Usability insights

UX, analysis and opinion.

Why I don't use Google Chrome or other browsers besides Opera

, , , , ,

Versão em portuguêsDifferently than most people, in this study I won't cite the "privacy" case in which we know Chrome has appends unique identifiers to its users and collect together all the queries sent to Google through the browser, installs Google Updater automatically giving permissions to installs coming from Google, etc... Especially because most of these items can be disabled and I wouldn't care Google collects this anonymous data if I liked using the browser. Other browsers also have their methods of collecting anonymous data from users.

In what really matters, here are the cons of Google Chrome (those I can remember, because they're many), most of them are present in other browsers too:

Tabs and windows
MDI
Opera tabs are MDI, which means means they can be resized, organized, minimizes, etc, as they were sub-windows of the browser, the ones on Chrome and other browsers are just tabs.

In Chrome the dialog boxes are modal: if a JavaScript window open on it like a confirm asking for your OK or Cancel for example, you'll be stuck, you won't be able to switch to another tab or click in any other thing until you answer or click the X of the window. The dialog boxes in Opera are non-modal allowing you to do whatever you want before answering.

Pop-up windows open in new widows, in Opera they open in a new tab. Opera never open things in new window unless you explicitly gives the instruction to do so: what I never do. Other browsers opt for a mix of the two (tabs and windows) and make everything more complicated... Browse through windows is from the time when tabs didn't existed and is more complicated because the windows are mixed up with other open programs in the Alt + TAB.

New Tab page, or Speed Dial:
  • Chrome doesn't allow you to choose the exact websites that you want to put on the page;
  • Doesn't allow more than 8 websites;
  • Doesn't has keyboard shortcuts Ctrl + # (Number of Speed Dial item) to go to the page.
  • You don't have the choice of how much time you wish the websites (and its thumbnails) are updated.
  • Firefox hasn't such a page!

Closed tabs:
  • It has a list of recently closed tabs but only present a limited number of them (in my test it has been 9 only);
  • To have access to the list you need to open a new tab, in Opera there's a button on the end of the tab bar;
  • When you close the last tab on the last window the browser closes completely instead of showing the "Speed Dial", if I wished to close the browser completely I would use the X of the window (or Alt + F4), not the one in the tab (or Ctrl + W / mouse gesture down -> right).

Private Browsing
It only can be made in a per-window basis, in Opera it's on per-tab basis (you can have private and ordinary tabs on a same window).

Sessions
Doesn't has sessions feature to save the tabs and windows that are opened so you can restart your browsing from where you stopped it reopening the "session".

Tab bar
If you open many tabs it becomes impossible to recognize which is which, in Opera when you hover them you locate because it shows thumbnails. PS. I hate the solution of other browsers to make a tab bar that scroll sideways to see more tabs, this is a cumbersome, unnecessary work, a waste of time to find the tabs when you have smarter solutions in Opera (you have the option to wrap tabs into multiple lines or show an extender menu if you prefer).

Sandbox
When you close a tab it's completely removed from RAM, so to reopen this tab or the same website in another tab means reloading the website rather than reopening it from RAM, which means it won't be as fast as Opera or other browsers that maintains the data in RAM (RAM was made to be used with useful things like this that increase the overall speed of browsing).

The use of independent tabs can spend more RAM (the RAM in this case is spent in a sense that I find useless). Security flaws and crashes that are supposedly present in browsers that don't apply the sandbox system could be fixed fixed (and they are by other browsers) instead of applying a system that masks the real problem and in the end doesn't prevent crashes and other failures on security / data theft caused by other parts of the software. Furthermore, even a sandbox system can be broken, Java and Flash run in the sandbox and cause havoc anyway!

Shortcut browsing / Usability
Doesn't includes mouse gestures (even with the existence of extensions that add this functionality, they don't take away the trouble of having to install them while another browser is already ready to be used out of the box and have much less negative points than the ones I show in this text).

Chrome has a good list of keyboard shortcuts but Opera has more (and is customizable).

The use of the Ctrl and Shift modifier keys to open websites in new tab / new tab in background doesn't work in the address field, text fields that post with Enter button on the pages, commands in context menus of links, images or selected text (for searching), Go to web address, etc. To force the opening of some of these commands in the current tab is a missing option also.

Allows adding and modifying the search engines but don't show them as options to search from the context menu of selected text.

Images context menu:
  • It isn't possible to reload them individually if there was any problem with the loading (or you know that the image has been updated on the server and want to reload it individually, or you have "stopped" the loading of the page before the image download was completed and just to see this picture you'll have to reload the whole page);
  • Doesn't allow opening the image in a new tab in the foreground;
  • Doesn't has a proprieties window (dimensions, size, alternative text, etc...).
Interface
The zoom control of the page doesn't has a fast way of resetting to 100% unless you use the keyboard shortcut for it.

It hasn't useful commands such as the synchronization control right from the main menu, you need to enter the required browser settings to find that the feature exists.

Synchronization
The synchronized items cannot be accessed through a Web interface like in Opera Link.

Settings
The auto-update cannot be configured or disabled (only through regedit on Windows or similar commands in other operating systems).

It hasn't an "about:config" page.

As Firefox, it hasn't .ini configuration files that let you freely edit profile files like the search engine lost (what open browsers they are, aren't they??).

Layout engines / Browser behavior
The layout engine implemented by Safari and Chrome (Webkit), Firefox (Gecko) and Internet Explorer (Trident), loads certain elements of the pages before displaying them, what cause a white screen before displaying the page. Opera (Presto) was developed to give priority to the loading of the text of the page and display it as soon as possible, leaving less priority to other elements that in my opinion are really less important that the text information that I can already be reading and stop the loading of the page if what I want is there and even use the links that are already loaded together with the text to proceed to another page, in other browsers: white screen.

If I open a tab, I type and hit Enter there is a kind of delay / hang, a blank screen, the hang before connecting to the website also occurs simply from one site to another in the same tab, not in Opera (based on test, both on the same computer).

Opera is the only browser that allows you to select linked text starting from inside of the text of the link to get only a part of the text, in the other browsers you're obliged to click and drag the mouse at least one character before the link (and get more than the text you wanted to the clipboard / search / notes).

In Opera the TAB key switch the focus only between form elements (Shift + arrow keys switch between the other elements), in other browsers I need to press the TAB key more times, for example, to login in Hotmail where there's a link ("Forgot your password?") where the focus will pass before than the checkboxes that I want to check / uncheck sometimes (this is a silly example, take other pages where you have a search field and a lot of top links before it as another confirmation of the utility of separating form elements from the others). This is a major improvement for people who browser primarily with the keyboard.

Criticism to "minimalism":
  • It isn't a new concept, in Opera the tab bar always has been above the address bar and you can even hide the address bar and customize the UI by moving the address field to another bar... Some users like to use the shortcut F2 to enter the address or search at any moment.
  • When you're reading a text on the Web you'll always end up having to scroll down the page anyway, so the extra space earned by the minimalism is useless...
  • Minimalism on the number of resources? Chrome still has the largest installer of all even with the lack of a lot of features and moreover: it duplicates all its files for each user on the computer.

License / Company-consumer interaction
Open source? No one can guarantee me that a software is completely open source. Before being published, the base (Chromium project) gets modified (are added: Flash Player, PDF reader, the name Google and the differentiated logo, the auto-updater "GoogleUpdate", the RLZ, etc...) then who guarantee that other changes aren't made that aren't present in the original source code and I wouldn't use the software if I knew about them?

Lastly, Google does not demonstrate as a good company. They do their websites targeted for use on certain browsers instead of using the standards effectively (and even implements non-standard things to work on certain browsers), and for example, right now services like the new version of the search for images and "Instant" are still unavailable to Opera browser users despite it being perfectly able to load pages when the User-Agent String is masked to one that is on the list of "allowed" browsers to access them. [1]
Update: Google made Instant available for Opera users, "only" 10 months later.

Google is as a company that doesn't listens to its users, in the sense of not being unable to handle the feedback they receive on their forums (forums that are read and moderated by people who are not employees of the company), that is, in the end it doesn't accept suggestions.

Simply, the language used in their blogs, the kind of humor used, the justifications behind the actions it has been taken..., Google doesn't praises me!

Conclusion
Notice that I didn't need to cite differentials of Opera like the notes feature, Opera Turbo or Opera Unite for example, or Opera Mail for those who want an e-mail client integrated into the browser (and yet still the browser that has the smallest installer), in addition to its completely customizable interface (add / move / remove buttons and other UI elements [even let's you to create custom buttons])... Opera wins in the details..., and I could make similar comparisons with any other browser, all of them fit together in the same amateur level of Google Chrome.

Porque eu não uso o Google Chrome ou outro navegador além do OperaJogos são os aplicativos mais baixados em celulares

Comments

Daniel HendrycksDanielHendrycks Saturday, May 28, 2011 10:39:19 PM

Some of the things you say are a plus are a minus for me lol

Rafael Luikrafaelluik Monday, May 30, 2011 10:38:38 PM

OK, it's a personal choice. I just can't stand Chrome. p

Mağruf ÇolakoğluZAHEK Tuesday, May 31, 2011 8:00:37 PM

up

metude Tuesday, May 31, 2011 8:04:53 PM

A perfect article...

OPERATORGÖKTÜRK Tuesday, May 31, 2011 8:13:04 PM

up yes

Suntana Tuesday, May 31, 2011 8:31:52 PM

Originally posted by Rafael:

The layout engine implement by Safari and Chrome (Webkit), Firefox (Gecko) and Internet Explorer (Trident), loads certain elements of the pages before displaying them, what cause a white screen before displaying the page.


Yeah, this is the absolute pits. This sucks. This bites.

Prakash Omomprakash2k Wednesday, June 1, 2011 12:46:23 PM

+1 bigsmile

Rafael Luikrafaelluik Wednesday, June 1, 2011 3:31:37 PM

Originally posted by metude:

A perfect article...

Thank you!!

Hahaha! I'm very happy to see that my post pleased you all and was featured in My Opera community! Seeing other people agreeing with me... bigsmile

It's awesome, it increases the worth of writing about it, makes me happy. smile

Miles DavisMilesDavis Wednesday, June 1, 2011 7:07:26 PM

up

YoitssBeets526 Thursday, June 2, 2011 5:34:39 AM

Wow wat a winny ass juss suckit up n live wit it

dapxin Thursday, June 2, 2011 6:00:35 AM

well putted smile

Fede Balbofebaac Thursday, June 2, 2011 2:46:25 PM

Muy buen artículo.
Opera ES y seguirá siendo el mejor Navegador/Cliente e-Mail/RSS/etc... cool

Shein45 Thursday, June 2, 2011 7:43:04 PM

firefox the best

junakjunak64 Thursday, June 2, 2011 7:44:05 PM

up

Silvery CorganSilvery-Corgan Friday, June 3, 2011 7:33:57 AM

Originally posted by rafaelluik:

PS. I hate the solution of other browsers to make a tab bar that scroll sideways to see more tabs, this is a cumbersome, unnecessary work, a waste of time to find the tabs when you have smarter solutions (and optional because you can choose to have a tab bar that rolls if you prefer too) in Opera.



Ho do you make the tab bar to roll in Opera?

xinh xinhgiunda Friday, June 3, 2011 8:32:16 AM

oh, wel top

verfeb12 Friday, June 3, 2011 11:57:47 AM

very interesting and informative! really a real techie...

Rafael Luikrafaelluik Saturday, June 4, 2011 3:34:25 AM

Originally posted by Silvery-Corgan:

Originally posted by rafaelluik:

PS. I hate the solution of other browsers to make a tab bar that scroll sideways to see more tabs, this is a cumbersome, unnecessary work, a waste of time to find the tabs when you have smarter solutions (and optional because you can choose to have a tab bar that rolls if you prefer too) in Opera.

Ho do you make the tab bar to roll in Opera?


Oops, it's not possible... I misunderstood the option on Tab bar's Right-Click -> Customize -> Appearance... -> Wrapping. You can set it to wrap to multiple lines or show an extender menu but not to roll...
There's an old thread requesting for the option though.

I've fixed the part of the text.

toleranthink Saturday, June 4, 2011 4:18:44 AM

opera is the strongest,the most intelligent,and the most convenient browser I ever use,what's more?Yeah,opera mini also give a optimal browsing experience.^-^

Vectronic Saturday, June 4, 2011 10:37:29 AM

I'm certainly no fan of Chrome, but:

Originally posted by rafaelluik:

Sessions

Chrome does have the "Continue from last time" feature (as of at least v11), but not custom sessions ("Save Session as...") only the option of a list of predefined websites, which does have "Use current pages", so it basically only has the current session, and one saved session.http://files.myopera.com/Vectronic/files/tmpchrome.png -

Doesn't have an "about:config" page

chrome://settings ... but yeah, seems silly that it's not just chrome:config or about:config

hulkandrei Saturday, June 4, 2011 3:13:40 PM

nice article up

MXB2001 Saturday, June 4, 2011 5:03:44 PM

I don't use Chrome either. But that's because it won't run in Win98. Opera 10.5, FireFox 1.5 and K-Meleon 1.5 do so I use them all! Why? because it gives me options in case one browser is weak at something. Opera's certainly the best of the 3 but for some reason is really slow at JavaScript/Flash so I prefer one of the other 2 (both are Mozilla based and very similar except that K-Meleon is as new as Opera) for such things.

Rafael Luikrafaelluik Saturday, June 4, 2011 8:27:34 PM

Originally posted by Vectronic:

chrome://settings

Yeah, I meant it doesn't have the same options that Opera and Firefox do.

You understood what I meant by sessions, and just explained how counter intuitive it's to save a session (01 session), I don't even know where's this option of "Use current pages"... It's not enough anyway. :/ (Thanks for the update showing me where it's. p)

Skipskip029 Sunday, June 5, 2011 3:10:59 AM

Too bad build x1031 is lacking in speed.

Peacekeeper benchmark scores:

Chrome = 8777 (nightly build)

Opera = 6304 (latest snapshot)

aurora = 5068 (Firefox nightly build)

And Google's own V8 browser benchmark:

**Chrome **

Score: 7599
Richards: 12169
DeltaBlue: 15359
Crypto: 13162
RayTrace: 7828
EarleyBoyer: 19379
RegExp: 1905
Splay: 2058

**Opera**

Score: 3411
Richards: 3131
DeltaBlue: 2440
Crypto: 3638
RayTrace: 4767
EarleyBoyer: 4412
RegExp: 1412
Splay: 6515

**Aurora**

Score: 3122
Richards: 4960
DeltaBlue: 3488
Crypto: 5655
RayTrace: 2684
EarleyBoyer: 2581
RegExp: 1279
Splay: 3338

I'm sticking with Chrome for now. I feel Opera has gotten slower. I'm hoping the Opera team will get their act together and give us some speed improvements. I'm a huge Opera fan but for now, Chrome is KING.

Rafael Luikrafaelluik Sunday, June 5, 2011 4:44:02 AM

I use Opera since it was the slowest browser (9.5), I don't care. I really have put all the reasons why I use Opera above (with exception of the ones involving company's vision and actions), and it isn't about layout engine speed: it's about usability and features.

Gregiamablaze Sunday, June 5, 2011 9:03:42 AM

Opera also doesn't need its own sandbox because there is already awsome sandboxes to run browsers in period. smile

Anna Petrovaannacott Monday, June 6, 2011 9:02:16 AM

great post

samuel-seo Wednesday, June 8, 2011 5:11:03 AM

Crome is a very light weight browser but it lacks options that Opera gives.

Jack Dunnffe132lij777e12 Thursday, June 9, 2011 5:26:50 PM

2 Browsers That I HATE!!!mad
lunascape orion 6
flashpeak slimbrowser
Why? simple: YOU CAN'T FIND THE FLIPPIN' SETTINGS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


by the way well put
bye
wink

Alexodius PrimeAleksOD Monday, June 13, 2011 9:00:15 PM

Originally posted by ffe132lij777e12:

Browsers That I HATE!!!
lunascape orion 6


I can't stand lunascape, either. It is beyond me why anyone would use it.

Fr0sT Tuesday, June 14, 2011 6:46:49 AM

Awesome article! Using Chrome from time to time I even hadn't an idea of how much it sucks lacks comparing to Opera.
Chrome's main goal is simplicity while Opera allows incomparable customization possibility what I really love. http://files.myopera.com/Kaktusgartens/myopera/smiley_loveOpera.gif -

Alexeyalex-shpak Wednesday, June 15, 2011 9:50:20 AM

probably you need to rewrite

...and "Instant" are still unavailable to Opera browser users

in past tense, since now at least "Instant" is available for Opera-identifying Opera users.

Also,

The layout engine ... loads certain elements of the pages before displaying them

for some people (including me, I admit) this behavior (paint everything after 1sec delay) feels faster than "five repaints in 0.5sec". Fortunately, Opera gives the user ability to choose between them (Prefs-Advanced-Browsing-Loading-Redraw when loaded), so the answer to the "[other browser] is faster then Opera" is: "Enable this option!"

Overall, thanks for a great article! yes

Rafael Luikrafaelluik Wednesday, June 15, 2011 3:20:55 PM

Originally posted by alex-shpak:

The layout engine ... loads certain elements of the pages before displaying them

for some people (including me, I admit) this behavior (paint everything after 1sec delay) feels faster than "five repaints in 0.5sec". Fortunately, Opera gives the user ability to choose between them (Prefs-Advanced-Browsing-Loading-Redraw when loaded), so the answer to the "[other browser] is faster then Opera" is: "Enable this option!"

Nope, I wasn't talking about this option. I was talking about HTML body content being loaded before CSS and images in Opera. But yes some people confuse this 1 second delay to display as a time it takes to load.

I added an update about Instant. smile
I'd like to note this wouldn't had solve anything if there were other browsers than Opera being blocked. I talked about this on the same part of the article actually, they make their webpages based on browsers instead of standards.

Fr0sT Friday, June 17, 2011 3:45:14 PM

Btw, there's cool mod ChromePlus which fixes some of silly Chrome stuff and adds many nice features (gestures, tab closing on dbl click, enhanced settings,...)
Opera is the best anyway though

Santiago Rivera dxg31 Wednesday, June 22, 2011 12:29:59 AM

I don't care for chrome either. Good article.

Jan SegreJanLukaz Wednesday, June 22, 2011 2:49:37 AM

Originally posted by samuel-seo:

Crome is a very light weight browser but it lacks options that Opera gives.



If you run win7 you'll find chrome installation on your {userfolder}/AppData\Local\Google\Chrome\Application

Opera is on you program files

Chrome installs itself again for each user if you have many.
Check the size of both applications and see yourself who's light weight.

brainreset Monday, September 12, 2011 7:56:36 AM

Only one problem with opera as I see it...

you cannot remove bookmarks via the "chrome" (opera) as easily as say Seamonkey and adding them still asks no less than 1 question.

Rafael Luikrafaelluik Monday, September 12, 2011 8:41:40 AM

Originally posted by brainreset:

you cannot remove bookmarks via the "chrome"

Do you mean via the Opera menu? You can, right-click it.

Originally posted by brainreset:

adding them still asks no less than 1 question

What?

brainreset Monday, September 12, 2011 12:51:44 PM

Yep, I gotta actually go into Bookmarks unlike Seamonkey and yes Seamonkey doesn't ask any questions, it simply saves it so thumbs down in that respect.

Rafael Luikrafaelluik Monday, September 12, 2011 1:13:58 PM

I don't think Opera asks anything, you can simply click OK on the dialog... Also if you're being upset by having to click a lot on OK when bookmarking a lot of pages you can add all opened tabs as bookmarks via the context menu of any area on the bookmarks manager to simplify.

brainreset Monday, September 12, 2011 9:43:31 PM

Awesome!

Thanks smile

Lorenzo CelsiLorenzoCelsi Friday, September 30, 2011 9:50:41 AM

Opera browser is good. What I like more is the integration of the mail client and Dragonfly. I don't think that "speed" makes any sense in real world and it is more about standards compliance and general efficiency of "engines". I use Opera as backup then because I am still more comfortable with Firefox.

Chrome was designed with two main ideas:
- the user is dumb so the browser must be as dumb as possible
- the browser must be the environment for Web applications, then stay out of the way.
So it doesn't fit my needs since I am not dumb enough to like its "dumbness" and I don't use any Web application (in the Chrome OS sense).

On a side note, in my own little testing Chrome wasn't quicker than other browsers and it consumed more hardware resources. So I don't see the point.

brainreset Friday, September 30, 2011 10:13:45 AM

Lorenzo CelsiLorenzoCelsi Friday, September 30, 2011 10:28:06 AM

In my experience what matters the most is the time needed to request a page and get it from the remote webserver, even more if it includes embedded objects and/or queries to some remote database. The difference the browser can make in parsing/rendering is pretty much irrelevant compared to that.

The importance of speed in JS execution varies depending on the kind of pages you visit. I don't care of HTML5 online games and you don't see much JS in my own blog, which is pretty the kind of page I read when connected.

brainreset Saturday, November 12, 2011 7:38:35 AM

I think HTML5 will be most useful on mobile devices, hence Opera Mobile 11.5 citing "known issues" of no flash, video etc

Luchs Tuesday, November 15, 2011 7:19:25 PM

When you close the last tab on the last window the browser closes completely instead of showing the "Speed Dial", if I wished to close the browser completely I would use the X of the window (or Alt + F4), not the one in the tab (or Ctrl + W / mouse gesture down -> right).


Unfortunately, Opera also closes the window when there is another one open. Always annoys me when I'm using multiple windows.

Stephen Murphysaviorself Wednesday, November 16, 2011 12:02:17 AM

Interesting!

Catyoul Wednesday, November 16, 2011 1:51:04 AM

Originally posted by Luchs:

When you close the last tab on the last window the browser closes completely instead of showing the "Speed Dial", if I wished to close the browser completely I would use the X of the window (or Alt + F4), not the one in the tab (or Ctrl + W / mouse gesture down -> right).


Unfortunately, Opera also closes the window when there is another one open. Always annoys me when I'm using multiple windows.

Preferences / Advanced / Tabs / Addtional tab options / check Allow window with no tabs

Michael A. Puls IIburnout426 Wednesday, November 16, 2011 2:56:06 AM

Chrome's mouse gestures suck. You have to install an extension to get them. And, the extension doesn't have full access to Chrome so gestures only work on web pages.

I also can't stand how Chrome closes the window when you close the last tab. There's an extension that works around this, but there are 2 problems with it. For one, it only works for web page tabs because the extension doesn't have full UI access. Two, there's a visually annoying effect of opening a new tabl and close the other that happens even when you have more than one tab open and close a tab.

But, Chrome is just too minimal for me.


Sandbox
When you close a tab it's completely removed from RAM to reopen this tab or the same website in another tab means reloading the website rather than reopening it from RAM,



I like that Chrome has this. It doesn't affect me in a bad way at all. And, it allows me to manage the memory used by Chrome just by closing a tab. Wish that Opera had this as an option.

Cutting Spoonhellspork Wednesday, November 16, 2011 3:37:46 AM

Generally, it is sufficient merely to close a few tabs and open a program that needs the memory; that program should be able to take what it needs.

Write a comment

You must be logged in to write a comment. If you're not a registered member, please sign up.

May 2013
S M T W T F S
April 2013June 2013
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31