Skip navigation.

exploreopera

| Help

Sign up | Help

Directory of Lost Causes

The Last of Morbid Tales

, ,

Well, I've just received news that Tartarus Press has shifted the last few copies of Morbid Tales, my second collection of short stories, and will not be reprinting. I note that the book is already listed as out of print. Don't ask me where you can get hold of the few remaining copies that are for sale. Obviously not from Tartarus, and not from me, either. I don't have any spare copies, I'm afraid, as I've already given them all away to people who probably use them to adjust the height of their computer monitors with.



Every now and then, when people learn I write stuff, they will say to me something like, "Oh, I'll check the shops for your book", at which I usually get a sinking feeling and wish to kill myself. I suppose people can't be blamed too much for not buying my books, as they are ridiculously hard to get hold of. I've been told by someone that he always recommends my books to people, but they find the buying process online too Byzantine and eventually give up on the endeavour, along with the wearying business of taking air into their lungs. Well, now they have a very slight inkling of how I feel most of the time about being a writer. It's fucking horrible, thank you very much.

Anyway, I didn't mean to go on another rant. This (rant) has just come out unexpectedly - obviously it's still there lurking beneath the surface.

But no, people are sadly, sadly naive about what a writer's life is like. No, I don't earn a living from my fiction. I know many, many writers, and I'd say fewer than one percent of them earn a living from their writing. What I mostly see in the world of writing is writers getting shat on repeatedly. Another common misconception I'd like to dispell here. When a book is published, right, that doesn't mean that suddenly infinite copies of it exist in a never-to-be-exhausted supply. Print runs are finite, and, when you're not famous, are usually very, very limited. This means that, if you're lucky, the book could disappear from the marketplace, forever, within months. If you're not so lucky, it will theoretically stay in the marketplace forever, just because no one buys it, or it could get remaindered.

So, how do I feel about the first edition of Morbid Tales coming to an end? Hmmm. Well, Morbid Tales was my second collection, but the fact that it was a hardback, nicely produced, did give me a certain sense of actually being a writer. When I got the cardboard box with my copies in, I felt - and this is typical of me - nothing much really. This was what I'd worked for for many years. I had a very faint sense of satisfaction, hardly passing the threshold of thought into feeling. I like the cover. The book got one or two reviews that gave me something of a boost as a writer. I mean, in terms of confidence, not in terms of sales or anything like that. I'm glad, generally, to be associated with Tartarus Press, and if you want to support them and me you could always buy a copy of Strange Tales Volume II in which I have a story, and tell them you particularly want it for the story by Quentin S. Crisp. You could also just buy more books and read more generally.

I don't think I've answered my own question. How do I feel about Morbid Tales coming to an end? Well, copyright reverts to me now, so I can always try and interest some other publisher in the material. I'm a bit too tired for that at the moment. What I really feel is not so different to what I felt when I first held the solid book in my hands. But now I also feel a vague sense of freedom and a vague sense of emptiness. This is what I became a writer for - this freedom, this emptiness.

It's back and better than ever

, ,

The best Youtube clip ever has now been returned to us. A terrible shadow has lifted. I think the sound and picture quality are a little better on this than the previous one, too. I only pray that someone will preserve this against a time when the depredations of Youtube grow fierce and there is much malicious taking down of brilliant clips.

One of the beautiful people

Who on Earth is Tom Baker?

, , ,

I sent an e-mail to someone recently about the new Doctor Who. That is, the Doctor Who of Russel T. Davies. (One L or two?) I'm not going to look it up now.

Since I am well-known in my neck of the woods for being a Doctor Who fan, and have even played (very badly) Tom Baker's Doctor in a theatrical pro-ject, many thousands of people, androids, Sontarans, Silurians, Ice-Warriors (now there's a monster I'd like to see ressurected, have I already missed it?), Time Lords and robot dogs have asked my opinion on the new series. I see if I can remember now my first impressions.



Before I go on to say anything else, let me say that the entire world should be grateful to Russel T. Davies for renewing interest in the series, and for bringing the Daleks and the Cidermen to a new generation of children who I hope are not too cynical to hide behind the sofa, as of old, as that would be sad. So, the man done good. And I will now preface my observations further, and ominously, by saying that, of course, everyone has their own favourite Doctor, which is probably heavily influenced by which Doctor they grew up with. However, since I have been a Doctor Who fan for about ninety percent or more of my now 36 years, I think I have a right to express an opinion here.

So, my first impressions of the new series. Christopher Eccleston seemed a bit stiff, but had something. I liked him. One thing I immediately noticed was that the episodes were self contained stories (there have since been some longer stories stretched over a few episodes), which seemed to me to eliminate one of the great traditions of Doctor Who, which was the cliffhanger, and particularly the cliffhanger combined with the enticement of a slow build-up. Usually there were four episodes, though this varied. At the end of the first episode you would see, through the crack in a steel bulkhead in some underground lair, a green, mucilaginous claw made of hideous bubble-wrap, spray paint and sugar paper. And we were sore afraid. At the end of the second episode, you would see as far as the shoulder, if that thing may be called a shoulder. At the end of the third episode, there would be a whole army of mucilaginous claw monsters from an art workshop surrounding the Doctor while he grinned and offered them a jelly baby, as if he did not even realise he was in danger of his life, and Sarah-Jane Smith would cry, "Dotor, look out!" And at the end of the fourth episode the Doctor and his assistant would slip quietly away in the TARDIS, leaving behind people too dazed and relieved to question very closely who this man was, where he has gone, where he came from, and why he spoke with such authority.

I suppose I miss that format. I think a lot of the spirit of Doctor Who was contained in that. Why was the decision made to change this. I'm tempted to say someone at a meeting said, "Exucse me, two words, 'Attention span!' Two more words, 'Lack of'."



I felt somewhat let down with this, but I persevered and watched, I believe, every episode of the new series, taking care to see the repeats and so on when I missed one. There were some good episodes. My favourites, as I recall them, were The End of the World, The Long Game, and The Empty Child. Things seemed to be promising.

Some things did bother me, however. I didn't like the introduction of sex. To me, Doctor Who is a children's programme in the best sense of the word. There should be nothing denigrating about such a term. The Doctor, to me, had always been asexual, and this was part of his alien quality. Never mind that off-screen Tom Baker was somewhat like the Rasputin character he once so brilliantly played. He knew very well his responsibilities as a hero for children. The introduction of sex seemed like another thing put forward at a meeting. "Of course, it will all be done in the best possible taste," someone must have quipped, attempting to re-cross his or her legs dementedly in the manner of the one and only Kenny.

Then there came David Tennant. I really liked his performance in the introductory episode of his incarnation. Things were still promising. However, somewhere along the line I seemed to lose interest, and it doesn't help that I'm not living in a house with a television at the moment. There's a lot I could say on this, but I kind of feel like it's summed up in this article from The Independent, with a story that very much tows the public line. Here's the quote that struck me:

Why place [Russell T. Davies] higher than Stephen Fry, Sir Elton John or Peter Mandelson? Partly because of the status he has within his industry, achieved by doing the impossible: reviving the Doctor – turning a dusty old joke into a witty, sexy, slick and scary show – and making Saturday tea-time family telly compulsory again. But also because of what his critics call "the Gay Agenda".


That was the line, the one seemingly inserted incidentally between dashes. "[T]urning a dusty old joke into a witty, sexy, slick and scary show". Now, let's have a little think about what is meant by 'dusty old joke'. The show that the BBC cared so little for that many of the old episodes are lost forever, carelessly archived, or perhaps just thrown away. The show whose first episode was broadcast the day that Kennedy was assassinated, so that if anyone actually saw that first episode when it was first broadcast, he or she is my hero forever. The show that has become one of the longest-running television shows in the world. The show where the hero is an alien with two hearts who is far more intelligent than humans and never carries a gun. The show that refused to die, kept alive by fans and writers who wrote Doctor Who books that were never made into TV episodes. The show in which Jon Pertwee dressed as a dandy, Tom Baker wore a ridiculosly long scarf and claimed not to be a fashion expert, and Peter Davison (who once sat in the same Barnstaple pub as me at the same time) wore a set of cricket whites. The show that gave us stories with Tibetan buddhism and giant spiders. The show that was only ever scheduled in the first place as a schedule-filler. The show that made a kind of robot without legs, driven by a blob of nuclear war-mutated slime, the most terrifying thing in the galaxy. The show that had the best theme tune ever, from the BBC Radiophonic Workshop (hello Ron Grainer and Delia Derbyshire). The show in which the Doctor refused to destroy the Daleks when he had the perfect chance to (twice, I believe, correct me if I'm wrong), saying at some point that out of their evil would come a greater good. The show in which Tom Baker met Lalla Ward and gave us one of the finest ever television double acts. The show for which Douglas Adams wrote a story about the Mona Lisa being faked by a malicious alien trapped in splinter-selves throughout history, giving John Cleese a great cameo in the Louvre. The show that dared to cast Bonnie Langford as an assistant. The show that had ecological themes expressed in terms of giant, mutated maggots. Image of the Fendahl (the Doctor offers a jelly-baby to an ancient glowing skull). An Unearthly Child (a strange girl leads her teachers into a police call box that is bigger on the inside than the outside, "But that's impossible!"). The Seeds of Death (Patrick Troughton's Doctor utters the immortal lines, later to inspire a song by The Dead Bell, "You can't kill me... I'm a genius!"). The Ark in Space, (one of my earliest memories, and still, to me, quintessential Doctor Who, even now making me thrill as I watch it again; when I first saw it, in the nextdoor neighbour's house {there was community in those days, and we didn't have a telly in our house}, I didn't just hide behind the sofa, I actually ran all the way back to my own house, and then went back again to watch more). Terror of the Autons (my memory grows hazy, but I believe that this story received a number of complaints that it would give children nightmares because it had familiar objects, such as dolls and sofas, being used as instruments of death by aliens; also, in one of the Auton stories, Jon Pertwee wrestles with a rubber octopus-thing).



This is the dusty old joke. I'm actually not going to let that lie. I'm going to comment further. When I hear people say something like, "Oh, Doctor Who. That was so ridiculous. You could see the sets wobble", and so on, and laughing about the show having a low-budget, what I immediately think is, "You have no imagination. That's why you need CGI, to fill the gaps that your own imagination won't supply. Is lack of money really the harshest criticism that you can come up with? Perhaps you should try going to the theatre, take in a play, see what people can do with a script and a few props, and without CGI?"

And now we have "a witty, sexy, slick and scary show". I have no objection to witty or scary, especially in combination, but "slick" and "sexy" sounds to me like a Justin Timberlake album.

All this is brought on by a number of things, but in particular by my catching the episode The Wasp and the Unicorn this weekend. I suppose I wasn't hugely impressed. However, I thought Catherine Tate was okay. I hear a lot of people are pissed off with her. No, I'd say she's one of the better assistants. At least she doesn't seem to be a device for teenage soap opera.

Well, I'm going to attempt to finish the first draft of my novel Susuki tonight, so I'll wrap up here, even though there's more to say.

Oh yes, this one goes out to Lawrence Miles. I've never met you, but I'm willing to bet you're a good bloke.

Not talking about my generation, talking about degeneration

, , , ...

When I first heard the song My Generation, as a teenager, I didn't identify with the sentiments at all. I've never felt a particularly strong sense of belonging to any generation, for which I am retrospectively glad, since it means I've never been a slave to fads and fashions. I remember some words in a review of some David Bowie release or other. The reviewer wrote, in an almost puzzled tone, that David Bowie never seemed to have been young and foolish; it was almost as if he were born old. I recognised in those words exactly what had made David Bowie stand out for me. "Look out you rock'n'rollers/Pretty soon now, you're going to get older." I've never been especially excited by music that celebrates youth, even when I was supposedly young. It's always seemed to me rather short-sighted, not presenting an elevated view of things at all.

I wonder why it is, then, that the following clip interests me:



Well, Stanhope is, of course, talking about America, and I'm not especially familiar with the younger generation in America. If it is well-represented by the kind of comments you find on Youtube, some of which are entirely incomprehensible beyong the fact they are probably meant to be insulting, and some of which are so incomprehensible that you just can't tell any more whether they are meant to be insulting or not, then it looks like he has just cause to complain.

My own complaints about 'the young generation' would probably differ from his. To be honest, the words 'the young(er) generation' hardly ever pass my lips anyway, because, as I've said, I don't concern myself much with generational identities. I have a sense, however, of a younger generation in Britain, cheated of any possibility of making their lives meaningful by an utterly materialistic society. I also caught a certain phrase in Stanhope's routine that has meaning for me, despite having become a modern cliche, and that phrase is 'dumbed down'. I do think that 'dumbing down' is a reality, yes. I'm afraid I only have anecdotal evidence for this, but I'm sure it must show up in things like falling literacy rates in the English-speaking world, too. I haven't checked. I'm writing this off the cuff. Oh, I've said before, I've never voted for Tony Blair's Labour. Even when he was new on the scene, and had never been Prime Minister, I didn't vote for him, because I knew that his lot were going to cut student grants. My generation were the last to receive student grants from the government. Without that grant I would not have been able to have tertiary education. I am a believer of education for its own sake, and education as an investment in the future of a country. Tony (educationeducationeducation) Blair clearly wasn't.

I recently asked someone who works for the BBC, the following question:

"Is it actually written policy in the BBC these days to make sure that any documentary programme is presented by someone who knows absolutely nothing about the subject?"

The response was:

"I'm so glad you asked me that."

It was explained to me that the general process would be something like the following (I paraphrase from memory):

"Someone will have a quick ask around the office, like this: 'Hey guys, we're putting together a documentary on colony collapse disorder. Do you lot know Meera Syal? No? Too old, maybe. How about Anouska Golebiewski? You've all heard of her? Great! We'll go with her.'"

I could go on with this kind of story, and you're free to contribute your own. The point is, I have the general impression, which may be adjusted with further information, that dumbing down is very real and is part of a process of social control, making people think they already understand everything so that they don't try to find out for themselves.

However, I do see some very hopeful things (by which I mean people) amongst 'the younger generation' (excuse, I just feel the urge to put that in inverted commas), some of whom I know personally. But to give an example of someone I don't know personall, there is, for instance, Magibon, who, I notice, has recently put up another clip in her 'mu' or 'nothing' series:



I realise a lot of people would disagree with me here, but I don't care. The interesting thing is that so many people (I'm guessing of her own generation) hate her. Let's have a look at the calibre of comment we find left beneath this clip by the haters:

I think you should speak EEENGLIIIISH in one of them since we seen you being on television and fo shizzle maaaaa nizzzlllle


What's this thing about wanting everyone to speak English? Do you know how ignorant, rude and aggressive that is?

SPEAKKKKKKKKK


There are a lot like this. It seems like a lot of people really can't stand silence. I'd hate to be in a room with one of them.

useless waste of 34 seconds lol


Not a useful waste, then? And now you've wasted more seconds by posting this comment.

WHAT THE FUCK IS THE POINT??????


These ones amuse me. Somehow these seem to me the most confused of all. Why are they looking for a point? Why don't they simply see what is there?

lmao shes not even asian


Errr, she never said she was. A lot of very silly Youtube posters seemed to think she was, probably because they've never met an Asian person before and thought Magibon was so un-American she couldn't possibly be American.

I dont understand..

I dont like any of her vids.. there pointless and stupid yet.. I subscribed!? OmGWwtFbbQ?


I quite like that one, actually. It's endearingly candid.

lol, i have seen a few of this girls videos... im stumped as to what it is shes trying to achieve :S


Does 'lol' really mean 'laugh out loud', as I'm told? If so, people seem to laugh out loud in the most deranged places. It never seems to make sense. Which is... quite interesting. Also, why should she be trying to acheive anything? Why?

dumy


I told you some of the comments are utterly incomprehensible.

Oh my god, I am tired of this staring bullshit. At least start talking again. This is why people hate you because you upload videos where you just stare into the camera. I hope you get a free dental makeover so your life will be better and you will stop doing this shit.


Errr... right. Okay. Next caller, please.

Well, it's interesting that a number of people say that she seems in a very good mood in this clip. I almost got the feeling that all the waves of hate are beginning to tell on her, and she's trying to deflect them in this video. I hope that's not the case, and that the hate is not getting her down.

Hmmm. Anyway, I started writing this and actually I'm feeling uninspired, and I haven't come to any conclusions. I was going to write a bit about different decades, but I don't feel like it now.

I think sometime I might write a post collecting together all my favourite Youtube comments. There are some good ones out there.

Aida Mitsuo

It seems like there are bad things happening in the world, and there's nothing much I can say about them.



now here

Head of Bleddyn

, , ,

Well, I have insomnia again, and I thought, what better way to deal with it than to post a new photo album on my blog, but it seems to be taking about fifty kasquillion aeons to upload each image, so I might just go back to bed.

If I actually succeed in putting an album together, I should explain that the image(s) below are from Wales. I've taken hundreds, perhaps thousands, of photographs in Wales since I moved here last year. These are from the latest batch. They're not the best. I think they're a bit blurry. I've got a new camera, and that's my excuse.



Some people, I believe, rave about summer dells carpeted with bluebells, and I wouldn't say 'no' myself. But I much prefer a wooded hillside blanketed with flowering wild garlic.

There were also photos, in this batch, of the piglets down the road, and of my favourite ever tree, but I do like to keep some things to myself.

This computer, or the Internet, is being so slow that I want to kill myself.

By the way, please read Chomu. There have been recent additions, and there should be more exciting stuff coming up soon. And I might even write briefly about Chomu on my blog. I actually put in two seperate sets of HTML for italics for those two words there.



I used to read more books. I really am blaming the Internet for that. Not Chomu, mind you, but the Internet, generally. Chomu is good, and it counts as proper reading.

I can't stand any more uploading. I'm going back to bed.

I'm the storyteller, and my stories must be told

Another Blog

, , ,

I've just stumbled upon this blog, which looks very interesting to me. In particular, I am interested in this entry and this entry.

I'd like to reproduce from the second of those two entries, the list of censored/suppressed news stories for the year 2007. These are there for me and you to find out more about ourselves, if we wish:

1. The Future of the Internet: giant cable companies seek a monopoly on cable Internet
2. Halliburton charged with selling nuclear secrets to Iran - illegally - under Cheney
3. The worldwide death of oceans: warming, toxic buildup, dead zones, changing PH balance, fish, grass and kelp die offs
4. Hunger and homelessness in the US on the rise: Government solution? Discontinue Census surveys that keep statistical tables on poverty
5. US supports genocide in the Congo to gain access to resources used to make high-tech gadgetry such as cell phones
6. The end of federal whistleblower protections
7. US operatives torture detainees to death in Afghanistan and Iraq
8. Pentagon exempts itself from the Freedom of Information Act
9. World Bank funds the Palestine-Israel Wall
10. The death toll of civilians in Iraq from the expanded air war
11. Dangers of genetically modified foods confirmed
12. The dangers of common pesticides like Roundup
13. Homeland Security contracts KBR (a Halliburton subsidiary) to build detention centers in the US
14. The EPA's primary research partner is the chemical industry
15. Ecuador and Mexico defy the US on the international criminal court
16. The Iraq reconstruction promotes OPEC agenda: profit for major US oil companies
17. Physicist concludes that official 9/11 explanation is scientifically implausible
18. Destruction of rainforests is at an all-time high
19. Bottled water: a global environmental problem
20. Gold mining threatens ancient Andean glaciers
21. Billions in homeland security undisclosed
22. US Oil targets Kyoto in Europe
23. Cheney's Halliburton stock rose of 3000 percent last year
24. Pentagon plans to build new landmines
25. US military in Paraguay threatens the region

I'm particularly interested in number 11. I have always been against genetically modified foods. Apart from anything else, I see no need for them. It seems to me that the people who will benefit will be those who run the food industry, since they will be able to patent foods and cream off royalties. I recently heard rumours that the US government has actually forbidden labelling of any food to inform consumers whether it contains GM products. I have heard further rumours that US agents have deliberately contaminated British crops with GM material in order to sabotage British resistance to GM foods. I have been meaning to write a post about this, but have not yet done enough research on it. If anyone can assist me with information, I would be very grateful.

The Last Post

I am actually pretty sick of the personal tactics being used on the Dawkins thread, and have come away from the whole thing with a bad feeling. This is the last comment I left there (in response to someone telling me that he hoped the door wouldn't hit my 'ass' (or would hit it, I can't remember) on the way out, and I think I'll leave it at that and we can get on with more pleasant matters. This has been an interesting learning experience. Here's the last comment I left:

To be honest I didn't come here interested in 'winning' an 'argument'. I feel like that's all most of the people on this board are interested in. You obviously haven't read or understood anything I've said. I don't think I'm "right".

It's incredible that someone here - not you - has tried to imply that I am preaching. For what, expressing an opinion contrary to the opinions of those gathered here? I'll tell you something. I actually came on this board thinking that we'd be able to have a more open-minded discussion here than on a religious website. I actually believed that.

Considering the fact that Justin and I are apparently idiots, you must all feel very good about yourselves for having tried for so long to tear two idiots apart, in your droves, without succeeding. You do realise that anyone who isn't especially sycophantic in their views about Dawkins - "Oh, Dawkins, you are so big. We're all pretty impressed down here with you" - to whom I am merely a flea, will see exactly what's going on on this thread. Dawkins's authority is not to be questioned. He can say whatever he likes, even about things outside his field - what is The God Delusion if not preaching? - and no one must challenge him. And even the challenge of a flea like me is taken very seriously. Most of the people on these boards are obsessed with 'god', which is why their pseudonyms tend to have religious connotations, they have priests for avatars, they have signatures that talk about god.

You know what, I think I will go now, because all that I've just written here seems to be so true that I know you won't be able to even consider it for a moment, and there will be no dialogue. And I don't care. I sent the link of this thread to a friend. He replied with a quote from Yoda:

"If to the asylum you go, lunatics find you will."

And he was right. It's my own fault for coming here and expecting to be able to talk. Well, I actually hope you have nice lives. It would be sad if you didn't.

Take care now,

Quentin.

The Airing Cupboard

I've been keeping Justin in the airing cupboard here, to try and dry him out a bit. I think he might have a silverfish infestation now.

Anyway, I took him out and dusted him off just as he was in the middle of his new designs for a prehistoric masquerade ball, and I asked him what he was thinking about the Dawkins situation:

"Yeah, hey, like I think I've pretty much lost interest. I haven't posted stuff because there doesn't seem to be anything new there."

"I think even Richard Dawkins has lost interest in Richard Dawkins. Or he would have, if he was even there to begin with."

"Yeah."

"I think we're boring our audience and that will never do."

"Yeah, hey, and I'm working on some really interesting designs now, too, all in different shades of gold."

"Anything to say in summary?"

"Not really. I, well, I might post a couple more things on the thread."

"Yes. I might too. Just generally try to wrap things up, leave it on a cliffhanger or something, so there's always the chance that the hero didn't die in the fall, or the villain, for that matter."

"So the hero didn't die in the villain?"

"Well, there is always that chance, yes."

"Yeah, hey, sounds cool. I just don't think it's going anywhere now."

"If there were a chance of some discussion."

"Well, it was getting really interesting a while back there."

"I'll have to take credit for that, as it was after I'd told them they could do better, wasn't it?"

"Yeah. I mean, hey, what was that all about anyway? We're just a couple of, like, flakey Taisho/Yellow Nineties hybrid fashion models and designers who just happened to arrive on the Dawkins board by accident as we were travelling back from the 23rd Century to get those sewing patterns from Arthur Machen, hey?"

"Yes. But on a lighter note, I feel a bit like, if I ever actually meet Richard Dawkins now it will actually be hypocritical of me to be pally and stuff. So, the only way to clear the air, if he comes round for muffins (which are, by default English), is to offer up front to have a fight. A duel to the death. I won't push it. I shall merely say that the offer is there, like the muffins themselves."

"Yeah. I'll be your second."

"Great."

"I think I might attack England."

"Excellent."

"No, I don't mean with like submarines and lasers and the members of the Shield Society and shit. I mean, on the thread."

"Oh yes. Of course. Well, if you do, I shall corroborate. I think attacking England is an excellent idea. It's all about England."

"These English atheists are not the same as the ones back home."

"Not any more. When I was an atheist, we had a much better class of atheist about. But, unfortunately, a few hardline materialists have emerged from the woodwork, trying to take materialism to the end zone, with all this 'collision of worlds', science-against-religion-for-the-big-showdown shit. It's so tacky."

"Yeah. Could you pass me the glue? No. I mean, like, the paste. Thanks."

Not the Peter Harris Experience No. 2

I'm posting this a bit late and in a hurry because the show's started. Sorry. Q.

hijacking again . . . 10 midnight, www.phonic.fm

last week the pc that does the streaming took exception to some acid cheese techno and died.

i hope tonight's tunes will find it in better fettle.

coming up this eve:

Couple of pieces from Darren Hayman’s musical ventures, one new one old, some off-kilter Polish Jazz/Jass, a hymn to the goddess Nemesis, a trip to the Toolshed, a Romanian village brass band, The Fall, Ukrainian wedding music, two more tracks from Portishead, some Thessalonikan guitar-noisiness from the wonderfully-named Dread Astaire, Uri Caine, some dadaist electronica from Hamburg’s Felix Kubin, JS Bach and ooo lots more besides.

.
hope you;ll give a whirl.


email for studio is studio@phonic.fm

www.myspace.com/deepseaball

thankyou for your time.

pete bish (the other part of the Tuesday Night Lullabies from the Twin Axis of Odd and Other or something akin)

He's the captain of the high school football team

,

I've been meaning for some time to write a review of the film Beach Party. Actually, it's been a while since I watched it now, so it's hardly fresh in my memory. Also, I've probably got some work coming in any minute, so, all in all, I'd like, if possible, to keep this short and sweet.

I'm not going to give all the Wikipedia crap about the background of the Beach Party film series. I'll start, instead, by saying that the film is excellent. So, if you're short of time, too, you need read no further. However, to go into details: The film starts with Dolores (Annette Funicello) and Frankie (Frankie Avalon) - and here I'm reminded of the way Sid James (almost) always played a character called Sid in the Carry On series - driving along some coast road with a stretch of golden beach in the background, and a couple of surfboards on the car's back seat, singing the best song ever written, Beach Party Tonight, which can be heard in all it's glory here. For some reason that I haven't worked out, Dolores and Frankie seem to be driving around in Chitty Chitty Bang Bang. Anyway...



Soon after they arrive, the two starry-eyed young lovers are strolling along by the surf anticipating the wonderful time that they will soon be having here on the beach and in its environs. Frankie avers that, "The one thing I've studied this semester is you." To this, Dolores replies, with a mischeivous twinkle in her eye, "Well, I hope you don't flunk." Poor simple Frankie looks confused. The girl's got something up her sleeve.

It seems Frankie was planning for them to have a beach hut all to themselves, presenting such a situation to Dolores as romantic. Of course, what 'romantic' means in this case is that, being the red-blooded teenager with a forty-year-old's haircut that he is, he is hoping to advance their relationship to its next stage by doing unmentionable things with and to the winsome Dolores. Fully aware of this, she has invited all of their friends to stay at the hut, too, much to Frankie's vexation. He should have known she's not that easy! There ensues, throughout the course of the film, a battle between Frankie and Dolores, with each trying to make the other jealous by showing interest in other parties. In the end, inevitably, and quite suddenly, they realise that they were both being silly and they both love each other and so on, which really brings us more-or-less back where we started and renders the whole 98 minutes entirely pointless. I'm afraid I've given the entire plot away, but you probably knew it anyway, as some deep race memory embedded in the very cells of your body.

Much is made, of course, of "today's pagan rites", which basically means lots of very mature-looking teenagers dancing around in swimwear between monolithic circles of surf-boards. The quaint voyeuristic aspect of this depiction of pagan rites is legitimised in an interesting way. The anthropologist Professor Robert Orwell Sutwell (Bob Cummings), is observing these rites from his own beach hut through a telescope and with the use of bugging devices. He has a long brown beard that looks like a disguise (but turns out to be real), and at first has about him more than a vague suggestion of a peeping Tom. There is something rather humorous in this - a middle-aged academic 'studying' scantily-clad teenagers (perhas as Frankie wanted to 'study' Dolores) for the sake of his next book. And that humour, of course, gives the viewer the excuse to peep over the Professor's shoulder and through his lens. In doing so, they are merely 'laughing at' the professor.

However, it's round about here that I began to be surprised by the tenor of the film. I already had the film mentally pegged as the American equivalent of the Carry On series, a kind of 'Carry On with a suntan'. Therefore, with very British expectations to the fore, I was fully imagining that the Professor would be secretly rubbing his hands together lecherously while his delectable assistant Marianne (Dorothy Malone - lovely name), was not looking, and planning, all the while, with revolting and lip-smacking prayers to a Priapic deity, by hook or by crook, to find some way past the elastic in the waistbands of the swimwear of his subjects. But no. It was not to be. At one point in the film, the Professor saves Dolores from the unwelcome attentions of a leather-clad ruffian by the name of Eric Von Zipper (Harvey Lembeck), by using some ridiculously esoteric karate move to paralyse him. Dolores is impressed and conceives a liking for the Professor. It is even unclear whether she is carnally attracted to the man, or whether she merely wishes to use him to make her hotheaded boyfriend jealous. (Perhaps a mixture of both.) However, even when she seems to offer herself to him in all her swimsuited glory, he acts like a perfect gentleman and, self-contained, with no sign of regret, though rather fondly (but not fondlingly) like an affectionate uncle, demures. This is where my surprise began. The Professor was actually a really nice guy, and sincere in his work. I was impressed that the makers of the film had the chance to depict this man as a sad old pervert, but decided to go the other way and show him as a man of intelligence, integrity and many other admirable traits, despite being too dense, in his professorial way, to realise that his sassy assistant has the hots for him. And this is basically why the film is excellent. If this had been a British film, the Professor would have turned out to be rather a dank sort of character, with a moist handshake, who secretly beat his mother with a fescue, or perhaps was beaten by her, and who had gravy stains on his underwear. But in Beach Party everyone was clean and nice and healthy. Even Eric Von Zipper was nice, in a way, since he was too bumbling in his bullying ever to do anyone real harm. His running joke was to call his underlings and his enemies "You stoopid", the joke being, of course, that he was the stoopidest of all. It wasn't actually a very funny joke. In fact, it's more like half a joke than a whole joke, perhaps because the comic timing was never quite right, but you can't have a film like Beach Party without a few limp running jokes (limping jokes) in them. It wouldn't be right.

Almost everything about the film is excellent. The colours are of those almost hand-tinted variety you find in films of the late fifties and early sixties. Even when the jokes aren't funny, they're lively enough to be fun. And the hipness is ridiculously quaint. The Professor, in his anthropological way, wants to blend in with the culture of his subjects, and tries to pick up and utilise their slang. One example of this is the word 'hooting', which I can honestly say I'd never heard before (probably because I'm not hip enough). Apparently it means something like 'great', 'cool', etc. I believe it's Dolores who explains the word to the Professor, whose response is something like, "Yes, I see. 'Hooting', no doubt derived from the word 'hoot', to give voice to excitement, express enthusiasm and so on." Dolores looks at him as if she's never thought of this, and says sweetly, "I think you're real smart." Of course the funny think is the way the joke here has become kind of... telescoped? At the time the joke must have been how dusty and archaic the Professor was. Now, the word 'hooting' itself sounds dusty and archaic. And the same principle applies to the swimwear. Not a thong in sight! Thank god. In one scene Dolores comes to the Professor's hut to escort him to the beach, and she is dressed in her swimwear. The obvious implication is that she's wearing something sizzlingly hot, in contrast to the Victorian-looking item worn by the Professor, apparently presented to him by the fire department of Tokyo. However, even Dolores's bathing suit here, to contemporary eyes, appears designed to protect one's modesty. Actually, it seems there really is something in this. I do believe I read a quote somewhere - which I cannot now find - that Annette said the things she wore in the Beach Party films were more revealing than anything she would normally feel comfortable in. Whether that is true or not, it does appear that Walt Disney extracted from her a promise never to wear anything on film that was so revealing as to expose her navel. This promise was, in the end, broken on more than one occasion. (Ah, this appears to be something definitive on the subject.)



Having said that, there are one or two aspects of the film that I find questionable, irritating or ho-hum, in a minor way. To be honest, the character of Frankie is something of a 'low point' for me. Brash, earnest teenage nice guys (with enough of naughty about them actually to still be one of the guys) just aren't interesting. Also, I noticed, perhaps more with interest than annoyance, that the, errr, scarlet woman, to whom Frankie turns his attention in order to provoke Dolores's jealousy, Ava (Eva Six), "a prime asset at any party", is European, anticipating a pattern seen in later films such as American Pie that depict European women as decadent and of questionable sexual morality, in contrast to good, wholesome American women who won't let you study the contents of their underwear until you have graduated from the wedding ceremony. Apparently. And... maybe that's it, actually.

Oh, and it's got a cameo appearance from Vincent Price. That's a good thing, I mean.

I should also point out, in conclusion, that I quite like dank, too, but it's nice to have a change from that sometimes, and watch films about nice people being generally nice, if a little misguided in a farcical kind of way here and there.

The Homophobic Goth

,

My Welsh friend, Thor, the God of Thunder, told me when last we met that he had once been standing on a crowded train in a carriage where Alan Carr was sitting, and, next to him, near the doors of the carriage was a spotty, greasy-haired, approximately sixteen-year-old goth, with his girlfriend. The goth was, for some reason, looking in Alan Carr's direction and saying, "I can't wait to get out of this carriage, it's a bit GAY in here", and repeating similar phrases, each time with the word 'gay' in block capitals. His girlfriend, apparently, was tittering uncomfortably, and Alan Carr, if I remember the account correctly, was looking miffed but long-suffering, perhaps rolling his eyes.

And I thought that all goths were depressive fags. Apparently some of them are jocks. How disappointing.

Tyson and Dawkins

Delusions

,

How can I be deluded? I am Richard Dawkins.

Oh, hang on, or am I Quentin S. Crisp?

Guilt

I suppose I feel that, sooner or later, I will have to confront all the bad things I have ever done (and will do) from my conception to my putrefaction, and be severely scourged.

Oh well, I suppose I'll do it tomorrow.

I am ACTUALLY an alien, I'm a, you know, a legal alien, I'm pretty much what you might refer to as 'An Englishman in New York'

, ,

You know, it's actually obligatory, under Japanese (and some sections of Neapolitan) law, for me to like this song:

Last night it lurked in Canada; tonight on your veranadah

, , , ...

Someone told me that Algernon Blackwood made TV appearances in which he read his tales, back in the early days of television, and that he had a very wrinkled face, like Auden. Naturally, I wondered if anyone might have put these on Youtube. The closest thing (the only thing, in fact) I found was this, a clip using excerpts from Blackwood's story The Wendigo. Now, one thing that fascinates me very much is the resonance contained in certain words whose meaning you do not know. I don't know where I first came across the word 'Wendigo', but it has always seemed wonderfully evocative to me. I haven't even read Blackwood's story, but I want to, just because of the title. Now, I think I had an idea, early on, that the Wendigo was something a little bit like Sasquatch, but the very mystery of the word excited me, and I didn't want to define it too closely. In some ways it has been enough for me just to have the word and the mystery, and to know that Algernon Blackwood has written a story about it, and, oh yes, not to forget, to see this picture:



Now, whatever else I write about on this blog, this is the kind of thing I really feel at home with. Monsters. Not just any monsters, either, but monsters who stride through the snowy night with their antlers in the Milky Way and a paw full of stars. Eerie, mysterious monsters. Monsters of the blackest eldritch midnight. In fact, I don't know why I don't write more about this kind of thing - the kind of thing that whispers to us from the shadows. Well, of course, I do, but not much on this blog. Perhaps I like to keep such things to myself and those who have the gumption actually to buy my books. Even then, I don't indulge as much as I might like to, because I've told myself time and time again to go easy on the H.P. (Lovecraft) sauce. But it's been so long since I spent some time with those shapeless monsters in the cellar I grew up with, the monsters known to me at the time as Gooligars - they were not so terribly different, I believe, to Lovecraft's Nightgaunts, from The Dream-Quest of Unknown Kadath - it's been so long, I say, that I'm really getting quite nostalgic and homesick. I want to feel the breath of the eerie once more. But when? When will I feel it again? We shall wait, and we shall see.

Let's get back, for the moment, to the Wendigo. Another association I have with the word is a poem by Ogden Nash, which, like Blackwood's story, is simply called, 'The Wendigo'. You'll find it at the bottom of this link, here. I do urge you to read it. Nash is known as a humorist, and, being a fan of preposterous rhymes, I know that he can trot a few out when he wants (check out the title of this blog post, for a start). However, I also find this poem eerie with the same eeriness inherent in its whispering way in the word 'Wendigo' itself. It's that nursery rhyme effect, perhaps, bringing back memories of a child's fear of the dark. There's also that almost onomatopoeic quality in his use of words, too:

You loll,
It contemplates,
It lollops.
The rest is merely gulps and gollops.


Lovecraft knew how to use words in this way, and the names of his creations are masterpieces of this sort of almost-onomatopoeic suggestion: Azathoth, Yog-Sothoth, Cthulhu. Ia! Shub-Niggurath! The Black Goat of the Woods with a Thousand Young!

I looked up - for the first time - some of the details of the Wendigo myth on Wikipedia just now, and am sorry to say that the actual myth Blackwood's story, Nash's poem and the above illustration are based on was a little too corporeal for my taste, dealing as it does with cannibalism and a kind of walking-corpse spirit. I was disappointed. Still, perhaps if I dig deeper I will discover more details that furnish me with the frisson of the sinister I seek. In any case, I did notice something strange. It was this line:

At the same time, Wendigos were embodiments of gluttony, greed, and excess; never satisfied after killing and consuming one person, they were constantly searching for new victims.


I don't know why it is, but this is really tickling my deja vu-bone. I've encountered or been thinking about something with this theme recently, I'm sure, and I can't quite remember what it is. Perhaps I should sleep on it. Who knows what dreams I shall have, or what dreams shall have me.

PS:

Its eyes are ice and indigo!


That's such a great line!

But I know they're wrong - I know, I know!

No one can accuse me of being fickle. Well, they can, actually. And they'd probably be right. Hmmmm. I'm not sure where to go from here, now that I've shot myself in the foot. Except to blatantly contradict myself. ... But I'm certainly not fickle! And as evidence - just when you thought I'd forgotten Our Annette (no chance of that!), I shall post another Annette song:



I'm working again at the moment. No, I'm not going to tell you what I'm doing. Suffice it to say, once again it will delay me from responding to communications, and, unfortunately, for the first time in a very long time, it means having to put my creative writing on hold. And I'm not getting younger. It's a bit frustrating that. I really need an agent or something to deal with promotion and administrative shit, at which I am entirely useless. Anyway, I'm in a confident phase again, regarding my writing. The last story I completed (a short piece) was about the sublime Annette Funicello, and I personally consider it the best thing I've ever written (though I suppose I would). Of course, it'll probably be another one hundred and eighteen years before it's actually published. That seems to be the average time-lag in publishing. Anyway, when I actually get a moment I'm going to look for some kind of mainstream-ish forum for the story as I think that, with Annette's help, it has universal and irresistable appeal. I'm not going to just give this one away. Sorry.