Posts tagged with "Usability"
How Microsoft can succeed with Windows 8 on all platforms by using mobile strategies
Saturday, October 20, 2012 1:54:19 AM
Since the announcement of Windows 8 there has been a great talk about the new features and usability paradigm users are being presented to. The changes are so big that enthusiasts define: or it's going to be a big success or fail miserably.
Many people criticized the system asking how Microsoft plan to put a OS coming from mobiles into desktops and succeed. In my opinion it turns out they might be able to do exactly that, by perfecting current mobile world characteristics and strategies they can become even tougher.
"Hit or miss"
One of the complaints about Windows 8 is the use of the hidden corners of the screen to perform some actions. Actually we've been quite using this feature already in our everyday use, yes on Windows 7, we just haven't noticed yet.
After this issue came to my attention I noticed the corners of the screen are already the hot spots for task switching and menus since a very long time. Let's take a look at Windows 7: at the upper left we have the menus (be it ribbon or classic), at upper right the close button and its siblings, bottom left the start menu and pinned apps (previously the quick launch bar was here) and at the bottom right the show desktop shortcut.
Microsoft managed to notice this and improve the idea into what Windows 8 offers now, and this fact already changed the way I use Windows 7. I didn't know before, but you can hit on the extremes of the screen to quickly perform actions like closing the window, opening the app menu, to get to your desktop or the start menu, you can make your mouse "fly" to the corners of the screen and click without having to aim. These highly common tasks on everyone's daily work are made even easier with Windows 8 and don't even waste screen space.
That used to be an argument on how mouse users would be affected, when in reality they get to know a faster workspace. Actually I think moving my finger to corners of a tablet is a more cumbersome experience...
Double the audience
The size of elements and fonts which are bigger and optimized for touch will only make it easier to see and click whatever be the input method. The fonts will increase the audience of the system to people with impaired sight, offering greater accessibility and at the same time not harming the general user experience. For example, having words in a big font but cut to fit as titles you swipe left or right to access on Windows Phones haven't confused people at all, you can still easily read which word is that even incomplete and it made the interface clear. It also means Windows 8 will be ready to anything from small devices to big monitors, widening the use applications of the operating system. I believe the visualization is improved in panels, and we can think of more use cases specially with the Metro-style apps.
When Microsoft first "Surface" project was shown there were many examples of use in places like hotels and cloth shops. Windows 8 somewhat accomplishes implementing the greater interaction of Surface on Windows, merging the project into the main product. This resulted into something unique!
Let changes flow in
One of the main advantages they can bring from the current mobile ecosystems is the incremental update smartphones receive over time. If they do it right they can refine the OS based on users' feedback and polish the features. The little details in functionality they can change with system updates and better implementations of the apps that can now get updates via an app store is something that pleases me very much.
It isn't very certain that Microsoft will do this, as they usually will set the way the OS will work on its roots and will never update it (until the next major version), but the chance they can think about launching new versions like "Windows 8.5" paired with Windows Phones updates is the most exciting thought I have about it, and we can see Windows in a brighter view.
Doesn't matter what you think of it, "Aero" features implementation slightly, but effectively, set a new way of using computers, a simpler way, and now the Metro UI is perhaps the most innovative software iteration to surface on mainstream in years. Honestly Linux distributions has been playing catching up by mimicking Windows features and never setting any new interesting paradigms despite all the freedom to do so... I can only say it's going to be fun to watch what they'll mimic from Windows 8.
Many people criticized the system asking how Microsoft plan to put a OS coming from mobiles into desktops and succeed. In my opinion it turns out they might be able to do exactly that, by perfecting current mobile world characteristics and strategies they can become even tougher.
"Hit or miss"
One of the complaints about Windows 8 is the use of the hidden corners of the screen to perform some actions. Actually we've been quite using this feature already in our everyday use, yes on Windows 7, we just haven't noticed yet.
After this issue came to my attention I noticed the corners of the screen are already the hot spots for task switching and menus since a very long time. Let's take a look at Windows 7: at the upper left we have the menus (be it ribbon or classic), at upper right the close button and its siblings, bottom left the start menu and pinned apps (previously the quick launch bar was here) and at the bottom right the show desktop shortcut.
Microsoft managed to notice this and improve the idea into what Windows 8 offers now, and this fact already changed the way I use Windows 7. I didn't know before, but you can hit on the extremes of the screen to quickly perform actions like closing the window, opening the app menu, to get to your desktop or the start menu, you can make your mouse "fly" to the corners of the screen and click without having to aim. These highly common tasks on everyone's daily work are made even easier with Windows 8 and don't even waste screen space.
That used to be an argument on how mouse users would be affected, when in reality they get to know a faster workspace. Actually I think moving my finger to corners of a tablet is a more cumbersome experience...
Double the audience
The size of elements and fonts which are bigger and optimized for touch will only make it easier to see and click whatever be the input method. The fonts will increase the audience of the system to people with impaired sight, offering greater accessibility and at the same time not harming the general user experience. For example, having words in a big font but cut to fit as titles you swipe left or right to access on Windows Phones haven't confused people at all, you can still easily read which word is that even incomplete and it made the interface clear. It also means Windows 8 will be ready to anything from small devices to big monitors, widening the use applications of the operating system. I believe the visualization is improved in panels, and we can think of more use cases specially with the Metro-style apps.
When Microsoft first "Surface" project was shown there were many examples of use in places like hotels and cloth shops. Windows 8 somewhat accomplishes implementing the greater interaction of Surface on Windows, merging the project into the main product. This resulted into something unique!
Let changes flow in
One of the main advantages they can bring from the current mobile ecosystems is the incremental update smartphones receive over time. If they do it right they can refine the OS based on users' feedback and polish the features. The little details in functionality they can change with system updates and better implementations of the apps that can now get updates via an app store is something that pleases me very much.
It isn't very certain that Microsoft will do this, as they usually will set the way the OS will work on its roots and will never update it (until the next major version), but the chance they can think about launching new versions like "Windows 8.5" paired with Windows Phones updates is the most exciting thought I have about it, and we can see Windows in a brighter view.Doesn't matter what you think of it, "Aero" features implementation slightly, but effectively, set a new way of using computers, a simpler way, and now the Metro UI is perhaps the most innovative software iteration to surface on mainstream in years. Honestly Linux distributions has been playing catching up by mimicking Windows features and never setting any new interesting paradigms despite all the freedom to do so... I can only say it's going to be fun to watch what they'll mimic from Windows 8.
10 reasons to use Opera
Monday, July 16, 2012 8:31:12 PM
Versão em português1. Take control of your things: you choose what's on your main page, Speed Dial, not a crazy most-visited-recently-visited-pin-before-it-goes-away-hide-before-someone-sees-it algorithm. Choose how many sites you want to add from 0 to ∞ in a customizable look. Manage the search engines of YOUR browser.
2. Please your inner geek: use unique keyboard and mouse shortcuts to browse the web like a pro. Fully customizable!
3. Have your content anywhere: Opera pioneered browser synchronization technology with Opera Link. With it you can have all your bookmarks, notes, and other stuff anywhere! Between computers or your phone, or even without Opera: you can access your data via the web interface.
4. Speed: Opera is aways improving its rendering engines for maximizing the speed of the browser; and with Opera Mini or Turbo, services that compress websites' data in servers to deliver the content in smaller size to you, you'll be able to browse the web considerably better in a slow connection.
5. Save money: browse faster and wasting less, because receiving compressed data (smaller content) means you consume less data from your connection data plan. And easily disable image downloading completely if you will.
6. Battery life: yes, one more benefit from Opera technology, because Opera Mini's rendering engine is more simplified, it will spend less battery from your phone as a result. Tests also show Opera performs great on the energy usage of desktops and notebooks.
7. Eye-candy: it's a browser with a beautiful sleek interface, and you may like a lot the recently introduced themes. You can also arrange anything to suit your needs.
8. Tab management is a breeze with tab-stacking, the windows panel, MDI and sessions. Aways choose whether a page will open in the background or foreground with shortcuts.
9. Support open web standards: Opera Software is a company which is aways supporting the latest web standards and only them, they don't implement proprietary technologies which affect websites' functionality, they're aways collaborating on standards organizations like W3C and WHATWG to push new technologies for everyone. They don't harm the web.
10. It's free: give it a try and you'll never look back.
More information and download at opera.com
2. Please your inner geek: use unique keyboard and mouse shortcuts to browse the web like a pro. Fully customizable!3. Have your content anywhere: Opera pioneered browser synchronization technology with Opera Link. With it you can have all your bookmarks, notes, and other stuff anywhere! Between computers or your phone, or even without Opera: you can access your data via the web interface.
4. Speed: Opera is aways improving its rendering engines for maximizing the speed of the browser; and with Opera Mini or Turbo, services that compress websites' data in servers to deliver the content in smaller size to you, you'll be able to browse the web considerably better in a slow connection.
5. Save money: browse faster and wasting less, because receiving compressed data (smaller content) means you consume less data from your connection data plan. And easily disable image downloading completely if you will.
6. Battery life: yes, one more benefit from Opera technology, because Opera Mini's rendering engine is more simplified, it will spend less battery from your phone as a result. Tests also show Opera performs great on the energy usage of desktops and notebooks.
7. Eye-candy: it's a browser with a beautiful sleek interface, and you may like a lot the recently introduced themes. You can also arrange anything to suit your needs.
8. Tab management is a breeze with tab-stacking, the windows panel, MDI and sessions. Aways choose whether a page will open in the background or foreground with shortcuts.
9. Support open web standards: Opera Software is a company which is aways supporting the latest web standards and only them, they don't implement proprietary technologies which affect websites' functionality, they're aways collaborating on standards organizations like W3C and WHATWG to push new technologies for everyone. They don't harm the web.
10. It's free: give it a try and you'll never look back.
More information and download at opera.com
Featherweight URL drop-down list problems
Saturday, November 26, 2011 8:32:14 PM
This is a compilation of the problems introduced by the new Featherweight address field URL drop-down auto-complete list (in 12 / 11.60 test versions) and my comments about it, I tried to organize them by relevancy from higher to lower. This is very important because these things have a huge impact on everyday browsing.
I'll keep this list updated.
The thing is it has been spoken enough... And we haven't received any feedback from Opera regarding how they think the new URL drop-down list is better aside from being clearer (whiter, with fewer features).
If I had to comment on anything, the only good idea is the one line per entry approach, but then you realize you actually lost the way of visualizing the content of the page and it doesn't plays very well. The list was simply better how it was before and I can't see myself using the new visual.
It isn't a cosmetic issue, you really can't find the pages you're looking for anymore.
I hope that, if they're going to keep the new URL drop-down list even after only negative views (or am I wrong and didn't see any person liking it?), at least they could give us separated options to have search suggestions enabled when using the keywords / search field but disabled on the address field and improve its intelligence.
Most of these comments were originally posted here and here.
Update: THANKS A LOT Blazej Kazmierczak and your team at Opera Software for taking our complaints into account and the hard work on improving the Opera address field experience with a brilliant implementation. Since the version 12.0 the address field has constantly improved and now it's better than ever.
I'll keep this list updated.
- The search suggestions, in addition to being displayed at the top, can't be disabled individually (if disabled via opera:config#UserPrefs|ShowSearchesInAddressfieldAutocompletion you lose the functionality on the use of the keywords on the address field). (switched to the desirable behavior in 12.00 1413)
- The history seems to be aways more prioritized than the bookmarks - the opposite of the older versions where bookmarks stayed at the top - is another drawback. The history and the bookmarks being mixed isn't such a big deal for me, as long as the most relevant items are above. (very nice improvements were done by Opera between 12.00 1289 and 1360 builds)
- The favicons of the pages aren't displayed anymore on the list, which causes identifying the pages harder, only by URL (to some size) and title (which sometimes is actually part of the text on the page). (a new setting was provided in 12.00 1325)
-
Bookmark nicknames doesn't works anymore.Oops, it works but with a visual focus issue (fixed in 11.60 1173), but it doesn't show the nicknamed bookmarks as suggestions when you start typing their nicknames. (fixed in 12.00 1256) - Previous searches aren't displayed anymore (when typing a keyword and pressing space). (fixed in 12.00 1256)
-
No button to search the typed text on history or bookmarks manager.(I don't believe it affects everyday use at all so I'm striking it.)
The thing is it has been spoken enough... And we haven't received any feedback from Opera regarding how they think the new URL drop-down list is better aside from being clearer (whiter, with fewer features).

If I had to comment on anything, the only good idea is the one line per entry approach, but then you realize you actually lost the way of visualizing the content of the page and it doesn't plays very well. The list was simply better how it was before and I can't see myself using the new visual.
It isn't a cosmetic issue, you really can't find the pages you're looking for anymore.
I hope that, if they're going to keep the new URL drop-down list even after only negative views (or am I wrong and didn't see any person liking it?), at least they could give us separated options to have search suggestions enabled when using the keywords / search field but disabled on the address field and improve its intelligence.
Most of these comments were originally posted here and here.
Update: THANKS A LOT Blazej Kazmierczak and your team at Opera Software for taking our complaints into account and the hard work on improving the Opera address field experience with a brilliant implementation. Since the version 12.0 the address field has constantly improved and now it's better than ever.
Paste and Go - a dumb browsers' little story
Thursday, November 24, 2011 8:49:03 PM
Versão em portuguêsI had to share this gem. It's unbelievable.
Although Mozilla Firefox and Google Chrome both have the command "Paste and Go", none of the two has a keyboard shortcut for it! And you can't set it by any means in the browser, having to use an app like AutoHotkey or an extension! While in Opera there's the default keyboard shortcut Ctrl + Shift + V and various other ways of doing so.
That's it, just imagine it, when the people behind Chrome and Firefox want to go to an URL or search using the text in their clipboard they open a new tab, move the mouse up to the address / search field, right-click and then choose "Paste and Go"! Ridiculous, isn't it? Considering they use Ctrl + T to open new tabs it gets even more cumbersome as they have to put their hand on the mouse after using the shortcut.
Should I mention Internet Explorer doesn't even have the function?
Ways to Paste and Go in Opera
Although Mozilla Firefox and Google Chrome both have the command "Paste and Go", none of the two has a keyboard shortcut for it! And you can't set it by any means in the browser, having to use an app like AutoHotkey or an extension! While in Opera there's the default keyboard shortcut Ctrl + Shift + V and various other ways of doing so.
That's it, just imagine it, when the people behind Chrome and Firefox want to go to an URL or search using the text in their clipboard they open a new tab, move the mouse up to the address / search field, right-click and then choose "Paste and Go"! Ridiculous, isn't it? Considering they use Ctrl + T to open new tabs it gets even more cumbersome as they have to put their hand on the mouse after using the shortcut.
Should I mention Internet Explorer doesn't even have the function?
Ways to Paste and Go in Opera
- Ctrl + Shift + V
- Edit the default shortcut or assign any other key to do it
- Assign a mouse gesture
- Enable opera:config#UserPrefs|PageBarOpenURLOnMiddleClick, for now on when you middle-click the tab bar to open a new tab
- Customize the menu / context menu of anywhere with the command
- Create a button for it
- Speak "Baby Paste and Go"
Speed Dial 2.0 - the big fish show off some teeth
Saturday, September 10, 2011 8:50:26 PM
Versão em português"All it takes is a bit of open-mindedness..."
When Speed Dial 2.0 was first introduced in Opera Barracuda snapshots a number of people including myself became very upset about how the new "flow" layout was going to work.
Here are the things some got upset about
Now after all the 2.x fishly evolution from 11.1x to 11.5x (some issues solved and settings / workarounds additions later...) we can tackle down all the cited cons of the new Speed Dial.
For the first two items on the above list, Opera provided us a much desirable behavior for moving Speed Dial items around: it used to switch with the one in the location you dropped, now it's better because you don't need to move one by one until you gets there when you want to keep the position of the original one and its fellows. [topic asking for it] With it, is much easier to put an about:blank on item 1 (and I see now that wanting to remove caused the whole thing, while could have simply edited it to about:blank - being that this isn't as intuitive).
3 and 4 are solved by manually editing the zoom level and the number of columns.
5 can be easily set via Reload Every -> X seconds, Reload and then set the option back to Never. The zoom area can also be adjusted on opera:config.
For more instructions on how to customize Speed Dial see this great topic:
Customising the New Speed Dial by Pesala.
Speed Dial has never been better than now
You might be wondering: what do we won with the new flow layout and unlimited number of items?
Well, it's about practicality. The word that comes to my mind now is freedom!
I see myself using it more. I can easily add and remove items without having to edit the number of lines and columns manually or editing the .ini file so it became a great place to put pages I really need to remember to visit later that would be out of view in a bookmarks folder and after doing what I need to do on these pages I remove them. Rearranging these items is a pleasure.
What needs to be improved
Extensions should be interactive
If extensions were able to have buttons inside of its item thumbnail area it'd greatly improve experience. A simple use case would be controlling the article being shown by the feed-like extensions, they show the main headlines displaying each one for some seconds so you might not be able to click it in time; two little arrows for browsing through the headlines presented would be very welcome. I also thought about the idea of them being able to generate a pop-up balloon of their own: setting the location of The Weather extension for example would be much easier via this pop-up called via a little config button instead of having to follow instructions on how to do it on the weather website.
Items suggestions
While some things were greatly improved, the items' add and edit dialogs were very damaged.
In previous versions the suggestions were displayed in a categorized list in the following order: Frequently Visited Pages, Opened Pages and Opera Sites. While "Opera Sites" was completely marketing and useless (I'm not complaining) the other two were the best way to suggest pages to users, now it's awful, the dialog displays only three pages probably mixing the concepts of last visited / opened, top and frequent rank system and all have thumbnails generated - wasting bandwidth before you actually have chosen one of the options, below three random Speed Dial extensions picks are shown.
Also, both dialogs (add and edit) had the same features back then while now the scrapped edit dialog only let you to edit the URL and the title instead of displaying the suggestions together. There's an huge mistake here! By seeing the edit function the user can only pretend one thing about it: "I'll be able to switch the page currently here to another one!". He is effectively surprised by a good thing: he discover he can edit the title of the pages anytime, but if he edits the URL the title remains the same of the old page and there are no suggestions to make it easier, so he ends up having to close the dialog, deleting the item, adding a new one and moving it to where the old one was.
My suggestion for the developers: bring back the old full-featured dialogs back and if you want to keep the discoverability of Speed Dial extensions by showing recommended ones, put them on one of the sides of the list in column or below it. For fixing the edit of URL retaining the previous personalized title, well, you'll need to detect it and get / update the title from the new URL (unless the user edit both the URL and title at once).
There's no better alternative
Opera's Speed Dial is the only (and first) implementation that lets you put the exactly pages you want there (instead of automatic pulling top visited pages into you) and gives you the ability to make it look like you want. The zoomed thumbnails and logos are beautiful and combined with extensions they make the browser to have a whole new dynamic.
The only other good implementation is Maxthon's which also gives you control of what's there and actually provide three different pages for people who want this kind of organization.
Meanwhile, the other browsers also have plans to update this feature. I already told how bad is their implementation on Why I don't use Google Chrome or other browsers besides Opera. The problem is the current plans lead to a much worse direction.
Google want to make three pages: Most visited, Apps and Bookmarks.[1] Bookmarks won't get thumbnails, only favicons so what's the usefulness of all this? More work scrolling and searching for bookmarks only. If they get thumbnails, bandwidth = gone...
Mozilla seems interested in releasing a New Tab Page but plans are completely confusing at the moment, the con we know until now is that the number of entries is limited, at least they explicit say the user will have control to add and remove what he wants (apart from the doubtful automated part).[2]
Apple and Microsoft plans for the feature aren't available. What I can say now is that the Safari's is just heavy (some people think it's pretty) and IE's is too much light (no options and no thumbnails).
It seems like Opera will keep its position, having the besthunting fangs Speed Dial. 
That's it, now I want to know your opinion. What ideas do you like and dislike for this feature that, I dare to say, is currently the most important in browsers - a truly start point for the Web in all major browsers after Opera invented it inspired from phones' speed dial feature. What do you think of Opera's current version, do you take any advantage of it?
When Speed Dial 2.0 was first introduced in Opera Barracuda snapshots a number of people including myself became very upset about how the new "flow" layout was going to work.
Here are the things some got upset about
- Ctrl + # shortcuts would change every time an item is removed.
- Having a X number of entries (imagine a big number like 50). If the user wants to remove the number 2 and put nothing there he'd have to create a new about:blank entry that when added go to the end of the list and re-organize all of them switching positions one by one until it got there.
- It changes the position of the items on different computers / resolutions.
- Creates scrollbar if there are a lot of items.
- New zoom applied on the logos to generate the thumbnails wasn't well received by some.
Now after all the 2.x fishly evolution from 11.1x to 11.5x (some issues solved and settings / workarounds additions later...) we can tackle down all the cited cons of the new Speed Dial.
For the first two items on the above list, Opera provided us a much desirable behavior for moving Speed Dial items around: it used to switch with the one in the location you dropped, now it's better because you don't need to move one by one until you gets there when you want to keep the position of the original one and its fellows. [topic asking for it] With it, is much easier to put an about:blank on item 1 (and I see now that wanting to remove caused the whole thing, while could have simply edited it to about:blank - being that this isn't as intuitive).
3 and 4 are solved by manually editing the zoom level and the number of columns.
5 can be easily set via Reload Every -> X seconds, Reload and then set the option back to Never. The zoom area can also be adjusted on opera:config.
For more instructions on how to customize Speed Dial see this great topic:
Customising the New Speed Dial by Pesala.
Speed Dial has never been better than now
You might be wondering: what do we won with the new flow layout and unlimited number of items?
Well, it's about practicality. The word that comes to my mind now is freedom!
I see myself using it more. I can easily add and remove items without having to edit the number of lines and columns manually or editing the .ini file so it became a great place to put pages I really need to remember to visit later that would be out of view in a bookmarks folder and after doing what I need to do on these pages I remove them. Rearranging these items is a pleasure.
What needs to be improved
Extensions should be interactive
If extensions were able to have buttons inside of its item thumbnail area it'd greatly improve experience. A simple use case would be controlling the article being shown by the feed-like extensions, they show the main headlines displaying each one for some seconds so you might not be able to click it in time; two little arrows for browsing through the headlines presented would be very welcome. I also thought about the idea of them being able to generate a pop-up balloon of their own: setting the location of The Weather extension for example would be much easier via this pop-up called via a little config button instead of having to follow instructions on how to do it on the weather website.
Items suggestions
While some things were greatly improved, the items' add and edit dialogs were very damaged.
In previous versions the suggestions were displayed in a categorized list in the following order: Frequently Visited Pages, Opened Pages and Opera Sites. While "Opera Sites" was completely marketing and useless (I'm not complaining) the other two were the best way to suggest pages to users, now it's awful, the dialog displays only three pages probably mixing the concepts of last visited / opened, top and frequent rank system and all have thumbnails generated - wasting bandwidth before you actually have chosen one of the options, below three random Speed Dial extensions picks are shown.
Also, both dialogs (add and edit) had the same features back then while now the scrapped edit dialog only let you to edit the URL and the title instead of displaying the suggestions together. There's an huge mistake here! By seeing the edit function the user can only pretend one thing about it: "I'll be able to switch the page currently here to another one!". He is effectively surprised by a good thing: he discover he can edit the title of the pages anytime, but if he edits the URL the title remains the same of the old page and there are no suggestions to make it easier, so he ends up having to close the dialog, deleting the item, adding a new one and moving it to where the old one was.
My suggestion for the developers: bring back the old full-featured dialogs back and if you want to keep the discoverability of Speed Dial extensions by showing recommended ones, put them on one of the sides of the list in column or below it. For fixing the edit of URL retaining the previous personalized title, well, you'll need to detect it and get / update the title from the new URL (unless the user edit both the URL and title at once).
There's no better alternative
Opera's Speed Dial is the only (and first) implementation that lets you put the exactly pages you want there (instead of automatic pulling top visited pages into you) and gives you the ability to make it look like you want. The zoomed thumbnails and logos are beautiful and combined with extensions they make the browser to have a whole new dynamic.
The only other good implementation is Maxthon's which also gives you control of what's there and actually provide three different pages for people who want this kind of organization.
Meanwhile, the other browsers also have plans to update this feature. I already told how bad is their implementation on Why I don't use Google Chrome or other browsers besides Opera. The problem is the current plans lead to a much worse direction.
Google want to make three pages: Most visited, Apps and Bookmarks.[1] Bookmarks won't get thumbnails, only favicons so what's the usefulness of all this? More work scrolling and searching for bookmarks only. If they get thumbnails, bandwidth = gone...
Mozilla seems interested in releasing a New Tab Page but plans are completely confusing at the moment, the con we know until now is that the number of entries is limited, at least they explicit say the user will have control to add and remove what he wants (apart from the doubtful automated part).[2]
Apple and Microsoft plans for the feature aren't available. What I can say now is that the Safari's is just heavy (some people think it's pretty) and IE's is too much light (no options and no thumbnails).
It seems like Opera will keep its position, having the best

That's it, now I want to know your opinion. What ideas do you like and dislike for this feature that, I dare to say, is currently the most important in browsers - a truly start point for the Web in all major browsers after Opera invented it inspired from phones' speed dial feature. What do you think of Opera's current version, do you take any advantage of it?
Why I don't use Google Chrome or other browsers besides Opera
Saturday, May 28, 2011 9:47:43 PM
Versão em portuguêsDifferently than most people, in this study I won't cite the "privacy" case in which we know Chrome has appends unique identifiers to its users and collect together all the queries sent to Google through the browser, installs Google Updater automatically giving permissions to installs coming from Google, etc... Especially because most of these items can be disabled and I wouldn't care Google collects this anonymous data if I liked using the browser. Other browsers also have their methods of collecting anonymous data from users.
In what really matters, here are the cons of Google Chrome (those I can remember, because they're many), most of them are present in other browsers too:
Tabs and windows
MDI
Opera tabs are MDI, which means means they can be resized, organized, minimizes, etc, as they were sub-windows of the browser, the ones on Chrome and other browsers are just tabs.
In Chrome the dialog boxes are modal: if a JavaScript window open on it like a confirm asking for your OK or Cancel for example, you'll be stuck, you won't be able to switch to another tab or click in any other thing until you answer or click the X of the window. The dialog boxes in Opera are non-modal allowing you to do whatever you want before answering.
Pop-up windows open in new widows, in Opera they open in a new tab. Opera never open things in new window unless you explicitly gives the instruction to do so: what I never do. Other browsers opt for a mix of the two (tabs and windows) and make everything more complicated... Browse through windows is from the time when tabs didn't existed and is more complicated because the windows are mixed up with other open programs in the Alt + TAB.
New Tab page, or Speed Dial:
Closed tabs:
Private Browsing
It only can be made in a per-window basis, in Opera it's on per-tab basis (you can have private and ordinary tabs on a same window).
Sessions
Doesn't has sessions feature to save the tabs and windows that are opened so you can restart your browsing from where you stopped it reopening the "session".
Tab bar
If you open many tabs it becomes impossible to recognize which is which, in Opera when you hover them you locate because it shows thumbnails. PS. I hate the solution of other browsers to make a tab bar that scroll sideways to see more tabs, this is a cumbersome, unnecessary work, a waste of time to find the tabs when you have smarter solutions in Opera (you have the option to wrap tabs into multiple lines or show an extender menu if you prefer).
Sandbox
When you close a tab it's completely removed from RAM, so to reopen this tab or the same website in another tab means reloading the website rather than reopening it from RAM, which means it won't be as fast as Opera or other browsers that maintains the data in RAM (RAM was made to be used with useful things like this that increase the overall speed of browsing).
The use of independent tabs can spend more RAM (the RAM in this case is spent in a sense that I find useless). Security flaws and crashes that are supposedly present in browsers that don't apply the sandbox system could be fixed fixed (and they are by other browsers) instead of applying a system that masks the real problem and in the end doesn't prevent crashes and other failures on security / data theft caused by other parts of the software. Furthermore, even a sandbox system can be broken, Java and Flash run in the sandbox and cause havoc anyway!
Shortcut browsing / Usability
Doesn't includes mouse gestures (even with the existence of extensions that add this functionality, they don't take away the trouble of having to install them while another browser is already ready to be used out of the box and have much less negative points than the ones I show in this text).
Chrome has a good list of keyboard shortcuts but Opera has more (and is customizable).
The use of the Ctrl and Shift modifier keys to open websites in new tab / new tab in background doesn't work in the address field, text fields that post with Enter button on the pages, commands in context menus of links, images or selected text (for searching), Go to web address, etc. To force the opening of some of these commands in the current tab is a missing option also.
Allows adding and modifying the search engines but don't show them as options to search from the context menu of selected text.
Images context menu:
The zoom control of the page doesn't has a fast way of resetting to 100% unless you use the keyboard shortcut for it.
It hasn't useful commands such as the synchronization control right from the main menu, you need to enter the required browser settings to find that the feature exists.
Synchronization
The synchronized items cannot be accessed through a Web interface like in Opera Link.
Settings
The auto-update cannot be configured or disabled (only through regedit on Windows or similar commands in other operating systems).
It hasn't an "about:config" page.
As Firefox, it hasn't .ini configuration files that let you freely edit profile files like the search engine lost (what open browsers they are, aren't they??).
Layout engines / Browser behavior
The layout engine implemented by Safari and Chrome (Webkit), Firefox (Gecko) and Internet Explorer (Trident), loads certain elements of the pages before displaying them, what cause a white screen before displaying the page. Opera (Presto) was developed to give priority to the loading of the text of the page and display it as soon as possible, leaving less priority to other elements that in my opinion are really less important that the text information that I can already be reading and stop the loading of the page if what I want is there and even use the links that are already loaded together with the text to proceed to another page, in other browsers: white screen.
If I open a tab, I type and hit Enter there is a kind of delay / hang, a blank screen, the hang before connecting to the website also occurs simply from one site to another in the same tab, not in Opera (based on test, both on the same computer).
Opera is the only browser that allows you to select linked text starting from inside of the text of the link to get only a part of the text, in the other browsers you're obliged to click and drag the mouse at least one character before the link (and get more than the text you wanted to the clipboard / search / notes).
In Opera the TAB key switch the focus only between form elements (Shift + arrow keys switch between the other elements), in other browsers I need to press the TAB key more times, for example, to login in Hotmail where there's a link ("Forgot your password?") where the focus will pass before than the checkboxes that I want to check / uncheck sometimes (this is a silly example, take other pages where you have a search field and a lot of top links before it as another confirmation of the utility of separating form elements from the others). This is a major improvement for people who browser primarily with the keyboard.
Criticism to "minimalism":
License / Company-consumer interaction
Open source? No one can guarantee me that a software is completely open source. Before being published, the base (Chromium project) gets modified (are added: Flash Player, PDF reader, the name Google and the differentiated logo, the auto-updater "GoogleUpdate", the RLZ, etc...) then who guarantee that other changes aren't made that aren't present in the original source code and I wouldn't use the software if I knew about them?
Lastly, Google does not demonstrate as a good company. They do their websites targeted for use on certain browsers instead of using the standards effectively (and even implements non-standard things to work on certain browsers), and for example, right now services like the new version of the search for images and "Instant" are still unavailable to Opera browser users despite it being perfectly able to load pages when the User-Agent String is masked to one that is on the list of "allowed" browsers to access them. [1]
Update: Google made Instant available for Opera users, "only" 10 months later.
Google is as a company that doesn't listens to its users, in the sense of not being unable to handle the feedback they receive on their forums (forums that are read and moderated by people who are not employees of the company), that is, in the end it doesn't accept suggestions.
Simply, the language used in their blogs, the kind of humor used, the justifications behind the actions it has been taken..., Google doesn't praises me!
Conclusion
Notice that I didn't need to cite differentials of Opera like the notes feature, Opera Turbo or Opera Unite for example, or Opera Mail for those who want an e-mail client integrated into the browser (and yet still the browser that has the smallest installer), in addition to its completely customizable interface (add / move / remove buttons and other UI elements [even let's you to create custom buttons])... Opera wins in the details..., and I could make similar comparisons with any other browser, all of them fit together in the same amateur level of Google Chrome.
In what really matters, here are the cons of Google Chrome (those I can remember, because they're many), most of them are present in other browsers too:
Tabs and windows
MDI
Opera tabs are MDI, which means means they can be resized, organized, minimizes, etc, as they were sub-windows of the browser, the ones on Chrome and other browsers are just tabs.
In Chrome the dialog boxes are modal: if a JavaScript window open on it like a confirm asking for your OK or Cancel for example, you'll be stuck, you won't be able to switch to another tab or click in any other thing until you answer or click the X of the window. The dialog boxes in Opera are non-modal allowing you to do whatever you want before answering.
Pop-up windows open in new widows, in Opera they open in a new tab. Opera never open things in new window unless you explicitly gives the instruction to do so: what I never do. Other browsers opt for a mix of the two (tabs and windows) and make everything more complicated... Browse through windows is from the time when tabs didn't existed and is more complicated because the windows are mixed up with other open programs in the Alt + TAB.
New Tab page, or Speed Dial:
- Chrome doesn't allow you to choose the exact websites that you want to put on the page;
- Doesn't allow more than 8 websites;
- Doesn't has keyboard shortcuts Ctrl + # (Number of Speed Dial item) to go to the page.
- You don't have the choice of how much time you wish the websites (and its thumbnails) are updated.
- Firefox hasn't such a page!
Closed tabs:
- It has a list of recently closed tabs but only present a limited number of them (in my test it has been 9 only);
- To have access to the list you need to open a new tab, in Opera there's a button on the end of the tab bar;
- When you close the last tab on the last window the browser closes completely instead of showing the "Speed Dial", if I wished to close the browser completely I would use the X of the window (or Alt + F4), not the one in the tab (or Ctrl + W / mouse gesture down -> right).
Private Browsing
It only can be made in a per-window basis, in Opera it's on per-tab basis (you can have private and ordinary tabs on a same window).
Sessions
Doesn't has sessions feature to save the tabs and windows that are opened so you can restart your browsing from where you stopped it reopening the "session".
Tab bar
If you open many tabs it becomes impossible to recognize which is which, in Opera when you hover them you locate because it shows thumbnails. PS. I hate the solution of other browsers to make a tab bar that scroll sideways to see more tabs, this is a cumbersome, unnecessary work, a waste of time to find the tabs when you have smarter solutions in Opera (you have the option to wrap tabs into multiple lines or show an extender menu if you prefer).
Sandbox
When you close a tab it's completely removed from RAM, so to reopen this tab or the same website in another tab means reloading the website rather than reopening it from RAM, which means it won't be as fast as Opera or other browsers that maintains the data in RAM (RAM was made to be used with useful things like this that increase the overall speed of browsing).
The use of independent tabs can spend more RAM (the RAM in this case is spent in a sense that I find useless). Security flaws and crashes that are supposedly present in browsers that don't apply the sandbox system could be fixed fixed (and they are by other browsers) instead of applying a system that masks the real problem and in the end doesn't prevent crashes and other failures on security / data theft caused by other parts of the software. Furthermore, even a sandbox system can be broken, Java and Flash run in the sandbox and cause havoc anyway!
Shortcut browsing / Usability
Doesn't includes mouse gestures (even with the existence of extensions that add this functionality, they don't take away the trouble of having to install them while another browser is already ready to be used out of the box and have much less negative points than the ones I show in this text).
Chrome has a good list of keyboard shortcuts but Opera has more (and is customizable).
The use of the Ctrl and Shift modifier keys to open websites in new tab / new tab in background doesn't work in the address field, text fields that post with Enter button on the pages, commands in context menus of links, images or selected text (for searching), Go to web address, etc. To force the opening of some of these commands in the current tab is a missing option also.
Allows adding and modifying the search engines but don't show them as options to search from the context menu of selected text.
Images context menu:
- It isn't possible to reload them individually if there was any problem with the loading (or you know that the image has been updated on the server and want to reload it individually, or you have "stopped" the loading of the page before the image download was completed and just to see this picture you'll have to reload the whole page);
- Doesn't allow opening the image in a new tab in the foreground;
- Doesn't has a proprieties window (dimensions, size, alternative text, etc...).
The zoom control of the page doesn't has a fast way of resetting to 100% unless you use the keyboard shortcut for it.
It hasn't useful commands such as the synchronization control right from the main menu, you need to enter the required browser settings to find that the feature exists.
Synchronization
The synchronized items cannot be accessed through a Web interface like in Opera Link.
Settings
The auto-update cannot be configured or disabled (only through regedit on Windows or similar commands in other operating systems).
It hasn't an "about:config" page.
As Firefox, it hasn't .ini configuration files that let you freely edit profile files like the search engine lost (what open browsers they are, aren't they??).
Layout engines / Browser behavior
The layout engine implemented by Safari and Chrome (Webkit), Firefox (Gecko) and Internet Explorer (Trident), loads certain elements of the pages before displaying them, what cause a white screen before displaying the page. Opera (Presto) was developed to give priority to the loading of the text of the page and display it as soon as possible, leaving less priority to other elements that in my opinion are really less important that the text information that I can already be reading and stop the loading of the page if what I want is there and even use the links that are already loaded together with the text to proceed to another page, in other browsers: white screen.
If I open a tab, I type and hit Enter there is a kind of delay / hang, a blank screen, the hang before connecting to the website also occurs simply from one site to another in the same tab, not in Opera (based on test, both on the same computer).
Opera is the only browser that allows you to select linked text starting from inside of the text of the link to get only a part of the text, in the other browsers you're obliged to click and drag the mouse at least one character before the link (and get more than the text you wanted to the clipboard / search / notes).
In Opera the TAB key switch the focus only between form elements (Shift + arrow keys switch between the other elements), in other browsers I need to press the TAB key more times, for example, to login in Hotmail where there's a link ("Forgot your password?") where the focus will pass before than the checkboxes that I want to check / uncheck sometimes (this is a silly example, take other pages where you have a search field and a lot of top links before it as another confirmation of the utility of separating form elements from the others). This is a major improvement for people who browser primarily with the keyboard.
Criticism to "minimalism":
- It isn't a new concept, in Opera the tab bar always has been above the address bar and you can even hide the address bar and customize the UI by moving the address field to another bar... Some users like to use the shortcut F2 to enter the address or search at any moment.
- When you're reading a text on the Web you'll always end up having to scroll down the page anyway, so the extra space earned by the minimalism is useless...
- Minimalism on the number of resources? Chrome still has the largest installer of all even with the lack of a lot of features and moreover: it duplicates all its files for each user on the computer.
License / Company-consumer interaction
Open source? No one can guarantee me that a software is completely open source. Before being published, the base (Chromium project) gets modified (are added: Flash Player, PDF reader, the name Google and the differentiated logo, the auto-updater "GoogleUpdate", the RLZ, etc...) then who guarantee that other changes aren't made that aren't present in the original source code and I wouldn't use the software if I knew about them?
Lastly, Google does not demonstrate as a good company. They do their websites targeted for use on certain browsers instead of using the standards effectively (and even implements non-standard things to work on certain browsers), and for example, right now services like the new version of the search for images and "Instant" are still unavailable to Opera browser users despite it being perfectly able to load pages when the User-Agent String is masked to one that is on the list of "allowed" browsers to access them. [1]
Update: Google made Instant available for Opera users, "only" 10 months later.
Google is as a company that doesn't listens to its users, in the sense of not being unable to handle the feedback they receive on their forums (forums that are read and moderated by people who are not employees of the company), that is, in the end it doesn't accept suggestions.
Simply, the language used in their blogs, the kind of humor used, the justifications behind the actions it has been taken..., Google doesn't praises me!
Conclusion
Notice that I didn't need to cite differentials of Opera like the notes feature, Opera Turbo or Opera Unite for example, or Opera Mail for those who want an e-mail client integrated into the browser (and yet still the browser that has the smallest installer), in addition to its completely customizable interface (add / move / remove buttons and other UI elements [even let's you to create custom buttons])... Opera wins in the details..., and I could make similar comparisons with any other browser, all of them fit together in the same amateur level of Google Chrome.
Opera-wishes
Monday, July 19, 2010 8:59:40 AM
What I want to see in the future...
Opera desktop
Opera for mobile devices
My Opera
Opera Link:
What I don't want to see in the future...
Opera desktop
What has changed for the worse and should be reverted...
Opera desktop
Opera desktop
- Ability to move search engines up / down + a "restore defaults" button
- "Aways on top" tab
- Shift + Delete to permanently delete notes and bookmarks
- "Go to Web Address" context menu command in selected hyperlinked text
- A way to restore typed text when restoring a closed tab (Persistent Text extension is available.*)
- Go back in a new tab
- Ability to middle-click on menus. Including the bookmarks' ones. People asking for it: [1], [2], [3], [4] (I guess it's impossible because the OS doesn't lets you, but I'm listing it here anyway until I get an official answer)
- Private browsing improvements (e.g. "Open in New Private Tab" in links context menu)
- Opera panels non-disruptive redesign
- MDI: Select some specific tabs to Organize
- Reload all tabs & Stop all
- Ability to easily hide the names of the Speed Dial items
- Utilize Windows Aero and other systems' correspondent to generate taskbar and tabs thumbnails
- Remove the focus from the auto-update dialog box's "Restart now" button
- A few "Pin Tab" improvements
- Explain Opera Turbo effects better
- Necessary changes to Opera defaults for new users
- Ctrl + Shift + Del to bring the "Delete Private Data..." window Also asking for it: More cross-browser keyboard shortcut compatibility
- Optimize 10.5+'s "Find in page" feature for slow computers (adding an 1s delay to start the search)
- Disable automatic importing of bookmarks on first run a.k.a. opera:config#UserPrefs|DisableBookmarkImport
-
Smarter address field✓(12.0+, thanks Blazej Kazmierczak!) -
Resizable text fields (An UserJS, Drag-Resize TextArea and Textarea resizer extensions are available.*)✓(12.10) -
Clean uninstall option when uninstalling✓(11.10) -
Private bookmarks(Windows 8 gave me reasons to configure a profile to each user) -
Option to ask for password when opening Opera from the system tray(I'm using Windows native "lock") -
"E-mail image" in images' context menu(I've given up on Opera Mail for some reasons.)
- DownThemAll-like ability to set the number of parallel downloads, parts and batch downloader
- "Exit when Downloads Complete" option when trying to exit Opera with active downloads and "Shutdown when Downloads Complete" also
- Add tab to saved sessions or greater innovative management tools, maybe something that looks like the Windows panel (imagine the session being displayed as the window is in the panel, expandable, where the [windows and the] [stacks of] tabs inside them would be manageable)
- Auto-completion of session name on the Save Session dialog
-
Integrate session files in shell(I discovered I can just drag and drop the session file in the Opera window to open it)
Opera for mobile devices
- "Copy link address"
- "Open link in New Tab" AND "Open link in Background Tab" available in the context menu
- Ability to choose the default search engine
-
"Go to Web Address"✓ -
Solution to have more than 9 Speed Dial items✓ (Opera Mobile 12) -
Drag and drop speed dials and bookmarks✓ (Opera Mobile 12)
My Opera
Opera Link:
- Bookmarks sorting option in link.opera.com (View -> Sort by Name / Nick / Address / etc)
- Ability to manage search engines in link.opera.com
- True multi-language blogging
- A shy smiley
- Text formating tools in the message system and blog/photo comments (UserJS available)
- Additional post search options for blogs
- Unfavorite button on favorited content's page
- Ability to mark individual items as read in the news (subscriptions) page (e.g. mark a blog post as read, not the entire blog).
- Cancel a sent friend invitation[another example]
-
Report abuse button in user's page✓ -
Merge Design & Sidebar/menu configuration pages✓
What I don't want to see in the future...
Opera desktop
- Multi-process architecture[1 (important)], [2 (supplementary example)]
- Aggressive tab locking (unless it's implemented in other way than modifying Pin Tab behavior)[1 (reason)], [2]
- Automatic definition of inline spell checker's language based on the Website
- Auto most visited in Speed Dial
- Merge Bookmarks with Speed Dial and create Categories
- "Speed Dial > Desktops"
- Movable hyperlinks like desktop icons
What has changed for the worse and should be reverted...
Opera desktop
- Pin Tab behavior
-
Featherweight address field URL drop-down auto-complete list✓ (brilliantly solved by Blazej Kazmierczak and Opera Software team)
Latest comments
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |
Tags
Countdowns
132 days until
POKÉMON X/Y
Websites you may like
-
FavBrowser
Web Browser News and Reviews
-
The Register
THE technology news website.
-
Tamil's blog
Opera FAQs, Tips, Tricks & Tweaks
Sites que você deve gostar
-
Consciencia.blog.br
Direitos animais, vegetarianismo, antidiscriminação e antimilitarismo.













