reporting adult images on my opera
Wednesday, 16. September 2009, 19:52:31
There is, however, a dilemma.
Sometimes it takes me a fair amount of time to determine what is pornography. Often I have to gaze at an image for quite awhile before I can make a determination. Then, and only then, do I feel that it is appropriate to report it. This is only to spare others the tedious evaluation process that I, myself, just had to go through.
The late great senator from North Carolina, Jesse Helms, I believe was a master evaluator. He always said, "I know it when I see it." I'm not always so sure.
One issue: Why can a man whip off his shirt, but when a woman does it, the planet wobbles off its axis and the sky starts to fall?
Y'all know this is tongue-in-cheek, right?









FoxM # 16. September 2009, 21:36
Even Jehovah's Witnesses watch read or in anyway are related to porn / erotic / sensual stuff... but still the criticise. But you know, this is of course just tongue-in-cheek.
slackwrdave # 16. September 2009, 22:57
slackwrdave # 17. September 2009, 05:50
EspenAO # 17. September 2009, 15:16
We only remove images where you no longer have to use your imagination to be sexually satisfied within "normal" morales... If you know what I mean.
We also don't remove pictures of girls showing boobs because we approve shirtless dudes.
slackwrdave # 17. September 2009, 15:24
...but sometimes I have to look at an image for a *long* time to make a decision. j/k
You know the imagination part you mention, I see people out at the bar/club undressed as much as possible. I don't find that nearly as interesting as clothes that are very flattering.
I had a friend who used to say, "If you see it all at the club, there's not as much left for when you get home."
EspenAO # 17. September 2009, 15:33
Originally posted by slackwrdave:
Haha. And that's probably not what you want to take home either.