Skip navigation.

Like A Teapot

"Enlightened or not, it is all the very same. Have a cup of tea! "

I cannot agree more

, ,

Never have I felt the desire to quote someone in the media so extensively. I agree with it a hundred percent and could not have said it better.

This is what The Wall Street Journal columnist Peggy Noonan said about Sarah Palin in her opinion piece “A Farewell to Harms”:

She went on the trail a sensation but demonstrated in the ensuing months that she was not ready to go national and in fact never would be. She was hungry, loved politics, had charm and energy, loved walking onto the stage, waving and doing the stump speech. All good. But she was not thoughtful. She was a gifted retail politician who displayed the disadvantages of being born into a point of view (in her case a form of conservatism; elsewhere and in other circumstances, it could have been a form of liberalism) and swallowing it whole: She never learned how the other sides think, or why.

In television interviews she was out of her depth in a shallow pool. She was limited in her ability to explain and defend her positions, and sometimes in knowing them. She couldn't say what she read because she didn't read anything. She was utterly unconcerned by all this and seemed in fact rather proud of it: It was evidence of her authenticity. She experienced criticism as both partisan and cruel because she could see no truth in any of it. She wasn't thoughtful enough to know she wasn't thoughtful enough. Her presentation up to the end has been scattered, illogical, manipulative and self-referential to the point of self-reverence. "I'm not wired that way," "I'm not a quitter," "I'm standing up for our values." I'm, I'm, I'm.

In another age it might not have been terrible, but here and now it was actually rather horrifying.


Ms. Noonan’s full article is here

Lucky man?My Saturday Brunch

Comments

daxonmacs 25. July 2009, 23:23

Not a big fan of the palest of them all, eh? :D
She's quite a character alright. Thanks for the link.

solid copper 25. July 2009, 23:34

You are welcome. The paragraphs that debunk the many Palin myths are also sharp and worth quoting. One thing I do not like in what I read is the author's speculation, near the end of the article, of what America will likely face in the next ten years. It is a bit paranoia but typical of conservative thinking.

daxonmacs 25. July 2009, 23:41

She's sharp for sure, with a very pessimistic view of the future. I mean the city that is going to be hit with a weapon of mass destruction, that sounds paranoid indeed.

solid copper 25. July 2009, 23:43

Hehe. We are on the same page.

daxonmacs 25. July 2009, 23:45

Don't turn it! :no:

solid copper 25. July 2009, 23:58

I am busy transferring pictures of goodies from my camera now.

daxonmacs 26. July 2009, 00:00

*fetching a dish and cutlery*

solid copper 26. July 2009, 00:17

You know it is food? :lol:

daxonmacs 26. July 2009, 00:19

I'll flip the dish upside down if it is your pro-like activity goodies :lol:

derWandersmann 26. July 2009, 03:00

Thanks, SC ... I wondered when some of the conservatives would wake up to the fact that they had nominated a person of no consequence.

solid copper 26. July 2009, 03:09

She is plain dangerous if put in power. It says a lot about John McCain, who I never thought had his mind in the right place ever since I heard him talk. He just surprised me by suddenly becoming a forerunner in the conservative camp. There's got to be someone better than this.

derWandersmann 26. July 2009, 03:25

John McCain's following came from his campaigns in previous elections ... I think 2000 was his high point. But he's aged a lot and maybe even gotten a touch senile, and he just couldn't come up to the mark.

There are guys better than this, but we don't know about them because the religious right has dominated the conservatives for so long that the conservatives have come 'round to the point of actually believing that they believe the stuff that they said they believed in order to get the bible-thumpers' votes. So any of them with any rationality at all are keeping their heads down.

noah counte 26. July 2009, 06:05

She's no longer even a solid choice among Republicans. And she looks as though she plans to start a new party. If she does, perhaps some center-right Democrats will move to the Republican party, and we'll have some interesting coalition-building in US politics. More likely, we'll just have one powerful party for a while.

derWandersmann 26. July 2009, 13:16

A pox on all their houses.

SqueakeyCat 26. July 2009, 13:36

i never did like McCain & Palin.

nice post

WoodRat 28. July 2009, 12:15

I think the paragraphs you selected from the article describe Sarah Palin to a Tee. Peggy Noonan is a gifted writer, you obviously have an appreciation of her insight.

solid copper 29. July 2009, 06:48

I am glad you agree, WoodRat.
This is actually my first time to read Peggy Noonan. Her take of Palin happens to correspond with mine. Yes, she is a gifted writer.

I also agree with dW's analysis on the problems of the conservatives.

There is another recent article about Palin on the Time magazine. She was sought out and interviewed at her in-law's property where she retreated to after her announcement of resignation. I don't quite agree with their take of the Palin character based on something she said about the uncertainty of a particular year's salmon run (when inquired about her intention regarding the 2012 election, she answered that she could not predict next year's salmon run let alone what would happen four years later; from that they conclude her authenticity makes sense in the Alaska context and expound on it). It is a bit simple-minded, in my view. She is no scientist; even equipped with all the necessary fishery statistics, it is difficult to predict the year by year salmon run. That simply cannot be compared to national election prediction and certainly does nothing to make more sense of her outlooks and decision making process, viewed in the Alaskan context or not. It is just a convenient answer to a question asked.

WoodRat 29. July 2009, 11:53

I am not so harsh on Palin's comparison of the unpredictability of next year's salmon run to the unpredictability of the next presidential election. Yes it was an answer of convenience, but probably the best one she had. I saw the news clip where this occurred ... must have been on CNN.

Now her resignation from the governor's office has killed any chance she may have had in becoming the Republican nominee for the next presidential election anyway, though she may try running for it. In the near term she's managed to free herself from her gubernatorial responsibilities to take better advantage of books deals and allow more time for making paid appearances. This reveals a short-term focus on her part that will be very detrimental to any ambition she may have of seeking a higher office down the road.

solid copper 29. July 2009, 12:05

I am not hard at her answer. My comment is directed at the writer(s) of the Time magazine article. They seemed to try to put her in a better light after seeing her on her home turf.

WoodRat 29. July 2009, 12:12

I agree.

derWandersmann 29. July 2009, 15:56

I tried to embed this vid here yesterday; it simply wouldn't work. I don't know why; it's worked before ... anyway, here it is:
[url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=69-D6Lpr0QU

Wood Rat: Are you a woodworker? There is a woodworking tool named Wood Rat ... I had one until I gave up my house. It does amazing things with a router.

WoodRat 29. July 2009, 21:54

derWandersmann, I will send you a private message so as not to diverge from the topic here too much.

Write a comment

You must be logged in to write a comment. If you're not a registered member, please sign up.