It's been a long time. More of the same.
Saturday, September 25, 2010 8:24:32 PM
My phone has GPS capability, as most phones now a days do and if turned on, it could display the speed at which we were moving. The highest I saw was about 72 mph in rural Ohio, near Sandusky. However, most of the trip was spent at much lower speeds and at times in Pennsylvania and western Maryland, it seemed like we were going only about 20 to 30 miles per hour on the tight turns through the mountains.
Since moving to the Washington DC area, I’ve taken two trips to New York City on the Acela Express, the only “high speed rail” in the United States. I use quotation marks because I don’t really consider it high speed rail as it only averages about 70 mph between Washington DC and NYC. The Acela Express is fast, using my phone, it said that we were traveling at 125 mph but those fast spurts are leveled out by the slow speeds through various cities with legacy rails that looked ancient (Baltimore, MD mainly but Philadelphia, PA too).
The rail system that the Acela Express travels on is known as the Northeast Corridor and is special in various ways. The main way is that there are no at-grade crossings between Washington DC and NYC and only a few between NYC and Boston, MA. The other reason why it is special is because it’s electrified all along it’s length. Combined, these two factors allow the Northeast Corridor to be the only high speed rail corridor in the United States, if only in name only.
What this background information gives is that the current push by the Department of Transportation of “high speed rail” is an absolute joke. Increasing the speed on freight lines to 79 mph is not high speed rail. High-speed rail in my book is a dedicated, electrified line with no at-grade crossings that averages at least 200 km/h. Diesel locomotives running on freight lines having a top speed of 79 mph (127 km/h) is not high speed rail. Spending money on it is a waste that gives the illusion of high speed rail when other countries have high speed rail that makes the American high speed rail embarrassing.
If I was the Benevolent Dictator of Transportation, what would I do? Step one would be to support the California high speed rail plan as much as possible, as it is actually high speed rail by my own definition. I’d also like to see a plan for the development of high speed rail in the Midwest with Chicago as the main hub. There would be lines from Chicago to Detroit, Toledo-Cleveland, Indianapolis, and to Milwaukee-Minneapolis. The line to Detroit is important as Detroit is across the river from Windsor, Ontario.
Windsor, Ontario is the first city in the Windsor - Quebec City Corridor. This corridor is where over half of Canada’s population (~18 million) live. Ideally, Canada would build an interoperable system with the US high speed rail and if the network effect lives up to its promise, both countries would benefit. Another added benefit would be to cut down the distance between Chicago and New York City by going through Buffalo - Hamilton (Toronto) - Detroit. I’m not overly concerned about customs problems as I genuinely believe that there will be a Schengen-like open border agreement between the US and Canada when common sense prevails.
I’ve read about Quebec wanting to develop a high-speed rail line from Montreal to New York City for both economic and sovereignty reasons. I’d certainly welcome it. Ideally, Canada would have a high-speed rail corridor from Windsor through Toronto to Montreal anyway but that is their choice. After all, I’d be the Benevolent Dictator of Transportation of the US, not Canada. Or would I…?
Oh, I guess this would be a good time to mention that I’d like to have a high speed line from New York City to Buffalo. I’d also improve the Northeast Corridor to maintain an average speed of 125 mph from Washington DC to Boston, MA. This increase in speed should cut the time from Washington DC to NYC from 2 hours and 45 minutes to 1 hour and 40 minutes. I’d like to see the speed increase even more but having stops in many of the major cities (Baltimore, Wilmington, Philadelphia, Newark) in the North east gives diminishing returns to increases in speed.
Basically, I’m a Midwestern boy who relocated to the east coast but believes that the Great Lakes Megalopolis should flex its might and develop a world class high speed rail network. After all, the GDP of the region where I’d like to see this network is astounding. The economy of New York is 1.1 trillion, Illinois is 633 billion, Ontario is 532 billion, Ohio is 471 billion and Michigan is 380 billion. The Northeast region of North America is an economic powerhouse and it should have the infrastructure to show it.














