The shoddy state of "Broadband" internet access in the UK
Saturday, September 22, 2007 2:34:35 AM
On this page the BBC asks readers to comment on the state of Broadband in the UK today. Being one of my pet irritations, I decided to rattle off a posting. The question posed is "Are you fed up with your broadband speed?"...
Since most "Max" 8M ADSL providers cannot economically provide "Max" bandwidth to all of its customers, the vast majority employ a technique called "traffic shaping", which really means "dreadful, inconsistent speed". For example, on my expensive "Max" (£35 pm) service, on a good day I can get 4-5M at 4am (yes, 4 in the morning), but at 4pm it is usually below 1M and has many times dropped below 1/4M (yes, a quarter). This is a truly awful state of affairs, and makes home/remote working very difficult. Although most services are advertised as "up to" (in very small font) 8M (large font), my current provider, Eclipse, offers four tiers of service of which I am paying the top tier. Some service. Add to this the fact that BT are also contending the Max services at the exchange - another bottleneck when too many users are connecting into your local exchange on the same service. I often wish that I could go back to my old 2M service - most of the time it was faster, and it was certainly more consistent.
As if this wasn't bad enough, I happened to get stuck with an ISP prior to Eclipse that I couldn't migrate away from, meaning downtime of 1-2 months and £70 fees, with no help from Ofcom or BT wholesale or anyone else. My isp - "Fast24" - weren't answering the phone and were actually talking to the official receiver, I had no connection and couldn't get the damn ADSL lock on my line removed.
Worse above all, given that internet connectivity is now an essential element in modern economic infrastucture, it's truly disadvantaging us all in the new global economy.
Isn't it about time that our celebrity leaders (ahem, sorry, our government) stepped in?
1) Things could be much faster (it is in many other countries) but for the stupid beaurocracy and competition rules that are getting in the way. BT wholesale still own the exchanges and really slow things down for their own benefit.
2) Companies should be held accountable. "up to" (in very small font) 8M (large font) is a clear misrepresentation; just ask 100 people (who don't know better) what they'd expect to get on average, from that description.
3) ADSL2+ has been around in other countries for ages, offering up to 20M and typically 15M speeds. BE (O2) offer it here but have their hands tied as to how and when they can fit their upgraded ADSL2 hardware to the exchanges (all over the country), for the above (BT wholesale) reasons. No pressure is being applied to BT wholesale to make this upgrade procedure swift and painless so that the country can keep up to date as ADSL3,4,5 develops. Hello 10 years ago, when we had the same swimming through treacle to try to get all the exchanges running good old ADSL, and the stupid queueing website where demand granted an upgrade. Remember that? After all, we do love queueing in this place, don't we?
4) Traffic shaping is used because the few internet backbone suppliers that pipe to the UK (mostly operating out of the London Docklands) have an effective monopoly and overcharge the ISPs for blocks of bandwidth. For that reason, their systems cannot support heavy users who might be getting their full 8M for hours on end while download a movie or using P2P software like bittorrent. My answer to all this is, so what? We shouldn't be in this position in the first place. Time for our celebrity leaders to step in again!
Overall, the current situation is a damn disgrace, and another example of "rip off britain" at work.







newscpq # Friday, November 16, 2007 10:57:12 AM
http://www.speedtest.net/global.php?continent=3
- TOP regions in UK:
http://www.speedtest.net/global.php?continent=3&country=4
(I asked speedtest.net administrators to publish the number of users that connect to a given speed range to their speedtest servers, so that we could see the speed at which the majority of people do really connect. They said "good idea, we'll put it in the roadmap"...)
Anyway, the situation in Italy is similar: maybe not as bad as UK if you look at the worst case (that seems to be yours'), surely not so good if you look at the best case you can hope.
Telecom Italia is the incumbent Telco provider and provides 2MB around the country, "to everyone". I have to say this is actually done (never read of any complaint at 384Kbps or similar, with a 2MB connection) and this year they will provide 7Mbps "to everyone" at no additional cost for the customers (19,95€ a month).
BUT:
- the upload speed will be at 384Kbps (did you ever try to upload a photo, for printing?)
- TELECOM ITALIA will provide TV services, too...
You can see, now, why they upgraded "for free" the download speed to 7Mbps...
Here in Italy (as in UK, it seems) the incumbet Telco provider does what it wants.
My solution:
- that telco were obliged to just provide connectivity to the customers
- that other players were allowed to provide contents and services on the networks of the telcos
An end user could then:
- choose the broadband connectivity solution he prefers in an OPEN market(e.g: 7Mbps dw, 2Mbps up, 128Kbps guaranteed)
- choose the services and the contents he wants from other providers (Internet, TV, ...)
I personally use Tiscali that provides connectivity to my city with fibers on its own network. This gives me 6Mbps dw, 512Kbps up that are measured 5.1 or 5.4 Mbps by most of the speedtests around (but unfornutately my city is not the reference for Italy, rather the top - and we are slow...).
So it not only an infrastructural interconnectivity network problem, rather a political one: they evolve the italian network only when they are sure they will be able to control the services the network will provide.
We used to see TV for free, now we will be asked to pay and only when everyone on us will have monthly TV rates to pay, they will upgrade the network upload capacity and probably simulteanously provide photo printing services, network based back-up services and so on...
Until then, our network capabilities will be bind!
You know what? They are so stupid they think it is clever to limit connectivity services.
Well, if they manage to "open the taps" as gradually as they wish... well, where is the open market?
newscpq
sebt # Thursday, December 4, 2008 2:57:36 AM