Skip navigation.

I am not the Robot Tourist

It's a song by Ten Benson

This is why I am not a teacher

, , ,

I love youth work, I'm in the Scouts, I help with Youth Club and I lead the Church Youth Fellowship and I go on summer camps with Scripture Union and Craigavon Christian Youth, but there are two reasons why I am not a teacher in the UK:

i) My mother is a teacher.

ii) The curriculum for computing is much too woolly.

iii) I don't really want to work for the government AND pay taxes

iv) No-one expects the Spanish Inquisition!

Explanation:
i) Because of this I know that the job itself is crap. Working practices, resources, support and local government are all lousy. Any level of government, often parents and even other teachers will actively and wilfully prevent you from teaching. My mother is also much too honest and hard working for her own good. Which is why I am writing this post at 2am of a Wednesday morning. My mother has felt the need to make out (and print at home) worksheets, on the computer. That requires my help to get it right and because she is printing it at home, my printer and my ink so that her (home) printer doesn't run out before dad can buy another cartridge. I know many people would not do this and would not think about school after they left the gate at 4pm until they returned the next morning, but late nights (or no nights) is the general practice among teachers because they have so much marking, lesson planning and other admin to do. Plus mum does her printing at home because it is more convenient than getting it photocopied at school. This is ludicrous. Photocopying is for volume and anything more than about 10 or 15 copies of a document should be photocopied. The vast majority of classes have more than 10 pupils. But how could it be easier for her not to use the school photocopier? A couple of reasons: lack of photocopiers, lack of staff authorised to use the photocopier (singular), overzealous budgeting on the paper and too much spent on nonsense like digital whiteboards (which suck electricity very quickly and send kids blind if they stare at the lens too long).

At least the late nights for me aren't quite so common now. It used to be that when I was still at school, mum would have kept me up about once or twice a month to do typing for her until about 2am. Most often around the time the school was to have an inspection (utter uselesnes, I am not against inspecting, but I am against the type of inspection carried out in the UK at the minute). Perhaps I should charge my time time to the goverment, but it would probably be taxed.

Plus, mum has just started teaching a GCSE course in learning for life and work. Seriously, who thought it would be a good idea to do a GCSE in learnging for life and work?

Anyway, in summary, my mother is a teacher, so I know what it's like and I wouldn't want to do it myself, even for a significant pay rise.

ii) Perhaps it was just my teachers, both were pretty easy to learn under but, I was not impressed by the syllabus at either GCSE A-Level. I got a grade A* for GCSE Information Systems. That is not a boast, it is an indication of how ludicrously easy the course was. It was also out of date, or perhaps it was our teacher, spending so much time on how dot matrix, daisy chain and line printers work. To me that requires 10 minutes and then one minute to say (even 10 years ago) nobody uses them anymore, not several lessons and pages of notes. That A* also rested on coursework that consisted of a really easy to make HyperCard application. Honestly, the only hard bit was having the will to type up the coursework report. At least we learned the Fetch/Execute cycle. But there was nothing more at GCSE level, and I've heard there is less now, that would inspire the next generation of software engineers that our country so desperately needs.

A-Level was better but our teacher jumped straight into solving quadratic and cubic equations without really helping us to translate between the problem space and the solution space (and Pascal has too many types of parameter). Plus we still had to cover dot matrix printers because GCSE Information Systems was not a pre-requisite. And the way was still open to rehash my GCSE coursework - yes, early HyperCard for the win in 1998! I freely admit to choosing HyperCard over Pascal for the coursework for reasons of least resistance. I didn't like Pascal and our Teachers didn't really have experience with anything else. So hypercard it was. Unfortunately not a mention of simple SQL, or much of proper databases at all, although I do remember we did normalisation at least and not a pip about object oriented programming, except to mention that C++ exists.

Really, nowadays, Computing syllabi for secondary schools could even take stuff from 3rd year university courses - especially data structures and their algorithms, thus leaving us more time at university to properly get to grips with concurent programming.

The short of it is: teaching is neither a good career move, nor good for your health and sanity. Current students: stay away until numbers of teachers get so low government has to intervene for better pay and conditions.

update: s/gst/get/
plus: I realised I should have bigged up the private sector, government can only do so much and should not be relied upon.

Now More Than Ever, Steyn and Grace

, , , ...

First, my copy of Now More Than Ever by Logistics just arrived. Logistics isn't quite as avant garde as Roni Size/Reprazent, but he still makes amazing music and is probably more consistent as a result. I think I am addicted to Drum and Bass music now. I also hope Logistics (whether he gets a new name from his label or not) should do a Roni Size/Reprazent-style project and do some orchestration. As London Elekticity's live gigs show, there's nothing like proper live drum and bass and the track 'Call Me Back' shows that he has the skills if only he would do it.

Second, the clash of two of my favourite writers: Steyn and Yancey. Mark Steyn has recently written a book called 'America Alone: The End Of The World As We Know It'. I have not yet read it, although I would dearly like to, but I've read nearly everything else Steyn has written as well as nearly all the publicity interviews and reviews he has linked from his homepage. Steyn's general theme is that 'the west' is losing or in some cases has lost its collective will to survive, especially culturally and hence demographically. I'm sure you've heard people say they could never bring up a child in the dangerous violent times in which we live, and that's British people in peace time! The truth Steyn continues to espouse is that, and it's in my previous post: a culture with no children will die. But Steyn also points out that culture will either meet a slow and painful end in isolation, be put out of it's misery nastily or go in a dangerous fit of kicking and screaming.

I have, however, nearly finished Philip Yancey's 'What's So Amazing About Grace'. It is an amazing book with an incredible challenge: live gracefully (i.e. like Jesus). In the book Yancey looks at the legalism of the world, the legalism of the church and shows that the Bible talks not about requiring us to follow all the laws, but to reflect God's grace - because too often we end up living like the servant who was cleared of millions of pounds of debt but persecuted a man who owed him a few tens of pounds.

I could focus on the differences between Steyn and Yancey as the former often espouses militarism, harsh judgements and the eradication of the welfare state. I do not criticise him for this and support much of what he says, but basically Steyn does not come across as a purveyor of grace, in fact I can imagine he might make a pun on Yancey's name along the theme of nancy. Yancey discusses politics, mainly to show the ungrace of many Christians today, but does not get into politics.

Both writers, however, share one very significant viewpoint which Steyn often states explicity, but it is more implicit in What's So Amazing About Grace, namely: it's not about the 'enemy', it's about us. For Steyn, the us is nearly always first person plural, e.g. Iran's leadership (and a startling number of others) wants to invite us to become Muslims, then subject us to Dhimmitude or death if we refuse, so what are we, as a nation, going to do about it? For Yancey, the us is really the first person singular, i.e. me - if something happens what am I as an individual going to do about it?

This is where I say what may be obvious to you, but something I only truly realised last week: namely the main reason for Jesus and hence the New Testament is that we had the rules in the form of the Torah and the Psalms and Prophets for centuries, and even millenia, you've applied that law to other people and your outward life, now apply it to your own insides. When I realised, it was a real moment of putting a piece into a jigsaw and making more sense of the picture - without a reference picture and without even realising you were missing a piece.

Let me explain a little. Everyone knows Jesus said we need to take the beam out of our own eye before taking the speck of dust out of our neighbour's eye, but it's still easy to say it applies to other people, 'You can't judge me!' Next, Adrian Plass's favourite theological discovery is that 'basically, God is nice and He loves me'. Add this to the true meaning of Revelation: that God has won and the rest is simply history to come, plus where God tells Isaiah that His ways are higher than man's and where He tells Jeremiah that He has plans to prosper us, and you have a somewhat heady mix. An intoxicatingly beautiful aroma of grace in a rotting world. Put simply: God has won, he is in control of the rest of the world. You have a duty to be clean livin', but forget about that and concentrate on how you relate to God and if you love Him, show it, because He loved you. But if you don't love Him, forget about trying to show it and concentrate of getting to love God. That does not clear us of our responsibilities to speak out for the Gospel, the poor, the oppressed and especially helping the poor and oppressed, but it is a message that should make Christians more relaxed, more at peace with themselves and other Christians. Jesus said the world would hate us as it hated him, but the world will never make peace with Christians unless we make peace first.

As Jesus said: seek first the Kingdom of God and His righteousness and all these things will be added unto you. Now add that to Psalm 37:4: Delight thyself also in the desires of the Lord and He will give you the desires of Thine heart.

For the sake of the children, think about the economics!

, , , ...

This item at arstechnica got me thinking about economics. I couldn't be bothered with posting my own thoughts to the discussion thread due to the length of time it would take to write about how the link between the article and my pet economic theory wasn't entirely tenuous.

My pet economic theory is this: people are the engine of the economy.

In other words we need children to be rich.

I can already sense Captain Capitalism (but not this one) claiming me to be anathema. But hear me out. The Captain may have charts, but I have common sense (and Mark Steyn).

Anyway. My explanation follows. It is often thought primitive to have children just to secure a comfortable retirement as this practice is supposedly commonplace in the poorest parts of Africa and India. Personally, I think the retirement thing is just the men trying to be romantic. "Hey, hot momma, one more kid and then we can retire!" I don't think I need to explain myself any further than suggesting that the man is NOT thinking about retiring any time soon. In richer societies, men both fear children and think they are a drain on their resources and that a child will stop them enjoying their girlfriend/spouse. I don't deny that the woman has an input into the decision, but since I am not female and don't really have much experience of how a woman decides to get pregnant or not, I'll leave this part of my thesis (which is not the core of it anyway) and move on. In both rich and poor societies, a decision is made, indirectly or not, over whether to have children and this is, indirectly or not, an economic decision. As the article in the link in the first paragraph showed, economic decisions can be rational or irrational.

Having children, I believe, should not be an entirely rational thing. I mean it can hardly be romantic for a woman to hear "Hey, hot momma, let's put off children till we both earn enough to pay for the house in which we think we need to raise children" or "Hey, hot momma, having another child to work the fields will make us 1.9287 times as productive as we are now". And just imagine the child's self esteem if he or she was told by his or her parents that he or she was only concieved to to make the farm 1.9287 times more productive. Although the reason, "I think your momma's hot" would probably induce vomiting whether or not it was a rational reason.

Neither should having children be entirely irrational, because then you end up with broadly the situation we have today of unbelievably poor, but fast developing, nations where the mean fertility rate is 8 children per mother, and very rich countries where the rate is 1.1 children per mother. Obviously, even though I think children are the basis of the economy, it is irresponsible to have so many that you cannot feed them. But that must not bring us to the other extreme we are seeing of rich people not wanting the hassle of children. Overpopulation, at least (and especially in free, capitalistic nations) drives people to enter new markets, produce cheaper foods and use resources more wisely. Overpopulation may mean death for more people than enough, but underpopulation leads to profligacy and ultimately the untimely death of the entire nation. That means all the economic benefits that rich nation bestows on its citizens are gone, because a few too many couples chose, for seemingly rational reasons, not to have children.

I could explain more, but I'm falling asleep, so I'll leave you to read Mark Steyn's material, see the link on the right. He takes more of a geopolitical view than my economic one, although he does say a little about the economic aspect. Neither have I seen 'Children of Men', but watch it and then think of what a world without children would be like.

Also, I don't have time, nor have I carried out the proper research, but I hope to post my reasoning behind believing that children are a gift from God as part of his glorious Grace to ease our life of burden in this fallen world. Teachers may not agree, but they see the effects of the earthly parents, not God, on the children they so bravely teach. But as I said, that's for another post.

update: fixed missing words - I really was falling asleep!

Hurrah for David Aaronivitch

, , , ...

I heard a little bit of Jenny Murray's 'Don't get me started' slot on Channel 5 and was rather non-plussed. Don't get me started on euthenasia.

David Aaronovitch, however, has used his slot on 'Don't get me started' to give an airing to the saner side of the British left, i.e. those who do not see it as justifiable to support Hizb-allah, Hamas or the Iraqi 'resistance'. In his documentary he may not have interviewed anyone who disagrees with him, but that is part of his point: i) given the evidence, anyone on the left who supports Hizb-allah is deranged and shouldn't be heard; ii) leftists who support Hizb-allah already get so much press and make so many protests, now this is his turn. You can watch it via YouTube with the following links (thanks to harrysplacevids for recording and uploading it):

Part 1

Part 2

Part 3

Part 4

Weirdly enough my main moment of enlightenment regarding the middle east was a couple of years back when I was looking through some of the user pages of www.perlmonks.org and came across a picture of some boys in the balcony of an appartment block (of the type you see in most British cities) about to throw or drop concrete blocks and it was captioned something like: Naughty Palestinian boys throwing stones again. Since then I've read lots of Mark Steyn and looked up littlegreenfootballs.com and read things like http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/myths/mftoc.html. I can't excuse everything Israel has ever done, but the Israelis are clearly not as evil as they are often made out to be by their enemies.

And before you even think it, I know David Aaronovitch is a very Russian-Jewish name, so of course he _would_ support Israel, but he is not necessarily supporting Israel, he is showing up Israel's enemies for what they are really, and the moral bankruptcy of those, especially on the left, who support Hizb-allah.

I do not advocate unthinking solidarity with Israel, but all those who support the intifada, Hamas, Fatah, Hizb-allah, etc., should remember that as Mark Steyn often says, the Jews are the canary in the mineshaft of history. If a group starts advocating the killing of Jews (or Zionists), watch out, they'll be after you next.

MasterChef, masterful music

, , , ...

The BBC's updated MasterChef may have some weird food and a repetitive voice-over, but the people are usually good to watch, it provides great drama and best of all it has the best background music of any TV show ever. There are lashings of Drum and Bass, electronica, big beats/breaks, ambient, trance and other genres I probably haven't heard of or can't remember, but it's all amazing. It makes me wonder if the person in charge of the music isn't also a radio DJ. I would also love to get a playlist so I could buy some of the music for myself.

Which reminds me of Channel 4's coverage of the NBA from a few years back (wow, 10 years now!). It had a soundtrack that was almost as good as MasterChef's and they actually put a playlist up at the end of each show, but it was never up long enough to read more than half of the track and band names.

The importance of fabulous people

, , , ...

I don't mean the characters in Absolutely Fabulous, rather people who are very camp and I mean as camp as a row of tents. I recently watched Mel Brooks's own remake of The Producers and definitely, (and I hope fabulous people don't mind me saying this) fabulous people are better than mad dictators any day. In fact, sometimes, fabulous people just make the whole world a fabulous place. Plus, if it wasn't for fabulous people Gary Larson's far side would be bereft of all the Liberace cartoons.

I thought I'd write something about September 11th. I don't have much to write, but I hope the world realises that remembering and honouring the dead and wounded is only a tiny piece of the path to victory. Victories in the war on terror are won every time we simply act like victors and not victims. In fact, by writing this I'm giving a little ground to Osama bin Laden and Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood, by not just ignoring them. If they want to be angry they should at least be rational. I mean, they're angry because we didn't intervene in Chechnya, we didn't intervene quickly enough in Bosnia and then they say they're angry because we intervened in Iraq by removing an oppressive, despotic, anti-Islamic, fascist, Stalin-fantasist from power.

Anyway, for sanity's sake, go watch all the Tokyo Ska Paradise Orchestra videos on www.youtube.com

Finally for now, Blogger's tools are useless compared to Opera's blog tools.