State of Affairs
Sunday, 4. October 2009, 16:21:06
For example this lovely little story about a mother who let her 12 year old daughter drive the other kids to daycare.
Is there anything dumber than letting a 12 year old drive? Okay letting an 11 year old would be even dumber.A woman accused of letting her 12-year-old daughter drive three siblings to day care has been fined nearly $1,000.
Angela Parenteau entered a no contest plea to one count of criminal endangerment Thursday in Municipal Court in Great Falls, KFBB-TV reported. Three other criminal endangerment charges were dropped under a plea agreement.
Prosecutors say in March, Parenteau allowed her daughter drive three younger siblings from their house in Vaughn to a day care about 15 miles (25 kilometres) away in Great Falls. Police say Parenteau claimed she was too sick to drive and on medication.
The state said it agreed to the plea agreement because the 12-year-old girl did not want to testify against her mother.
According to our glorious leaders ...all around the world the economy is picking up and everything is good again. Tell that to this enterprising young fellow.
From what I know - that's a bargain.
I can find loads of dumb research and ridiculous government funded studies online; this latest is a fine example of both ridiculous and government funded.
Willy Wonka would be horrified. Children who eat too much candy may be more likely to be arrested for violent behaviour as adults, new research suggests.
British experts studied more than 17,000 children born in 1970 for about four decades. Of the children who ate candies or chocolates daily at age 10, 69 per cent were later arrested for a violent offence by the age of 34. Of those who didn't have any violent clashes, 42 per cent ate sweets daily.
The study was published in the October issue of the British Journal of Psychiatry. It was paid for by Britain's Economic and Social Research Council.
The researchers said the results were interesting, but that more studies were needed to confirm the link. "It's not that the sweets themselves are bad, it's more about interpreting how kids make decisions," said Simon Moore of the University of Cardiff, one of the paper's authors.
Moore said parents who consistently bribe their children into good behaviour with candies and chocolates could be doing harm. That might prevent kids from learning how to defer gratification, leading to impulsive behaviour and violence.
Even after Moore and colleagues controlled for other variables like different parenting skills and varying social and economic backgrounds, they found a significant link between childhood consumption of sweets and violent behaviour in adulthood.
Previous studies have found better nutrition leads to better behaviour, in both children and adults.
Moore said his results were not strong enough to recommend parents stop giving their children candies and chocolates. "This is an incredibly complex area," he said. "It's not fair to blame it on the candy."
Just a pile of non-sense and of course more studies are required. You have to make up something to keep your job.
Halloween is coming up!Looking for a funny or obnoxious costume idea? Then look no further; I have found you the link you need. Prank Place has a large assortment of costumes and other junk to play with. Check them out for yourself and have a chuckle.
Until next time.










ellinidata # 4. October 2009, 19:15
I do not know if sweets made some of us growing up in the 70's aggressive,
( I include myself in the group too),
but,
now days for sure many adults do pay the price of it...
many became obese ..
awareness on healthy living that includes less fat and no smoking came way too slow for some...
interests of the industry , then and now....
and the news on who slept with whom in the rich and famous group keeps our minds busy...
Tabmartel # 9. October 2009, 15:03
Dollar stores are fantastic for stocking up on the crap you'd never let your kids eat.
So glad I never made the choice to smoke!
Shaunak # 11. October 2009, 05:19