Skip navigation.

User Centered

Studying the design of everyday things

Posts tagged with "mp3"

The iPod has taught my thumb to be double-jointed

, , , ...

Seriously- am I the only person on earth that thinks the iPod scroll wheel should be up on the top part where the thumb most comfortably rests (where the screen is)?

Instead I have to hold it more like this*:

...which isn't all that comfortable to do one handed (and as pointed out in the comments below, is getting difficult as the iPod continues to shrink). I usually pull it out from my pocket holding it like the first image, then "hike" it up in my hand to easily get to the scroll wheel like in the second picture.

I'd like to swap the screen and the thumb wheel. Oh- and FYI, the Shuffle has the thumb controls on top. Oh, and FYI again- I actually *have* tried to get used to holding it upside down. It just wasn't cutting it for me.

So, while I think that might be feasible- this is not: I'd also like to see (in addition to being on top of the display) the wheel rotated 45 degrees counter clockwise (lefties can take a long walk off a short pier... or rotate 45 degree clockwise- either one really). Personally, I think the prev/next controls are the most commonly used, especially when blindly controlling it in your pocket. So by rotating the controls, this facilitates next/prev to be the easiest and most natural movement for your thumb- try it:

Here's an activity for you readers-
1) flip your iPod upside down. (you don't have one? -use your imagination or sit next to a student that does)
2) Pretend your prev/next controls are at 7:30/1:30 positions respectively. (ok lefties, since we're pretending here, you can pretend we're using 10:30/4:30)
3) Act like you're flipping through your playlist like a mad-man.

Oh man, is that fun or what? It's not exactly aesthetically pleasing, so I guess that wipes that whole idea down the drain.

ps- No, I don't think this is directly related to iPod thumb, but I'm sure the goofy wheel placement and odd iPod holding has something to do with it.


*Note how I held it with my thumb on the bottom part exaggerating the awkward thumb position? That's the "User Centered" equivalent of those "before and after" pictures where the before guy (Cletus) is wearing a BBQ stained white tank top in a black and white pic, and the after looks like Troy McClure...except I don't have a "Troy McClure" picture. How 'bout it Apple?

DAPs and headphones- Focus on cord management

, ,

There has been a lot of pioneering of products and technology in the interest of reducing the cord clutter between digital audio players and headphones. If ever there was a goal worthy of declaring a holy crusade where engineers all over the world sell everything they own and head to silicon valley to solve, this would be it.

Our first contenter is bluetooth. We've seen many attempts at BT headphones that, frankly, just look rediculous and bulky. No body wants to look like Lobot from Star Wars by slapping these monstrosities on their dome. Although, there is hope, as Gizmodo points out, there are some entrees into this arena that are starting to not look rediculous

The other end of the spectrum, there's this. Ok- so our players are getting smaller. I dont know if it's every going to be smart to put your player up by your head. You're going to want to control it aren't you? So for things other than pause, next/previous and volume, you are going to need to look at it. Which means, you'll have to take it off. Not viable in my book.

So- what is the answer? I saw a portable speaker that had a retractable line-in cord that would plug into the headphone jack of the player. This would be nice on an audio player. With the Nano and WalMart's moblue player I think we've already managed to get as small as we can. Let's stop the arms race to see who can get their DAp the size of a dime and start focusing on adding usefulness instead. Store a bit of cord on the audio player that retracts into itself. Then, the actual ear buds can have a small amount of wire; just enough to get around your fat head- then plug into the retractable cord. Of course, I'm no engineer- but if you were to take the Nano and put it into a case the size of the mini, I'm sure there would be enough room to accomodate a little cord and a "retract" mechanism.

So engineers, if you can minimize the time I spend untangling the mess of cords I have, I will in turn, absolve you of all of your sins.


Why don't we have a "line in" jack on the front of car audio faces?

, , ,

There are some good thoughts here about USB ports in automobiles to accomodate portable audio players (presumably).

I would like to expand on that a bit. I'm not so certain I need a USB port there. I mean- it would be nice, but that seems a bit much. Now we have to have a audio player in the car that can decode all the many flavors of audio that would exist since certainly people are going to insert thumb drives with OGG, MP3, AAC etc- files on them all expecting to play. If you just want to hook your player up to your stereo, why not use a line-in? We have them on our home stereo already. FM transmitters and Cassette adapters are a kludge. I never thought that after getting my iPod that I would be the lucky one because my truck actually still has a tape deck in it (plus CD) so I can get a cleaner sound than I do through the iTrip FM transmitter.

A line-in would be a simple solution. You could use one of these to connect your music player etc to your stereo.

I've seen some aftermarket decks with a line-in, but seldom (ever?) are they on the front! They are in the rear of the deck and often require mounting something or running wire to your glove box or something of that nature.

Why not put the plug on the front of the audio reciever? It would allow a broad range of audio input capabilities, not locking you into any particular "iPod" connection kit and leavethe reciever as a passive device so you wouldn't need any more software there- just a switch of input mode. It's easy to get at- you don't need to be in the glove box or mount anything anywhere.

I realize some folks want it to be tucked away nicely and not have a wire dangling- you probably want it to dock/charge etc. I just don't think it's viable/easy to control the UI through the stereo. I don't think I want to. I like the UI my iPod has, and I want to use it- which means I want to pick it up easily.

We already have cassette adapters that are essentially the same thing.

Any reason why this wouldn't work... what am I missing?

Edit- The only reason I can come up with is that it may encourage drivers to wear headphones while they drive? Seems pretty fishy.