Why Time Travel Is Not Possible (With Pictures)
Thursday, 12. October 2006, 10:25:16
Time travel is not possible because if it were then we would have already seen the travellers
This bugged me, as I thought that the statement didn't prove anything - it just showed that they haven't visited a period in our history yet. Although we may have existed for thousands of years, in the grand scheme of things out "history" may only be a tiny part of what is to come.
That in turn got me thinking, and I've come up with a theory as to why time travel does not work at all. It's only basic (and really rather obvious), and can probably be counter-argued with Data, Quarks, and other characters from Star Trek. For me, however, it makes sense.
Part 1 - Travelling Back in Time
Here is time:

I like to think of it as a line, only going forward
Hooray! I've built a time machine! What shall I do? I know, I shall go back in time! I shall choose a memorable date in the middle of my two points. Let's say 1066, and the Battle of Hastings.

This point will now be known as C. Let's say that I do travel from point B to point C.
By doing this, however, I have changed history. As soon as I have entered this time, and tried to stop King Harold getting one in the eye, I have created a new, completely different line. Instead of A to B, the timeline now goes from A to B1 (via C).
.So what has happened to B? It has vanished. It never existed.

If it never existed I could not have gone back in time. It is a paradox that hurts my brain! The only way this would be possible is surely if the line C to B1 co-exists with the line C to B, creating a parrallel universe. This would not be time travelling, as such, surely it would be universe travelling?
Part 2 - Travelling Forward in Time
Ok this one is much simpler. As I said before, I consider time to be a line:

As point B is "now", it is not static. It is constantly moving, and the line gets bigger. In front of B there is nothing. Nothing has been created. If nothing has been created, then how can you possibly travel there?
Conclusion
I don't know why I choose to share this but in my eyes it shows to some extent why I believe time travel not to be possible. I'm no genius (as is probably extremely clear) or physicist (again, blindingly obvious), but it represents my thoughts on the matter.










drlaunch # 18. October 2006, 19:15
But aren't we all traveling in time?
We are always at point 'B' (now). 'B' is traveling away from 'A' (a past event) constantly and we are traveling with it.
Also, when you get closer to the speed of light, your time passes slower and everything else happens faster. So basically time travel to the future is possible. But this future is being created as you travel.
CaptainSeagull # 28. November 2006, 02:30
this diagram explains a couple outcomes at once.
FIRST EXPLINATION:
YOU, the time traveler, are the green dot.
your regular line will move from A to infinity
D is where you have invented the time machine
B is where you used the time machine to go back in time to point C
at point C you havnt created point D (the machine) yet.
because you time traveled to the earlier time, you are just in a 'rewound' place in time. you are right where you were last time you were at point C. you will create and use the time machine at the same points going into a loop. The fancy thing is, you will never ever know you are in the loop.
SECOND EXPLINATION: (the drawing shows this using the "step-downs")
all the same steps apply, only the time line from "B" will continue for other people forward, where you introduce a new timeline starting at "C"
This creates multiple time line, that are exactly the same to the original. you are in a multi-loop, as you are re-creating the same loop in a forward moving timeline...
the yellow line just shows the creation of a new timeline where time takes zero time to create travel.
seaempty # 4. December 2006, 15:23
I love time travel theories. You can spend so much time thinking about them that your brain hurts.
CaptainSeagull # 4. December 2006, 15:29
seaempty # 4. December 2006, 15:35
Säm # 9. January 2007, 04:59
And when Capt. Seagull told me he had drawn a timeline on MS paint, I was expecting it to look crummy, but I must say that's one-fine-time-line.
blackmystry # 28. July 2009, 10:09
CaptainSeagull # 28. July 2009, 23:17