Skip navigation.

exploreopera

| Help

Sign up | Help

User Centered

Studying the design of everyday things

Posts tagged with "Apple"

avatar

iPhone users: What do you do with your headphones all day?

, , , ...

The devil is in the details...


I'm sure I'm not the only person who wraps headphones around my music player. It's convenient, I never misplace them, they don't get tangled. But well, I can't do much with my iPod while it's wrapped up, but then again, I don't really need to.

I wonder then, for using the iPhone as an iPhone and an iPod, Do you have to store your headphones elsewhere? If you wrap them, you might not easily be able to answer an incoming call, unless you just slide the cords/headphones off the end (as I do when I plug it into my truck's audio input), but then you have to re-wrap the headphones everytime you want to call/answer/email/text/surf/etc...

Are you supposed to always wear them? I know there's the mic that's built in, and it seems to me this setup would work really well when you're already listening to music. But if you're carrying your phone around all day and occasionally want to listen to music, it seems to me you'd be most likely carrying the headphones in either in your pocket or... well, anywhere else and I'm certain I'd forget them when I want them most.

Has this even been remotely an issue with anyone? Just ball 'em up in the pocket? Extra pairs of headphone laying around where you'd most likely use them?
avatar

From the department of redundancy department

, , ,


Colonel Sandurz: You're looking at new sir. Everything that happened most recently, is happening now.
Dark Helmet: What happened to most recently?
Colonel Sandurz: We passed recently.
Dark Helmet: When?
Colonel Sandurz: Just now. We're at new, now.


I give Apple points for trying, but what exactly is "most recent new" as compared to just "most recent" in regards to syncing podcasts? It's newer than most recent!

Honestly, I'm not really sure from looking at this option what "most recent new" means. I'm eager to undock my ipod and find out, but wording of the option is unclear and appears to be a hasty addition to compensate for a lack of flexibility in managing podcasts.

Read more...

avatar

Mac Update 2: Electric Boogaloo

, ,

Well, after a week or so of Mac-tastic exploration, I've now gotten to the point where I sit down at my computer and don't think it's a new toy... it's just my computer (although of course, I have TONS to learn still). Instead of poking into every preference menu and expose/dashboard crevice, I've got that "eh... now what?" feeling. Which I guess is good. That means I'm ready to get back to doing work.

Some closing thoughts and comments:

I still don't like the keyboard workings for manipulating my way around the finder window. I like to start typing out the name of the folder/file I'm looking for... in Mac I have to move from the "home key" arrangement to use the "command-down arrow." instead of just hitting enter to drill into the folders.

Although I'm used to the iTunes "all library view" with everything showing at once, I was entirely unprepared for the same approach to my iPhoto library. To my girlfriend: I'm sorry you had to see all the pictures of my ex at the top of my library (as they are the oldest). Nice job Apple... way to put me in the doghouse.

What's with resizing in iPhoto? I have to go to the "Share/email" menus to "fake" my way into just resizing the image? I guess most of you Mac guys have other image manip software, this just seems STRANGE to me.

Between the Dock at the bottom, the bar at the top and then the (what us windows guys call) the title bar, I'm missing the fact that I can't reduce on of them in Opera. I want the "turn menu bar off" option I had in Windows, but that doesn't make sense in Mac.

Things I won't be able to live without
-Quicksilver
-xGestures
-Expose

xGestures got me to install strokeit again for Windows.. neither aren't as "native" and smooth as Opera which is why I haven't used them before, but it's ok.

Quicksilver (which I was interested from Enso on Win), also led me to try Launchy on Win, but I've now settled with Find and Run Robot (FARR). Great launcher app for Windows.

Expose replaces the "Win-D or M" combo and the "Show Desktop" icon I have in my Windows Quicklaunch bar.

Most surprising things
"Close" is a minimize more than anything. Before I dropped my 2Gigs of RAM this was much more of an issue... oh yeah, that reminds me: the things I do to save 60 bucks (see right) like get my RAM from Crucial instead of Apple.

HFS (Mac file system) can't write to NTFS (Windows File system). I'm not sure how I've gone this long in my computing life without knowing this, my jaw dropped when I realized this.

I don't really see what all the fuss is about with Safari... I'll stick with Opera- although downloading apps and stuff just work better in safari than Opera (understandable). Also, I haven't yet installed

Oh- do I even need Norton antivirus at all? :smile:
avatar

Site Update: A trepid toe into the pool of Mac

, , ,

I've been spending the last few nights getting comfortable with OSX, so thanks to vaspers88 for keeping things lively, I expect to spend a few more days getting acclimated.

I title this "trepid" because I got a Mac Mini to act as my casual email/browsing/music/photo desktop machine, so it's not a full blown investment. I've read and tried OSX quite a bit, but nothing like getting into the driver's seat full time. This is my "daily driver," I'm purposely refraining on dual booting XP- sink or swim. I also have an XP laptop and of course work computers, but I've dedicated myself to Mac for the time being.

The Mini is replacing a sturdy, 7 year old video editing PC that still isn't half bad spec-wise (stock HDD is bigger than the Mini's) It had plenty of 1394 support, but no USB2.0. And after several power supply failures, and some airflow/case/fan noise problems due to the fact that the replacement power supplies never fit right- I had to part ways and thought I'd finally take the Mac plunge.

Everything I read says that OSX matches the way I want to do work, although my first impressions are that even though I have QuickSilver, Spotlight, and Terminal, actually using the keyboard in the GUI is a bit more cumbersome- or at least I haven't found the shortcuts or keystrokes to do things like "go up a folder" or the "alt/first letter of the command" type of interactions. These Computer World posts (one, two) bring up a handful of things I've noticed. If I find something of interest that hasn't been posted on to death from a usability perspective or a "switcher" perspective, you can be sure I'll make a note of it here.

...until then, happy computing.

(yes, Opera was the first app I installed...and yes, un/installing apps on a Mac is cool)

avatar

DAP in deck

, , , ...

'Bout time something like this came around! This always seemed like the best way to solve this problem:


(via Gizmodo)
avatar

Guerrilla Usability: iPods are batting a thousand

, , ,

Guerrilla Usability is what I call it when we take existing systems and use them in unexpected ways to create a more "usable" solution. Often, it's forcing something to be more usable via glue/tape, or the diagnal path of worn out grass between buildings when the sidewalks just aren't quick enough. If there's a right way and an easy way, Guerrilla Usability is choosing the easy way (inspired by Gerry Gaffney).

That's why I thought this ESPN article was a good example of G.U. It's about how the iPod has become a much sought after gadget for Major League Baseball, and although we're still talking about watching video on iPod (what the system is designed to do), I still want to classify this as G.U. because it's just an interesting twist on technology to accomplish a user's goal. Instead of watching video in a "projection room" (I'm sure they don't have them anymore, but you have to admit that's what you thought of right?) or on DVD, they are loading every hit against every team and pitcher up on their iPods and reviewing them at any time: while on the plane to play the next team, in the locker room, etc... of note is the effort being put into a "playlist" for each player to have all the appropriate videos on hand at any given time.

I'm not sure exactly how motivated players are to watch video of themselves and opponents all day, but from this article it would seem that having the video on hand any time of the day is the real killer experience. I'm always fascinated when people find new ways to accomlish goals with existing tools.

The system is working out so well that all sorts of teams are looking into the how they can set up the same kind of system.

(via Slashdot)

avatar

A new spin on voice mail

, , ,

Updated -added google search link for VM->MMS search results and some edits/clarifications

There's something else floating about the weblogs that isn't getting the attention it deserves in regards to the iPhone, and I think it's worth a special mention. Apart from whether or not you'll be able to type easily on glass, or what cell phone vendor is locking it up, I'm very interested in the new approach on Voice Mail which I think is long overdue for all of us.

We've discussed this here before when we talked about the simple cell phone, but all of my thoughts are inspired by Donald Norman's thoughts on the matter . Apple took a step in the right direction by having Cingular re-tool the voice mail system to create something that is easy, efficient, and user centered for getting messages. Anyone who knows me knows I detest voice mail. Look, I see I missed your call, it has your name right there. I'll call you back. No need to have me dial into my voice mail box and press a bunch of numbers to hear you say "Hey Eddie, call me when you get this..." If you have a valid voice mail- fine, there's a time and place. I don't mind voicemails, just dumb voicemails because I hate dailing in just to hear you ask me to call you back. Luckily my belle has a Treo and leans HEAVY on the SMS messaging, so it's been heaven.

I've always been an advocate of a more user centered approach to voice mail. If SMS fails me, I try to record a voice MMS message and send that along to my target. But that requires an initial intent to send a message. Not a fall back if the phone isn't answered. We need (as Norman says) "near real time" voice communication. SMS/MMS gives us a buzz or beep on our phone, and we can pick it up when we are free and immediately get the information we want without jumping through hoops. This is "near real time" since it's we initiate the action (after we pull over on the road, or when the meeting is over, or after the current conversation is over, etc), and then get instant access. Instant communication is the plain old phone call. You answer it when it comes or you don't, no putting it off. A good number of people feel rushed by phone calls, they might feel they have to answer, it must be important etc. That often will break the flow of whatever else is going- like eating in a restaurant or driving. Voice Mail is on the other end of the spectrum as far as I can determine. It's a "Pull" service where you're passively notified. If I see I missed a call from someone I know, and there's a voicemail icon, I usually just call them back and it's days before I get around to "cleaning it up." If it's an unknown number though, then of course I check right away.

Well...I have a solution that I think would work well. I'd like any voice mail placed in my inbox to be converted into an MMS and delivered/pushed to my handset as a voice note. This part is not a new idea, but it's not something any carrier does (that I know about), so it includes a middle man which lessens the user experience. So I'm going to present it anyway like it's something innovative :smile: I see the best use of current technology and User Centered design is for someone (let's use kmaage for example) to call me up, and get my voice mail. He records a message, it's then sent to my handset as an MMS message (but handled as a voice mail... you can't charge me for that you thieves!). Doesn't seem too difficult for our "infrastructure" to handle, just some changes on the voice mail server as a minimum, of course I am not a cell-network admin, so what do I know? But I do wonder if this is what is going on with the iPhone behind the scenes. I've read about other "push" (email) services that send an SMS to the handset to initiate a pull.

Then, as the next step of my plan to further the user experience (which would be something new) we could just adjust the handset software to read these certain MMS message according to some meta data about the caller (caller ID info), even if the only meta data is just the "sender" (the voice mail system). They are treated/handled differently than standard MMS picture/audio message... my first thought is to allow these MMSs to be included with standard VM package (no charge) versus the picture/audio sending (charge... even though that's stupid too)

Bingo- we've just done what Apple did, but on the cheap, in two phases, and within reach (stage one at least) of every MMS capable phone. I don't think it's beyond our current capability to pick up my phone and say "ah- kmaage called while I was away.. let's hear the message" and press one button and immediately hear the "Eddie- your last post had a ton of typos... you suck." without having to dail up a number to hear:
"You have ONE unheard message. To listen to new messages, press 1. First message sent TODAY at FIVE THIRTY ONE PM..... Eddie- your last post had a ton of typos... you suck..... To delete this message, press 7, to save this message press 9."

So I'll be interested in how Apple approached the problem. Based on the demo and handful of details I've seen, it looks like it might have everything I'd want. You can pick and choose the order of how you can review your VM, and it appears you don't have to run the gauntlet of phone tree options. I've sufficiently beaten it into all my friends and family that I'd rather they didn't leave a message unless there was a really a message to be left, but I will welcome more carriers supporting something along the lines of this.


avatar

Quick Notes- iPhone (aka: Dangit! I just got a BlackBerry!)

, , , ...


...oh well. It's finally hear, the iPhone. General consensus- This looks like the best thing since sliced bread with some possible reservations on the virtual keyboard.


Thoughts:
  • They also are teaming up with Yahoo! Go- Opera + Yahoo! + Apple = good. Is Yahoo! going to get some street cred again? I was skeptical when Opera decided to go with oneSearch, but Apple likes it too. I can't wait to flex it and see if it's better than Google.
  • They have "the first full fledged browser" on a mobile"most advanced web browser ever on a portable device"... them's fighting words. Althought they do sync with desktop bookmarks. A welcome addition to the mobile browsing community.
  • Widgets on mobile- beaten to the punch Opera? I was DYING to see that in Mobile/Mini first!


About the UI: a compilation of first impressions and thoughts (in no particular order, and just things to consider- Apple may have very well addressed all of these for all I know...)

1) Texting SMS, URLs, Browsing etc without tactile feedback is difficult. It nicely allows you to have a context aware qwerty keyboard, but at the cost of being able to feel the keys. It'll be interesting to see how this plays out. I'd be interested in what percentage of smartphone users don't look at the keys (I'm still learning on my BB). I imagine the same would apply for dailing, but I'm sure there are capable voice dailing and speed dialing features available- and for what it's worth, I'm not sure I could dial my BB without looking at the UI either since the numbers are so close together.

2) Auto adjusting (landscape/portrait) -it will also be interesting to see how this plays in real life. It would be nice if the user could initiate it. I rotate my phone around quite a bit (putting in pocket etc..) it might seem odd to watch the orientation flip (if that's how it works) randomly as I'm handing the phone over to someone.

3) Great focus on activity centered design. They took a good look at in call features and made them easily accessible. I thought my Blackberry did a good job at this (review coming soon!).

4) Touchscreen- My girlfriend is a longtime Treo user- she felt like touchscreen mobiles were going to go away in favor of the Pearls trackball, the Q and BlackJack et all... she was very excited to see the touchscreen come back in a big way.

5) Finger Gestures- Can these be done one handed? Are they just shortcuts to functions that could be addressed otherwise? I'm a big fan of gesture based input and I can't wait to find out more on how Apple implemented this.

6) Deactivation when it gets near your face- nice touch! now if they could only figure out a way to keep it from getting "greasy-face" all over it, we'd be all set! (seriously, what percentage of users do you see that wipe the phone on a shirt or palm to clean it off?)

7) Convergence- I think this might solve a lot of convergent issues. it's *tiny* for what you're getting. Adding the music player UI in there shouldn't be too difficult since Apple's already pioneered the simple UI. At first glance it appears the biggest sacrifice for this convergence is a tactile keyboard. If you're not big into typing on the go, this might be the perfect device.
avatar

My eardrums don't like this design

,

EDIT/Updated- see update below
These two menus look so similar that sometimes when I'm flipping through, moving from lock to unlock and casually looking at it I sometimes end up blasting my eardrums out when I really want to quickly fast forward to another portion of my podcast, and vice versa.





Updated
The biggest usability issue I run into with this is when I'm seeking a new track location, particularly with podcasts (read my other thoughts on iTunes/podcasts). I switch to the seek mode and get the blue diamond to scroll on. The problem is that I have to listen to a few seconds of it before I know if this is where I want to be... but of course, if I'm not quick enough, it times out and i get back the volume control.... I decide I want to fast forward a little more and next thing I know... BAM! eardrum blast. According to this man's anecdotal evidence.. I use the FF/RW and seek features *much* more often in podcasts than I do with music. Probably because:

  • They are so much longer. And when you mark it as unplayed (just to keep it from getting wiped off your ipod if you set it up that way), you have to seek back to where you were.
  • I often miss something and want to repeat it. With music I usually don't do that, I'll just start the whole track over.

...perhaps my affinity for podcasts has exasperated this problem to the point of me drafting this post, maybe that's why others have not noticed it.
/Updated

They switch to the blue diamond when you're seeking a new track location, but the way the ipod represents the track location (the first screenshot) makes it easy to forget what context/mode you're in. I often associate the volume with the track location and the track location with the volume.

There's a couple ways this could have been more clear:
  1. Use a different color for volume and track location.
  2. Put the bars/indicators in different spots. Maybe have the track information at the top of the screen and the volume information at the bottom. Or use a vertical bar for the volume, or have the one of the menus sit on top of what's currently on the screen. Do not overlay them.

These suggestions may not be the prettiest. But the menus are sharing:
  • Click wheel control
  • Exact same color/appearance of indicator
  • Location on the screen of indicator
  • They (the modes) are only seperated by one click of the center wheel

I think that is enough to take a closer look at doing more to differentiate the modes.
avatar

iTunes as a Podcast Manager: It's time for an intervention (2nd version)

, ,


Summary:
iTunes applies a blanket approach to podcast subscriptions that assumes they are all “consumed” in the same manner; it’s a music manager first that has been adopted for podcasts. It should instead embrace the many ways that audio is being published and subscribed to. One suggestion would be to move the concept of playlists over to podcasts and allow us to set download/sync options on playlists instead of each individual podcast. I'd *love* to hear suggestions of any software you know of that might meet my goals (Songbird, ODEO, Juice,ziePod, etc...)

This is a rehash/revisit of an earlier article. I've just refined some thoughts a bit and incorporated some ideas from people who have posted and emailed me in response to the last article. If you read the old one, you can probably skip this. Also please note this has little to do with the iPod, or iTunes as a music manager. I love them!

But when it comes to podcasts, I'd like to see iTunes change. I *am* looking at other clients/managers that might work for me, but I want iTunes to go into rehab & get itself straightened up. Figure out what direction it wants to go in life and all that.


Read more...