Worldtheories

DAVID ICKE NEWSLETTER, AUGUST 20^TH, 2006

THE 'LAND OF THE PURE' ...

... AND THE BOGUS 'TERROR PLOTS' ...

Hello all ...

When the story broke of the latest 'terror plot' to explode passenger planes in mid-Atlantic a clock began ticking in my head waiting for the first mention of the 'Pakistan connection'. Even more so, I was waiting for the letters 'ISI'.

Neither took long to arrive.

The 'ISI' is Inter-Services Intelligence, which is, in reality, the Pakistan branch of the CIA and runs a state within a state on behalf of the global agenda. If the ISI is involved in any way in a situation or event then it's deeply corrupt and not to be taken seriously.

And what do we have? The trans-Atlantic 'terror plot' was 'uncovered' after two British brothers of Pakistani descent were arrested by the ISI in Karachi and Lahore.

Already the credibility of a genuine rather than manufactured 'terror plot' is in tatters - not least when we hear that these ISI arrests were made in 'a coordinated operation with British and American intelligence agencies'. All three 'agencies' are terrorist organisations who create and fund the very 'terrorist groups' they later claim to have 'uncovered'. The News in Islamabad reported on August 12th:

'The plot to blow up passenger planes bound for the US from Britain by making bombs onboard was revealed for the first time by Pakistan's prime intelligence agency, which then brought it into the notice of its counterpart agencies in the US and the UK ... The agencies of all the three countries then launched a successful operation in unison to foil the plot. Well-placed sources revealed to The News on conditions of anonymity that the operation was coordinated at the highest level by all the three agencies. The heads of governments of all three countries were also kept abreast with the efforts in this regards.

Pakistan's top intelligence agency's chief, Lt-Gen Ashfaq Pervez Kiyani, personally supervised the coordination of the three agencies. Gen Kiyani, who is director-general of the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), returned from London only last week. The ISI chief and senior aides travelled regularly to the West and even across the Atlantic in this endeavour and not only unearthed the plot but also rendered tangible assistance with precision in nabbing the suspects.'

Yes, he returned from London a few days before where the final details of the scam were agreed.

'They were planning to ride unicycles onto planes and throw liquid chemicals disguised as cream pies', said an MI-5 spokesman. 'The ISI confirmed it after we sent them a fax.'

First of all, the ISI's methods of 'interrogation' make anything you have seen in pictures from US prisons in Iraq look like tea with your granny. Nothing that a 'suspect' says when 'questioned' by these mind-sick morons has a shred of believability on this basis alone.

But it goes further. The ISI is a notorious supporter of the very terror groups it is claiming to be responsible for exposing in this latest 'plot' and is one of the prime vehicles through which manufactured terror organisations are created and funded on behalf of its masters in the US and Britain. I have been exposing its activities for years.

The ISI is a military operation and its director general has to be a serving Lieutenant General in the Pakistan Army. It controls the government, headed by Pervez Musharraf, the Pakistan President and chief of the army who took power in a coup in 1999. Pakistan, dubbed the 'Land of the Pure' by the inventor of its name, is, in truth, a blatant military dictatorship with fundamental ties to a stream of engineered terrorist groups and the intelligence agencies of the US, UK and elsewhere.

Pervez Musharraf, puppet of Washington and London. See how many medals you get for mass murder?

The ISI was fundamentally involved in the funding of Osama bin Laden on behalf of the United States and in the manipulation of 9/11. After the US covertly provoked the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979, as later admitted by the then National Security Advisor, Zbigniew Brzezinski, tens of millions of dollars were funnelled to the Afghanistan resistance groups called the Mujahedeen which would later become the Taliban and 'al-Qaeda'.

The money came from the United States and Saudi Arabia and was largely managed and distributed by the ISI over the border in Pakistan. The front man for the 'resistance' to the Soviet Union was Osama bin Laden and the CIA database on the Mujahedeen is where the name 'al-Qaeda' comes from. It literally means 'the database', as former British Foreign Secretary, Robin Cook, revealed in 2005. A month later he was dead from a heart attack:

'Throughout the 80s [Bin Laden] was armed by the CIA and funded by the Saudis to wage jihad against the Russian occupation of Afghanistan. Al-Qaida, literally "the database", was originally the computer file of the thousands of mujahideen who were recruited and trained with help from the CIA to defeat the Russians. Inexplicably, and with disastrous consequences, it never appears to have occurred to Washington that once Russia was out of the way, Bin Laden's organisation would turn its attention to the west.'

(http://www.guardian.co.uk/terrorism/story/0,12780,1523838,00.html)

I think the increasing openness about what he learned in government cost Cook his life. Triggering a heart attack is child's play to these people. Where I disagree is that 'inexplicably' the US authorities did not see the 'disastrous consequences' coming. Oh, but they did because that was the plan and the ISI would continue to be a major bag carrier and conduit for funds to manufacture the 'war on terror'.

Of course, you can't have a war on terror unless you have the 'terror' in the first place and that was the main role of the ISI.

In 1984, Bin Laden located himself in Peshawar, just across the border in Pakistan. Even MSNBC reported in 1998 how his organisation, Maktab al-Khidamar (MAK), was 'nurtured by Pakistan's state security services, the Inter-Services Intelligence agency, or ISI, the CIA's primary conduit for conducting the covert war against Moscow's occupation.' One of the main financial vehicles for funding this and other terrorist networks was the BCCI, the Bank of Crooks and Criminals International as it was known after its crash amid enormous scandal in 1991. It was a front for drug money laundering and for intelligence agencies financing terrorist operations.

The bank was based in Pakistan, where it opened in 1972, and it had extremely close ties with ... the ISI.

A great deal of the funding for Bin Laden and co came from heroin after opium production in Mujahedeen-controlled Afghan territories soared from 250 tons in 1982 to 2,000 tons in 1991. Bin Laden and the ISI were reaping a reported $100 million a year in a deal that had Mujahedeen 'warlords' paying an opium tax and these drugs were sold on the world market with the full knowledge and cooperation of the CIA. The United Nations Drug Control Program said in 1999 that the ISI was making around $2.5 billion annually from the sale of illegal drugs. As Time Magazine reported in 2002:

'Even by the shadowy standards of spy agencies, the ISI is notorious. It is commonly branded "a state within the state," or Pakistan's "invisible government." It has sponsored Muslim rebels in Indian-held Kashmir, and propped up the Taliban and by extension its malevolent Arab guests in Afghanistan-though it denies these charges. Its tentacles stretch into Pakistani politics, courts and everyday life. It is much feared; a venal whisper from an ISI informer can destroy a career or lead to arrest-or worse.'

(http://www.time.com/time/asia/magazine/article/0,13673,501020506-233999,00.html)

This is the organisation, lest we forget, that 'uncovered' the 'plot' to bomb multiple airliners over the Atlantic, which led to the pathetic changes in airport 'security' that caused all the disruption, chaos and fear this past week.

The CIA, Britain's MI-6 and the ISI created and oversaw 'training camps' in Pakistan that coached more than 100,000 Muslims in the art of terrorism and bomb-making between 1986 and 1992, according to journalist John Pilger. Remember, the Soviet Union left Afghanistan in 1989 and only 43,000 of this 100,000 actually took part in the war! The 'elite' British special forces unit, the SAS, was involved in the training in Pakistan while those Muslims selected for leadership roles went to a camp in Virginia under a project called Operation Cyclone.

Terrorist training camps funded by the CIA, Saudi Arabia, drug money, and the Pakistan ISI.

Richard Murphy, assistant secretary of state for Near East and South Asian relations during the Reagan administration, later said that 'We did spawn a monster in Afghanistan'. The then Pakistan President, Benazir Bhutto, told President father George Bush that he was 'creating a Frankenstein'. But that is exactly what he wanted to do. He was creating the potential terrorists across the world that his son was scheduled to 'fight' at a later stage of the plan.

As I have been stressing all these years, the Illuminati agenda is projected forward decades and more - much more.

After the Soviet Union left and the remains of the communist Afghan government was removed from Kabul, control of Afghanistan was entirely in the hands of the Mujahedeen warlords and the ISI. Out of this came rule by the Taliban and the emergence of the largely invented terrorist group given the name, al-Qaeda, which began to be blamed for striking 'Western' targets.

In 1999, Pervez Musharraf seized power in Pakistan in a coup and appointed his ally, Lt General Mahmoud Ahmed, as head of the ISI. A year later an alleged funder of the 9/11 attacks, Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh, was given a house in Pakistan by the ISI. This is a man who had been jailed for kidnapping British and American citizens. The following year Saeed Sheikh made many phone calls to ISI chief, Mahmoud Ahmed.

Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh

Agence France Presse and the Times of India both quoted an official Indian intelligence report saying that the 9/11 attacks were in part funded by money wired to Mohammed Atta from Pakistan, on the order of the ISI's Mahmoud Ahmad by ... Saeed Sheikh.

Now, of course, there is much more to 9/11 than that, but the connections are crystal clear between the ISI, terrorist groups, the US and British governments, CIA, British Intelligence, and some of those officially named as complicit in the attacks.

Sleaze-ball Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage, with close ties to the ISI, visited Pakistan publicly in May 2001, five months before 9/11, while CIA director George Tenet met President Musharraf in an unpublicised meeting later described as 'unusually long'. ISI Director Mahmoud Ahmed was in town at the same time. Just two months later the American organisation, Human Rights Watch, reported that the ISI had been ...:

... bankrolling Taliban military operations ... arranging training for its fighters, planning and directing offensives, providing and facilitating shipments of ammunition and fuel, and on several occasions apparently directly providing combat support.'

Within months of that report, and the visit to Pakistan by Tenet and Armitage, the US and Britain would be bombing the Taliban for their alleged involvement with 9/11 and 'al-Qaeda' while, at the same time, the Pakistan government and the ISI were being touted as 'allies' in the 'war on terror'!!

President Musharraf shakes hands with fellow 9/11 conspirator, ISI Director Mahmoud Ahmed

A week before the September 11^th attacks, ISI chief Mahmoud Ahmad, arrived in Washington and while the attacks were unfolding he would be having breakfast with Florida senator, Bob Graham, chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, along with Pakistan's ambassador to the US, Maleeha Lodhi, and other US members of the Senate and House Intelligence Committees, including CIA operative, Representative Porter Goss.

It was Graham and Goss who later co-chaired the joint House-Senate investigation into the 9/11 attacks which supported the official story. What a web.

Meeting with the ISI's Mahmoud as the planes crashed: Representative Porter Goss, who would later be head of the CIA, and Senator Bob Graham. They would head the 'inquiry' into 'intelligence failures' on 9/11!

Pakistan journalist, Amir Mateen, wrote this on September 10^th:

'ISI Chief Lt-Gen. Mahmoud's week-long presence in Washington has triggered speculation about the agenda of his mysterious meetings at the Pentagon and National Security Council. Officially, he is on a routine visit in return to CIA Director George Tenet's earlier visit to Islamabad. Official sources confirm that he met Tenet this week. He also held long parleys with unspecified officials at the White House and the Pentagon.

But the most important meeting was with Marc Grossman, U.S. Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs. One can safely guess that the discussions must have centred around Afghanistan . . . and Osama bin Laden. What added interest to his visit is the history of such visits. Last time Ziauddin Butt, Mahmoud's predecessor, was here, during Nawaz Sharif's government, the domestic politics turned topsy-turvy within days.'

It would take just one day to transform American and global politics.

September 11^th: massive Pakistan involvement through the ISI

Mahmoud Ahmed was replaced as ISI chief when the links were made public between him and Saeed Sheikh in the transfer of money to Atta, but Pakistan still joined the US in the 'war on terror' and was rewarded by a major American aid package.

Ironically, Saeed Sheikh would later be given the death sentence for killing the Wall Street Journal reporter, Daniel Pearl, who was kidnapped and beheaded in 2002 while in Pakistan to investigate the connections between Al Qaeda, the 'shoe bomber' Richard Reid, Pakistan's ISI and the $100,000 wired to Mohammed Atta's account in the US by Saeed Sheikh on the order of General Mahmoud Ahmad.

Daniel Pearl ...getting too close ...

I say 'ironically' because it is highly unlikely that Saeed Sheikh killed Pearl. As the former British government minister, Michael Meacher, wrote:

'Omar Sheikh, a British-born Islamist militant, is waiting to be hanged in Pakistan for a murder he almost certainly didn't commit - of the Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl in 2002. Both the US government and Pearl's wife have since acknowledged that Sheikh was not responsible. Yet the Pakistani government is refusing to try other suspects newly implicated in Pearl's kidnap and murder for fear the evidence they produce in court might acquit Sheikh and reveal too much.'

Significantly, Sheikh is also the man who, on the instructions of General Mahmoud Ahmed, the then head of Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), wired $100,000 before the 9/11 attacks to Mohammed Atta, the lead hijacker. It is extraordinary that neither Ahmed nor Sheikh have been charged and brought to trial on this count. Why not?'

The answer is self evident. To bring the true killers to justice would mean the danger of exposing the nexus behind 9/11 and the bogus 'war on terror'. It involves the cult that controls the US and UK governments and, to a vast and fundamental extent, it involves the Pakistan government and its terrorist wing, the ISI.

We have already had so many lies and been sold so many 'terror plots' that turned out not to be so. We have had an innocent Brazilian electrician shot seven times in the head while held down by police and no-one has been charged; we have had a 'terrorist' shot by police in Forest Gate, London, when they raided his home on an 'intelligence tip off' that turned out to be false; we have had the 'Ricin terrorists' that weren't and the 'plot' to 'attack' a British football stadium that, it turned out, was never planned at all; we have had hundreds of thousand killed and maimed in Iraq because of 'weapons of mass destruction' that never were.

Now we have another 'terror' plot 'foiled' by the 'intervention' of a Pakistan terrorist organisation called Inter-Services Intelligence which has trained, armed and funded terrorists on a staggering scale, been responsible for political assassinations, global drug-running, and were at the heart of the conspiracy, with US and British military intelligence, to attack the United States on September 11^th .

No wonder the backgrounds to many of those accused do not sound like Islamic terrorists, but after all the ridiculous plots that never were public scepticism is growing fast and you can be sure the authorities will do all they can to frame their targets even if they were not involved.

Whenever we hear the names Pakistan and ISI the alarm bells should be deafening.