December 2008, 01:46
Go pack some womans stocking with your beef log...
Oh wait, I mean share a nice evening with a lovely woman...
qlue # 26. December 2008, 13:28
Now Mathew, you've pretty much hit the nail on the head. I'm not interested in 'fly by night' liaisons. Trust me, in this new 'free' society we live in, I can get plenty of that. But, religion aside, a committed relationship cannot grow out of an unsecured tryst. Commitment starts at the begining. On one would deposit cash with a bank they don't trust. So it boggles the mind when people suggest that one should 'deposit' ones heart with someone who clearly cannot be trusted.
Furie # 26. December 2008, 14:04
ripp2002 # 26. December 2008, 16:01
qlue # 26. December 2008, 17:15
Just as with money, with love one expects at least the promise of good faith. Now one can obtain that promise of good faith as a verbal agreement, but let's be honest here, a verbal agreement is worth less that the paper it's printed on.
noah counte # 26. December 2008, 18:58
Furie # 26. December 2008, 19:39
Let me use your bank analogy for a second to make my view clearer. You may want a contract with that bank before giving them your money, but unless you could see what a good bank it was in the first place you wouldn't be interested. If it looked like a shoe shop you wouldn't even offer it your money. The same applies to love. Unless you're willing to get close enough to someone (and this can mean sex depending on the person) to know that they're a bank you can't say they're the right or wrong one for you, or even get offered that contract. Not counting stalking the only way to start getting close is to take the chance and go on a date.
I'm not saying film yourself having sex with a thousand virgins. Hell, where would we find that many these days? I'm saying give love a chance before you turn it away. I've seen people go into relationships with your mindset (which I'm understanding as living together and sex before marriage are the signs of untrustworthiness so you wouldn't consider someone who was up for that - correct me if I'm wrong) and the majority of them are bloody miserable because they aren't compatible and never took the time to find that out. Unless you've lived with someone for quite a while and seen them at their best and worst, you can't say "This is the one for me." and be telling the whole truth.
Basically, there's only so many people in the world. Would you really be willing to turn away someone you could be happy with for the rest of your life, just in case?
qlue # 26. December 2008, 23:58
Now I don't like going into brothels and shebeens. I don't drink (never did like the stuff) I can't stand crowded places and I hate been outdoors after sunset. What are the odds of my finding someone compatible with me in a brothel or a shebeen?
Furie # 27. December 2008, 00:30
I'm not saying hit a brothel and I don't even know what a shebeen (sounds vaguely transexual) is? Even if it's ultimately not for you, you have to know that there are people out there who get together these ways (one nighters and such) and it all worked out for them. There are more honestly happy people together who met through a drunken one night stand than who waited til after marriage for sex.
At the end of the day it comes down to personal choice, but you do have to sacrifice something whatever you choose to do. There are no guarantees with any way, it's all a numbers game in the end. Like I said at the beginning of my barrage of comments, there are a million different ways to live in the world and they're all wrong.
noah counte # 27. December 2008, 01:19
ripp2002 # 27. December 2008, 05:14
okkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk is just as good as yes...
qlue # 27. December 2008, 08:45
Furie # 27. December 2008, 09:33
Cois # 27. December 2008, 09:57
Pubs are your best bet to get to meet people. Except if you're religious and you go to meets regularly.
Go in the afternoon and shoot some pool. Most likely there'll be some girls that go to do just the same. A pub isn't just for drinking yo.. Most girls I know don't drink at all or they sip on some coolers. Don't need to be drunk to have a good time
A relationship isn't built on sex but it doesn't hurt to have a good time but still playing it safe eh..
SqueakeyCat # 27. December 2008, 19:42
nepmak2000 # 30. December 2008, 05:38
edwardpiercy # 6. January 2009, 21:58
Unless people are close friends who are truly concerned about your welfare, they should just mind their own frigging business.
gud-malik # 11. January 2009, 20:53
gud-malik # 11. January 2009, 21:01
gud-malik # 11. January 2009, 21:02
gud-malik # 11. January 2009, 21:05
Furie # 11. January 2009, 23:41
Spaggyj # 12. January 2009, 00:05
qlue # 12. January 2009, 04:07
Oh and don't worry too much about the two english teachers above,
SqueakeyCat # 1. February 2009, 20:28