Israeli Political Players: the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

Subscribe to RSS feed

The problem with professors.

, , ,

Recently the Jerusalem Post (you know, the supposedly right-wing news source that supported the Disengagement/Expulsion/Pogrom) had an article by Abe Selig entitled "US professors: Support for Israel eroded." The article "reported" on some kind of "fact-finding trip" sponsored by Dalia Rabin's Yitzhak Rabin Center. According to Selig, "The professors described the week-long crash course as a 'fact-finding mission' intent on 'educating the educators.'" So it seems that the educators being educated (by the fanatical leftist and Jew-hating Dalia Rabin) are the very "US professors" who are opining on changes in support for Israel. In other words, this laughable article by our Selig tries to use professorial prestige to validate claims right after it establishes that the professors in question are unqualified to opine, as they needed education by the political hacks of the Rabin Center. Got it?

Anyway, I decided to send an email to one of these professors, Richard Samuels, cc'ing the chairman of the MIT political science department. I will update this blog with any response I get, unless I am asked to keep the response confidential.

It is time for academics to fear blathering about areas they know nothing about. And it is always time to ridicule journalists like Selig.


Your comments in the Jerusalem Post.
From: S K
Sent: Mon 6/29/09 7:02 PM
To: samuels@mit.edu
Cc: cstewart@mit.edu

Dear Professor Samuels:

You were quoted in the Jerusalem Post regarding American support for Israel:

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1245924953068&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

I find two things especially striking regarding your contributions. First, I note the pervasive vagueness in your writing and the lack of evidence for your sweeping claims. For example:

"The mood in the United States is changing," . . . "And it's changing in ways that I think deserve a lot of attention, especially from an Israeli point of view. . . . The ability to count on unquestioned support - we're talking now not for the State of Israel, but for the government's policies - I think has eroded, and I think has eroded very dramatically. . . ."

What does such language mean, precisely? I cannot even understand how a scientist could use vague language like "the mood in the United States." Who precisely have you surveyed? What is your study design? A panel? What are your variables? Or do you mean some subset of "elite" opinion? If so, which subset and where is your evidence?

Second, I wonder what qualifies you to comment so sweepingly as a professor given that you have published no work in this area. You are a Japan specialist after all--and you haven't even published on Japanese public opinion, if you do intend to make claims about public opinion.

Are academic standards irrelevant when Israel is involved? Or is American politics such a simple field that its findings can be intuited from a study of Japan's Goldilocks Strategy?

Sincerely,


skzion
http://my.opera.com/skZion/blog/



--------------------------

UPDATE July 1, 2009

Your humble blogger has received no response either from Richard Samuels, the academic who took part in this charade, or from the chairman of the political science department at MIT, Charles Stewart. Here is their contact information.

Samuels
Office: E38-235
Phone: 617-253-2449
email: samuels@mit.edu

Stewart
Office: E53-463
Phone: 617-253-3127
email: cstewart@mit.edu

One day I hope that we have a clearinghouse for information that will allow the average concerned reader to hold academics and journalists accountable (through fully legal means, of course). Until then, my poor efforts will have to do.

Yishai Fleisher of "Generation Z": One Big Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

,

According to Israel's Arutz Sheva,

"Yishai is an internationally recognized lecturer, show host, and columnist and has been featured on CNN, Al Jazeera, the BBC, and other international and Jewish media. Yishai was an IDF paratrooper and studied Poli-Sci at Yeshiva University. Yishai co-founded Kumah, a grassroots organization dedicated to encouraging American Aliyah. His writing and Zionist efforts landed him a job at Arutz Sheva's Israel National Radio. Today he hosts the 'Yishai and Friends' show and is the Director of Programming of the station."

Impressed? And yet, Yishai and I have been going back and forth on his blog regarding what I consider his utter failure to think rationally about Israel's situation and what can be done to secure Jewish life there. At this point, my talkbacks are being censored 100%, an act that Yishai has publicly endorsed. I am thinking of writing a full analysis here of Yishai's intellectual and moral failures, but for now I am reprinting my last attempted blog entry at Israel National News, with a few edits for grammar and style.


WHY I WOULD NEVER MOVE TO ISRAEL

(Note: YF currently has a cliche- and falsehood-laden letter (Nisan 29, 5769; 4/23/2009) from a new immigrant to Israel on his blog ["Why I Moved to Israel"].)


Dear Yishai:

I would never move to Israel because I don't trust Israelis to know the right thing, let alone to do it. I do not trust the Left, the so-called Right, and certainly not you, Yishai, or anyone of "Generation Z." A people who, one way or another, suppress information via censorship to advance their agendas (a practice they justify in different ways depending on their political orientation) cannot be trusted--and trust is essential when one is surrounded by Bnei Amalek (Muslims).

You are manifestly unwilling to address the points I first brought up months ago. Specifically, you have no plan to turn Israel from a Bolshevik state where the popular will is regularly flouted to a state where this will dominates the political scene. No plan? Hell, you do not even have any tactics. You have tried to argue that Jewish wombs would birth so many Jewishly identified Jews that eventually observant Jews would demographically dominate Israel. But I have shown that this depends on the elites being inept enough not to counter this approach, as they are in fact already doing. (And there are plenty of Muslims to bring in if the elites need any demographic help.) You have asserted that the IDF would socialize individuals into greater Jewish consciousness when in fact the opposite occurs. You have seen 96% of Israeli voters vote against National Union--the closest Israel gets to half-decent government--and yet you have no comment. You have asserted that greater immigration from America would do the trick, despite the obvious fact that for all your "fuzzy pink bunny stories" only a few will ever be persuaded. You have no reason to believe that any plausible level of American immigration will solve any problem, but you continue to harp on this as a fix. Indeed, the considerable level of immigration from elsewhere has coincided with even more bizarre anti-Jewish actions by the elites--but then empirical evidence does not concern you. Your latest pink bunny story involves you trotting out a 5-week-old immigrant, Dani Koesterich, to repeat the platitudes and sheer falsehoods that you propagate on your blog, as if such testimonials addressed the arguments that had been mooted. And really, when our Mr. Koesterich claims that the Israeli state protects Jews everywhere with the Mossad, we've heard quite a whopper. The elites do not even protect Jews in Sderot.

Your latest trick, as you cannot answer any of my challenges (let alone Vienna Mike's), is to censor my TBs (and evidently Mike's) 100%. How very Israeli to use censorship to facilitate immorality. Yes, you have surely achieved an Israeli identity. And you expect immigration from America to succeed in changing anything when, in your case as in others, it is American good sense and decency that is subverted by the Israeli status quo?

I guess you can always depend on the sure-fire approach of praying for a miracle, as if Hashem would appreciate your attempt to coerce Him into doing what you should do yourself. Hey it worked in Gush Katif, not to mention WW2 Europe!

I said that you would know when I gave up on you because you would see no more TBs from me. Well, I no longer have a choice, as my TBs are now completely censored. This is what you actually prefer, as you have said in one of your responses. So, you have "won." I will not comment on your blog in the future.

Sincerely,

sk

Ted Belman: He supported the Disengagement/Expulsion before he was against it

It is crucial that Israeli politicos and pundits (and their American colleagues) admit their mistakes when they get things wrong. More generally, if we are to avoid trusting knaves and fools, we must know who, through his previous actions, has shown himself to be either of these things. Nor can we allow people to curry political favor with their opinion pieces all the while posing as disinterested observers.

With this in mind, I recently wrote a Talkback to one of Ted Belman's columns on Israel National News (http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Articles/Article.aspx/8221):

2. Belman, a supporter of the Expulsion, should be shunned.
Now he will pop up here and say this was just a momentary consideration of an alternative. It wasn't.
sk, USA (04/09/08)

Ted is the current editor of Israpundit, which is supposed to be conservative and pro-Israel. What does he say to my #2?

10. #2
SK, you are lying
Ted Belman, (06/09/08)

But am I lying, or is Belman? You can decide by reviewing the attached PDFs from the time of the Disengagement/Expulsion/Pogrom. I have numbered them according to the date. However, before the first file, Belman had made many arguments in favor of the Disengagement. When he said "I'm Back" that supposedly meant that he had reconsidered. Evidently, he hadn't. In the last file, we see his last word on the matter before it concluded:

I don't see disengagement as a reward for terror. I see it as in Israel's best interest. Gaza was a burden and not a benefit. Israel is stronger for having gotten out. Stronger to deal with terror and stronger to resist pressure. The hated Roadmap will now be used as a shield. The Pals must fulfill their obligations before before the second stage comes up. All attemps by the Quartet to bypass their Roadmap should be resisted.

Posted by: Ted Belman on August 20, 2005 08:34 AM

My point here is not to bash Belman, even though he called me a liar. Rather, it is to insist on some basic level of integrity in the actions of journalists and political pundits. "Business as usual" must end. When someone is employed for his knowledge and analytical ability but turns out to have been wrong and refuses to admit that he was wrong, we must stop him in his tracks. We cannot allow pundits to hide their history of bad ideas and wrong calls. We certainly cannot allow them to help create a political reality that consists of a fog of lies and wishful thinking.

01-Israpundit_ IÆm Back.pdf

02-Israpundit_ Stop Blaming Sharon.pdf

03-Israpundit_ Is there really a deal with Bush.pdf

04-Israpundit_ The Gaza Withdrawal and Israel's Permanent Dilemma.pdf

05-Israpundit_ Stop Blaming Sharon, Con'd.pdf


UPDATE: 9/11/08
I have tried three times to respond directly in talkback form to Belman on Israel National News (www.israelnationalnews.com), and none of these responses have been posted. Some will know that censorship at INN has become a visible area of controversy--and yes, I have joined that controversy. The Belmans of the world are propped up by censoring those who attempt to expose them. Thank Baruch Gordon, English-language editor of Israel National News, who permits this "unauthorized" censorship to continue and who is dragging his feet on creating an official censorship policy that would be properly enforced. Jeez, even Haaretz looks good in comparison (though NOT the Jerusalem Post under the execrable David Horovitz).

A Face as Beautiful as Her Soul: Devorah from Efrat

Rabbi Shlomo Aviner: Very, Very Bad

Before reading all this, please view the YouTube video from Shlomo Wallins: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3D91xkM0YJM

This rabbi pretends to advance the cause of the "nationalist camp," and particularly of the settlers. Instead, he undermines both by his collusion with the Israeli leftist establishment.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Rabbi Shlomo Chaim haKohen Aviner is the Rosh yeshiva of the Ateret Cohanim yeshiva in the Muslim Quarter of Jerusalem and the rabbi of Bet El.[1] He is considered one of the spiritual leaders of the Religious Zionist movement.

Contents

<script type="text/javascript"> //<![CDATA[ if (window.showTocToggle) { var tocShowText = "show"; var tocHideText = "hide"; showTocToggle(); } //]]> </script>

[edit] Background

Rabbi Aviner was born in 1943 in Lyon, France, and was involved in the Bnei Akiva youth movement, rising to the position of National Director. Rabbi Aviner is a qualified electrical engineer and holds an MA in mathematics.

When he emigrated to Israel in 1966, he settled on Sde Eliyahu, a kibbutz in the northern Jordan valley near Bet She'an. He subsequently went to learn in the Mercaz HaRav yeshiva in Jerusalem, under Rabbi Zvi Yehuda Kook. Later, he became the rabbi of Lavi and afterwards the rabbi of Keshet in the Golan Heights. Since 1981 he has been the rabbi of Bet El. He served in the IDF and is a lieutenant in the reserves.

[edit] Controversy

Rabbi Aviner has always had an air of controversy surrounding him, due in part to what is perceived as an overly submissive attitude towards the government of Israel and an acceptance of all of its actions. More recently however, three new accusations have arisen. Local women have accused him of sexual harassment,[2][3][4] while youths involved in protesting the 2005 Gaza Disengagement were allegedly strangled or otherwise attacked by Aviner.

The third and best publicized accusation is that Rabbi Aviner made (possibly intentionally) clearly erroneous rulings with regards to questions of niddah-family purity. The matter was brought before a rabbinic court made up of Rabbis Dov Lior, Mordechai Eliyahu, Avraham Shapira, Nechemyah Zalman Goldberg, and Yaakov Yosef, son of Shas leader Ovadiah Yosef. The court ruled against Rabbi Aviner, prohibiting him from ruling further on the issue of family purity. When he refused to recognize the court's decision his writings were banned.[citation needed]

In 2005, prior to the forced mass eviction of Jews from Gush Katif as part of Israel unilateral disengagement plan, Aviner took a minority rabbinical stance that soldiers should not refuse orders to participate with the plan, explaining that the religious issue was the state's responsibility, not the individual's. He continued to publicly oppose the resistance to the eviction plans and in one case took physical action.[5]

In 2007, in an article about Baruch Marzel's threats over the settler movement, Aviner stated that he felt that the IDF was sincerely evacuating the renewed Homesh settlers and other demonstrators at the site of the abandoned village to protect from future terrorist attacks.[6] Aviner further distinguished between the IDF's responsibility to protect settlements versus its responsibility for protecting demonstrators, saying that the IDF should do whatever is necessary to protect a settlement to keep it intact, including armed forces, but demonstrators may be evacuated if thought necessary where there is a danger to their lives.[6]

[edit] Prohibition on women wearing trousers

Rabbi Aviner has ruled that "a woman must always wear modest clothes even when she is alone and in the dark, because the Holy one blessed be he is everywhere. And yes, trousers are a self-prohibition even when a woman is alone."[7]

[edit] References

  1. ^ Odot (Hebrew)
  2. ^ [1]
  3. ^ The rights of religious women / Voice that won't be silenced
  4. ^ Barbara Sofer's To censor or not to censor?
  5. ^ Shlomo Wollins. Testimony on Shlomo Aviner [YouTube].
  6. ^ a b Wagner, Matthew. "Marzel vows to mobilize against Ronzki over Shabbat evacuations", Jerusalem Post, 2007-12-04. Retrieved on 2007-12-11. 
  7. ^ "Rabbi Aviner: Women must not wear pants even when alone," Ynet, 2 May 2008

[edit] External links

Jews are not hated in America

This might seem obvious to some, but there are plenty of Israeli Jews who believe that it's only a matter of a little time before there is another Holocaust, this time in the US. While nothing is impossible, I have seen no evidence of mainstream anti-Jewish feeling from those who claim that there is.

The following shows "feeling thermometers" for various individuals and groups in US society in 2004. A higher score on the thermometer shows "warmth" to the individual or group; a lower score indicates "coldness." The best way to look at these scores is by comparison, one to the other. If you examine the means (averages) you will see that Jews score about the same as Catholics and Protestants. I expect that there will shortly be a thermometer for Muslims as well. Most likely, their score will be lower than Catholics.


Descriptive Statistics

p045007 Q16.f1c1a. George W. Bush Thermometer 58.52
p045019 Q28.f2d2a. Supreme Court Thermometer 63.24
p045020 Q29.f2d2b. Congress Thermometer 57.38
p045021 Q30.f2d2c. Military Thermometer 79.64
p045022 Q31.f2d2d. Federal Government Thermometer 56.24
p045023 Q32.f2d2e. Blacks Thermometer 68.55
p045024 Q33.f2d2f. Whites Thermometer 70.16
p045025 Q34.f2d2g. Conservatives Thermometer 59.86
p045026 Q35.f2d2h. Liberals Thermometer 51.72
p045027 Q36.f2d2j. Labor Unions Thermometer 55.58
p045028 Q37.f2d2k. Big Business Thermometer 52.79
p045029 Q38.f2d2m. Poor People Thermometer 68.92
p045030 Q39.f2d2n. People On Welfare Thermometer 54.08
p045031 Q40.f2d2p. Hispanics Thermometer 65.24
p045032 Q41.f2d2q. Christian Fundamentalists Therm 53.55
p045033 Q42.f2d2r. Elderly Thermometer 78.51
p045034 Q43.f2d2s. Environmentalists Thermometer 61.99
p045035 Q44.f2d2t. Gay Men And Lesbians Thermometer 46.31
p045036 Q45.f2d2u. Catholics Thermometer 65.53
p045037 Q46.f2d2v. Jews Thermometer 67.68
p045038 Q47.f2d2w. Protestants Thermometer 67.13
p045039 Q48.f2d2y. Feminists Thermometer 52.73
p045040 Q49.f2d2z. Asian-Americans Thermometer 66.26
p045041 Q50.f2d2za. News Media Thermometer 47.81
p045042 Q51.f2d2zb. Catholic Church Thermometer 57.87
p045043 Q52.f2d2zc. Men Thermometer 71.35
p045044 Q53.f2d2zd. Women Thermometer 77.85

Valid N (listwise) 669


The FT for Jews, analyzed by Race and Religion:

Tables Race SDA.htm

Tables Religion - SDA.htm

The Bad Guys

10/18/07

Rabbi Yisrael Rosenne
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/123964

This rabbi quotes a Torah portion to justify giving part of the land of Israel to killer Arabs, after first expelling the Jews who live there of course. It is a laughable ploy, as the Talkbacks to the linked article show. The Torah does not seem to prohibit non-Jews from living on Jewish land as long as they abide by the law and are good neighbors. But nobody sentient could think that the "Palestinians" (on either side of the Green Line) qualify, and, even if they did, they would not therefore have any right to create a new state from the land they currently squat upon. Furthermore, since Jews finally control Israel, the Biblical promise that Jews would possess the land has now been fulfilled. Therefore, it is ludicrous to refer, as the rabbi does, to Lot's use of this land as if this story were relevant for what appears to be yet another land breakup scheme hatched by Honest Olmert and aided by Birdbrain Livny, Tongue-in-Cheek Ramon, "Shades" Yosef, Rightwing Leftist Lieberman, and Peace Prize Peres.

The good rabbi is laying the groundwork for another land-for-peace disaster, a follow-up to the Gaza expulsion (I'm sorry, the "Disengagement"). This is the way rabbis are used in Israel: they provide a religious fig leaf for manifestly anti-Jewish policies. Their followers are herd animals. In return, the government gives the rabbis money (for themselves and their schools) and a nice position. This give-and-take corrupts religion just as facilitates a corrupt government.
May 2013
M T W T F S S
April 2013June 2013
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31