Directory of Lost Causes

Subscribe to RSS feed

Posts tagged with "David Bowie"

The Neverending Story

, , , ...

Recently, I've been feeling like this:

I expressed the matter to someone yesterday, more or less thus: that I have crashed like a computer with too many windows open. And now I am struggling to know how to make the best use of my time, since everything appears (more or less) equally absurd. But I know I have duties and so on, so please forgive me if you know me and I am seeming to spend my time on the wrong things at present

There are many things that go through my head, and which I could write on this blog. Perhaps you know this quote:

I've seen things you people wouldn't believe.
Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion.
I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.

I doubt I've seen things you wouldn't believe, but it's possible. Did you also know that David Bowie paraphrased the above on a wreath for his brother's funeral? If I recall what I read, something like, "You've had more thoughts than any of us will ever know. All these will be lost now like tears in the rain."

Well, I probably won't write all the things I sometimes think of writing. For instance, I probably won't write in detail about what led me to formulate a new law (Crisp's Second Law), that states that anyone who claims (or implies) they are 'at one with everything' and also claims (or implies) that they are a master, should be automatically dismissed. How can you be better than the people you are one with? So, that's a blog post that probably won't get written.

Here's one that now, I suppose (if I can last long enough before needing to eat some soup), will:

Many years ago, just after the middle of the second half of the twentieth century, I received a book. There was something extraordinary about my receiving this book. Why? Well, I think because, first of all, I thought I had discovered it just lying around, and wondered where on Earth it had come from, and then because, I discovered it was mine. This was very peculiar.

It was a new book, a hardback, with a shiny and beautifully illustrated, tapestry-like dust jacket. The endpapers had a swirling marbled pattern of green and red. There were many very captivating internal illustrations, and the text, I saw, was printed in green and red ink. I spent a long time examining this object, which did (strange though it may sound) appear quite magical to me. The title of the book was The Neverending Story, and this was enigmatic, too. I had never heard of this book, and yet its title seemed to claim that it had existed forever and always would exist. It was written by someone called Michael Ende. How very odd - a neverending story - THE Neverending Story - written by someone whose name ended in 'Ende'.

After some time, I was so wonderfully perplexed at the existence of this object that I asked an adult what it was and where it had come from. I was told that it was for me. This made no sense, either, as it wasn't my birthday and it wasn't Christmas. It took me a long time to get used to the wonderful fact that the book, apparently, belonged to me.

I must eat soup soon, so will need to keep my words to a minimum. I read the book, and I was not in the least disappointed. Now is not the time to tell of all I gleaned from that tome. Recently, however, I have been thinking of the Acharis, or Everlasting Weepers. As I remember it, the Acharis were repulsive worm creatures, miserable because they were so ugly, who made beautiful silver structures out of their tears. In pity, the hero of the book, Bastian, uses a wish to transform them into happy creatures. Later he encounters them again, to find they have turned into the Shlamoofs - butterfly clowns, irreverent, taking nothing seriously, who are merry and rude, and who are cheerfully destroying all the beautiful structures that were once made by the Acharis, whom the Shlamoofs, oblivious, do not remember.

It's become something of a cliche that a sense of humour is the ultimate antidote to megalomania, oppression, and so on. But sometimes I recall the words of a friend of mine who described someone as "pathologically incapable of taking anything seriously", and I wonder about this. Humour, too, can be insensitive. Humour, too, can be a way of repelling unknown things in order to protect a closed system. Sometimes there is a sadness without words and without apparent use that perhaps makes the world larger. Or, if it seems to make the world small and distant, which nonetheless opens up a largeness in the melancholy, star-hung sky. Perhaps even that is saying too much. Perhaps I should simply say that sometimes - and especially recently - I think about the Acharis and the Shlamoofs.

And, in some oblique (sometimes direct) way, I've been thinking much of late about opposites - about the need for opposites. Recently I began reading Cordwainer Smith's The Rediscovery of Man. It seems a very appropriate book to be reading at a time when the spectre of transhumanism looms large on my mental horizon. These words in John J. Pierce's introduction struck me:

In these stories, it is the underpeople - and the more enlightened lords of the Instrumentality who heed them - who hold the salvation of humanity in their hands. In 'The Dead Lady of Clown Town,' the despised, animal-derived workers and robots must teach humans the meaning of humanity in order to free mankind from its seeming euphoria.

Lord Jestocost is inspired by the martyrdom of the dog-woman D'joan; and Santuna is transformed by the experiences in 'Under Old Earth' into the Lady Alice More. Together, they become the architects of the Rediscovery of man - bringing back freedom, risk, uncertainty and even evil.

Illegitimi non carborundum (David Bowie ruined my life)

, , , ...

There are so many things in life that should be but are not - if that makes sense. In other words, they are not in life at all, but we are aware of them because we have imagination, or perhaps we are aware of them for other reasons. In this blog post, about the writing of Brendan Connell, I quoted G.K. Chesterton:

Men spoke much in my boyhood of restricted or ruined men of genius: and it was common to say that many a man was a Great Might-Have-Been. To me it is a more solid and startling fact that any man in the street is a Great Might-Not-Have-Been.

Recently, I am trying to see things more in this way.

I'm actually bone-tired at present, so please forgive me if I fail to be effervescent, as I should be.

When I was at FantasyCon in Brighton this year, behind the Chomu Press stall, I got talking to a man who said he was a fan of fantasy fiction. "Someone has to be," he said, and I agreed, as this seemed a sound proposition. I hope, if he ever reads this, he doesn't mind me saying a little about our conversation.

I asked him who his favourite fantasy writer was. He protested, with justice, that it was a ridiculous question, though he made a valiant attempt at answering, giving a number of names. He asked me, in return, rhetorically, "What's your favourite song?", meaning, of course, that my question was similarly difficult to answer. However, I answered: "'Bewlay Brothers' by David Bowie."

"Ah," he said, "David Bowie ruined my life."

I thought at first this was going to be a fan story, a story of obsession taken too far, but it was nothing like that. He gave a succinct and convincing account of why he could justifiably make the claim that he had. There had been a publishing concern in which he was involved. An investment from David Bowie was promised, which would have ensured its future, but Bowie pulled out at the last minute because someone had advised him that there was no money in books.

"'David Bowie ruined my life' - sounds like a blog post," he said. "No... maybe not. Couldn't handle the law suit."

For the purposes of this blog post, of course, we must take the above as hearsay. Even so, these days I'm less inclined to the hero-worship of my younger years, and so the story didn't come to me as quite the shocking, difficult thing it might have at the height of my fandom. I don't know how I never understood, when I was younger, that there was no need for me to be jealous of Bowie's talent. I no longer feel wistful wondering if Bowie will ever make good music again. There are other people in the world, and other artists, more interesting, more consistent, not selling out, keeping on, even without the adulation, the money, the advantages enjoyed by the likes of Bowie.

Just today I was wondering whether, actually, my favourite song, if it's possible to have such a thing, might not be 'Lovely Tree' by Momus. It's not on YouTube like the 'Robin Hood' song above. If you want to hear it, why not buy the Oskar Tennis Champion CD? After all, it's not every song that can claim to be my favourite. Here's a link to the lyrics.

Now, here's a guy who's just kept going and doing his own thing, on and on, despite no mainstream success - Momus, I mean. Some people have remarkable creative staying power. Jeremy Reed is another such - truly a unique artist whose energy and inspiration have remained undimmed despite the almost deafening silence of the literary establishment.

You know, there are many people who, in carrying on in their own way, in determinedly being who they are, make it easier for me to carry on in my own way, too (which, let's face it, can be really, really hard sometimes). I want to mention some of these people now. I've mentioned some of the following on my blog before. But they cannot be mentioned too often. Some of them I have met. Some of them I have not. (And there are plenty of others who have also made a real difference, but here I will mention only a few, and I hope I don't embarrass anyone.)

Mark Samuels - a sane man, a gent, and a wonderful writer. His work is a haven from the vicious superficiality of our age. Dare Wright - there are in the world some things that are sacred, and the work of Dare Wright is among these things. Justin Isis - stops this world from being boring and is possibly the galaxy's best dressed criminal. Joe Campbell - artist, musician, has a tremendous pope-like quality, general cool guy and now also half of the Chomu Radio Archive. Dominika Kieruzel, who is also a wonderful artist and who forced me to sing 'Jerusalem' by William Blake once, and is now working with me on this. Brendan Connell - nobody yet actually comprehends how good Brendan Connell is as a writer. No one yet understands. Sasa Zoric Combe (of Kodagain) - early on in my acquaintance with Sasa and his music Justin commented that Sasa was like some kind of superhuman, who could take anything, put it in a song and make it sound great, and it's true.

Of course there are many others. Let me restrict myself for now, and I hope that we do actually get the time and opportunity to make more 'should-be's into reality, and that we don't always have to struggle to apply the point of view offered by Chesterton that what is is startling enough.

For now:

Keep, lovely tree, your leaves in wintertime
Stand strongly in your bark of love
Make shelter for the lion and the lamb
Keep every tender beast safe from the butcher's knife

Live



Infiltrated business cesspools
Hating through Our sleeves
Yea, and We slit the Catholic throat
Stoned the poor
on slogans such as

'Wish You Could Hear'
'Love Is All We Need'
'Kick Out The Jams'
'Kick Out Your Mother'
'Cut Up Your Friend'
'Screw Up Your Brother or He'll Get You In the End'

And We Know the Flag of Love is from Above
And We Can Force You to Be Free
And We Can Force You to Believe"





All the Madmen



A song that deserves much better than YouTube and my blog.



Spoiler

, , , ...



Where will it end?

I found myself asking this question the other day, out for a walk, and I thought of the above song.

The lyric does something quite common in pop music - takes a common idiomatic expression and gives it a new meaning in a different context.

At present, the human race exists in time, in history, with the suspense of the question, where will it end? I'm not sure that that is the meaning of the song, but that's what I was thinking about. In fact, I was writing about suspense just the other day.

There's a film that I often recommend that people watch if they are feeling depressed. It is Woody Allen's Hannah and Her Sisters. Actually, I haven't watched the film for some time now.

I'm going to post a couple of clips from it here, from the end of the film. Needless to say, the clips contain 'spoilers'. In what to me is the crucial scene, the Woody Allen character describes the resolution of his long existential crisis. If you don't have time to watch the whole film and you don't mind spoilers, here are the clips, with the scene in question starting about seven and a half minutes into the first clip and going over just a little into the second clip.





Now I'm going to write something that's a bit of a spoiler, so read no further if you want to avoid such: The basic message is that we don't know where it will all end, but that we might as well enjoy it while we're here. Sounds trite when written like that, but in the film it's not trite (I don't think). There's also, to me, a suggestion that part of the enjoyment of life comes in the not knowing, a sense that perhaps the most rewarding attitude to take to life is that one takes to a film or story, not knowing how it will end, and not wanting to have any spoilers.

Earlier today, I read this article (or one like it) about Obama's declaration that it was too early for a climate deal to be agreed at Copenhagen. I read some of the comments under the article, too (which I can't find under this one, so it must be a different article). On the whole, I find comments on the Internet depressing, and something of a reminder of what many people claim are the shortcomings of democracy. This was another such depressing experience. I can understand, to a degree, skepticism about climate change, but what I don't understand is the very prevalent denial. In very simple terms, if a number of people were sitting in a house and one (or most of them) said, "I can smell burning", what kind of person would say, "Shut up! Nothing's burning, you irrational, religionistic doom-monger!"? The answer, of course, is someone who was afraid that something was burning but didn't want to believe it or do anything about it. And this is the feeling I get from those who think that climate change is a hoax.

On the other hand, there is something, I think, that exacerbates this kind of denial. I have e-mail subscriptions to newletters from a number of environmental organisations. I got an e-mail from one of these with the title, "Who is the Scariest Climate Action Opponent?" I almost expect the words "of them all" to be tacked on at the end. I find this tone to be patronising. It's a talking down, as if to children (who shouldn't be talked down to anyway). Unfortunately, I've noticed just this tone more and more in the e-mails I receive, and I begin to think that it's no wonder people have the impression green activists are "religionistic", or whatever ridiculous, illiterate, Internet-age, made-up word they want to use, if this is a sample of the tone and attitude of the activism.

I suppose - I'm just guessing, in a writing-a-blog-post kind of way - that what the deniers and this particular kind of fixated activist have in common is fear. Of death, probably.



Where will it end?

I actually think, at the moment of writing, that it would be a shame if we let the film come to a premature end, through one kind of fear or another. To be accepting of the fact of death, of the end of the film, might make the film more enjoyable, and might make it possible to watch for longer. I suppose it has to end some time, but it seems to me that we haven't got to the really good bits yet. If there are any.

Sorry if this is trite.

I was going to link in David Bowie's Saviour Machine to this theme somehow, but I'm not sure I have a neat, seamless way of doing it now. I'll inset the clip, anyway.


For who can bear to feel himself forgotten?

, , , ...

Every now and then I think I have to remind myself that I know nothing.



For instance, there's a spoken (sampled?) line repeated in the Bowie song, Ricochet, that runs, "And who can bear to be forgotten?"

I attributed the line to Bowie in a blog post I wrote some time ago, I seem to recall. Now I realise that this must be a quote slightly adapted from Auden's 'Night Mail' (incidentally, a poem which, for many years, unaccountably, I believed to be by John Betjeman).

The actual line, from the poem, is:

For who can bear to feel himself forgotten?



It's a fascinatingly ominous line with which to end what otherwise seems an advert for the Royal Mail.

(Note that the line in the Bowie song is not gender-specific, and is therefore more PC.)



Anyway, I'll go and flog myself now for such an egregious misconception (or, anyway, such ignorance in my attribution), though I suppose I must have known it was a quote from elsewhere, if only because of the 'sampled' quality of the words. Also... maybe I'm wrong about some of the above, too. For instance, maybe the poem was intended unambiguously as an advert, and there's no 'seems' about it (we did actually have to read this poem at school, and my recollection is that we were taught it was a kind of advert). And maybe Auden is quoting someone else.

Memory and knowledge are slippery things.

Before I go and flog myself to sleep, I'll tell you a very little about my day.

I went into Swansea and visited the Dylan Thomas Centre (incidentally, I failed to spot the Dylan Thomas reference in the title of Momus's album Ocky Milk when it came out). There I had an egg mayonnaise sandwich, a pot of tea, a chocolate brownie thing, and some salt and vinegar flavoured crisps. I noticed, on the bookshelves, a number of books about which I have recently been reading, including Piers Plowman, and, intrigued, I began to search through the shelves for any interesting finds. There were, in fact, a great many interesting books. I ended up, rather extravagantly, I'm afraid to say, buying four whole books. They were as follows:

The Mabinogion (Penguin paperback, new)
Greek Pastoral Poetry (Penguin paperback, second-hand)
The Turn of the Screw and other short novels, by Henry James (Signet Classic paperback, second-hand)
Far-Off Things, by Arthur Machen (The New Adelphi Library, second-hand)

One or two people reading this may know that I wrote a story called 'Far-Off Things'. At the time I wrote it, I was actually ignorant of the fact that Machen had written anything under the same title (I have this problem with titles). I wanted to call my story 'Unhappy Far-Off Things', but Lord Dunsany had already used that title. As far as I was concerned, the title was a quote from Wordsworth's poem 'The Solitary Reaper'. I suppose Dunsany was quoting Wordsworth, too. I'm guessing that Machen was also quoting Wordsworth for his title, but 'Far-Off Things' is a brief enough phrase that it might not necessarily be an allusion to the poem. Still, I suppose it is. And maybe Machen had the same problem as me, and had meant to use 'Unhappy Far-Off Things', but was thwarted by Lord Dunsany getting there first.

Please excuse my excessive concern with things that don't matter. I want you to know that I know they don't matter. It concerns me.

I've said this before, but sometimes it's actually a relief to think that I'll be forgotten.


Here comes the night

I'd forgotten about this song...

Meyer and I

, , , ...

The other day - I won't give the exact date - Mr. Wu, notorious on this blog, sent me this fascinating link comparing Hannah Montana and Ziggy Stardust.



Losing sleep recently considering the indifference of the universe to the fate of human beings, as individuals or collectively, and the probable collapse of civilisation in the near future due to a 'cluster-fuck' of such factors as shortage of potable water, overpopulation, the end of oil, 'global financial meltdown', the increasing risk of new epidemics of the bird flu variety, famine caused by general ecological disintegration, increasing ferocity and frequency of tornadoes and tidal waves, the rise of sinister bunkered Dr. Strangelove technocracies who will encourage and take advantage of the chaos to genetically create a race of labour-slaves and sex-slaves to serve their every Kurzweilian whim, and so on, I decided that I should follow the example set in the above link by comparing myself closely with the popular writer of 'young adult' vampire romance fiction, Stephenie Meyer.



Age

SM: 36

QSC: Uncannily, I, too, am 36, though not for much longer. I'm just a few months older than Stephenie. Although, logically speaking I am actually dead. I work this out as follows: I am so soon to be 37 that I might as well just say I'm 37 rather than 36. If we extend this principle, we see that there is so little difference between 37 and, say, 76, from the point of view of eternity (and it is impossible to isolate a moment in time, anyway, since they slide each into the other), that, really, I might as well just say that I'm 76. From which, it's only a very short step to saying, that, after all, I'm dead. Which I am.

Sex

SM: Female

QSC: Fauxmosexual. (Both these words begin with an 'f'.)

Dreams

SM: Meyer's first novel, The Waning of Late Afternoon into Something a Trifle Melancholy and Portentous, was apparently based upon a dream she had about huge pika from the planet Rachel Bilson, locked into eternal conflict with a race of many-breasted 'Amazonian' sea-slugs.

QSC: I am nothing but a dream within a dream. I don't know why I bother to write at all, in that case; it seems redundant. Having said that, I seem to be trapped within a peculiarly prosaic dream. I mean, it must be a prosaic dream in which I dream that the main activity of my existence is to try and record dreams in writing.



Britney Spears

SM: Bears an uncanny resemblance to the Louisiana-born chart-topping sensation.

QSC: Ditto. A resemblance marred only by a slightly larger nose, and glasses.

Tattoos

SM: Meyer reportedly has a tattoo under her left armpit of the Devil's child being born from a demonic vagina. The 'child' in question has been carefully rendered in such a way as to bear a ghostly resemblance to Robert Aickbon, whom, it is rumoured, visits Meyer in a secret place every full moon in order to impart privileged knowledge concerning the future of consciousness and its manifestation in matter. Those who have witnessed these trysts from a distance speak of what appears to be a steed, or familiar, belonging to the Aickbon figure, in the form of a preying mantis with luminous pink eyes.

QSC: I have two tattoos, of anime characters.



Anti-human/Anti-life

SM: On her website, Meyer proclaims herself "anti-human":

I am not anti-female, I am anti-human.



QSC: When, on occasion, I go out for a stroll, and strangers yell and spit at me from their cars, or when I find, yet again, that someone holds Dawkins as their 'hero', or when I discover that all I love is loved by no other on Earth, and I see mediocrity worshipped in a frenzy, I, too, find myself wishing personally to bash in the skulls of every human being on Earth with a rock from the roadside, to free the universe at last from the presence of this scum, this trivial, aggressive, self-celebrating scum who will never understand the beauty of dream - wishing to pile corpse upon bloody corpse, before wiping my crimson hands on my coat and walking away into the wilderness. In this way, perhaps more than any other, I am very like Stephenie Meyer.

You've got to wait to die

, ,







When I'm 62

I've just realised, it's David Bowie's birthday, today.

Hip hip hooray:



Over the wall we go. All coppers are nanas!

,

It's got to stop!



Those were the days!

"I think it just has to stop now," he murmurs in a fey voice that tails wispily off into camp silence.

Not talking about my generation, talking about degeneration

, , , ...

When I first heard the song My Generation, as a teenager, I didn't identify with the sentiments at all. I've never felt a particularly strong sense of belonging to any generation, for which I am retrospectively glad, since it means I've never been a slave to fads and fashions. I remember some words in a review of some David Bowie release or other. The reviewer wrote, in an almost puzzled tone, that David Bowie never seemed to have been young and foolish; it was almost as if he were born old. I recognised in those words exactly what had made David Bowie stand out for me. "Look out you rock'n'rollers/Pretty soon now, you're going to get older." I've never been especially excited by music that celebrates youth, even when I was supposedly young. It's always seemed to me rather short-sighted, not presenting an elevated view of things at all.

I wonder why it is, then, that the following clip interests me:



Well, Stanhope is, of course, talking about America, and I'm not especially familiar with the younger generation in America. If it is well-represented by the kind of comments you find on Youtube, some of which are entirely incomprehensible beyond the fact they are probably meant to be insulting, and some of which are so incomprehensible that you just can't tell any more whether they are meant to be insulting or not, then it looks like he has just cause to complain.

My own complaints about 'the younger generation' would probably differ from his. To be honest, the words 'the young(er) generation' hardly ever pass my lips anyway, because, as I've said, I don't concern myself much with generational identities. I have a sense, however, of a younger generation in Britain, cheated of any possibility of making their lives meaningful by an utterly materialistic society. I also caught a certain phrase in Stanhope's routine that has meaning for me, despite having become a modern cliche, and that phrase is 'dumbed down'. I do think that 'dumbing down' is a reality, yes. I'm afraid I only have anecdotal evidence for this, but I'm sure it must show up in things like falling literacy rates in the English-speaking world, too. I haven't checked. I'm writing this off the cuff. Oh, I've said before, I've never voted for Tony Blair's Labour. Even when he was new on the scene, and had never been Prime Minister, I didn't vote for him, because I knew that his lot were going to cut student grants. My generation were the last to receive student grants from the government. Without that grant I would not have been able to have tertiary education. I am a believer in education for its own sake, and education as an investment in the future of a country. Tony (educationeducationeducation) Blair clearly wasn't.

I recently asked someone who works for the BBC, the following question:

"Is it actually written policy in the BBC these days to make sure that any documentary programme is presented by someone who knows absolutely nothing about the subject?"

The response was:

"I'm so glad you asked me that."

It was explained to me that the general process would be something like the following (I paraphrase from memory):

"Someone will have a quick ask around the office, like this: 'Hey guys, we're putting together a documentary on colony collapse disorder. Do you lot know Meera Syal? No? Too old, maybe. How about Anouska Golebiewski? You've all heard of her? Great! We'll go with her.'"

I could go on with this kind of story, and you're free to contribute your own. The point is, I have the general impression, which may be adjusted with further information, that dumbing down is very real and is part of a process of social control, making people think they already understand everything so that they don't try to find out for themselves.

However, I do see some very hopeful things (by which I mean people) amongst 'the younger generation' (excuse me, I just feel the urge to put that in inverted commas), some of whom I know personally. But to give an example of someone I don't know personally, there is, for instance, Magibon, who, I notice, has recently put up another clip in her 'mu' or 'nothing' series:



I realise a lot of people would disagree with me here, but I don't care. The interesting thing is that so many people (I'm guessing of her own generation) hate her. Let's have a look at the calibre of comment we find left beneath this clip by the haters:

I think you should speak EEENGLIIIISH in one of them since we seen you being on television and fo shizzle maaaaa nizzzlllle



What's this thing about wanting everyone to speak English? Do you know how ignorant, rude and aggressive that is?

SPEAKKKKKKKKK



There are a lot like this. It seems like a lot of people really can't stand silence. I'd hate to be in a room with one of them.

useless waste of 34 seconds lol



Not a useful waste, then? And now you've wasted more seconds by posting this comment.

WHAT THE FUCK IS THE POINT??????



These ones amuse me. Somehow these seem to me the most confused of all. Why are they looking for a point? Why don't they simply see what is there?

lmao shes not even asian



Errr, she never said she was. A lot of very silly Youtube posters seemed to think she was, probably because they've never met an Asian person before and thought Magibon was so un-American she couldn't possibly be American.

I dont understand..

I dont like any of her vids.. there pointless and stupid yet.. I subscribed!? OmGWwtFbbQ?



I quite like that one, actually. It's endearingly candid.

lol, i have seen a few of this girls videos... im stumped as to what it is shes trying to achieve :S



Does 'lol' really mean 'laugh out loud', as I'm told? If so, people seem to laugh out loud in the most deranged places. It never seems to make sense. Which is... quite interesting. Also, why should she be trying to acheive anything? Why?

dumy



I told you some of the comments are utterly incomprehensible.

Oh my god, I am tired of this staring bullshit. At least start talking again. This is why people hate you because you upload videos where you just stare into the camera. I hope you get a free dental makeover so your life will be better and you will stop doing this shit.



Errr... right. Okay. Next caller, please.

Well, it's interesting that a number of people say that she seems in a very good mood in this clip. I almost got the feeling that all the waves of hate are beginning to tell on her, and she's trying to deflect them in this video. I hope that's not the case, and that the hate is not getting her down.

Hmmm. Anyway, I started writing this and actually I'm feeling uninspired, and I haven't come to any conclusions. I was going to write a bit about different decades, but I don't feel like it now.

I think sometime I might write a post collecting together all my favourite Youtube comments. There are some good ones out there.

I've prepared a document legalising mass-abortion

, ,



I quote from An Abrupt Climate Change Scenario and Its Implications for United States Security, by Peter Schwartz and Doug Randall:

With inadequate preparation [there] could be a significant drop in the human carrying capacity of the Earth's environment. ... an abrupt climate change scenario could potentially de-stabilize the geo-political environment, leading to skirmishes, battles, and even war due to resource constraints such as:

1) Food shortages due to decreases in net global agricultural production
2) Decreased availability and quality of fresh water in key regions due to shifted precipitation patterns, causing more frequent floods and droughts
3) Disrupted access to energy supplies due to extensive sea ice and storminess