Skip navigation.

Perspective

It's all in how you look at it

"False rumors" in Flag City

Well, looks like we made the front page of the Washington Post. Maybe some of you even saw it? They painted a rather ugly picture of this small town ... sadly, none of it true.

On Monday, the Washington Post ran an article about how Internet rumors are effecting Barack Obama's chances in the upcoming general election. Since they chose us as the means to present their story, the local paper picked it up yesterday and ran it on their own front page - but they also ran the real story beside it. Additionally, they had an editorial about the whole thing, and a number of letters to the editor. (Ah, the digital age, where you can receive letters from everywhere the same day ...)

I won't repeat the story. If you haven't heard it yet, you can click the various links. Both stories are a bit long of course, but you really have to read both. (And if you're asking - I did look around the Washington Post's website to try to get the story straight from them, but couldn't find any link to archived stories. I'm sure it must be there somewhere, but they sure don't make it easy to find.)

Yes, I did say "sadly" back there, the fact that they could practically make up a story like this in order to advance their agenda is well beyond "disappointing". Okay, I don't read the Post - and after this I'm certainly not going to start - but I have heard some of their stories quoted on radio and television. And while I recognized that they were basically one-sided, I still figured that they must have some amount of journalistic integrity ... apparently I was seriously mistaken.

Equally sad is that anybody believed them. We're not exactly some little hicktown, we do get cable here. We've heard all about these rumors - as much from television as anywhere else - and the real facts. Personally, it wouldn't matter to me if Obama was a muslim - in fact, I would probably be more likely to vote for him if he were, but that's me. The fact he's black, and his father was a muslim - he didn't choose either one of those, it doesn't tell me anything about his character. Like most people, I want to vote for someone I can believe in, and race, sex, religious affiliation, and age really don't mean anything. (Not that I'm claiming most people in town are like me - that would be really boring - but we're not living in the stone age here.)

Worst of all is those people who not only believed the story, but somehow believed they could do something about it. I'm sure that by now all of those people mentioned on College Street who didn't already have an unlisted phone number have changed that. And those letter from Columbus and from Washington? Completely incredible.

So here you have a liberal, big-city paper telling their readers pretty much what they want to believe - is there no critical thinking left in this country?

I guess I'll never understand politics. There's two groups of people - no, not the Democrats and the Republicans, but the true believers and the rest of us. The "party faithful" their called, they believe what they want to believe, and think they can win everyone else over based solely on the strength of their convictions. And then of course, anyone who doesn't agree with them is short-sighted or downright neanderthal. Well, sorry, some of us need more.

Then again, there's a lot of people locally who were "on the fence" who would now have made up their mind. Yes, that's right, thanks to the Washington Post the odds of people in Flag City, USA voting for Barack Obama have gone down substantially. With friends like the Washington Post, who needs enemies?

(I know some of you are saying "Okay Steve, so after those nice words earlier, you're voting for McCain because of some hatchet job by the Washington Post not even related to Obama as a person." Wrong, on both counts. I made up my mind some time ago, this has no impact on how I'm going to vote. You see, I'm a Libertarian, I'm voting for Bob Barr, but he's not going to win locally either - short of some miracle.)

In all honesty ..."Grandmother"

Comments

Rapunzel 2. July 2008, 08:29

What's a Libertarian? I can look it up but I'd like to hear
what it means to you.

Steve 2. July 2008, 14:27

There are two parts to Libertarianism, and actually many self-proclaimed Libertarians are only concerned about the one ... Libertarians believe in the smallest amount of government possible. Get rid of welfare, get rid of the war on drugs, get rid of the federal income tax and all the various paperwork and red tape regulations. Get rid of 99.9 percent of the bureaucracy, and return the government to what our founders originally conceived of it as.

A lot of anarchists actually profess to be Libertarians, but they're not. Anarchists want no government at all (or at least, think they do) - well, I guess in their mind that is "the smallest amount of government possible" huh? But you know, we do need a (smaller) military to defend this country in case of attack, stuff like that - you can't get rid of all government.

The real definition of a Libertarian (which not everyone who claims to be a libertarian really believes in) is called "non-initiation of force". All forms of coercion are immoral, and can only be justified in response to attacks and threats. You know, like self-defense - you are legally allowed to kill someone only if they are trying to kill you or someone else, you can't kill someone just because his dog dug up your flowers, or he cut you off in traffic.

Unless you have unanimous consent (and in any groups of more than about 50 people, unanimous consent is inconceivable), all government is coercion. Ever heard the expression "Democracy is 3 wolves and a sheep voting on dinner?" Another common expression is "tyranny of the majority" - in a real democracy, if you only have 20% of the people who agree with you ... well, you get to be the dinner.

I could spend a few hours on this topic - but then I wouldn't get anything at all done, so I guess I'll leave it there.

Anonymous 2. July 2008, 15:17

Gus writes:

"In November 2007, the Washington Post was criticized by independent journalist Robert Parry for reporting on anti-Obama chain e-mails without sufficiently emphasising to its readers the false nature of the anonymous claims."

For your readers. It seems they've done this kind of thing before, just happened to pick Findlay to be the scapegoat this time around.

Charlie 2. July 2008, 15:54

Hooray, libertarianism! I'm still not voting for Barr, though. He just rubs me the wrong way. Maybe it's his "party faithful / true believer" past. I don't know. He's certainly not as inspiring as Ron Paul, though. I can't decide if I'm going to vote for Paul anyway, or maybe just abstain. I suppose voting for Barr would be better than abstaining. Ahh, decisions, decisions...

Steve 2. July 2008, 16:03

I wish Dr. Paul were the Libertarian candidate, but he isn't ... :frown:

Rapunzel 2. July 2008, 21:55

In our country if you don't vote they assume you are happy with who is in Government. Thank you Steven that was very informative.

Charlie 2. July 2008, 23:07

Just got around to reading your comment about libertarianism. I know that quote well: "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." -- Benjamin Franklin

:up:

theoddbod 3. July 2008, 22:02

Reminds me a bit of when our Guardian newspaper decided to ask its readers to write to undecided voters of Clark County in Ohio (to persuade them to vote against Bush), and created a small swing in the other direction.

I count myself as a Libertarian, but in the 'small government' sense. I'm a bit short of the likes of Samizdata, or even Glenn Reynolds of Instapundit. Even in my sense, there are hardly any of us in the UK awww.

Robert Hurley 27. January 2009, 04:00

...is there no critical thinking left in this country?


No. There is none.

theoddbod 27. January 2009, 22:09

Oh, I wouldn't go that far. It's just not as visible as it should be, nor accorded the importance it deserves.

53north 11. February 2009, 15:49

I thought a well armed flock of sheep was Pink Floyd...
=o)

How to use Quote function:

  1. Select some text
  2. Click on the Quote link

Write a comment

Comment
(BBcode and HTML is turned off for anonymous user comments.)

If you can't read the words, press the small reload icon.


Smilies

January 2010
S M T W T F S
December 2009February 2010
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30