DAVID ICKE NEWSLETTER, SEPTEMBER 17TH 2006
Friday, 7. December 2007, 15:11:09
ATISHOO, ATISHOO, WE ALL FALL DOWN ...
... 9/11 - THE CARD THAT WILL DEMOLISH THE BUILDING
Hello all ...
I was walking around ancient earthworks in Dorset, England, chatting with my wife, Pam, as an American couple approached. The couple, hearing Pam's accent, asked: 'Have you heard what has happened in America?'
It was the afternoon - in English time - of September 11th, 2001. As I heard the brief details recounted there was no doubt in my mind or, most importantly, in my intuition. This was a massive problem-reaction-solution to advance the global agenda I had spent the previous decade warning about.
Those of the concrete heart had played their biggest card yet - a play that will ultimately prove fatal to their ambitions.
The agenda's biggest card, but ultimately its undoing
I kept an appointment a few miles away with an alternative healer and saw some of the television pictures from New York. The more I heard, the more obvious it became. Those who were condemning the attacks as the work of 'Islamic terrorists', were actually the ones responsible for them. Or, at least, they knew that their masters were.
As I drove home, listening to the coverage on the radio, the next stage was crystal clear. Actions and responses to advance the agenda of control and suppression would now be justified by what had happened in New York, Washington and Pennsylvania.
Such thoughts and views were not shared by many in these early days, weeks and months and they certainly weren't popular. I was asked to appear on a Los Angeles radio station very soon after the attacks because they had seen on the Internet that I was saying it was an inside job by elements within the US government and its related agencies and overseas connections.
You can imagine the response. I was 'interviewed' by two 'DJs' and I never did work out which one had the brain cell that day. 'What are you, on?' was a pretty good summary of their reaction. I pointed out that this was precisely the reaction I expected, yawn, yawn, and I made them an offer: Have me back in a few weeks and if A, B, and C had not happened I would hold my hand up and accept I was wrong.
They agreed, but the phone was not to ring because A, B and C did happen. They were called the Patriot Act, the 'War on Terror' and other assaults on freedom
The response to 9/11 ...
... bombing the innocent in Afghanistan ...
Once you identify a problem-reaction-solution (P-R-S) event and you know the basic agenda it is seeking to advance - the Orwellian global state - predicting the future, in theme if not every detail, becomes pretty straightforward.
The overwhelming majority of shocked and bewildered humanity bought the official story. Nineteen Islamic extremists had hijacked the planes using box cutters and flown them into those buildings. Repetition, one of the most potent of all mind manipulations, was all that was needed to convince the unquestioning masses.
After all, the government wouldn't lie about something as terrible as this.
No, YOU wouldn't lie about it. They WOULD.
The usual suspects, Icke, Rense, Jones and others immediately questioned the propaganda, not least because 9/11 and its aftermath fitted so perfectly the recurring patterns of covert manipulation, everything from Pearl Harbor to the Nazi burning of the German parliament building, the Reichstag, so they could blame it on their enemies. Later came researchers like the Frenchman, Thierry Meyssan, who alerted the world to the fact that no 757 could have hit the Pentagon.
Questioning the government's '757 hit the Pentagon' conspiracy theory
But to the mainstream of public perception these were voices from the twilight zone, the lunatic fringe of 'conspiracy theorists' to be lumped together with flat earth believers and those who talked of little green men.
For a long time the concrete hearts held sway in the minds of the masses. The lap-dog media acted as the propaganda ministry for the official story and horrors like the invasion of Afghanistan and fundamental invasions of our privacy and freedoms were passed 'on the nod' while most agreed these were necessary to 'fight terror'.
The concept that those offering the solutions could be the perpetrators of the problem was too much to handle and conceive.
But I have had a simple philosophy that has kept me going through the 'wilderness years' in relation to 9/11 and much else. If what you are saying is true it will eventually be proved to be so. Thus, keep walking and talking, no matter what the reaction, and if the information stands up the struggle and abuse will be worth it in the end.
Challenging the government's version of 9/11 ...
... Then...
... and now.
So often people shut up and walk away when others are not listening or reacting with ridicule and contempt. But what use is that? It just leaves the field to the liars, cheats and serial killers.
That is not to say that there were not significant numbers of people who were sceptical of the 9/11 fairytale. Interest in my own work most certainly soared in the months that followed and especially after the publication of Alice in Wonderland and the World Trade Center Disaster in 2002 when the dots could be connected and the picture seen.
But it was in the wake of the Iraq invasion that I noticed a transformation in attitude and the opening of minds to the, at least possibility, that there was more to know about 9/11.
This happened for two main reasons. Firstly the early pioneers of the 'conspiracy' version of those attacks had been followed by many others and by 2003 the Internet was becoming a library of information and questions that undermined (not difficult) the original credibility of the official explanation.
The fact that this 'credibility' lay only in repetition, and the suppression in the mainstream of alternative views, meant that the house of cards was vulnerable to even the slightest nudge. Even the most simple of questions was met with the most ludicrous, implausible, often impossible, of answers.
Hey, the emperor is naked! Shit! They're LYING to us!
The second turning point in the emerging acceptance of a 9/11 conspiracy was Iraq itself. It's a strange human trait that people constantly dismiss politicians and journalists as untrustworthy liars and then believe them over something like 9/11.
Opinion polls all over the world list politicians and journalists as the top professions not to be trusted, together with lawyers and bankers. We hear all the time that 'you can't believe what you read in the newspapers', for instance. But then often the people who say that DO believe it.
The invasion of Iraq was to give the public a symbolic smack around the face to awaken them to this comical contradiction. It was like 'Oh yeah, they DO lie don't they, sorry I forgot.'
After 'weapons of mass destruction' were not found in Iraq, when they were supposed to be the very reason for the war and slaughter, I felt a real shift in public attitudes. When this was followed by leaked documents proving that the war was planned and agreed long before Bush and Blair claimed - see Tales From The Time Loop - the shift strengthened and spilled over into the conspiracy version of 9/11.
It still amazes me that there can be anyone who still believes the official history of September 11th when it is parroted by the same people, never mind even the same agencies, who provably lied to us over Iraq and WMD. Are we really so naive as to believe that those who lie so comprehensively about one will tell us the truth about the other?
Fortunately, ever increasing numbers are not falling for it anymore and, as we pass the 5th anniversary of 9/11, the official story and its mendacious advocates are in urgent need of a getaway car.
Five years later, even many academics, at first accepting, are now in the forefront of the exposure movement that has exploded in the last 24 months. So are professional demolition experts. The swell of scepticism has even forced the mainstream media to acknowledge its existence, as some examples at the end of this article will confirm. The French newspaper, La Monde, said:
'Media coverage of the events of 11 September 2001 had to deal with an unexpected newcomer: the internet. But is the net a new medium or is it a counter-medium? We have to ask that question because the internet has encouraged circulation of a different type of information, while the conventional media relayed the standard version of the events as gospel, repeatedly showing nightmare images accompanied by a familiar institutional commentary, given by cohorts of pontificating experts.
Now, information highways are a spaghetti junction of alternative routes easily accessible to anyone who wants to get away from the main routes of the politically correct and ethnocentric, and that egress is often a good thing. Yet the digital counter-information saturating the net seems to be produced by some new version of the old socialist International organisations: internet users who want to spread the word about their findings or feelings, perhaps about 9/11. Their output spreads wide and loud, as the internet's characteristic viral circulation has amplified the old word of mouth into unprecedented resonance. Electronic mail circulates files continuously, and can reach hundreds of contacts with a single mouse click.'
There are multi-levels of the global conspiracy and my work is taking me deeper and deeper into those unseen realms from where this false reality is projected. Future books will tell this story and offer ways to change the movie.
But in this five-sense 'world' of daily experience, 9/11 is the key holder or, to use other analogies, the card that holds the house together, the banana beneath the juggler's feet.
The official story ... so many questions ... so few answers
The fascist agenda depends for its very survival on the continued credibility of September 11th. Without it there was no excuse to invade Afghanistan; no excuse to take our freedoms away; no excuse for all that goes with the 'War on Terror'.
And if the official story isn't true, why did Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Blair and the rest of them tell us such lies and do such deadly deeds in its name?
If 9/11 goes, it all goes, no shaped charges necessary, no dynamite required. And it is going.
That is why it is so vital that we go on with still renewed vigour posing the questions and presenting the evidence that will complete the process of demolishing the deceit.
We have come so far - now let's finish the job.
FIVE YEARS ON - THE TRUTH IS COMING OUT AT LAST
Canadian TV Covers 9/11 Conspiracy
..........................................................
The Big Lie Is Crumbling All Over The World
'Five years after they pulled it off, hardly anyone in the world believes the ridiculous story about 19 hijackers with box-cutters and hundred-story buildings magically collapsing into their footsteps. They miscalculated big time.
When they took the towers down, they never anticipated that this many people would question their version of reality and work so hard to demonstrate, unequivocally, that they lied. But, we did. And to those who think that the truth was buried at ground zero, think again. It's only a matter of time. Just as the towers collapsed into their footprints, so will the lie.'
.............................................
Theory that U.S. orchestrated 9/11 attacks is 'not absurd', says Chavez
'The Venezuelan leader, an outspoken critic of U.S. President George W. Bush, was reacting to a television report investigating a theory that the Twin Towers were brought down with explosives after hijacked airplanes crashed into them in 2001. "The hypothesis is not absurd . . . that those towers could have been dynamited," Chavez said in a speech to supporters. "A building never collapses like that, unless it's with an implosion."
"The hypothesis that is gaining strength . . . is that it was the same U.S. imperial power that planned and carried out this terrible terrorist attack or act against its own people and against citizens of all over the world," Chavez said. "Why? To justify the aggressions that immediately were unleashed on Afghanistan, on Iraq."'
.................................................
9/11 - Manna From Heaven
..........................................................
Everyone's First Reaction Was 'Controlled Demolition'
...........................................................
Who Told Giuliani the WTC was Going to Collapse on 9/11?
Cashing In on Catastrophe
'Even before he left office as New York City's mayor at the end of 2001, Rudolph Giuliani was telling reporters about Giuliani Partners, the management consulting firm he intended to open up with his old City Hall team. The partners were more of a Giuliani posse than a group of peers. Michael Hess, the former city corporation counsel, was named managing partner.
Fire Commissioner Tom Von Essen became a senior partner, as did Police Commissioner Bernard Kerik, whose later nomination as head of Homeland Security would go down in flames after revelations that his concern for following the rules and avoiding ethical conflicts appeared close to nonexistent.'
................................................................
5-Minute Video of George W. Bush on the Morning of 9/11
....................................................................
Scholars for 9/11 Truth
....................................................................
Dov Zakheim and the 9/11 Conspiracy
.....................................................................
4-Ton Girders: Blowing in the Wind?
.............................................................
The Twin Towers: Controlled Demolition
......................................................................
The Strip Club 'Extremists'
'According to well-informed police sources in New Jersey, on the evening of September 10, 2001, the four men who would, the following morning, hijack United Flight 93 en route from Newark Liberty International Airport to San Francisco, were living it up in a Wayne, New Jersey strip club called "Lace."
The four hijackers, Ziad Jarrah (Lebanese), the pilot, and three Saudis: Ahmed al-Haznawi, Ahmed al-Nami, and Saeed al-Ghamdi were later pegged by U.S. authorities as extreme Wahhabi Muslim followers of Osama bin Laden. However, the security videotape from "Lace" showed the four to be far from pious followers of Wahhabism.
In what seemingly appears to be an attempt by the Bush administration to keep the myth alive that the hijackers were fanatic Muslims, the FBI confiscated the security tape from "Lace" and it was never identified or discussed in the official 911 Commission report.'
