Saturday, 4. October 2008, 04:47:28
Charts show that gold rose and stocks fell when Bush took his pen to sign EESA; perhaps this week saw Peak US Dollar and Peak Treasuries and a bottoming in gold providing a safe entry point for buyers of the safe haven metal.
The Russell 2000, IWM, fell 2.87% for the day to close at 619 ...
IWMThe ongoing Yahoo Finance one year chart of gold,
GLD, compared to IAT, IWM, IWN, and IWO, shows a rise of 18% for gold ...
Gold is up eighteen percent since the Citigroup CDO Bust started October 8, 2007.
The ongoing Yahoo Finance dive day chart of gold,
GLD comapred to ITA, IWM, IWN, and IWO, shows gold's stunning rise in value as stocks fell when Bush took his pen out ...
Five day chart of gold shows gold's rise and stocks fall at Bush's command The ongoing MSN Finance one month chart of gold,
GLD, compared to ITA, IWM, IWN, and IWO shows the breakout of gold on September 11, 2008 ...
One Month chart of gold shows the breakout of gold since the banks were unable to sell assets or raise capital beginning on 9-11-2008The Stockcharts.com chart of the gold ETF,
GLD shows a close at $82.59.
The
Yahoo Finance ongoing chart of GLD relative to the EUR/JPY and the USD/JPY, provides fascinating insights into the interplay of gold and the two major currency pairs. A rising USDJPY and a falling EURJPY took the US Dollar up and gold down as the market took the bailout to be dollar friendly ...
GLD down for the week.
One supporting factor for gold is the
James Chen USD/JPY update which shows the chart of USDJPY at the
brink of resistance.
Valeria Bednarik confirms in article
USD/JPY For Today suggesting that the
USDJPY is down from today's 105.35.
James Chen's
USD/CHF made chart of the day; it suggests that the USDCHF has hit resistance and is headed down.
The
Elliott Wave Analysis Of EUR/USD, USD/JPY and GOLD by TheLFB News for Oct 03 08 provides the EUR/USD chart suggesting that it will be going up; and the GOLD chart suggesting it will soon be fininishing an Elliott Wave 2 down and also heading up with a floor of $770 to $800 ...
EURUSD soon to be going up ...
GOLD bottoming from and Elliott Wave 2 down US Government Bonds,
TLT, closed for the week at $97.40 ...
TLTThe Ten Year US Government Note,
$TNX shows a close at 36.44.
The US Dollar,
$USD, closed the week at $80.47 ...
$USD Weekly and
$USD DailyJesse in
Committment of Trader report for the US Dollar provides this chart of
DX Dollar at resistance.
The dollar bull ETF,
UUP, courtesy of Jack Chan from
JC's Buy and Sell Signals shows a bearish lollipop hanging man candlestick ...
UUP manifests a lollipopGold,
$GOLD, closed the week at $835 ...
$GOLDS&P 500,
$SPX, closed down 9.4% for the week at 1099.23; this is the
first time in four years Eddy Elfenbein relates.
Fertilizer manufacturer, Agrium, AGU fell 36% this week; this chart more than any shows how the Euro drove commodity stocks up and it relates took that the Euro as part of an unwinding yen carry trade lives up to its name the Armageddon Trade ...
AGUAt the beginning of the week, I asked blog readers,
Which Way For SFK And SDK? Well, charts show SFK rose 21% and SDK rose 27% ...
SFK and
SDK Debt ETFs were stable today; these include
LQD, HYG, CFT and EMB which will likely continue to loose value; and the principal value of the tax free municipal bond mutual funds like
USSTX, will likely continue to fall, as interest rates rise. And the municipal bond ETFs such as
MUB and TFI will likely continually go lower as well.
The
Ted Spread closed at 3.85; this is the code red alarm relating that a total financial system breakdown can come at any time!
Here are various helpful charts for your examination.
The
on going monthly MSN Finance chart of the gold ETF, compared to world stocks, EFA, and US Stocks, VTI, and US Treasuries, TLTThe
ongoing five day Yahoo Finance chart of gold, GLD, relative to the US Dollar ETF, UUP, and the Euro, FXE, and oil, USO The
on going five day Yahoo Finance chart of the gold ETF, GLD, compared to FXE, EFA, and EEBThe
on going five day Yahoo Finance chart of the gold ETF, GLD, compared to IWM, and SPYThe
on going five day Yahoo Finance chart of the gold ETF, GLD, compared to FXE, USO, and RJIThe
ongoing ten day MSN Finance chart of EUM, compared to TWM, SDK, and SFK The
the ongoing five day Yahoo Finance chart of EUM, compared to TWM, SDK, and SFKThe
ongoing five day Yahoo Finance chart of the yen, compared to gold and the world's major currencies Gold relative to world stocks:
GLD:EFAGold relative to US Stocks:
GLD:VTIGold relative to the euro:
GLD:FXE Gold relative to world currencies:
GLD:DBVGold relative to oil:
GLD:USOHere is the news report at 4:30 PM announcing that President Bush had signed EESA.
At approximately 4:30 PM ET on Friday, October 3, 2008, Julie Hirschfeld Davis and David Espo of the Assoicated Press reported:
With the economy on the brink and elections looming, Congress approved an unprecedented $700 billion government bailout of the battered financial industry on Friday and sent it to President Bush who quickly signed it. (
Here is the roll call vote courtesy of MyWay showing how the House members voted).
"
We have acted boldly to help prevent the crisis on Wall Street from becoming a crisis in communities across our country," Bush said shortly after the vote, although he conceded, "our economy continues to face serious challenges."
Underscoring that somber warning, the Dow Jones industrials, up more than 200 points at the time of the House vote, ended the day down 157.
The final vote, 263-171 in the House, capped two weeks of tumult in Congress and on Wall Street, punctuated by daily warnings that the country confronted the gravest economic crisis since the Great Depression if lawmakers failed to act. There were 58 more votes for the measure than an earlier version that failed on Monday.
"We all know that we are in the midst of a financial crisis," House Republican leader John Boehner of Ohio said shortly before casting his vote for a massive government intervention in private capital markets that was unthinkable only a month ago.
"And we know that if we do nothing, this crisis is likely to worsen and to put us into an economic slump like most of us have never seen," he said.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said the bill was needed to "begin
to shape the financial stability of our country and the economic security of our people."
Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson pledged to begin using his new authority quickly, and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said the central bank would work closely with the administration.
At its core, the bill gives the Treasury Department $700 billion to purchase bad mortage-related securities that are weighing down the balance sheets of institutions that hold them. The flow of credit in the U.S. economy has slowed, in some cases drying up, threatening the ability of businesses to conduct routine operations or expand, and adversely affecting consumers seeking financing for mortgages, cars and student loans. Some state governments have also experienced difficulty borrowing money.
The House vote marked a sharp change from Monday, when an earlier measure was sent down to defeat, largely at the hands of angry conservative Republicans.
On Friday, 91 Republicans joined 172 Democrats to support the bill, while 108 Republicans and 68 Democrats opposed it. Twenty-five Republicans and 33 Democrats switched their votes from "no" to "yes." One Democrat who supported Monday's version, Rep. Jim McDermott of Washington, opposed the bill Friday. One Republican who didn't vote Monday, Rep. Jerry Weller of Illinois, voted "yes" on Friday.
Several of the Democrats who switched were members of the Congressional Black Caucus who said presidential candidate Barack Obama had pledged to support legislation easing the burden on consumers if he wins the White House.
Republican presidential candidate John McCain also lobbied for the measure, according to aides who declined to release a list of lawmakers he called.
Following Monday's vote, Senate leaders quickly took custody of the measure, adding on $110 billion in tax and spending provisions designed to attract additional support, then grafting on legislation mandating broader mental health coverage in the insurance industry. The revised measure won Senate approval Wednesday night, 74-25, setting up a furious round of lobbying in the House as the administration, congressional leaders, the major party presidential candidates and outside groups joined forces behind the measure.
In addition, the measure was changed to broaden the federal government's deposit insurance program,
and the Securities and Exchange Commission loosened a regulation to ease the impact of the distressed assets on the balance sheet of financial institutions.
Despite occasionally strong criticism of the added spending and tax measures, the maneuvers worked — augmented by a sudden switch in public opinion that occurred after the stock market took its largest-ever one-day dive on Monday.
"No matter what we do or what we pass, there are still tough times out there. People are mad — I'm mad," said Republican Rep. J. Gresham Barrett of South Carolina, who opposed the measure the first time it came to a vote. Now, he said, "We have to act. We have to act now."
Rep. John Lewis, D-Ga., another convert, said, "I have decided that the cost of doing nothing is greater than the cost of doing something."
Critics were unrelenting.
"How can we have capitalism on the way up and socialism on the way down," said Rep. Jeb Hensarling of Texas, a leader among conservative Republicans who oppose the central thrust of the legislation — an unprecedented federal intervention into the private capital markets.
It was little more than two weeks ago that Paulson and Bernanke concluded that the economy was in such danger that a massive government intervention in the private markets was essential.
White the main thrust of their initial proposal was unchanged, lawmakers insisting on greater congressional supervision over the $700 billion, measures to protect taxpayers and steps to crack down on so-called "golden parachutes" that go to corporate executives whose companies fail.
Earlier in the week, the legislation was altered to expand
the federal insurance program for individual bank deposits, and
the Securities and Exchange Commission took steps to ease the impact of the questionable mortgage-backed securities on financial institutions.
In the moments before the vote, Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., chairman of the House Financial Services Committee,
pledged "serious surgery" next year to address the underlying causes of the crisis.
If anything, the economic news added to the sense of urgency.
The Labor Department said initial claims for jobless benefits had increased last week to the highest level since the gloomy days after the 2001 terror attacks. The news of the payroll cuts came on top of Thursday's Commerce Department report that factory orders in August plunged by 4 percent.
Typifying arguments the problem no longer is just a Wall Street issue but also one for Main Street,
lawmakers from California and Florida said their state governments were beginning to experience trouble borrowing funds for their own operations.
Pelosi said, "We must win it for Mr. and Mrs. Jones on Main Street."
One month before Election Day, the drama unfolded in an intensely political atmosphere.
Members of the Congressional Black Caucus credited Obama with changing their minds.
Reps.
Elijah Cummings and
Donna Edwards, both Maryland Democrats, were among them. They said Obama had pledged if he wins the White House that he would help homeowners facing foreclosure on their mortgages. He also pledged to support changes in the bankruptcy law to make it less burdensome on consumers.
Obama's rival, Republican Sen. McCain, announced a brief suspension in his campaign more than a week ago to try and help solve the financial crisis.
Republican Rep. Sue Myrick of North Carolina, who switched her vote to favor the measure, said, "I may lose this race over this vote, but that's OK with me. This is the right vote for the country."
Myrick said she hadn't heard from McCain as she made up her mind about how to vote. "They told me he was going to call me. He didn't," she said.
The vote on Monday had staggered the congressional leadership and contributed to the largest one-day stock market drop in history, 778 points as measured by the Dow Jones Industrials.
Associated Press writers Jim Abrams, Charles Babington, Alan Fram, Suzanne Gamboa, Kimberly Hefling, Andrew Miga, Andrew Taylor, and Erica Werner contributed to this story.
The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act, EESA, doesn't make the credit crisis go away; it makes the credit crisis worse, much worse -- Here are 4 problems with EESA.
Problem #1: EESA helps only a few select banks and not banks as a whole.
... I relate that while Regional Banks, IAT, are currently up 22% since the US Dollar stock rally began, July 14, 2008, when the yen carry traders, sold oil, USO, and commodities, RJI, to go long the banks, the facility of TARP provided under the
Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, that is EESA, is unlikely to be of much help to most regional banks.
The authority and facilities given to the Federal Reserve Chairman by the Paulson-Bush-Pelosi bailout legislation provide a rescue of derivative laden and threatend JPMorgan, Citigroup, Bank of America and Morgan Stanley, and not of the community and smaller banks.
The President said: "We have acted boldly to help prevent the crisis on Wall Street from becoming a crisis in communities across our country."
That is understatement, they acted unconstitutionally, to provide frightening auhority and facilities to the Chairman of the Federal Reserve. The legislation does nothing to resolve the crisis; it assures that it will quickly escalate.
The reporter relates: "The Securities and Exchange Commission loosened a regulation to ease the impact of the distressed assets on the balance sheet of financial institutions."
Yes I know, that was unconscionable; the action is a denial and abandonment of The Truth. And as I write the
Suspension Of The Fair Value Accounting Rule By SEC And Congress Is Causing Credit Gridlock And Places One's Investments At Risk .
Problem #2: EESA doesn't resolve the current crisis of confidence, that is a lack of trust, it exasperates risks stemming from unknown and unrevealed counterparty risk on derivaties and from a suspension of fair value accounting by ruling of SEC and by mandate of Congress.
... Blair Lee in October 3, 2008, Gazette.NET article
Who Killed The House Bailout? wrote:
Predictably, the media gave congressional Republicans the full discredit for the $700 billion bailout plan's 228-205 defeat on Monday. But the voting patterns show a different story. A once-in-a-lifetime, unholy and inadvertent coalition of disparate congressional voting blocs sank the measure.
First, a bipartisan combination of conservative Republicans and Blue Dog Democrats balked at such a risky and expensive taxpayer-financed free market intervention.
Second, 78 percent of the 41 incumbents in tight re-election contests voted "no," responding to angry constituent e-mails. Political self-preservation knows no party lines: 17 of the "no" votes were Republicans, 15 were Democrats. Lesson: Don't propose sweeping, highly controversial legislation five weeks before a national election.
Third, the Congressional Black Caucus broke ranks with the Democratic House leadership and overwhelmingly voted against bailing out white, wealthy Wall Street.
House Democratic leaders, in one of those inexplicable Capitol Hill double standards, excoriated the Republicans but excused the Black Caucus because its members were casting "a vote of conscience."
Maryland's Congressional delegation offers a good example of what happened. The four white Democratic liberals (Hoyer, Van Hollen, Sarbanes and Ruppersberger) all voted "yes." Meanwhile, "no" votes were cast by Roscoe Bartlett, the Western Maryland conservative Republican, and by Maryland's two liberal Democratic blacks, Elijah Cummings (Baltimore City) and Donna Edwards (Prince George's and part of Montgomery). This has to be the first and last time in history that the 4th, 6th and 7th districts band together against the rest of Maryland's congressional delegation.
Missing from Maryland's voting pattern was a "no" vote by a closely contested incumbent. Wayne Gilchrest, the Eastern Store moderate Republican, might have played that role, but he was defeated in the primary, so he voted "yes." Likewise, in a fit of lame duck spite, he's backing Obama for president.
Congressman Bartlett and congresspersons Cummings and Edwards voted "no" together, but for completely different reasons. Bartlett, a free market conservative, wants to let the financial institutions solve their problems by themselves. In his view, the extent of permissible government intervention is taking the current $100,000 ceiling off FDIC deposit insurance and making it unlimited.
Meanwhile, Cummings and Edwards want to bypass Wall Street and spend the $700 billion directly on home foreclosure aid, unemployment payments, food stamps, home heating assistance and Medicaid. It's no coincidence that, together, Cummings' and Edwards' districts contain 58 percent of the state's recent home foreclosures. But neither their plan nor Bartlett's has a prayer of becoming law. Nor is doing nothing an option. Without a comprehensive approach, the government is left limping along, dealing with one bank failure after another.
Our financial system runs on credit and confidence. People must borrow money to make money. But banks won't lend to businesses and depositors won't lend to banks (or governments) without the reasonable expectation of being repaid, with interest. When that confidence disappears, so does our economy. The bailout stabilizes lenders and investors by having the government take $700 billion of devalued mortgage-backed securities off the balance sheets. In other words, in order to jump-start the nation's financial system, Uncle Sam becomes this toxic paper's buyer of last resort.
Maybe this is a bad idea. Maybe Roosevelt's New Deal was, too. But what's the alternative? Or put it this way: Isn't it wiser and cheaper to try something before, instead of after, the train wreck? How much would our parents and grandparents have paid to avoid the 1930s Great Depression and its aftermath, World War II?
Apparently, public opinion against the bailout is shifting somewhat: 45 percent now support it, while 44 percent say do nothing. Meanwhile, a revised $700 billion bailout bill passed the Senate on Wednesday night and heads to the House.
Senate passage was less difficult, because only one-third of that body is up for re-election, as opposed to all 435 House members, so only three senators in tight re-elections felt compelled to vote "no." Also, the Senate's Black Caucus is a group of one, Barack Obama, and he's now playing to a national constituency.
To gain House passage, the Senate's bill is loaded with billions and billions of new tax cuts and new spending to win the votes of naysayers like Bartlett, Cummings and Edwards. It will probably work at the expense of ballooning, even further, our national debt and national interest payment. Yes, folks, we're addressing the national crisis brought on by fiscal recklessness by being even more reckless. God help us.
Blair Lee is CEO of the Lee Development Group in Silver Spring.
Presented below are my related comments to Blair Lee.
He related "Congressman Bartlett and congresspersons Cummings and Edwards voted "no" together, but for completely different reasons. Bartlett, a free market conservative, wants to let the financial institutions solve their problems by themselves. In his view, the extent of permissible government intervention is taking the current $100,000 ceiling off FDIC deposit insurance and making it unlimited."
"Meanwhile, Cummings and Edwards want to bypass Wall Street and spend the $700 billion directly on home foreclosure aid, unemployment payments, food stamps, home heating assistance and Medicaid. It's no coincidence that, together, Cummings' and Edwards' districts contain 58 percent of the state's recent home foreclosures. But neither their plan nor Bartlett's has a prayer of becoming law."
"Nor is doing nothing an option. Without a comprehensive approach, the government is left limping along, dealing with one bank failure after another."
I say one option could have been to convene a Congressional investigation to completely investigate events of late, especially after September 11, 2008 when banks were unable to sell assets and raise capital. And of course to thoroughly investigate credit default swaps and their destabilizing ways as well as the destabilizing ways of yen carry traders who borrow at 0.5% interest fromt the bank of Japan to go short the EUR/JPY for great personal gain and the destruction of the world's economy.
Mr. Lee continues: "Our financial system runs on credit and confidence. People must borrow money to make money. But banks won't lend to businesses and depositors won't lend to banks (or governments) without the reasonable expectation of being repaid, with interest. When that confidence disappears, so does our economy."
I say there is indeed a crisis of confidence and a complete lack of trust, and it comes in large part from countyparty risk on default event settlement of derivatives of existing, and future financial organizations. Our nation and the world needed to address these risks but failed to do so.
Jesse in article
Waves of Credit Default Swaps Incoming relates that its "time to start settling those Credit Default Swaps for Fannie and Freddie (Oct. 6), Lehman Brothers (Oct. 10) and Lehman Brothers (Oct 23)".
A lack of trust is that which is going to cause the destruction of the US Dollar, $USD, and send interest rates higher, such as the interest rate on the 10 Year US Government Note, $TNX, and send the value of US Government bonds, traded by the ETF, TLT down.
The legislation will accelerate an exit from municipal bond mutual funds and ETFS as well as money market funds, MMFs, owned by the wealthy.
"The bailout stabilizes lenders and investors by having the government take $700 billion of devalued mortgage-backed securities off the balance sheets. In other words, in order to jump-start the nation's financial system, Uncle Sam becomes this toxic paper's buyer of last resort."
I say the bailout stabilizes only a few select financial organizations JP Morgan and possibly Morgan Stanley, and actually destabilizes the rest as these two organizations and other crony bankers are likely going to be given preferential treatment. The debt will indeed be coming off the the publically approved SEC and FASB 157 balance sheets and income statements; but the assets are marked to fantasy and not to market, thus the securitized CDOs, mortgage backed securities, and other debt creates even more of a greater risk now becuase no one knows the true value as fair value rules, that is fair value accounting, has been thrown out the window.
We indeed are entering a new era, Uncle Sam is now the world's investment banker. The Federal Reserve becomes the Bank of Banks, and goes into the business of securitization of CDOs. The legislation nationalizes US Banks, and privatizes profits to a select group of elites, while it socializes risk and losses unto the US taxpayers.
Yes Uncle Sam is indeed the purchaser of the toxic paper, and becomes the buyer of last resort; and in so doing enslaves Americans, and really the whole world unto debt of the worst kind. The debt should have been liquidated, that is done away with, but it now remains and is the world's heritage and inheritance of a bygone era of credit liquidty, that started with the fairy tale neoliberal laissez fair economic policies of Milton Friedman, and continued through with the easy credit of The Purveyor of Credit Liquidity, Alan Greenspan, and culminated with the neocon helicpter drops of Ben Bernake lowering of the central bank rate, and provisions of TAF, TSLF, and PDCF facilities.
The econonomy will not be jump started, only a small portion of crony capitalists, that is those who participate in state corporate rule, that is state corporatism get a boost through public private partnerships to be signed by the government. Here stakeholders from business and government will become overlords and taskmasters of Ameican citizens.
"Senate passage was less difficult, because only one-third of that body is up for re-election, as opposed to all 435 House members, so only three senators in tight re-elections felt compelled to vote "no." Also, the Senate's Black Caucus is a group of one, Barack Obama, and he's now playing to a national constituency."
I wonder how many of the Black Caucus caved in. Those who did so, forgot their ancestor's history of slavery: their vote enslaved Americans and the world unto debt, and established bankers and government officials as the beast's task masters and overlords.
Problem #3: EESA's increased FDIC limits: these are going to take gullible leming investors up a hill, and then off a cliff to their destruction -- that is sad but true.
The smart investor anticipates what's gona happen to his money in banks and appreciates the value of gold.
Whereas, the gullible investor simply gets led off a cliff like a leming .... click here for
image of gullible investor
... The reporter relates that "Earlier in the week, the legislation was altered to expand the federal insurance program for individual bank deposits." The raising of the limit of FDIC insurance accelerates the process of liquidity evacuation as investors flee stocks, and unfortunately municipal bonds which are especially liquidity stressed; the legislation herds investors into banks and away from the physical asset which will protect their wealth.
Problem #4: All liquidity supplied by EESA gets trapped and instantly vaporized.
... The facility of TARP provided under the
Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, that is EESA, is designed to provide liquidity. Yet, all liquidity that has been provided by the Federal Reserve under currency swaps with other central banks, facilities of TAF, TSLF, PDCF, acquisitions of companies such as AIG and Bear Stearns, and emergency grants has literally disappeared as soon as it went into the system. The $700 billion to be provided will meet the same doom: instant vaporization.
The liquidity goes only to banks and major broker-dealers, the rest of the financial system has no access to it; the credit transmission mechanisms will not see even a dime of it, so thus corporations, educational institutions, municipalities desperately in need will be frozen out.
Peter Schiff in Safehaven.com article Liquidity Is In The Eye Of The Holder
writes: The government is seeking to "create liquidity" by overpaying.
The government's assumptions about the "held to maturity" value of these mortgages completely understate the likelihood of widespread default. Some of the "illiquid" assets represent tranches of mortgage-backed securities that will be completely wiped out. Even the higher quality tranches will suffer severe losses due to mortgages that will inevitably go bad.
For example, take a $500,000 adjustable rate mortgage on a condo in Las Vegas that has a current value of only $250,000. To assume that this asset can be safely held to maturity is absurd, when in all likelihood the borrower will default shortly after the rate re-sets, even if the borrower has not yet shown signs of distress. Of course such a mortgage would be completely illiquid if one tried to sell it anywhere near par, but would be extremely liquid if priced to reflect a more realistic value; say 35 cents on the dollar. But if the government pays prices that fairly factors in likely defaults, it will bankrupt the very institutions it is trying to bail out.
Also missing in the discussion is the concept of the time value of money. Even if a substantial percentage of the $700 billion is eventually recovered, it will still represent a huge loss for taxpayers who theoretically have to come up with the cash today to buy the mortgages. Further, the inflationary nature of the bailout ensures a substantial rise in long term interest rates. This will further suppress the present values of the low coupon mortgages the government will be restructuring.
In addition to the government bailout, distressed lenders are looking to the suspension of "mark to market" accounting rules as a means of salvation. These rules require institutions to value their mortgage assets according to the most recently traded price. However, suspending these rules will not make the losses go away. Rather it will simply allow lenders to pretend that the losses do not exist.
Armed with such fantasies, banks could pretend that their mortgage assets had more value, and that their balance sheets were well capitalized. They would not need to raise more capital in order to fund new loans. But, just as a person with no sensitivity to pain runs the risk of catastrophic injury, such a move would encourage financial institutions to take greater risks which, in the end, will produce more bankruptcies and greater losses.
In fact, the Senate version of the bailout bill, which authorizes a suspension of mark-to-market, also increases the dollar limit on FDIC insured deposits from $100,000 to $250,000 (with no extra money budgeted to fund the increased taxpayer liability). Only in Washington would a bill pass which simultaneous makes banks more likely to fail while increasing taxpayer exposure when they do!
Gold is the timely safe haven.
I believe a run on stock brokerages is coming soon; and I suggest that one take one's money out of brokerage accounts, and that one buy gold, even though gold can easily fall from its current $835 to $825, $800 or $775, with a falling EURJPY.
And the gold ETF, GLD, could very easily fall to $77.50.
While bank accounts will have higher FDIC limits, I want something that is tangible, that I can secure, that I can personally own and have a large degee of personal control over.
I recommend diversification of investment in gold in four locations immediately because of financial system instability and lack of liquidity: the gold ETF, GLD, directly through streetTRACKS Gold Trust, and not in a brokerage account; two BullionVault, three GoldMoney; and four a limited number of gold coins.
I am simply a blogger who communicates what I see as an investment demand for gold; I suggest that one consult with a licensed investment professional before making any investment decisions.