Ruari's thoughts

From time to time users ask me about getting more Opera Linux repositories. Recently I was asked about this in relation to us providing .rpm based auto updates of snapshots on the desktopteam blog, and I answered as follows:

Originally posted by ruario:

The debian packages are by far our most popular Linux download so they got a repository first. Additionally there is more that one rpm update system (apt-rpm, Urpmi, Zypper, Smart Package Manager, etc.), and if you start considering non .rpm distros as well the multitude of update systems on Linux/UNIX gets ever larger (slackpkg, slapt-get, Swaret, pacman/Yaourt, Portage, etc.). As you can imagine the decision about what to support is therefore quite hard. Additionally, a number of distros (Gentoo, Arch, SUSE, Linux Mint, etc.) include us in their own official or community repositories anyway meaning that further repositories are often unnecessary. All that said, we are of course constantly reviewing this situation and we may add an rpm based repository in the future.

Also, it is worth mentioning that snapshots are not currently available on the debian repository anyway, so the users of debian based systems are also downloading these snapshots 'manually'. For more information on this read the "Why no snapshot auto-updates?" section of my recent blog post.

If you feel it is too 'manual', it would be fairly simple to knock up a shell script utilising wget (or curl) to auto grab your favoured package and install it (I'm not recommending you do so but it could be done), e.g. a script that does something like:

1. Pull the rss feed.
2. Extract the first blog post link and grab that page.
3. Extract the 'snapshot.opera.com/unix/....' link.
4. Parse the sub-directory and build number to work out the download link to your favoured package.
5. Grab the package and pass this to your package manager for install (or extract and install with the tar package).

This got me thinking about exactly how easy this would be to do and it occurred to me that I could probably do it with a one liner (albeit a fairly long and ugly one liner). Here is what I came up with after a just a couple of minutes thinking.

Read more...