Every now and then I think I have to remind myself that I know nothing.
For instance, there's a spoken (sampled?) line repeated in the Bowie song, Ricochet, that runs, "And who can bear to be forgotten?"
I attributed the line to Bowie in a blog post I wrote some time ago, I seem to recall. Now I realise that this must be a quote slightly adapted from Auden's 'Night Mail' (incidentally, a poem which, for many years, unaccountably, I believed to be by John Betjeman).
The actual line, from the poem, is:
For who can bear to feel himself forgotten?
It's a fascinatingly ominous line with which to end what otherwise seems an advert for the Royal Mail.
(Note that the line in the Bowie song is not gender-specific, and is therefore more PC.)
Anyway, I'll go and flog myself now for such an egregious misconception (or, anyway, such ignorance in my attribution), though I suppose I must have known it was a quote from elsewhere, if only because of the 'sampled' quality of the words. Also... maybe I'm wrong about some of the above, too. For instance, maybe the poem was intended unambiguously as an advert, and there's no 'seems' about it (we did actually have to read this poem at school, and my recollection is that we were taught it was a kind of advert). And maybe Auden is quoting someone else.
Memory and knowledge are slippery things.
Before I go and flog myself to sleep, I'll tell you a very little about my day.
I went into Swansea and visited the Dylan Thomas Centre (incidentally, I failed to spot the Dylan Thomas reference in the title of Momus's album Ocky Milk when it came out). There I had an egg mayonnaise sandwich, a pot of tea, a chocolate brownie thing, and some salt and vinegar flavoured crisps. I noticed, on the bookshelves, a number of books about which I have recently been reading, including Piers Plowman, and, intrigued, I began to search through the shelves for any interesting finds. There were, in fact, a great many interesting books. I ended up, rather extravagantly, I'm afraid to say, buying four whole books. They were as follows:
The Mabinogion (Penguin paperback, new) Greek Pastoral Poetry (Penguin paperback, second-hand) The Turn of the Screw and other short novels, by Henry James (Signet Classic paperback, second-hand) Far-Off Things, by Arthur Machen (The New Adelphi Library, second-hand)
One or two people reading this may know that I wrote a story called 'Far-Off Things'. At the time I wrote it, I was actually ignorant of the fact that Machen had written anything under the same title (I have this problem with titles). I wanted to call my story 'Unhappy Far-Off Things', but Lord Dunsany had already used that title. As far as I was concerned, the title was a quote from Wordsworth's poem 'The Solitary Reaper'. I suppose Dunsany was quoting Wordsworth, too. I'm guessing that Machen was also quoting Wordsworth for his title, but 'Far-Off Things' is a brief enough phrase that it might not necessarily be an allusion to the poem. Still, I suppose it is. And maybe Machen had the same problem as me, and had meant to use 'Unhappy Far-Off Things', but was thwarted by Lord Dunsany getting there first.
Please excuse my excessive concern with things that don't matter. I want you to know that I know they don't matter. It concerns me.
I've said this before, but sometimes it's actually a relief to think that I'll be forgotten.
The other day - I won't give the exact date - Mr. Wu, notorious on this blog, sent me this fascinating link comparing Hannah Montana and Ziggy Stardust.
Losing sleep recently considering the indifference of the universe to the fate of human beings, as individuals or collectively, and the probable collapse of civilisation in the near future due to a 'cluster-fuck' of such factors as shortage of potable water, overpopulation, the end of oil, 'global financial meltdown', the increasing risk of new epidemics of the bird flu variety, famine caused by general ecological disintegration, increasing ferocity and frequency of tornadoes and tidal waves, the rise of sinister bunkered Dr. Strangelove technocracies who will encourage and take advantage of the chaos to genetically create a race of labour-slaves and sex-slaves to serve their every Kurzweilian whim, and so on, I decided that I should follow the example set in the above link by comparing myself closely with the popular writer of 'young adult' vampire romance fiction, Stephenie Meyer.
Age
SM: 36
QSC: Uncannily, I, too, am 36, though not for much longer. I'm just a few months older than Stephenie. Although, logically speaking I am actually dead. I work this out as follows: I am so soon to be 37 that I might as well just say I'm 37 rather than 36. If we extend this principle, we see that there is so little difference between 37 and, say, 76, from the point of view of eternity (and it is impossible to isolate a moment in time, anyway, since they slide each into the other), that, really, I might as well just say that I'm 76. From which, it's only a very short step to saying, that, after all, I'm dead. Which I am.
Sex
SM: Female
QSC: Fauxmosexual. (Both these words begin with an 'f'.)
Dreams
SM: Meyer's first novel, The Waning of Late Afternoon into Something a Trifle Melancholy and Portentous, was apparently based upon a dream she had about huge pika from the planet Rachel Bilson, locked into eternal conflict with a race of many-breasted 'Amazonian' sea-slugs.
QSC: I am nothing but a dream within a dream. I don't know why I bother to write at all, in that case; it seems redundant. Having said that, I seem to be trapped within a peculiarly prosaic dream. I mean, it must be a prosaic dream in which I dream that the main activity of my existence is to try and record dreams in writing.
Britney Spears
SM: Bears an uncanny resemblance to the Louisiana-born chart-topping sensation.
QSC: Ditto. A resemblance marred only by a slightly larger nose, and glasses.
Tattoos
SM: Meyer reportedly has a tattoo under her left armpit of the Devil's child being born from a demonic vagina. The 'child' in question has been carefully rendered in such a way as to bear a ghostly resemblance to Robert Aickbon, whom, it is rumoured, visits Meyer in a secret place every full moon in order to impart privileged knowledge concerning the future of consciousness and its manifestation in matter. Those who have witnessed these trysts from a distance speak of what appears to be a steed, or familiar, belonging to the Aickbon figure, in the form of a preying mantis with luminous pink eyes.
QSC: I have two tattoos, of anime characters.
Anti-human/Anti-life
SM: On her website, Meyer proclaims herself "anti-human":
I am not anti-female, I am anti-human.
QSC: When, on occasion, I go out for a stroll, and strangers yell and spit at me from their cars, or when I find, yet again, that someone holds Dawkins as their 'hero', or when I discover that all I love is loved by no other on Earth, and I see mediocrity worshipped in a frenzy, I, too, find myself wishing personally to bash in the skulls of every human being on Earth with a rock from the roadside, to free the universe at last from the presence of this scum, this trivial, aggressive, self-celebrating scum who will never understand the beauty of dream - wishing to pile corpse upon bloody corpse, before wiping my crimson hands on my coat and walking away into the wilderness. In this way, perhaps more than any other, I am very like Stephenie Meyer.
When I first heard the song My Generation, as a teenager, I didn't identify with the sentiments at all. I've never felt a particularly strong sense of belonging to any generation, for which I am retrospectively glad, since it means I've never been a slave to fads and fashions. I remember some words in a review of some David Bowie release or other. The reviewer wrote, in an almost puzzled tone, that David Bowie never seemed to have been young and foolish; it was almost as if he were born old. I recognised in those words exactly what had made David Bowie stand out for me. "Look out you rock'n'rollers/Pretty soon now, you're going to get older." I've never been especially excited by music that celebrates youth, even when I was supposedly young. It's always seemed to me rather short-sighted, not presenting an elevated view of things at all.
I wonder why it is, then, that the following clip interests me:
Well, Stanhope is, of course, talking about America, and I'm not especially familiar with the younger generation in America. If it is well-represented by the kind of comments you find on Youtube, some of which are entirely incomprehensible beyond the fact they are probably meant to be insulting, and some of which are so incomprehensible that you just can't tell any more whether they are meant to be insulting or not, then it looks like he has just cause to complain.
My own complaints about 'the younger generation' would probably differ from his. To be honest, the words 'the young(er) generation' hardly ever pass my lips anyway, because, as I've said, I don't concern myself much with generational identities. I have a sense, however, of a younger generation in Britain, cheated of any possibility of making their lives meaningful by an utterly materialistic society. I also caught a certain phrase in Stanhope's routine that has meaning for me, despite having become a modern cliche, and that phrase is 'dumbed down'. I do think that 'dumbing down' is a reality, yes. I'm afraid I only have anecdotal evidence for this, but I'm sure it must show up in things like falling literacy rates in the English-speaking world, too. I haven't checked. I'm writing this off the cuff. Oh, I've said before, I've never voted for Tony Blair's Labour. Even when he was new on the scene, and had never been Prime Minister, I didn't vote for him, because I knew that his lot were going to cut student grants. My generation were the last to receive student grants from the government. Without that grant I would not have been able to have tertiary education. I am a believer in education for its own sake, and education as an investment in the future of a country. Tony (educationeducationeducation) Blair clearly wasn't.
I recently asked someone who works for the BBC, the following question:
"Is it actually written policy in the BBC these days to make sure that any documentary programme is presented by someone who knows absolutely nothing about the subject?"
The response was:
"I'm so glad you asked me that."
It was explained to me that the general process would be something like the following (I paraphrase from memory):
"Someone will have a quick ask around the office, like this: 'Hey guys, we're putting together a documentary on colony collapse disorder. Do you lot know Meera Syal? No? Too old, maybe. How about Anouska Golebiewski? You've all heard of her? Great! We'll go with her.'"
I could go on with this kind of story, and you're free to contribute your own. The point is, I have the general impression, which may be adjusted with further information, that dumbing down is very real and is part of a process of social control, making people think they already understand everything so that they don't try to find out for themselves.
However, I do see some very hopeful things (by which I mean people) amongst 'the younger generation' (excuse me, I just feel the urge to put that in inverted commas), some of whom I know personally. But to give an example of someone I don't know personally, there is, for instance, Magibon, who, I notice, has recently put up another clip in her 'mu' or 'nothing' series:
I realise a lot of people would disagree with me here, but I don't care. The interesting thing is that so many people (I'm guessing of her own generation) hate her. Let's have a look at the calibre of comment we find left beneath this clip by the haters:
I think you should speak EEENGLIIIISH in one of them since we seen you being on television and fo shizzle maaaaa nizzzlllle
What's this thing about wanting everyone to speak English? Do you know how ignorant, rude and aggressive that is?
SPEAKKKKKKKKK
There are a lot like this. It seems like a lot of people really can't stand silence. I'd hate to be in a room with one of them.
useless waste of 34 seconds lol
Not a useful waste, then? And now you've wasted more seconds by posting this comment.
WHAT THE FUCK IS THE POINT??????
These ones amuse me. Somehow these seem to me the most confused of all. Why are they looking for a point? Why don't they simply see what is there?
lmao shes not even asian
Errr, she never said she was. A lot of very silly Youtube posters seemed to think she was, probably because they've never met an Asian person before and thought Magibon was so un-American she couldn't possibly be American.
I dont understand..
I dont like any of her vids.. there pointless and stupid yet.. I subscribed!? OmGWwtFbbQ?
I quite like that one, actually. It's endearingly candid.
lol, i have seen a few of this girls videos... im stumped as to what it is shes trying to achieve :S
Does 'lol' really mean 'laugh out loud', as I'm told? If so, people seem to laugh out loud in the most deranged places. It never seems to make sense. Which is... quite interesting. Also, why should she be trying to acheive anything? Why?
dumy
I told you some of the comments are utterly incomprehensible.
Oh my god, I am tired of this staring bullshit. At least start talking again. This is why people hate you because you upload videos where you just stare into the camera. I hope you get a free dental makeover so your life will be better and you will stop doing this shit.
Errr... right. Okay. Next caller, please.
Well, it's interesting that a number of people say that she seems in a very good mood in this clip. I almost got the feeling that all the waves of hate are beginning to tell on her, and she's trying to deflect them in this video. I hope that's not the case, and that the hate is not getting her down.
Hmmm. Anyway, I started writing this and actually I'm feeling uninspired, and I haven't come to any conclusions. I was going to write a bit about different decades, but I don't feel like it now.
I think sometime I might write a post collecting together all my favourite Youtube comments. There are some good ones out there.
With inadequate preparation [there] could be a significant drop in the human carrying capacity of the Earth's environment. ... an abrupt climate change scenario could potentially de-stabilize the geo-political environment, leading to skirmishes, battles, and even war due to resource constraints such as:
1) Food shortages due to decreases in net global agricultural production 2) Decreased availability and quality of fresh water in key regions due to shifted precipitation patterns, causing more frequent floods and droughts 3) Disrupted access to energy supplies due to extensive sea ice and storminess